@mcm_ct_usa
@mcm_ct_usa • 18,362 subscribers
Analytics - Markets - anti-communist - Commentary on Central Planner Misdeeds. Private/Member feed at @mcm_ct_markets
Videos
Well Seyed Mohammad Marandi absolutely perfectly sums up the situation expertly in response to Trump’s demented reckless Easter Sunday post Things are tremendously dangerous because Donald J. Trump is completely out of control and willing to do anything to usher in the third temple and his Messiah (the anti christ) and cover up his Epstein files “This is a psychopath. And you can only imagine what they have on him—what kind of leverage or dirt they hold. But Iran is not going to back down. When those 10 days are over, if he begins to annihilate Iran’s key infrastructure, then everything in the Persian Gulf region will be annihilated. That will be the end of Kuwait. That will be the end of Qatar. It will be the end of Saudi Arabia. It will be the end of Bahrain. And it will be the end of the United Arab Emirates. It will be over. Everyone will have to leave immediately and cross the desert. And by the way, we are in spring—the heat will rise quickly. The weather will become extremely hot. You’ve lived in that region—you understand how it is. In the Persian Gulf, everything depends on electricity. Without electricity, those regimes collapse immediately. And with that, everything tied to the U.S. presence in West Asia collapses overnight. Of course, the Iraqis will act, and Yemen will act. So if they go for all-out war, the Iranians will respond with all-out war, along with the Axis of Resistance. And who will be the biggest losers? Zionism. Trump. Netanyahu. Because the world will see who destroyed their world. Even in India, those who foolishly supported Netanyahu and Zionism—despite being viewed as inferior by them—will come to realize that it was Netanyahu and the Zionists who destroyed their lives. The world will see everything for what it is. So when the 10 days are over, he can do what he wants. But Iran will finish the job. We are determined to end this war—this aggression that has been directed against our country since 1953—once and for all. I think the key point, when discussing the Strait of Hormuz, is: what role would the United States actually play? They are not prepared to fight Iran directly in the Strait of Hormuz. Instead, they have been trying to encourage or pressure Europeans to take on that role. As we speak, European countries are in contact. They are trying to engage diplomatically with Iran. For example, just before this broadcast, Austria’s foreign minister said she had been speaking with Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, about facilitating tanker passage through the Strait of Hormuz. This is the reality: anyone seeking a solution must speak with Iran. No one else controls the Strait of Hormuz. That is exactly the point—the so-called “mafia don” is no longer in charge. They must deal with Iran. You saw this shift at the UN Security Council—France changed its position. They understand where the real power lies. Even if they joined the United States in the Strait of Hormuz, they would not change the outcome. They would only make things worse for themselves and for the world. The Strait of Hormuz is under Iran’s control, and going forward, it will remain under Iran’s control—potentially in coordination with Oman, if they choose to cooperate. But Iran will control the Strait of Hormuz. That is the reality now, whether the Americans or Europeans accept it or not. And the Europeans are beginning to recognize this. Trump, meanwhile, behaves like a five-year-old child—a psychopath throwing constant temper tantrums because things are not going his way. He’ll break his toys, your toys, everyone’s toys. And this is the person leading the United States. The political class around him is not much different—he is just more crude. The fact that European ships are now passing through safely reflects this shift. France changed its position. If Europeans want access to the Persian Gulf, they will have to change their mindset and their policies.”
@mcm_ct_usa424,046 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад
![The Alleged Secret Conference Call [alleged] At 1:34 a.m. on Thursday morning, Christmas Day, while markets were closed, six powerful figures in global finance reportedly held a 47-minute conference call. The participants included the Global Head of Commodities at JPMorgan, the Head of Derivatives Trading at HSBC, the CEO of the CME Group, a senior U.S. Treasury official, the representative for the Bank for International Settlements, and the chairman of the London Bullion Market Association. No official record or press release was made. The narrator claims a source on the call sent a message at 3:15 a.m. saying simply, “They agreed $75.” This was described as an emergency summit to prevent silver from crossing $75, a price level allegedly capable of triggering systemic collapse due to massive exposures in call options. $75 Is the Critical Line There are said to be 41,000 open call option contracts at the $75 strike price, expiring in January 2026, representing 205 million ounces of total exposure. Banks reportedly sold these options when silver was around $50, collecting premiums without proper hedging. At prices around $71-72, the banks remain comfortably hedged. However, if silver breaks and holds above $75 for more than 48 hours, delta hedging requirements would explode, potentially requiring 180 to 200 million ounces. With COMEX registered inventory at only about 24.8 million ounces, London withdrawals restricted, and ETFs frozen, delivery would become impossible, leading to price gaps toward $80, $85, and then $100 in a death spiral. The alleged agreement - a gentleman’s deal for coordinated selling to maintain a ceiling at $75, with regulatory cover and unlimited liquidity backstop from the BIS. What Happened on the Call The call was scheduled at 1:34 a.m. Eastern Time to avoid detection. The CME CEO reportedly opened by saying silver was refusing to stay down—they had smashed it to $70.16 earlier, but buyers rallied it back to $71.69, leaving it only $3.31 from the $75 strike. Volatility was too high, and a snap to $75 would force buying of 180 million ounces they could not deliver. A hard ceiling at $75 was needed. The JPMorgan executive spoke next, noting they were short