Larry 長祥
@jambuki888 • 7,500 subscribers
🇹🇼 🇨🇳 Peacefully Reunifies by 2040 Geopol & Philosophy Enjoyer Buddha = Anti-Teacher ❤️☯️ 15k hrs - Meditation Areligious Meditation book & more free at 🔗
Shorts
Videos
Secretly Recorded Canadian Chinese Man to his Daughter: “Impossible. All fake. If Elon Musk can’t do it. No way China can do it. China is all BS.” I am gonna quickly translate the key points in this vid while my daughter is asleep. -Did you notice how excited this Hua Ren Chinese Person got when he exclaimed China cannot be advanced and it’s all lies? -Most of these Chinese diaspora left China in the 1980s and 1990s, when China was incredibly poor and lame. (China was still in the century of humiliation) -These early wave immigrants may have been wealthy landowners in Beijing or Shanghai. They left China feeling prideful. Now they cannot believe China has advanced. They missed out on potential deals. (This upsets the Chinese businessman) Larry note: Most of the people who chose to leave China were privileged in China. Most of these people are the most anti socialist/communist. Often aristocrats. Their ancestors may have lost a lot of money and land during Mao’s peasant revolution. What is most striking to me is the belief that China cannot innovate and everything is stolen. This slogan is peddled hard in countries under the Western media sphere. Including Taiwan, SKorea, Japan, and Philippines etc. How this media umbrella works and operates to influence these countries is interesting. Like Carlin says, you don’t need an official conspiracy when interests align. My fave teacher Mr. Parker said his favourite word is converge. IB history guy. A commie sympathizer looking back. Tar and feather or nah?
Larry 長祥564,430 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen
She does a great job explaining the Chinese debt trap narrative in Africa. She speaks Chinese and then switches to English. “China doesn’t demand political changes or interferes politically” “No one else is filling the gap” Her Chinese speaking is better than mine.
Larry 長祥191,604 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten
Dad Helps You Rizz with Oriental Characteristics “He is only 5 foot 9 but he went to Stanford so iss ok.”
Larry 長祥93,291 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten
Tibetan Facts by Lana: -Many Tibetans live in Sichuan. Only 3 million Tibetans are from Tibet. -Number of Tibetans in Communist Party of China, 400k -Before CPC liberated Tibet, 95% of Tibetans were serfs. Lana’s grandma lost fingers for disobeying the Rinpoche (like a Brahmin or High Priest) -The non serf Tibetan elites escaped to The West and try to convince you they are on the right side of history. 150k-200k of em. Spoiler: they are, in fact, not on the right side of history. Source at whatdoeslanamean on taktoke tiktok
Larry 長祥82,477 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten
Westerners still ask the same question like it’s clever: “Does the rest of the world actually want to be like China? No democracy, repressive on speech and human rights?” They’re looking at the 21st century with 19th and 20th century glasses. The assumption is that 1.4 billion Chinese must be suffering under some evil CCP. Black-and-white thinking that doesn’t fit reality anymore. China’s going to build its own system. It might not match the Western model — and that’s fine by them. When China was weak and divided, nobody was exporting human rights or democracy to them. The British forced opium on China in exchange for tea. Western powers seized territory, set up settlements, and burned the Summer Palace. It remains now unrestored as a permanent reminder of history for Chinese to never be blinded by hubris again. Now the same voices show up acting as saviors: “Don’t you want a better government? What’s wrong with you?” The condescension is unreal says Kishore. China will choose its own path. It may not be perfect in Western eyes, but it’s theirs. Unlike America, they don’t pretend their civilization is a universal model the whole world must copy. They do what works for China. You do what works for you. They’re not exporting their system to anyone. No threat. No need to feel insecure about China succeeding on its own terms. The West needs to drop the savior complex and get used to it. The 21st century isn’t yours to dictate anymore. Paraphrasing Kishore Mahbubani answering questions about China in 2020.
