Insider Trackers
@InsiderTrackers • 11,712 subscribers
Tracking trading activity across Wall Street and Washington DC. 100% free
Videos
BREAKING: Michael Burry just compared Nvidia to the company that lost 90% of its value in the dot-com crash and took 25 years to recover. "I stand by my analysis. I am not claiming Nvidia is Enron. It is clearly Cisco." Here's the most recent warning from the investor who called the 2008 crash: Michael Burry built his reputation on one trade. He saw the housing market collapse before anyone else and bet against it. "The Big Short" made him famous. Now he's looking at Nvidia. And he says it looks like Cisco in March 2000. That comparison is not a casual insult. Cisco was the most valuable company in the world at the peak of the dot-com bubble. Its valuation crossed $500 billion. Then the bubble burst. The stock fell roughly 90% from its 2000 peak. Its market cap collapsed to about $60 billion by 2002. And it took roughly 25 years for the stock to climb back to where it started. An entire generation of investors waited a quarter century just to break even. That is the company Burry is comparing Nvidia to. Now here is the number that triggered the warning. In Nvidia's fiscal 2026 results, the company disclosed its purchase obligations. These are the commitments Nvidia makes to its suppliers to lock in future manufacturing capacity. A year ago, that figure sat at $16.1 billion. This year it jumped to $95.2 billion. Total supply obligations now sit at roughly $117 billion. Nvidia is committing $117 billion to build capacity for demand that has not arrived yet. Burry's argument is simple. A company does not lock in $117 billion in supplier commitments unless it is betting the demand keeps climbing. If that demand slows even slightly, Nvidia is holding billions in obligations it cannot unwind. And that is exactly what happened to Cisco. Cisco overcommitted to supplier capacity expecting roughly 50% annual growth. Then tech spending slowed. The inventory piled up. The stock cratered. Burry is not calling Nvidia a fraud. He is not saying it is the next Enron. He is saying it could be the market's Cisco. The single stock that becomes the symbol of an AI spending unwind that drags everything down with it. And the dot-com comparison carries weight because of what happened to the broader market. When that bubble burst, the Nasdaq 100 fell 77%. The S&P 500 dropped 49%. It was not just one stock. It was the whole market. Now here is the other side of the argument. Nvidia's supporters say the Cisco comparison is too simple. Because Cisco was riding hype. Nvidia is riding actual revenue. Nvidia reported fiscal 2026 revenue of $215.9 billion, up 65% year over year. Data center revenue alone hit roughly $193.7 billion, up 68%. Record quarterly data center revenue of $62.3 billion in the fourth quarter, up 75%. These are not promises. These are realized sales, booked and collected. The bulls argue that pricing power and margins this strong do not exist inside a pure bubble. In their view, Burry is warning about a future slowdown that has not shown up in a single quarterly report. So the debate splits into two clean halves. The bears say the $117 billion in commitments makes Nvidia dangerously sensitive to any demand slowdown. The bulls say the revenue is real, the growth is accelerating, and the buildout is justified by the orders already on the books. Both sides are looking at the same company. Both sides are looking at the same numbers. They just disagree on what those numbers mean. And there is a second force pulling at this market that has nothing to do with Nvidia's earnings. A wave of mega-IPOs is reportedly coming. SpaceX. OpenAI. Anthropic. Some estimates suggest the market may need to absorb close to $200 billion in fresh equity supply. That creates a quieter question underneath the Burry debate. Even if AI demand stays strong, capital is finite. When the next wave of private giants goes public, money has to come from somewhere. And the easiest place to pull it from is the stock that already tripled. The real test is not whether Burry is right or wrong today. It is whether demand growth, margins, and contract utilization keep matching the $117 billion that Nvidia and its entire ecosystem are committing right now. If the demand keeps climbing, the commitments look like foresight. If it stalls, they look like Cisco. The man who saw the last crash before anyone else just put a name on the risk. A company that was once worth over $500 billion, then lost 90%, then made its investors wait 25 years to get back to even. The numbers say Nvidia is booking record revenue. The same numbers say Nvidia is committing $117 billion to a future nobody can see. One of those facts ages well. The other one is the entire question.
