
Gloria Tshiamala Ndekezi
@GloriaNdekezi • 6,480 subscribers
Shorts
Videos

"To all of you Rwandans who were singing “Uvira has fallen,” now that M23 is in the process of leaving Uvira, leave with them. Wazalendo— please: let no one waste his bullet by shooting a Rwandan. Slaughter them like animals—slaughter them thoroughly—roast them and eat them. They must see a lesson." A hateful message openly calling for the extermination of people is still visible on TikTok Policy. This alone should be enough to raise serious concern. In Europe or in the United States, content like this targeting people in Europe or US, would not be treated lightly. It would likely be removed quickly, the account responsible suspended or banned, and in some cases the author could face legal consequences. In those contexts, calling for extermination is understood for what it is: a dangerous call to violence. When similar messages target African people, the response is very different. The content stays online. The accounts remain active. No action is taken This difference reveals a clear double standard. The same rules exist on paper, but they are not applied equally. African lives appear to receive less protection, less attention, and less urgency from platforms that claim to enforce global community standards. This silence is not neutral. Allowing such messages to remain online contributes to normalization of violence and dehumanization. It sends the message that hate in Africa is tolerated in ways that would never be acceptable elsewhere. Facebook TikTok US Elon Musk Nikita Bier X Meta
Gloria Tshiamala Ndekezi78,589 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

The United States understands that the DRC has not yet neutralised the FDLR threat; therefore, Rwanda has not been able to lift its security measures. This is simple logic: if the root cause of Rwanda’s security concerns remains unresolved, expecting Rwanda to withdraw its defensive posture without addressing that threat is unrealistic. In this context, the real spoiler should be identified by looking at the sequence of actions. The DRC’s failure to neutralise a threat perceived by Rwanda as a security risk is what continues to trigger Rwanda’s response, including maintaining its defence measures. If the objective is truly to hold spoilers of peace accountable, why sanction Rwanda for protecting itself instead of addressing the actions that created the security dilemma in the first place?
Gloria Tshiamala Ndekezi🇨🇩14,531 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

.Muhindo Nzangi affirme que le président Tshisekedi dispose d’une armée de clochards et que la RDC ne peut compter que sur des cris. Il affirme également que le M23 est une armée professionnelle, au-dessus des clochards de Tshisekedi. Merci pour votre honnêteté cette fois-ci, bro.
Gloria Tshiamala Ndekezi31,493 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад
2:18
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.

A genocide against the Ba-Hema in Ituri, Congolese labeled as Ugandan Tutsi. They are being massacred by CODECO, an armed group supported by the Congolese government. I am sharing these videos so that the international community can see the barbarism of Kinshasa, before my tweet is deleted.
Gloria Tshiamala Ndekezi19,712 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад
Больше нет контента для загрузки