FedererIsBetterer's banner

FedererIsBetterer

@incontextfed • 1,315 subscribers

A Fed fan who knows he is the greatest player of the modern-racquet era. Here to illustrate that using context, numbers, & video.

Videos

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.ai•Sponsored•Livecam

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

Exclusive private shows

1.2k viewers online

Private Show

Join now for exclusive access

Free preview available • Premium content

A nice analysis of Fed's serve. It's hard not to believe Fed was BORN to ELEVATE tennis, since virtually every one of his strokes was a Platonic Ideal *and* was basically fully formed by the time he turned pro. The Maestro ↔️ the greatest player who'll ever play tennis. 👑🙏🏾

A nice analysis of Fed's serve. It's hard not to believe Fed was BORN to ELEVATE tennis, since virtually every one of his strokes was a Platonic Ideal and was basically fully formed by the time he turned pro. The Maestro ↔️ the greatest player who'll ever play tennis. 👑🙏🏾

FedererIsBetterer

118,070 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Federer meeting Djo at AO 2020 may the best illustration of his relentless ANTI-opportunism. He beat Millman in a super TB, beat Sandgren in the QF saving 7 MPs, & came into the SF with a thigh injury in match #1513. Meanwhile, Djo in 2017: 🦗🦗🦗

Federer meeting Djo at AO 2020 may the best illustration of his relentless ANTI-opportunism. He beat Millman in a super TB, beat Sandgren in the QF saving 7 MPs, & came into the SF with a thigh injury in match #1513. Meanwhile, Djo in 2017: 🦗🦗🦗

FedererIsBetterer

116,555 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

It is a FACT that 24 > 22 and 24 > 20. Similarly, it is a FACT that Federer > Nadal & Federer > Djokovic. There is no difference between these FACTS except that the first (set) is more straightforward. A thread explaining this. 🧵

It is a FACT that 24 > 22 and 24 > 20. Similarly, it is a FACT that Federer > Nadal & Federer > Djokovic. There is no difference between these FACTS except that the first (set) is more straightforward. A thread explaining this. 🧵

FedererIsBetterer

309,263 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Only the greatest player to EVER LIVE would have the confidence to say what Federer said here about 'getting lucky' – despite it being anything but. Fed was a never-before-never-again phenomenon. The Maestro, the Magician, & the King. 👑🙇🏾‍♂️🙏🏾

Only the greatest player to EVER LIVE would have the confidence to say what Federer said here about 'getting lucky' – despite it being anything but. Fed was a never-before-never-again phenomenon. The Maestro, the Magician, & the King. 👑🙇🏾‍♂️🙏🏾

FedererIsBetterer

170,637 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

In slams from 2000 onwards, just 6 players reached ≥ 4 slam finals AND played both Fedole ≥ 2 times. Safin, Hew, ARod, Stan, Rafa, Mur Seeded Fedole vs this set in slams. Fed: 36-13 (73%) ✅ Djo: 25-19 (57%) Finals Fed: 12-6 (67%) ✅ Djo: 9-9 (50%) Fed is the tennis 👑.

In slams from 2000 onwards, just 6 players reached ≥ 4 slam finals AND played both Fedole ≥ 2 times. Safin, Hew, ARod, Stan, Rafa, Mur Seeded Fedole vs this set in slams. Fed: 36-13 (73%) ✅ Djo: 25-19 (57%) Finals Fed: 12-6 (67%) ✅ Djo: 9-9 (50%) Fed is the tennis 👑.

FedererIsBetterer

15,919 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

In 2004, Federer beat a 𝗧𝗼𝗽 𝟱 opponent in a 𝗯𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗳𝗶𝘃𝗲 final on each of hard, clay, & grass. He became the 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 player to do so in the OE. He remains the 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 player to do so. It's why he's the Maestro AND the GOAT.

In 2004, Federer beat a 𝗧𝗼𝗽 𝟱 opponent in a 𝗯𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗳𝗶𝘃𝗲 final on each of hard, clay, & grass. He became the 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 player to do so in the OE. He remains the 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 player to do so. It's why he's the Maestro AND the GOAT.

FedererIsBetterer

15,753 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Below is a VIDEO of 29.7-30.9 y.o Fed reaching MPs vs peak Djo in slams on EVERY surface. To me, that is proper proof that PEAK Fed (2004-07) would WALLOP peak Djo. We can ALSO use stats to prove that Fed's CAREER ACHIEVEMENTS >> than ALL of Djo's "main" achievements. A 🧵.

Below is a VIDEO of 29.7-30.9 y.o Fed reaching MPs vs peak Djo in slams on EVERY surface. To me, that is proper proof that PEAK Fed (2004-07) would WALLOP peak Djo. We can ALSO use stats to prove that Fed's CAREER ACHIEVEMENTS >> than ALL of Djo's "main" achievements. A 🧵.

FedererIsBetterer

21,063 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

YET ANOTHER example of AFTER-prime (tired) Fed raising his level to create a 5-set classic. This was match #1186 for Fed. Exactly 𝟯𝟬𝟬 matches LATER, he beat Rafa at Wim19. 🔥 The Maestro was SUPERNAL. Tennis incarnate & the greatest player who'll EVER live. 🙏🏾

YET ANOTHER example of AFTER-prime (tired) Fed raising his level to create a 5-set classic. This was match #1186 for Fed. Exactly 𝟯𝟬𝟬 matches LATER, he beat Rafa at Wim19. 🔥 The Maestro was SUPERNAL. Tennis incarnate & the greatest player who'll EVER live. 🙏🏾

FedererIsBetterer

27,552 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Keine weiteren Inhalte verfügbar