The Trials of Lucy Letby's banner

The Trials of Lucy Letby

@LucyLetbyTrials • 11,539 subscribers

News & updates on the Lucy Letby case by journalist Cleuci de Oliveira I can be reached by direct message or email: [email protected]

Shorts

Ed Balls: "Is it your worry that, in this case, an individual is being scapegoated, possibly, for what we now know in other places were more systemic issues in quality of care?" Sir Jeremy Hunt: "Spot on, Ed. That is exactly the worry."

Ed Balls: "Is it your worry that, in this case, an individual is being scapegoated, possibly, for what we now know in other places were more systemic issues in quality of care?" Sir Jeremy Hunt: "Spot on, Ed. That is exactly the worry."

104,093 просмотров

Sir David Davis, in an interview with the The Daily T: "I've had four nurses say they wanted to give evidence on behalf of Lucy, but they were told by their supervisors, their managers, it would not be good for them. And so they didn't."

Sir David Davis, in an interview with the The Daily T: "I've had four nurses say they wanted to give evidence on behalf of Lucy, but they were told by their supervisors, their managers, it would not be good for them. And so they didn't."

115,840 просмотров

Videos

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.ai•Sponsored•Livecam

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

Exclusive private shows

1.2k viewers online

Private Show

Join now for exclusive access

Free preview available • Premium content

"There were a lot of people who stuck their head above the parapet for me. And I don't know if I would've been found innocent…were it not for people who were willing to take the risk to look for the truth." Poignant from Amanda Knox, on why she's speaking up for Lucy Letby.

"There were a lot of people who stuck their head above the parapet for me. And I don't know if I would've been found innocent…were it not for people who were willing to take the risk to look for the truth." Poignant from Amanda Knox, on why she's speaking up for Lucy Letby.

The Trials of Lucy Letby

108,827 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

❝ She didn't confess. She wasn't caught red handed. She wasn't cold and unemotional. She wasn't there when every baby died. All these things have been blown to pieces by experts, over and over again, since her conviction. ❞ Peter Hitchens on the crumbling of the Lucy Letby case

❝ She didn't confess. She wasn't caught red handed. She wasn't cold and unemotional. She wasn't there when every baby died. All these things have been blown to pieces by experts, over and over again, since her conviction. ❞ Peter Hitchens on the crumbling of the Lucy Letby case

The Trials of Lucy Letby

18,132 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Cheshire police have released another statement to the press this morning, "confirming that they have submitted a full file of evidence to the Crown Prosecution Service, for charging advice, on the ongoing investigation into deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies at the neonatal unit at both the Countess of Chester Hospital, and the Liverpool Women's Hospital too," per BBC Breakfast. The Crown Prosecution Service, in their own statement, confirm they've received the file from police, and will be reviewing it. The CPS stress that any future decision to charge, "will be made independently, based on evidence, and in light with our legal test," and that they won't be making any further comments until/unless further charges are brought.

Cheshire police have released another statement to the press this morning, "confirming that they have submitted a full file of evidence to the Crown Prosecution Service, for charging advice, on the ongoing investigation into deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies at the neonatal unit at both the Countess of Chester Hospital, and the Liverpool Women's Hospital too," per BBC Breakfast. The Crown Prosecution Service, in their own statement, confirm they've received the file from police, and will be reviewing it. The CPS stress that any future decision to charge, "will be made independently, based on evidence, and in light with our legal test," and that they won't be making any further comments until/unless further charges are brought.

The Trials of Lucy Letby

52,701 просмотров • 1 год назад

By way of comparison, here is the original version, as it aired on Panorama on Monday, alongside the corrected version, currently on iPlayer.

By way of comparison, here is the original version, as it aired on Panorama on Monday, alongside the corrected version, currently on iPlayer.

The Trials of Lucy Letby

46,201 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

In his 60 Minutes Australia interview, Dr Dewi Evans dismisses the findings of Dr Shoo Lee's expert panel as "about as weak a group of opinions that I've ever seen." At Letby's first trial, Evans was singing a different tune about Lee's credentials & research, referring to his 1989 paper on air embolus as a kind of gold standard in the field.

In his 60 Minutes Australia interview, Dr Dewi Evans dismisses the findings of Dr Shoo Lee's expert panel as "about as weak a group of opinions that I've ever seen." At Letby's first trial, Evans was singing a different tune about Lee's credentials & research, referring to his 1989 paper on air embolus as a kind of gold standard in the field.

The Trials of Lucy Letby

25,585 просмотров • 1 год назад

Despite correcting the major factual error they made in the programme, Panorama left in much of the discussion between the hosts, Judith Moritz & Jonathan Coffey, about how bad the incorrect data they presented supposedly looks for Lucy Letby. Compare & contrast both versions:

Despite correcting the major factual error they made in the programme, Panorama left in much of the discussion between the hosts, Judith Moritz & Jonathan Coffey, about how bad the incorrect data they presented supposedly looks for Lucy Letby. Compare & contrast both versions:

The Trials of Lucy Letby

14,290 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Extraordinary to hear Tim Owen KC tell the Daily Mail's The Trial that, "If it's right that Dr Dewi Evans has changed his opinion, then, frankly, that is exceptional." "And I would expect, if that was the case, that the prosecution would themselves seek to relist the case."

Extraordinary to hear Tim Owen KC tell the Daily Mail's The Trial that, "If it's right that Dr Dewi Evans has changed his opinion, then, frankly, that is exceptional." "And I would expect, if that was the case, that the prosecution would themselves seek to relist the case."