Larry 長祥66,269 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten
Social User XIMTOPIAN Visits Xinjiang. Bro gets sent coordinates of alleged slave camp. Goes to coordinates...It's Xinjiang CAREER UNI. 好乖乖! Looks very modern and clean, no easy feat considering the remote desert low basin terrain. Another similar case is The Guardian confidently posting the location of another evil re-education camp. Supposed satellite images were on the front cover. Turns out it's a camel milk farm for tourists and people curious about camels Camelcapitalist proof below from Dante Munoz: Did you know that the violent extremism in Xinjiang was from Wahhabis? A dangerous zealot faction that does not work with modern society. Under Wahhabi ideology, women are essentially subhuman. There were multiple violent incidents in China from Wahhabi separatists. China has the full support of their citizens with regards to maintaining a safe society. Hui and Uyghur Muslims in China sometimes wear headscarves. But covering up the face? Very rare. This is seen as extremism by the Chinese. You think a Chinese woman is going to allow this kind of extreme (abusive) inconvenience? She is gonna go flying tiger hidden fist of Buddha on your ass. You can keep your idealistic word salad essays about how a women being forced to cover her face is for her benefit. A Chinese Muslim woman is not gonna go for it. 不吃这一套 Random thought, the UK has more surveillance cameras than China, but somehow China has created a very low crime, safe, society. How come? Most of their police don't even carry guns. Only in China: Someone please send me the video of that ornery elderly woman with the two butcher knives in hand being taken down by like five cops with these long staves with plastic boxes attached to the end. I lost this file and I need it desperately for my archives. As China rises, expect to see more well crafted propaganda to keep you under the spell that USA is the only international player in town. Obey and consume. Don't question anything. The international world order is perfect and your obedience is appreciated. 好乖乖! Final clip starts at 7:20. It's a Mainland Chinese business man meeting some Taiwanese Chinese tourists. As soon as he finds out they are from Taiwan, he says oh these are free. My treat. Your money is no good here :) This businessman knows that Taiwanese have to break through a wall of propaganda to find the courage to visit Mainland China. Thankfully, the number of Taiwanese visiting Mainland China are on a pretty prettay good upward trend. Starting in late summer of 2025, after Taiwan's biggest influencers visited China, all of a sudden you started hearing that phrase again: "I am Taiwanese and I am a proud Chinese." Another traveler said: "I went to China and everything I heard was a lie. The major cities surprised me. However, it was the rural areas that really opened my heart to my Mainland Chinese compatriots." 好乖乖!
Larry 長祥22,863 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen
Conversation with Eric Li, VC from China, 2013, Oxford. Eric never misses on his analyses and now, with a rising China, people are starting to listen: • Eric Li grew up in China at the height of the Cultural Revolution. • Disillusioned by that “failed religion,” he went to the US, got degrees from Berkeley and Stanford, worked for Ross Perot, and joined Perot’s presidential campaign. • The interviewer asks how he became skeptical that liberal democracy is desirable or compatible with China. How his view changed? • When young, he “knew everything” and bought neat formulas that explained the whole world. • First formula: primitive society → slavery → feudalism → capitalism → communist utopia. It did not work out. • Second formula, learned in America: the individual is sovereign, and 1.3 billion people will vote themselves to paradise. Also too simple. • He left the US, returned to China, traveled Africa and Southeast Asia, and built a business. The world was more complex than either story. Post–Cold War playbook: • The Western script for prosperity failed most countries that followed it, including many in Africa and Southeast Asia. They cannot easily go back. • China did not follow that script. It had many problems, but produced the largest living-standards gain for the most people in the shortest time in history. Self-correction • The Party did not hold back modernization. It led it. • Self-correction, often treated as a unique democratic strength, has been a hallmark of Party governance. • Interviewer: without a free press, courts, or elections, how does the Party know a policy is wrong? Why electoral democracy is rigid? • Political science assumed democracies uniquely self-correct. • Evidence