Insider Trackers285,109 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
BREAKING: The biggest investor in the Trump family's crypto company just turned on them publicly. He claims they built a "trap door" into the code to freeze investor money at will. And they just secretly borrowed $75 million against tokens that aren't theirs. Here's the crypto scandal unfolding right now: World Liberty Financial launched in 2024 during Trump's third presidential campaign. Co-founded by Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, Barron Trump, and Zach Witkoff, the son of US envoy Steve Witkoff. Donald Trump was listed as "co-founder emeritus." The Trump family company was structured to receive 75% of net revenues from token sales. On Trump's 2025 financial disclosure form, he listed more than $57 million in income from World Liberty alone. By December 2025, the family had booked roughly $1 billion in profits. And held another $3 billion in unsold tokens. Now that empire is cracking open from the inside. One of the first, largest, and loudest investors in the project was Justin Sun. The Tron founder. Chinese-born crypto billionaire. He put in between $30 million and $75 million starting in late 2024. Sat as an advisor. Attended Trump's memecoin gala dinner. Held roughly 545 to 595 million WLFI tokens at peak, worth over $100 million. He was the whale the project pointed to as validation. On April 12, he went to X and publicly torched them. He called World Liberty "a trap masquerading as a door." He accused the project of building hidden controls into its smart contracts. Controls that let the company unilaterally freeze any wallet without notice, without warning, without due process. His own wallet was frozen last September, after he moved $9 million in tokens to a new address. He says he was running routine exchange deposit tests. No buying. No selling. No market impact. The wallet got blacklisted anyway. Hundreds of millions in tokens, locked for months. And according to Sun, the ability to do this was never disclosed to investors before they bought in. "This is the opposite of decentralization," he wrote. He called the Trump family "bad actors." He accused them of treating investors as a "personal ATM." World Liberty's official account fired back within hours. "Does anyone still believe Justin Sun?" "Justin's favorite move is playing the victim while making baseless allegations to cover up his own misconduct." "We have the contracts. We have the evidence. We have the truth." "See you in court pal." The biggest backer of a Trump family crypto venture. Publicly accusing them of a scam. Being told "see you in court" by the company. In public. On X. But the timing is the part nobody's putting together. In February, blockchain data later reported by CoinDesk showed something that never made it into a press release. World Liberty took out a $75 million loan from a crypto lending platform called Dolomite. The collateral? Five billion WLFI tokens. That's 5% of the entire supply. Borrowed against, quietly, while the same company was blocking regular holders from selling their own tokens. Think about what that means. Investors like Sun were told their tokens were locked. Couldn't be sold. Couldn't be moved. Meanwhile, the company was taking 5 billion of its own tokens and using them as collateral to borrow $75 million in stablecoins. Austin Campbell, a crypto consultant and NYU instructor, told NBC News: "If you took this conduct and translated it to traditional markets, you would have some problems." That is as close as a sober industry voice gets to saying "this is not supposed to be legal." Then on Tuesday, April 15, it escalated again. World Liberty filed a new governance proposal. It would unlock 62.3 billion WLFI tokens that were previously locked with no vesting schedule. Early supporters holding 17 billion tokens would keep all of theirs, with a two-year cliff. Founders, team, advisors, and partners would see 10% of their 45.2 billion tokens burned. The remaining 40.7 billion would unlock over five years. Sun called it a "trap door" the second it hit the forum. He warned that the proposal involves billions of dollars in assets. That it could reshape vesting rights, burn billions of tokens, and shift governance power permanently. All without the minority protections or independent review a public equity would require. His words: "These steps would never pass in traditional markets, where investors expect clear legal rights and due process." Meanwhile the token itself is bleeding. WLFI has lost 74% of its value since August. As of this week, it trades at around 8 cents. Down from a high of 40 cents at launch. But the Trump family has not been hit the way retail investors have. A Wall Street Journal analysis found the Trumps have cashed out at least $1.2 billion in real dollars from World Liberty Financial over the past 16 months. Not paper wealth. Not locked tokens. Actual cash. The separate TRUMP memecoin, launched days before the second inauguration, has crashed roughly 90% from its high. It now trades around $2.81. It was once $45. And there's the foreign money trail. Days before the inauguration, an investor linked to the UAE government paid $500 million to acquire nearly half of World Liberty Financial. A UAE government fund later used $2 billion of World Liberty's USD1 stablecoin to invest in the crypto exchange Binance. Allowing the Trump-linked entity receiving those dollars to hold them in bonds or money market funds and keep the interest. Shortly after, the Trump administration reversed a Biden-era restriction and gave the UAE access to advanced US chips. Binance's founder, Changpeng Zhao, received a presidential pardon despite his prior guilty plea for failing to stop illicit money flows tied to terrorism and trafficking. World Liberty publicly denied any connection between the UAE deal and the chips policy. But the paper trail is a paper trail. And now add this: Justin Sun's own SEC fraud case from 2023, charging him over crypto trades and illicit promotion, was quietly dismissed in March. He paid a $10 million fine. The case disappeared. One of the first investors in a Trump family crypto