Florida Sky Watchers
@FLskywatchers • 7,748 subscribers
102K Followers on Facebook @Floridaskywatchers | Florida Sky Watchers is dedicated to bringing the truth about Climate Engineering & Weather Modification
Shorts
Videos
Augustus Doricko CEO at Rainmaker Technology Corporation delivers testimony on Florida's Weather Modification Bill SB56. 3/18/25 Transcript: My name is Augustus Doricko. I am the CEO and founder of Rainmaker. We're a cloud seeding company that is enhancing precipitation via Advanced radar and also drones for the sake of supplementing Water Supplies for Farms, cities, reservoirs and Wildlife throughout the United States. Our ultimate vision is to end water scarcity and we've begun that mission already. I'm testifying today not to oppose the spirit of this bill, which I think is well founded, but the current configuration of the bill which I think would impede this mission for ending water scarcity and also for bringing the Best-in-Class technology to Florida and the rest of the United States. And so, the first point that I would like to make is the difference between Solar Radiation Management and Cloud Seeding.
Florida Sky Watchers351,903 просмотров • 1 год назад
🚨BREAKING: Dane Wigginton Drops Bombshell on the The Jimmy Dore Show. Just like I've been saying from the very beginning Rainmaker and Augustus Doricko is just a patsy. Lee Harvey Oswald 2.0. This is a mass distraction from the real military grade weapons systems at play in the Texas Floods. And not only just Texas but also New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, etc. all happening simultaneously.
Florida Sky Watchers87,686 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад
Powerful testimony delivered today by Judge Bradford L. Thomas in support of Florida's Weather Modification Bill SB56 sponsored by Ileana Garcia This bill will prohibit and criminalize weather modification activities in Florida. Bradford L. Thomas was a former Judge and criminal justice prosecutor who also previously served for the Bush Administration as a Policy Safety Coordinator for Criminal Justice and also previously served as an Environmental Lawyer for Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection. He gave a very compelling testimony and was highly received by the Committee because of his credentials. In his opinion, $100,000 fines for each incidence of weather modification isn’t enough—he believes it should be a felony and those who do this and are behind these activities should serve a minimum of 5 years in state prison. The Weather Modification Bill passed through Committee on Agriculture, Environment and General Government with a 10-2 Vote. 3/18/25
Florida Sky Watchers92,303 просмотров • 1 год назад
What's happening in Florida tonight? Check out these flight patterns. 2/21/25
Florida Sky Watchers56,642 просмотров • 1 год назад
Looks like a War going on in our Florida skies. 📸 Ormond Beach, FL
Florida Sky Watchers46,892 просмотров • 1 год назад
Weather Modification Report : Aerial Mosquito Spraying in Naples 4/10/25
Florida Sky Watchers16,389 просмотров • 1 год назад
For those who might have missed this. Earlier in the week Florida's House Bill on Weather Modification HB 477 passed through the State Affairs Committee with a favorable vote (15-9) and is headed for the House Floor. Thank you Representative Kevin Steele for fighting for Florida.
Florida Sky Watchers14,647 просмотров • 1 год назад
Renay Cummings Testifies on Behalf of Florida Sky Watchers Florida Sky Watchers at the Senate Committee Hearing on Florida's Weather Modification Bill SB56 Transcript: I am here today as a representative of Florida Sky Watchers. This is a very popular Facebook page that is quickly approaching 100K followers and has an average 90 day reach of approximately 15 Million for the past 1.5 years now. Florida Sky Watchers is a page dedicated to bringing the truth about Climate Engineering and Weather Modification. The founder of the page could not make it here today so I am here to deliver this message to the Senate Committee.. Full Text here:
Florida Sky Watchers12,580 просмотров • 1 год назад
Florida Senator Jason Pizzo @senpizzo questions Augustus Doricko CEO of Rainmaker Technology Corporation about Cloud Seeding and Weather Modification during the Senate Committee Hearing on Florida's Weather Modification Bill SB56 Transcript- Senator Pizzo : St Thomas Aquinas proved that that which is of matter cannot be of matter as a conclusive proof from a theological perspective. But here's a question I have, is there a fixed amount of water molecules in a local or in a universal atmosphere? Because it would seem to follow that if whatever you're taking from the atmosphere, naturally occurring from the atmosphere, to seed a particular targeted area is taking a natural precipitation or weather pattern from some other area that might be depending on natural cyclical precipitation schedule. Augustus Doricko : The question of stealing from Peter to pay Paul. That is a question that is old as cloud seeding itself and it's one that requires sophisticated permitting to ensure that that's not going on. What I'm saying is that there is a fixed amount of water on the planet and in the atmosphere, however, 91% of all the water that traverses the continental United States does not precipitate over the United States. Moreover, precipitating clouds are only about 20% to 40% efficient so most of the water from precipitating clouds does not actually come down. Moreover, lots of clouds don't ever naturally precipitate and so what you can do with sophisticated radar processing like we've developed is identify clouds that are never going to naturally precipitate or that are going to precipitate over the oceans and then purely do positive sum seeding by targeting those clouds rather depleting other watershed. Senator Pizzo : There's a tipping point when you reach a saturation level of a cloud formation that lets go and just lets loose, so even if in its travels and I agree with you, but the supposition is that even in its travels it may be picking up more and becoming more dense and then at some point falling wherever it falls. But if you were to go ahead and target an area, let's say for instance by way of exercise, to bring potable water to the West we wanted to go ahead and Dam up and then fill the Grand Canyon. That is placing and depositing a large volume of water which would otherwise be precipitation somewhere else in the world. So my question is if you're going to deposit a large volume of water in one particular area doesn't it naturally follow that it's taking away from some other area later on? Full Conversation here -
Florida Sky Watchers10,611 просмотров • 1 год назад