Luke de Pulford's banner
Luke de Pulford's profile picture

Luke de Pulford

@lukedepulford166,614 subscribers

Co-Founder, Executive Director: Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China. Personal account. DMs open.

Shorts

This is an historic moment. For the Prime Minister’s answer to be correct, normal procedure would have to have been abandoned, and journalists and their sources must have been wildly misled.

This is an historic moment. For the Prime Minister’s answer to be correct, normal procedure would have to have been abandoned, and journalists and their sources must have been wildly misled.

329,516 次观看

For the doubters: here is Bi-khim Hsiao 蕭美琴 leaving the European Parliament with a diplomatic escort. Thank you Belgium! If you know, you know.

For the doubters: here is Bi-khim Hsiao 蕭美琴 leaving the European Parliament with a diplomatic escort. Thank you Belgium! If you know, you know.

88,079 次观看

Here’s the real question on the lips of leaders around the world: If you (KMT) won the next election and Beijing invaded Taiwan, would you deploy the army to defend the Taiwanese people?

Here’s the real question on the lips of leaders around the world: If you (KMT) won the next election and Beijing invaded Taiwan, would you deploy the army to defend the Taiwanese people?

27,066 次观看

Judge for yourself. Shenzhen or Xinjiang? MPMichaelMa said “you claim that there’s forced labour in…” and then attacked. So, was the witness Margaret McCuaig-Johnston 🇨🇦’s testimony about Shenzhen? Let’s see 🤥🤥🤥

Judge for yourself. Shenzhen or Xinjiang? MPMichaelMa said “you claim that there’s forced labour in…” and then attacked. So, was the witness Margaret McCuaig-Johnston 🇨🇦’s testimony about Shenzhen? Let’s see 🤥🤥🤥

26,620 次观看

If the “China Audit” was suppressed for fear of damaging trade and investment links, then what then Foreign Sec David Lammy said in June (that nearly all had to be classified) cannot be correct.👇

If the “China Audit” was suppressed for fear of damaging trade and investment links, then what then Foreign Sec David Lammy said in June (that nearly all had to be classified) cannot be correct.👇

51,839 次观看

‼️ROAD TOTALLY CLOSED STILL SAFE FOR PROTEST Metropolitan Police??

‼️ROAD TOTALLY CLOSED STILL SAFE FOR PROTEST Metropolitan Police??

36,968 次观看

Bloody hell there has to be 5,000 people here.

Bloody hell there has to be 5,000 people here.

30,473 次观看

Let’s talk about this. Having spoken to several members of the press corps, here’s what happened: 1️⃣ When Starmer raised points of disagreement, the British press were *roughly* bundled out of the room by 🇨🇳security. 2️⃣ No complaints were raised by the UK (political) delegation. 3️⃣ Veteran journalists present said they couldn’t think of a precedent. The entire corps being manhandled by foreign representatives in an official diplomatic setting, but many also surprised and (understandably) disappointed that it all happened without complaint from the PM’s delegation. None of the press present seem to want to make a fuss. But it’s really worrying that nothing has been said about this during or after. 🇨🇳 diplomacy is increasingly assertive, and sending a signal that our journalists can be treated like this without any consequences will increase the likelihood of it happening again.

Let’s talk about this. Having spoken to several members of the press corps, here’s what happened: 1️⃣ When Starmer raised points of disagreement, the British press were *roughly* bundled out of the room by 🇨🇳security. 2️⃣ No complaints were raised by the UK (political) delegation. 3️⃣ Veteran journalists present said they couldn’t think of a precedent. The entire corps being manhandled by foreign representatives in an official diplomatic setting, but many also surprised and (understandably) disappointed that it all happened without complaint from the PM’s delegation. None of the press present seem to want to make a fuss. But it’s really worrying that nothing has been said about this during or after. 🇨🇳 diplomacy is increasingly assertive, and sending a signal that our journalists can be treated like this without any consequences will increase the likelihood of it happening again.

28,432 次观看

Who, listening to this, does not feel ashamed of what has befallen #HongKong

Who, listening to this, does not feel ashamed of what has befallen #HongKong

15,061 次观看

Videos

lukedepulford's profile picture

Is it true that "Taiwan has been a part of China since ancient times", as Beijing often claims? No, not at all. Here are some inconvenient facts which most people don't know. I invite the swarm of CCP trolls to try to unpick them. ✅ FACT: Before 1624, Taiwan was inhabited by indigenous Malay-Austronesian populations with no official Chinese administrative presence. ✅ FACT: The Dutch established formal administrative control over Taiwan in 1624, which was recognised by Ming Dynasty representatives as being "beyond [Chinese] territory." The Dutch found no evidence of Chinese administrative control. ✅ FACT: In 1662, the Ming loyalist Koxinga expelled the Dutch after himself being expelled from the mainland. He founded an independent kingdom, seeking to reestablish Ming rule. But the Ming Dynasty itself had already collapsed. This was not rule by "China". ✅ FACT: From 1683 to 1887, Taiwan was managed as a province of Fujien; but Emperor Kangxi considered Taiwan beyond his domain. Indeed, he said as much: ‘Taiwan is outside our empire and of no great consequence.’ There were popular revolts throughout this period. ✅ FACT: Taiwan was formally administered as a province of China for eight years, from 1887 until it was ceded to Japan in 1895. This is the only such period. Shorter than the Dutch. ✅ FACT: Following the 1895 Treaty of Shimonoseki, the Qing Empire ceded Taiwan to Japan "in perpetuity". ✅ FACT: Local leaders briefly declared an independent Formosa Republic in 1895 to resist Japanese rule, but the Japanese shut this down within five months. ✅ FACT: Between 1926 and 1942, both the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Kuomintang (KMT) supported independence for Taiwan, viewing it similarly to Korea (as an essential part of an anti-Japanese military strategy). ✅ FACT: The CCP changed its mind. After WW2, the party coalesced around an effort to reclaim "lost territories". In 1943 Cairo and 1945 Potsdam declarations were issued which, while not formal treaties, maintained that "all the territories Japan has stolen from the Chinese, such as Manchuria, Formosa (Taiwan), and the Pescadores, shall be restored to the Republic of China". The 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty left Taiwan’s legal status "undetermined." ✅ FACT: The People's Republic of China (established 1949) has never, in any capacity, exercised control over Taiwan. As to the territorial claim of what constitutes "China", worthy of note is the highly variable claims to territory (not to mention autonomy and governance structures) over even the past 150 years. See below.

Luke de Pulford

293,350 次观看 • 1 个月前

lukedepulford's profile picture

This is Jimmy Lai.

Luke de Pulford

88,888 次观看 • 3 个月前