The Trials of Lucy Letby

19,920 просмотров • 1 год назад

Late last night, Liz Hull published a remarkably dishonest article in the Daily Mail. (See quoted tweet.) The headline and lede claimed Letby was on duty for 12 of the 13 baby deaths during the relevant indictment period. That's not true. Liz Hull knows it's not true. She admits this herself in the article, in the most underhanded way possible: "Letby was on duty or had been on shift less than a couple of hours before five of the six other babies died." In other—clearer—words: Letby was not on duty when some of these babies died. Rather, she was on duty on the shift that preceded these babies' deaths. What's even more remarkable is that Hull, only four months ago, argued in her own podcast that nine deaths for which Letby was never charged were expected and explained. You can listen to what Hull said about those deaths in the clip below. Here are some excerpts: "Four of them were born with serious congenital defects, so were completely discounted in the case. Their deaths were not suspicious. They were expected." "One of them suffered severe asphyxia and brain damage at birth." "Another four died of infection." "From what I can gather, from talking to people that looked at the notes and were very, very close to the case, those babies that died with infections weren't part of the indictment because their infection followed a pattern, which was expected, and they died of that infection."

Late last night, Liz Hull published a remarkably dishonest article in the Daily Mail. (See quoted tweet.) The headline and lede claimed Letby was on duty for 12 of the 13 baby deaths during the relevant indictment period. That's not true. Liz Hull knows it's not true. She admits this herself in the article, in the most underhanded way possible: "Letby was on duty or had been on shift less than a couple of hours before five of the six other babies died." In other—clearer—words: Letby was not on duty when some of these babies died. Rather, she was on duty on the shift that preceded these babies' deaths. What's even more remarkable is that Hull, only four months ago, argued in her own podcast that nine deaths for which Letby was never charged were expected and explained. You can listen to what Hull said about those deaths in the clip below. Here are some excerpts: "Four of them were born with serious congenital defects, so were completely discounted in the case. Their deaths were not suspicious. They were expected." "One of them suffered severe asphyxia and brain damage at birth." "Another four died of infection." "From what I can gather, from talking to people that looked at the notes and were very, very close to the case, those babies that died with infections weren't part of the indictment because their infection followed a pattern, which was expected, and they died of that infection."

The Trials of Lucy Letby

19,917 просмотров • 1 год назад

"The police have been engaging and putting stuff out there to the media all the way since her arrest…Here, we just have me." Lucy Letby's barrister Mark McDonald appearing on Good Morning Britain this morning:

"The police have been engaging and putting stuff out there to the media all the way since her arrest…Here, we just have me." Lucy Letby's barrister Mark McDonald appearing on Good Morning Britain this morning:

The Trials of Lucy Letby

12,431 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

"Our top story: More doubts over Lucy Letby's guilt. Now, a former coroner's officer says her convictions are unsafe." From yesterday's evening news on BBC North West. The segment also provides a decent overview of all the most recent developments in the Letby case:

"Our top story: More doubts over Lucy Letby's guilt. Now, a former coroner's officer says her convictions are unsafe." From yesterday's evening news on BBC North West. The segment also provides a decent overview of all the most recent developments in the Letby case:

The Trials of Lucy Letby

11,630 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Dr Dewi Evans spoke to Radio Wales Breakfast this morning. It is a fascinating interview—in particular, Evans' response to the question of whether he'd changed his mind on what caused Baby C's death. For context: Evans testified at trial that Lucy Letby murdered several babies by forcing air down their nasogastric tubes. But there is nothing in the scientific literature supporting this as a plausible method of murder—a fact Evans himself has had to concede post-trial. Evans has since recanted his theory, telling Channel 5 last summer that, "None of the babies were killed as a direct result of the injection of air, or fluid and air deliberately injected into their stomachs." More recently, Evans has denied that he ever recanted his original murder theory in the first place. The latest about-face came in response to Letby's new lawyer, Mark McDonald, announcing that he will seek to appeal Letby's convictions—based, in part, on Evans having changed his mind about this particular method of murder. And that brings us to Evans' interview this morning with Radio Wales Breakfast. When asked if he'd changed his mind about what caused Baby C's death, Evans equivocated. He told the interviewer that Letby may have "used both mechanisms"—meaning air forced down the nasogastric tube, and air injected directly into the baby's veins—and that, "either option was possible." It's a response reflective of the impossible position Evans has put himself in. He's no longer willing to stand by 'air forced down the nasogastric tube' as a feasible method of murder, but is similarly unwilling to admit that he's changed his mind.

Dr Dewi Evans spoke to Radio Wales Breakfast this morning. It is a fascinating interview—in particular, Evans' response to the question of whether he'd changed his mind on what caused Baby C's death. For context: Evans testified at trial that Lucy Letby murdered several babies by forcing air down their nasogastric tubes. But there is nothing in the scientific literature supporting this as a plausible method of murder—a fact Evans himself has had to concede post-trial. Evans has since recanted his theory, telling Channel 5 last summer that, "None of the babies were killed as a direct result of the injection of air, or fluid and air deliberately injected into their stomachs." More recently, Evans has denied that he ever recanted his original murder theory in the first place. The latest about-face came in response to Letby's new lawyer, Mark McDonald, announcing that he will seek to appeal Letby's convictions—based, in part, on Evans having changed his mind about this particular method of murder. And that brings us to Evans' interview this morning with Radio Wales Breakfast. When asked if he'd changed his mind about what caused Baby C's death, Evans equivocated. He told the interviewer that Letby may have "used both mechanisms"—meaning air forced down the nasogastric tube, and air injected directly into the baby's veins—and that, "either option was possible." It's a response reflective of the impossible position Evans has put himself in. He's no longer willing to stand by 'air forced down the nasogastric tube' as a feasible method of murder, but is similarly unwilling to admit that he's changed his mind.

The Trials of Lucy Letby

13,094 просмотров • 1 год назад

Больше нет контента для загрузки