
Gipp 🦅
@gippp69 • 12,293 subscribers
18 / ai workflows print money / dm open testing @SpaceXSI so you don't have to. @grok @bot
Shorts
Videos

HOLY SH*T, I BUILT A F**KING COMPANY INSIDE GROK BOT i split the operation into separate roles for research, writing, outreach, ops, finance and support. each agent owns one narrow job 6 agents → 1 shared operation → automatic handoffs → human approval each bot keeps its own workflow and memory, then passes finished work forward instead of routing everything back through me the control layer catches anything that sends, spends, publishes or deletes and pushes it into approval before anything happens after a few runs this stops feeling like ai chat. it feels like a 24/7 operations team running behind one dashboard
Gipp 🦅1,395,087 次观看 • 2 个月前

claude + REA can rebuild software features without copying a single line of code opus 5.5 reads what REA finds inside a program, then rebuilds the feature in a separate clean-room setup. here's how to do it: 1. run npx rea-agents setup to connect REA to Claude Code 2. pick a feature and let REA figure out how it works. save the behavior and rules in a spec file 3. start a fresh Claude session with only that spec. rebuild the feature without touching the original code 4. use /goal to run the tests and check 3 intentionally broken versions. all 3 must fail one project recovered 697 functions in just 12 days, with 696 exact matches. the real trick is building tests that catch mistakes before they become part of the finished software.
Gipp 🦅140,768 次观看 • 11 天前

your Grok Bot routine is quietly burning $397 a month. until you add one prompt. a routine on a 5-min clock wakes 8,640 times a month and does the full job every single time, even when nothing changed. the fix is a change check before every run: 1. read one cheap signal 2. compare it with the last state 3. no diff, stop 4. diff, run the heavy work same routine, same 5 minutes. $397 drops to $45. that's -89%. paste this into your Grok Bot: add a change check to all my routines. check first, run only on diff save this before your weekly pool hits zero. full article ↓
Gipp 🦅22,457 次观看 • 2 天前

i'm f**king done with Grok Bots waking up 8,640 times a month just to find nothing changed... one routine running every 5 minutes costs roughly $397/month at Grok 4.6 API rates. run it hourly and that drops to $33. same bot, same job, 12x the estimated cost. so here's how i'd structure a 6-bot crew that actually makes sense overnight. [the setup looks like this] 1. chief routes events, not noise 2. scout checks what actually changed 3. quant compares the last saved state 4. risk returns PASS / CUT / KILL 5. exec handles safe, approved actions 6. scribe logs every run and queues drafts the trick isn't making 6 bots work harder. it's stopping them from waking up for nothing. add a cheap change check before every full run and my cost model drops from $397 to $45 (-89%). anything risky at 3 a.m. stays a draft until you're awake. that's the Grok Bot setup i'd actually trust overnight. full breakdown in the article below ↓
Gipp 🦅113,302 次观看 • 15 天前

A 19-year-old girl makes $50,000/month from automated kids’ YouTube videos. She found a viral video with 2.2M views, copied the format, and made her own. Bright visuals, fun animations, satisfying endings kids love. It took her 30 minutes to set up using $40 on Picsart for graphics and CapCut for editing and captions. Uploaded as Shorts, views climbed fast. Week 1: $6,000, week 2: $18,500, week 3: $50,000 from one channel. Now she runs three kids’ channels, making $120,000/month, fully automated. She never appears on camera, didn’t film a single clip herself, and the system handles uploads, captions, and scheduling automatically. One person, a laptop, and simple tools now generate what used to take full teams.
Gipp 🦅1,446,005 次观看 • 5 个月前

A 20-year-old Japanese guy is turning kids’ AI videos into a $12,000/month main income. He didn’t hire animators or build a studio. He found a simple format: bright nursery characters, short stories, catchy songs, clean captions, and videos kids can replay nonstop. The numbers are wild. One channel he shows has 28.2M subscribers, 771 videos, and three Shorts with 32M, 3.4M, and 42M views. That’s around 77M views from just three videos. His math: 77M Shorts views can be roughly $15,400. The setup is simple: Claude for ideas, scripts, and structure. Then AI visuals, voice, and CapCut turn it into repeatable kids’ content. Kids don’t care who made the video. They care if it’s bright, simple, loud, and worth watching again. That’s the entire business.
Gipp 🦅588,844 次观看 • 5 个月前

A GIRL BOUGHT A $599 APPLE BOX AND CUT HER AI COSTS FROM $459/MONTH TO $23/MONTH. THE MAC MINI M4 IS QUIETLY BECOMING THE CHEAPEST AI SETUP IN 2026 she didn’t buy it because it looked nice on her desk. she bought it because paying for claude, chatgpt, cursor and api usage every month was getting ridiculous the setup is simple. mac mini m4, ollama, open webui, and local models like qwen, deepseek and llama. for most daily work, that’s enough to write, code, summarize, search notes, and run private workflows without sending everything to the cloud that’s why the math looks so good. a heavy ai stack can hit $459 a month, or $5,508 a year. the mac mini starts at $599 and uses around $3 a month in electricity. if it handles even 70 to 80% of the workload, it pays for itself fast install ollama, point your tools to localhost, and the workflow changes immediately. no token stress, no rate limits, no wondering where your files are going you still keep one cloud model for the hardest tasks but once a small box on your desk does most of the work, paying full price for everything starts to feel stupid
Gipp 🦅459,617 次观看 • 4 个月前