venture, under SEC fraud charges, had his case dropped months into the new administration. That same investor is now the loudest public critic of the company. Because he believes they built a kill switch into the code to lock him out of his own money. Here's the broader picture: World Liberty Financial holds a stablecoin, USD1, that ranks among the 10 most heavily used in the world. It runs on Binance and Kraken. It settles billions in transactions. The project's governance token, WLFI, has now collapsed in value while the company borrows against its own supply. The biggest institutional backer is calling it a trap. The House Judiciary Committee has published a report accusing the family of running a multi-billion-dollar self-dealing machine. The Committee documented $11.6 billion in Trump family crypto holdings and over $800 million in crypto income in the first half of 2025 alone. Democrats have accused the administration of dismantling the DOJ's National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team to shield these ventures from exactly this kind of scrutiny. The White House denies any wrongdoing. The Trump Organization has not responded to media requests. World Liberty is threatening its biggest investor with a lawsuit over his public accusations. This is not a crypto story anymore. This is an ownership story. About who owns the tokens. Who owns the code. Who owns the switch that freezes the wallets. And who owns the 75% cut of every dollar that flows through it. Retail investors are holding an 8-cent token down 74% from its high. The biggest whale is publicly accusing the company of a scam. The company just announced it secretly pledged billions of its own tokens as collateral for a $75 million loan. And the founding family has already cashed out $1.2 billion in real money. One of these things is not like the others. The question now is not whether this ends in court. Justin Sun vs. World Liberty is coming. The question is which courtroom. A civil dispute between two crypto parties? Or the first real securities case testing whether a sitting president's family business structure qualifies as a legal enterprise at all? Because "see you in court pal" works both ways. And Sun's lawyers have been waiting for him to give them something to file. He just did.
Insider Trackers79,896 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад
BREAKING: The soldier who captured Maduro just got arrested. Not for what he did in Venezuela. For what he did on his phone the week before. He bet $33,000 on his own classified mission and won $410,000. And the federal government just made history charging him for it. Meet Master Sergeant Gannon Ken Van Dyke. 38 years old. Active duty U.S. Army Special Forces since 2008. Stationed at Fort Bragg. A communications specialist supporting Joint Special Operations Command. The unit that oversees Delta Force and SEAL Team Six. On December 8, 2025, Van Dyke received a "Classified Information Security Briefing." He signed a nondisclosure agreement. He promised to never reveal classified information about U.S. Army Special Operations. Then he was read into Operation Absolute Resolve. The covert mission to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. 18 days later, on December 26, he opened a Polymarket account. He used a VPN to make it look like he was logging in from a foreign country. He funded it with about $35,000 from his personal bank account. And he started buying. 13 separate "YES" bets between December 27 and January 2. All on Venezuela. "Maduro out by January 31." "U.S. Forces in Venezuela by January 31." "Will the U.S. invade Venezuela by January 31." "Trump invokes War Powers against Venezuela by January 31." The market gave those outcomes a 17% chance. Long-shot bets that Wall Street wouldn't touch. Van Dyke went all in. Total wagered: $33,034. On January 2, the day before the raid, he placed $26,000 of those bets in a single afternoon. Hours before the operation kicked off. In the predawn hours of January 3, U.S. forces stormed a residence in Caracas. Maduro and his wife were captured. Hours later, Trump posted the announcement on Truth Social. Polymarket resolved the contracts to "YES." Van Dyke's $33,000 became $409,881. A 1,141% return in seven days. The same day Maduro hit American soil, Van Dyke withdrew most of his winnings. He sent the proceeds to a foreign cryptocurrency vault. Then to a brand new brokerage account. Three days later, on January 6, he asked Polymarket to delete his account. He told the platform he had "lost access to the email." He changed the email on his cryptocurrency exchange to one not registered in his name. An email he had created on December 14. Twelve days before the bets. He knew exactly what he was doing. Here's the part that should infuriate every American: A photo was uploaded to his Google account on the day of the raid. The picture, according to the indictment, shows him on the deck of a ship at sea at sunrise. Wearing combat fatigues. Carrying a rifle. Standing alongside three other soldiers. That ship was the USS Iwo Jima. The same vessel where Maduro was held after the operation. He didn't just have classified information. He WAS the operation. For weeks, the trade was an internet mystery. CNN and on-chain analytics firms flagged the suspicious wallet. An anonymous account had turned $33K into $410K on the longest of long shots. Federal prosecutors started watching Polymarket directly. The platform handed over the records, and they pointed to Van Dyke. On April 23, 2026, the Department of Justice unsealed the indictment. Five charges. Unlawful use of confidential government information for personal gain. Theft of nonpublic government information. Commodities fraud. Wire fraud. Engaging in a monetary transaction in property derived from specified unlawful activity. Maximum sentence: 20 years on the wire fraud count alone. 10 years on each of the others. The CFTC filed a parallel civil complaint. They want every dollar back. Plus penalties. Plus a permanent ban from regulated markets. This is the first time in U.S. history a person has been criminally charged for insider trading on a prediction market. The first time.