about 35% of the contracts and already bleeding at $71.69, facing potential $500 million losses in 24 hours if $75 was breached. Coordinated action was essential. The Treasury official sounded urgent, viewing $100 silver as a macro threat signaling loss of confidence in the dollar, and offered support for stabilization efforts within legal parameters—interpreted by the narrator as permission to do whatever was needed. The deal involved coordinated selling whenever silver approached $73, political pressure on ETFs to halt buying, and unlimited dollar liquidity from the BIS for any bank in trouble. The call ended around 2:21 a.m. The Cap in Action On Wednesday, December 24, Christmas Eve, silver reached a high of $72.75 before a midnight dump crashed it to $70.16 in an attempt to break $70 support and induce panic. Physical buyers stepped in, rallying it back to close around $71.69. The narrator calls this a failed execution of the alleged plan, not random volatility. With markets reopening on Friday, December 26, a coordinated media campaign was expected, with experts claiming silver was overbought and demand slowing to discourage holders. Why the Cap Will Fail Banks can coordinate paper selling and print dollars, but they cannot create physical silver. There is a real 1.1 billion ounce annual deficit, refineries remain constrained, and crucially, Shanghai buyers are bidding massive premiums, purchasing physical at equivalent prices around $80 while dismissing paper games. As long as this arbitrage persists, physical will drain paper dry. JPMorgan, HSBC, and Scotia Mocatta pretending to cooperate, but bankers follow a prisoner’s dilemma. All are heavily short and losing money. If one covers, the price skyrockets, bankrupting the others](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2004563791166451719/amplify_video_thumb/2004563458830864384/img/zBcFa4sHDCZHpHVt.jpg)
The Alleged Secret Conference Call [alleged] At 1:34 a.m. on Thursday morning, Christmas Day, while markets were closed, six powerful figures in global finance reportedly held a 47-minute conference call. The participants included the Global Head of Commodities at JPMorgan, the Head of Derivatives Trading at HSBC, the CEO of the CME Group, a senior U.S. Treasury official, the representative for the Bank for International Settlements, and the chairman of the London Bullion Market Association. No official record or press release was made. The narrator claims a source on the call sent a message at 3:15 a.m. saying simply, “They agreed $75.” This was described as an emergency summit to prevent silver from crossing $75, a price level allegedly capable of triggering systemic collapse due to massive exposures in call options. $75 Is the Critical Line There are said to be 41,000 open call option contracts at the $75 strike price, expiring in January 2026, representing 205 million ounces of total exposure. Banks reportedly sold these options when silver was around $50, collecting premiums without proper hedging. At prices around $71-72, the banks remain comfortably hedged. However, if silver breaks and holds above $75 for more than 48 hours, delta hedging requirements would explode, potentially requiring 180 to 200 million ounces. With COMEX registered inventory at only about 24.8 million ounces, London withdrawals restricted, and ETFs frozen, delivery would become impossible, leading to price gaps toward $80, $85, and then $100 in a death spiral. The alleged agreement - a gentleman’s deal for coordinated selling to maintain a ceiling at $75, with regulatory cover and unlimited liquidity backstop from the BIS. What Happened on the Call The call was scheduled at 1:34 a.m. Eastern Time to avoid detection. The CME CEO reportedly opened by saying silver was refusing to stay down—they had smashed it to $70.16 earlier, but buyers rallied it back to $71.69, leaving it only $3.31 from the $75 strike. Volatility was too high, and a snap to $75 would force buying of 180 million ounces they could not deliver. A hard ceiling at $75 was needed. The JPMorgan executive spoke next, noting they were short about 35% of the contracts and already bleeding at $71.69, facing potential $500 million losses in 24 hours if $75 was breached. Coordinated action was essential. The Treasury official sounded urgent, viewing $100 silver as a macro threat signaling loss of confidence in the dollar, and offered support for stabilization efforts within legal parameters—interpreted by the narrator as permission to do whatever was needed. The deal involved coordinated selling whenever silver approached $73, political pressure on ETFs to halt buying, and unlimited dollar liquidity from the BIS for any bank in trouble. The call ended around 2:21 a.m. The Cap in Action On Wednesday, December 24, Christmas Eve, silver reached a high of $72.75 before a midnight dump crashed it to $70.16 in an attempt to break $70 support and induce panic. Physical buyers stepped in, rallying it back to close around $71.69. The narrator calls this a failed execution of the alleged plan, not random volatility. With markets reopening on Friday, December 26, a coordinated media campaign was expected, with experts claiming silver was overbought and demand slowing to discourage holders. Why the Cap Will Fail Banks can coordinate paper selling and print dollars, but they cannot create physical silver. There is a real 1.1 billion ounce annual deficit, refineries remain constrained, and crucially, Shanghai buyers are bidding massive premiums, purchasing physical at equivalent prices around $80 while dismissing paper games. As long as this arbitrage persists, physical will drain paper dry. JPMorgan, HSBC, and Scotia Mocatta pretending to cooperate, but bankers follow a prisoner’s dilemma. All are heavily short and losing money. If one covers, the price skyrockets, bankrupting the others
@mcm_ct_usa312,076 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад
"In a stunning late-night operation titled 'Neighborhood Takeover,' I had some friends of mine execute a raid on my neighbor Tom's house. He put up quite a fight, but we got through, and he is now in custody. I haven't liked what he's been doing over there for a while now, so I've decided to run his house myself.” - Jamie Kaler tiktok
@mcm_ct_usa20,757 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад
Больше нет контента для загрузки