so far: they are extraordinarily rigid. Too many interests can block change. • Fukuyama called the US a “vetocracy”: everyone can veto everything. • Fareed Zakaria said the US should become parliamentary. That change will not happen. • Even switching presidential ↔ parliamentary form is nearly impossible, let alone larger reform. • America and Europe need reform. It is not happening because the systems are rigid. Why the Chinese system has been agile • The one-party system so far has been agile. He does not say it will be forever. • Before the 18th Party Congress, the Standing Committee had 9 members. Power was too diffuse. They cut it to 7. • Shrinking the US Senate from 100 to 88 would not happen, however urgent. Meritocracy and recruitment • He calls the CCP one of the most meritocratic, upwardly mobile political organizations in the world. • Princeling talk is overstated by his numbers: in the previous 25-person Politburo, only 5 came from privileged backgrounds. The other 20, including president and premier, came from ordinary backgrounds. • The Central Committee share was even smaller. • Contrast: US Senate (sons of senators and wealth) and South Korea (princeling patterns from politics to CEOs to university presidents). • The Party recruits top rural students at universities. They move up step by step. Selection is tough and performance-based. • Xi is a princeling, and the first Party head of state in 64 years with a political-family background. His path still took ~30 years: village → county → mayor → province. By the top he had managed ~150 million people and trillions in GDP. • You do not reach the top without that grinding machine. • Grassroots recruitment is the key to adaptation: rulers come from the same generation and know conditions on the ground. • He expects the princeling share to keep falling. In the next 20-year pipeline, almost none have a realistic shot at the top. Popularity vs speech controls • He cites high Pew and FT support as performance-based legitimacy. • Interviewer: if so popular, why control media, internet, protest, and dissent? Why not hold elections? • Li: not mainly about popularity or confidence. • Absolute free speech is a fallacy. No society has it. Every society regulates speech by its conditions. • The ideology treats speech as harmless because it is “not an act.” History says speech is an act and can do great harm. • Examples: 1933 Europe; Greece; face covering in France; banned books in Germany. • China is changing at unprecedented speed and scale. Stability is fragile. Amplified speech can disrupt it. • A responsible government calibrates debate space to the time. History judges whether the current range is right. Will China democratize after getting rich? • He rejects the premise that higher income creates demand for a particular system. • After the Cold War, many poor countries adopted electoral democracy. It did not deliver. • South Korea and Taiwan did democratize after getting richer, but under special Cold War / semi-sovereign conditions. • Many poor countries also wanted democracy. Income and political preference are not tightly linked. How long the system lasts? • It depends on many variables. • Can they keep performing? He thinks yes for some time, probably within his generation. • Second: will imported electoral democracy keep failing in non-Western countries that adopted it because they thought it worked, not because it grew from their own tradition? • If that trend continues, China is less likely to copy it. His line: who would be that stupid to copy something that does not work? Is it an alternative to Western liberal democracy? • It is an alternative for China under current conditions. • The model itself is not exportable. • Systems work when they fit culture and time. They are not universal. • What is exportable: the idea that alternatives exist. Each country should find a path that fits its own circumstances instead of blindly copying others. 2013 → 2025 framing: • This exchange is from 2013 Oxford, when faith in the Western model was still strong. • Born in the Cultural Revolution and educated in top US schools, Li was supposed to be a convert. He became a critic instead. • Three claims that sounded radical then: electoral democracy is unusually rigid; absolute free speech does not exist; do not copy a script that is failing. • A decade later, polarization, division, and populism in the West made the rigidity diagnosis harder to dismiss. China stayed on a different path. • The old conversation is a time capsule. The questions got sharper, not weaker. • The video asks: was Li a clear-eyed realist or a clever defender of China? And does a path to prosperity exist outside the Western playbook?