Grok Bot users: you're paying for 94 out of 96 overnight runs that find nothing. one skill fixes it: /night-filter save it as a custom skill, then split the night between 4 bots: 1. SCOUT checks for changes every 5 min 2. QUANT kills the full run if nothing moved 3. EXEC does the real work 4. RISK blocks anything you can't undo my last night: 96 checks, 2 full runs, 0 irreversible actions. the expensive part was never the model. it was waking up for nothing. save this before your next overnight routine.
Gipp 🦅35,255 次观看 • 12 天前

this is the most UNDERRATED Grok Bot setup right now 1 router + 4 specialist agents. no polling, no wasted runs, nothing fires until something actually needs action i switched after doing the math: a routine every 5 minutes costs 12x more than hourly. $397 a month vs $33 for the same job → webhooks, Slack, GitHub and email all hit one router → most events get ignored on purpose, zero wasted runs → 4 specialist agents wake up only when there's real work → risky actions stop at a draft before they reach you stop polling every 5 minutes. let events wake your agents. here's the exact setup, send it to your Grok Bot ↓
Gipp 🦅29,431 次观看 • 10 天前

xAI Grok Bot has a f**king brutal 3 a.m. problem: 96 wakeups while you sleep, and nobody is there to approve anything [the overnight rule] give your Grok Bot crew 3 hard stoplines: → SCOUT checks what changed before waking the full team → EXEC handles safe, reversible actions on its own → RISK leaves anything irreversible as a draft background approvals expire after ~10 minutes. your bots can't wait until breakfast. save this before your next overnight run. full guide below ↓
Gipp 🦅34,631 次观看 • 14 天前

Grok Bot users: paste this ONE prompt NOW before your routines burn another $350 this month [check first, run only on diff] 1. every 5 min it compares a hash to the last run 2. nothing changed, it skips in milliseconds 3. real change, it drafts a plan and waits for your tap 4. non-urgent stuff waits until 07:00 in the video: 176 checks, 171 skipped, 4 real runs 1. full run every 5 min: $397/mo 2. hourly: $33/mo, but you're up to an hour late 3. every 5 min + check: $45/mo copy this into your Grok Bot: for every routine: hash check before the full run, skip if nothing changed, hold non-urgent diffs until 07:00, drafts before any send. show me the cost before and after, change nothing until I say go. wake up for changes, not for the clock
Gipp 🦅20,540 次观看 • 8 天前

F**KING INSANE, GROK BOT IS TRYING TO FIND A TREATMENT FOR A DOG WITH A DISEASE THAT HAS NO CURE 6 agents, 1 patient, 0 candidates and 0 doses. milo is still at 1.4/10 mobility, but on day 2 the crew finally gets the structure it needs to start working chief → assigns charter → defines owns → defines stops → signs role → unlocks vote scout owns literature, chem owns molecule design, tox owns safety, vitals watches milo, scribe keeps evidence, and chief routes the whole case the important part is what happens before research starts. no agent can vote until its charter is signed, and every role gets a hard stopline showing exactly where it must stop by the end, 6/6 charters are active. still 0 candidates, still 0 doses, still 1.4/10 mobility. no treatment yet, but now the crew is finally allowed to search for one. bookmark this
Gipp 🦅132,604 次观看 • 2 个月前

A GROK ENGINEER JUST SHOWED HOW TO MAKE AGENTS IMPROVE THEMSELVES AFTER EVERY RUN most agents lose the useful part when a task ends: the mistake, the correction, and the reason the final version actually worked grok runs two loops at once → one handles the real task → another studies the result → extracts the lesson → saves it for the next run instead of growing one massive prompt, feedback becomes small reusable knowledge files. bad decisions get corrected once, while useful patterns survive across future tasks over time, research, coding and review all inherit what previous runs learned without retraining the model or rebuilding the agent from scratch this is where grok stops feeling like something you keep correcting and starts behaving like a system that compounds what it learns
Gipp 🦅90,342 次观看 • 1 个月前

dots + gpt-6 astra is f**king insane. sam altman just shipped an agent that can keep working after you close chatgpt. this setup turns 5 dots into an always-on launch team. [the part people will miss: each dot owns a job] 1. researcher watches feedback, docs and new signals, then routes what matters. 2. app builder takes repeated requests, builds fixes and hands back a tested PR. 3. launch lead updates positioning and launch assets whenever the product changes. 4. sales lead tracks requirements, checks product docs and prepares the next move. 5. creator turns new interviews and updates into clips, copy and social drafts. same launch. 5 workers. one coordinated system. approvals only when the action actually needs you.
Gipp 🦅44,499 次观看 • 23 天前