Insider Trackers49,736 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад
BREAKING: A Google engineer just got arrested for insider trading. But not on stocks... On ONE specific bet, using data that only a handful of Google employees were allowed to see. Meet Michele Spagnuolo. 36 years old. Italian national. Long-serving Google security engineer based in Zurich. One of a limited number of employees with access to the internal data behind Google's "Year in Search" report. The same report Google publishes every December. The one that ranks the most-searched people, events, and terms of the year. Marketing campaign. Cultural moment. Commercial barometer of Google's dominance in search. And, according to the FBI, the foundation of a million-dollar insider trading scheme on Polymarket. Between October and December 2025, Spagnuolo allegedly logged into Google's internal tool to view the unpublished Year in Search rankings. The screen displayed "Confidential" in red text at the top. He looked anyway. Then he opened Polymarket under the account name "AlphaRaccoon." And he started loading up. His first bet was $403 on Kendrick Lamar to be the most-searched person of 2025. The market gave Lamar a 3% probability. It started small. It did not stay small. $10,807 against Pope Leo XIV being the most-searched person. $937,688 against Bianca Censori being the most-searched person at 85% probability. $509,149 against Donald Trump being the most-searched person at 90% probability. $171,612 against Trump being in the top five at 66% probability. The bets weren't random. They were precisely shaped to match a leaderboard nobody outside Google had seen. Then he placed the bet that gives the whole thing away. $381 on a relatively unknown singer named D4vd to be among the top five most-searched individuals. The market gave that 18% probability. He made the bet in November. After, according to the FBI, re-accessing the internal Year in Search data, which had updated since he viewed it in October. He placed another $5 bet on D4vd to be number one. The market gave that almost zero. On December 4, Google published the Year in Search 2025 report. D4vd was number one. Spagnuolo's bets resolved. The AlphaRaccoon account collected approximately $1.2 million in profit. Almost immediately, the wallet started moving the money out. 5.045 million USDC was transferred off Polymarket and into a series of decentralized swap services. Then into a privacy-focused cryptocurrency mixer that strips wallet addresses from the blockchain. The FBI says this was an attempt to launder the proceeds. And here's where the story turns from a corporate insider scandal into something more interesting. Within days of the Year in Search release, online sleuths were already speculating that AlphaRaccoon had to be a Google insider. The bets were too specific. The bankroll was too large. The timing was too clean. The FBI was watching the same forums. Special Agent Brandon Racz pulled the criminal complaint together by combining blockchain data, Google's internal access logs, and screenshots of the confidential dashboard Spagnuolo had viewed. The dashboard logs reportedly showed his employee ID accessing the unpublished data on the exact dates that matched the betting pattern. On May 27, 2026, Spagnuolo was arrested. The charges: Commodities fraud. Wire fraud. Money laundering. Combined maximum sentence: 50 years. The CFTC filed a parallel civil complaint within hours. US Attorney Jay Clayton's statement is the part worth reading twice. "Today's charges reinforce a decades-old message: corporate insiders cannot use confidential business information to turn a profit in our markets." Translation: Polymarket is now "our markets."
Insider Trackers20,003 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
Больше нет контента для загрузки