Larry 長祥21,222 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
200,000 people stood for hours in Taipei’s heat and humidity on Ketagalan Boulevard demanding the US-backed DPP Democrative Progressive Government resign. What started as a toxic cooking oil scandal (carcinogen-laced soybean oil in nearly 2,000 schools and businesses across the island) has turned into something bigger. DPP won't admit fault as usual. The Specter The Specter was on the ground. Protesters told it straight: the anger goes far beyond food safety. The DPP deliberately manufactures division. They glorify Japanese colonization. They vilify the mainland. They deny their own ancestry one protestor said. About 60% of recent respondents support the protests organized by the KMT. Take Taiwanese polls with a grain of salt (Mayor Ko learned that the hard way), but the numbers match what you hear on the street. I’ve been back at least once a year for a long time. Taxi drivers, mall workers, grandmas, uncles — the sample size is small but consistent. People are tired. The work culture is brutal. We inherited the toxic aspects of Chinese and Japanese culture. We refuse to let go (floppy disks still exist in some offices). Most Taiwanese are not working at TSMC. They’re grinding at tough jobs in a tough work culture. Food scandals hit them hard. The DPP ran on food safety years ago. Then came ractopamine pork after US pressure, growth hormone turbo beef, expired eggs that smelled wrong, and now this. They initially talked tough on contaminated American pork, then completely folded once in power. Circus, no bread. Taiwan has already paid over $30 billion for military equipment that is undelivered. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-Wun (鄭麗文) is not soft on this. She stood there and asked: 200,000 citizens on the street and you still won’t admit fault? A government that doesn’t dare face the people or the truth. Taiwanese politics has always been loud and theatrical...politicians throwing literal punches and pig guts INSIDE diplomatic buildings. Online the shift is already visible. Major Taiwanese influencers started visiting the mainland around 2025. Comment sections that used to treat “I am Chinese and I am Taiwanese” as social suicide now treat it as normal. The DPP years hollowed things out. Howard Lutnick talking about TSMC like a gangster... The tech is moving to Arizona anyway. China is building its own lithography. Fighting over the last few fabs isn’t worth a kinetic war. Time is not on the side of the identity project. Chinese bridges, roads, EVs, and buildings speak for themselves. A collapsing building video or a car fire does not equal the whole picture. Journalists who can’t speak Chinese still try to narrate China to people who can. That insult is wearing thin. In Taiwan, we are mostly Chinese. Historically accurate. Biologically accurate. Culturally accurate. Spiritually accurate for those who care about continuity. The indigenous peoples of Taiwan are the true Taiwanese. The rest of us are Taiwanese Chinese. That phrasing is more precise and more respectful. The protest is not abstract geopolitics. It’s people who are done being told their own history is propaganda while they eat contaminated oil and watch their kids’ schools get hit. The DPP can keep the separatist line. The street is telling them the cost is rising. Peaceful reunification remains the only adult path. Everything else is performance that the people on the ground are increasingly unwilling to subsidize. I predict we will return to an understanding similar to the 1992 One China Consensus by end of 2036.
Larry 長祥37,322 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten
We Taiwanese Chinese are PRAGMATIC. That’s why new polls show the majority of Taiwanese prefer the status quo. No unification. Also no SEPARATISM, the part Western Media strategically leaves out. Strategery ala Bush Jr. We 🇹🇼 are in favour of status quo because we want stability and prosperity. We try to get benefits from both China Mainland and USA. Given current trends. Most Westerners and deceived and do not understand the benefits Mainland gives to Taiwan (ECFA). This argument that the PRC has never ruled Taiwan is child’s play. The PRC and ROC knew full well they were both fighting for control of all of China. The ROC has survived only because of external interference. Taiwan is growing closer to Beijing’s influence and is warming up again to the FACT that we are all Chinese ethnically, culturally, and spiritually. Given current global trends, I predict peaceful reunification post 2035.