26-YEAR-OLD GIRL QUIT HER JOB AND BUILT A SMALL SOCIAL NETWORK FOR NYC CAFES. 31,000 USERS IN 4 MONTHS. NOW IT MAKES $18,400/MO FROM LOCAL SHOPS she didn’t try to build another instagram. she built a tiny app for one obsessed niche: people who save cafes, share lists, follow local taste, and discover places before they go viral on tiktok the product is simple. profiles, posts, likes, saved lists, search, comments, and a feed. that is basically every social network at the core. the hard part was never the idea. it was needing 5 engineers to make it work claude code changes that. one person can now build auth, database, feed logic, profiles, follow system, storage, notifications, and deployment with supabase and vercel instead of hiring a full team the money is not from ads. cafes pay $199/month to claim their page, boost new menu drops, see which lists saved them, and post local offers. power users pay $8/month for private maps and early city guides most people still think social networks need millions of users. she proved the opposite. 10,000 people in one niche can be worth more than 100,000 random users scrolling for nothing small social networks are the new local media businesses. claude code just made them cheap enough for one person to start one from a laptop
Gipp 🦅224,469 次观看 • 4 个月前

jev + opus 5.5 is one of those setups that makes agent architecture feel weirdly overcomplicated in hindsight. the useful split isn’t “small model vs big model.” it’s deciding which calls actually need generation at all. → jev routes the next worker → scores which context is worth keeping → catches repeated actions before they burn the run → gates risky tool calls and sends uncertainty to review opus still owns the expensive part: planning, writing, coding, synthesis. jev sits around it as the decision layer. that matters because a typical loop can have 11 decision points but only 2 real generation calls. once those are separated, latency and cost stop scaling with every tiny fork in the workflow.
Gipp 🦅51,452 次观看 • 1 个月前

I USED GPT-6 ASTRA TO TURN 1 FLY INTO A 7-PART ROCKET FACTORY the goal was simple: 1 fly studies every part, fits it, verifies it, then keeps building until the rocket is complete. part → study → neural state → fit gate → assembly → verify I called it buildfly. Astra helped me turn the idea into a working bay with 7 rocket parts, 3 live systems, a build log, neural activity map, and tolerance checks. the weird part is that the rocket is not even the main experiment. the real system is the neural loop deciding what happens next without skipping verification. I put the full build into a public GitHub repo so anyone can run it, break it, or make it even stranger. repo in the comments. bookmark this.
Gipp 🦅49,931 次观看 • 1 个月前

EIGHT USED RTX 3090s. 192GB OF VRAM. ONE PRIVATE BOX BUILT TO RUN 70B AI MODELS WITHOUT RENTING A DATACENTER. 00:06 the team lowers all eight GPUs into the chassis at once, turning a pile of old gaming cards into the core of a serious local AI server. each 3090 contributes 24GB of memory. combined, the rack has enough VRAM for heavyweight models, large document collections, long context and multiple jobs running side by side. these cards are five years old, but AI economics work differently from gaming. memory capacity matters more than having the newest badge, which is why used 3090s remain valuable. the server can keep one model loaded while separate GPUs handle video, images, transcription and overnight agents without sending private company data into the cloud. bookmark this build before yesterday’s gaming GPUs become tomorrow’s cheapest AI infrastructure.
Gipp 🦅119,133 次观看 • 3 个月前

i built a Robinhood Chain watchtower that remembers what the chart forgets it's called Canary. most tools help you enter a Pons V2 launch faster. Canary starts after that: it watches the position, remembers every state change, and tells you when something actually matters. [give it a token or wallet] → reads deployer balance, reserve / liquidity, swaps, fees and phase changes → stores every sweep as a snapshot → compares the new state against the last one → turns changes into QUIET, WATCH or LEAVE if a deployer starts dumping, reserve drops, fees get swept or volume dies, Canary doesn't look at one fresh chart and guess. it already remembers what changed. the web board keeps everything in one place: token table, selected-position memory, deployer-share history, persistent signals and a live refresh while the watcher keeps writing new snapshots. and the whole thing is intentionally READ ONLY. no signer. no private key. no buy button. no automatic exit. 34/34 deterministic tests passing. open source repo in the first reply.
Gipp 🦅46,370 次观看 • 1 个月前

$500 a day. Kids' songs. YouTube Shorts Before: 30 mins per video. Claude + Make: 10 videos simultaneously. A month’s worth of content in minutes. > $34/mo software costs > Claude scripts, InVideo edits > $10–500 revenue per video > Your cut: $30,000+/mo on autopilot 10 channels. 10 minutes to review. Zero employees. A niche everyone calls "child's play" while you print the money.
Gipp 🦅122,569 次观看 • 5 个月前
![xAI Grok Bot has a f**king brutal 3 a.m. problem: 96 wakeups while you sleep, and nobody is there to approve anything [the overnight rule] give your Grok Bot crew 3 hard stoplines: → SCOUT checks what changed before waking the full team → EXEC handles safe, reversible actions on its own → RISK leaves anything irreversible as a draft background approvals expire after ~10 minutes. your bots can't wait until breakfast. save this before your next overnight run. full guide below ↓](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2109624801719435265/media/HUbkjrvXYAAZY4O.jpg)