Larry 長祥26,712 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
Lana gets ATTACKED for speaking her view as a native Tibetan Chinese. These are her words paraphrased: What’s the real difference between the liberation of Xinjiang and Western colonialism? Let me set the record straight and school the people shamelessly projecting their own crimes onto China. This slander ends here. First, Xinjiang has been part of China since the 13th century. Western narratives try to bury that history, but the records and history books don’t lie. The liberation campaign targeted only the tiny minority — roughly 5-10% — of nobles and serf owners who oppressed the people. The common folk and original local leaders were never the enemy. By contrast, colonial powers raped, burned, pillaged, and massacred indiscriminately across the lands they conquered. Women, children, commoners, and elites — no one was spared. Second, the liberation of Tibetan areas (including parts of Sichuan) was just one chapter in China’s nationwide drive. It wasn’t only ethnic Tibetans who gained freedom. The PLA fought landlords across the entire country to emancipate the peasantry. That’s exactly why the card game Dou Dizhu — “Fight the Landlord” — exists. Third, ask the real question: Did these colonial powers ever unleash that level of brutality on their own people, on their own soil? Never. They sailed across oceans to do it to indigenous populations on other continents. They never treated their own the same way. Fourth, the PLA was never made up solely of Han soldiers, and the CPC has never been an exclusively Han organization. We don’t frame the liberation as “Han people coming to save the Tibetans.” That’s not how it was. The PLA is the people’s army. A far cry from colonial forces. How dare anyone draw that parallel? Fifth, after seizing lands through bloody conquest, colonial powers systematically erased indigenous languages and cultures. To this day, few remember the Aztecs by their original identity — they’re called Latinos, a colonial label, and their descendants speak only Spanish. Here in China, every ethnic group still has its native language and culture. Yes, some dialects (even certain Han ones like Cantonese) face pressure and decline — but that’s not the same as deliberate colonial erasure, and they still receive attention and space. Sixth, Tibetans still make up over 80% of Xizang’s (Tibet’s) population today. Indigenous peoples make up roughly 1% of the population in the United States — and English is the dominant language. Colonial powers have never paid meaningful reparations for their atrocities. Instead they project, deflect, and whine. Every nation built on colonial bloodshed will face its karmic reckoning. Those powers accumulated their wealth through centuries of primitive plunder and then rebranded it as “civilization,” “investment,” and “prosperity.” Now they complain about migration. If you hate immigration that much, maybe you shouldn’t have colonized in the first place. The hypocrisy is nauseating. Retribution is coming. Anyone in a former colonial nation with even a shred of honesty can see that mainstream Western media and history textbooks lost all credibility the moment they refused to face their own crimes and pay reparations. Five centuries of exploitative prosperity are drawing to a close. Justice will prevail in the end. Just wait and see.
Larry 長祥42,839 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten
“China's "ghost cities" were photographed, mocked, and cited as proof of inevitable collapse for over a decade. Then, one by one, they filled up. Kangbashi hit 153,000 residents. Zhengdong crossed 1.3 million. Chenggong passed 725,000. The corrections never traveled as far as the original claims.” -Sam Szuchan
Larry 長祥64,768 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten
Dalai Llama: We are not seeking independence from China. We will stay WITH the People's Republic of China. One of my meditation teachers in Taiwan can trace his spiritual lineage to Tibet. As a Taiwanese Chinese of course I am interested to find out the truth. It is important to remember that when the Dalai Llama was working with the CIA in the past, he was less than 15 years old. His older brother was mainly calling the shots. Critical thinking is difficult to develop for human beings and without proper education and environment, we are easily swayed. Generally by age 26 our brains are fully developed but factors such as violence, trauma, and abuse can really slow us down or completely hamstring us mentally. Tibet has full autonomy to practice Buddhism. Buddhism is sacred to the Chinese as many scholars would agree that the Chinese spiritual practice of Taoism gave a strong foundation to fully understand Buddha's deep teachings on the nature of the Universe. Blessings to you.
Larry 長祥219,789 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren
Taiwan is an unfinished civil war. The fighting is done. Diplomacy is next. Tibet was a brutal religious theocracy before being modernized. Historically Tibet was always part of China, XiZang. Honk Kong riots were an attempted color revolution backed by foreign powers and/
Larry 長祥70,102 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten
Taiwan (Republic of China) is the most brainwashed island in the Far East. 🇹🇼 Tang Xiang Long 唐湘龍 is a political commentator from Taiwan who is clean enough to stay out of Jail. It is common knowledge among Taiwanese that the current ruling DPP government goes after influencers critical of the regime. Reality check that too many people in Taiwan still refuse to face, according to 唐湘龙 Xiang Long Ge: • 193 member states in the United Nations. Roughly 182 of them recognize only one China. Taiwan is China. That is the international standard. ROC/PRC both claim all of China. • Inside the entire UN system there is only one official designation for Taiwan: Taiwan Province of China. Not “Taiwan.” Not “Chinese Taipei.” Taiwan Province of China. Whether you like it or not is irrelevant. That is the terminology. • You can keep running your regime's messaging and misinforming the public. That is your choice. But when you are telling the story, look at the actual facts and tell the truth to the people who actually have to live with the consequences. Note: The DPP government has heavily revised Taiwanese history books and education platforms to support a Taiwanese Independence Narrative. • Talking tough is easy. Being a “hawk” politician in today’s environment is easier than being a singer. Anyone can do the loud part. Real courage is being willing to take the criticism, the labels, and the reports when you say something that is unpopular but true. • Look at Ukraine in 2022. Before the war they limited opposition voices, restricted media criticism of the government, and left only “civic groups” that later turned out to be heavily funded by the United States. • Three years later: ~20% of territory gone massive population loss majority of exports destroyed over half of grain production hit Would you trade places with them right now? • If we are going to discuss war, discuss it seriously analytically instead of just performing toughness. • During World War II the two countries that paid the highest human price and still ended up on the winning side were China and Russia. Britain, France and the United States combined suffered far fewer military deaths than China alone. • America was not some pure hero from day one. Before Pearl Harbor, the United States was playing multiple sides while Europe and Asia were already on fire. Only after being attacked did the narrative change. • Under Japanese rule, many Taiwanese followed the Japanese war machine across Asia. Some people today still speak with pride about Japanese connections in the family. If Japan had not been defeated and Taiwan returned to China, a large number of those people would have been treated as war criminals and aggressors. • How can you be so arrogant and lie with a courageous face? your face skin must be very thicc. • Listen carefully to recent American statements. Trump has openly said he does not rule out using force to take Greenland. The same language appears regarding Panama. • When Taiwan hears those words, the reaction is quiet or comfortable. When the mainland says it does not rule out force regarding Taiwan Separatists, the reaction is completely different. Same type of language. Completely different emotional response. • No matter which party is in power in Taiwan, if you cannot maintain a basic, consistent position grounded in actual history and international reality, almost everything you say starts sounding ridiculous. • History does not care about your feelings or your campaign slogans. The numbers and the records are still there. The person being criticized here is Dai Wei Shan of the Democratic Progressive Party. She has recently been the target of public ire as she recently described benzopyrene (in a food-safety oil scandal) as a “natural substance,” which drew heavy flames. Thank you TT User Rita314218 for sharing the clip with me. The background music is a good fit for Xiang Long's righteous indignation.
Larry 長祥15,112 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
Half blood prince calls Taiwanese Woman Chinese. 🇹🇼😱🇨🇳 People say he is disgusting. Some praise him. I say what is truly disgusting is how there is a global effort to lie to you about Taiwan, province of Republic of China. I talk about random things like my cousin blaming the Chinese for having a boxer rebellion when eight nine countries ganged up to carve up China. There is a social biological factor for Taiwanese diaspora to say they are not Chinese. It offers social safety and elevation. Ultimately this is for the benefit of the American empire. The smaller powers that align with America on this are likely going to see changes coming up. I made this video and post in the bath tub. So that is why the video feels so intimate. Namaste ninja!
Larry 長祥36,055 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten
