Michael Reiners
@MCRReiners • 7,057 subscribers
Englishman, Writer, Lawyer, Cantab. Co-author of the @asi Freedom of Speech Bill (2026). Redrafting our constitution to fit our people, at: @ReinersProject.
Shorts
Videos
British speech law: "Why have the Lotus Eaters not been arrested yet?" asks Dan Tubb (Dan 🏴). We discuss how having an independent platform is one of the few affordable defences to censorial law. For the rest, the Adam Smith Institute Freedom of Speech Bill (2026) offers a permanent fix
Michael Reiners12,709 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag
Former PM Liz Truss & Toby Young (Toby Young) discuss the prospect of a "British First Amendment" ..to be passed on day one of a government & renewed by subsequent parliaments... We wrote such a Speech Bill last month, published by Adam Smith Institute, here:
Michael Reiners91,818 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
Britain is not a free country. In April 2025, I discussed speech suppression & censorship law with @LeeAlanHal on NTD news' British Thought Leaders In April 2026, with Adam Smith Institute, we drafted a Freedom of Speech Bill (2026), to address the laws which shackle the Englishman's speech.
Michael Reiners78,738 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
"The UK" is a recent creation. A successor state to Britain, with a diluted sense of identity. A fixation of the post-2000 era, "The UK" sees an uptick in use & implementation coinciding directly with the nation's acute demographic terraformation. From John Gillam:
Michael Reiners58,203 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
An Englishman, Welshman, Scotsman walk into a bar.. ..The British Citizenship Act of 1981 states "you're all just British Citizens, with no legal distinction". Such legally reductive thinking has led people to deny the existence of these distinct groups. From my discussion with John Gillam (John Gillam)
Michael Reiners68,693 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten
From my interview with Harrison Pitt and Charlie Downes for The New Culture Forum. Here we discuss the mode of operation of ‘Hope Not Hate’, who operate above the law & doxx, defame & are unwittingly uniting the British right against a common enemy. Watch here:
Michael Reiners125,715 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten
The time is ripe for a "Freedom of Speech Act" Various laws have deliberately constrained Britain's national conversation. The first step to addressing Britain's myriad problems is discussing them without fear of criminal penalty, loss of employment or professional regulation. From my discussion with Nick Dixon, on 'The Current Thing' .
Michael Reiners12,790 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten
The Public Order Act (1986) threatens to criminalise any speech regarding ethnicity which is not wholly positive – online & in the press – at a time when the Englishman has little positive to say about +1m 'Global South' net migration. From my interview for British Thought Leaders with Lee Hall. I further link my article for ConservativeHome on the subject of the POA's application to our speech landscape:
Michael Reiners44,384 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr
On the silencing of the British professional classes: The British state has always delighted in turning the working class, and their legitimate concerns, into mincemeat. More recently (the last 30 years) it has found it can similarly turn the professional classes into hamburger – limitations that squat upon our key institutions, stifling their ability to signal the economic & demographic decline Britain is experiencing at pace. The UK has over 90 professional regulatory bodies covering most forms of respectable work. Everyone from medical doctors to the Bar of England & Wales, from Members of Parliament to nurses, was entrusted to third-party regulatory steering entity which regulated what professionals, and their professional bodies may do and say – increasingly this is private conduct outside of professional work. These regulators, and hundreds of other permanent state bodies, are recent creations. There is also the Climate Change Committee (2008) with its net zero policy and SAGE (2009) who recommended placing Britain under house arrest for two years, the Office for Budget Responsibility (2010) – capable of ousting prime ministers if their budget is not approved, by way of the Bar Standards Board (2006). In the passing 30 years, every professional you can imagine was given a legislatively enshrined body to limit his agency on political grounds, and, create statutory responsibilities to monitor and promote equality and diversity in their industry, or at least, never to be seen to oppose it. I discussed this, and my essay England Is Under Attack, on British Thought Leaders in April 2025 – excerpt here.
Michael Reiners25,733 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten
Speech in Britain: 1) The Public Order Act (1986) forbids frank discussion of ethnicity 2) The Malicious Communications Act (1988) forbids 'gross offence' 3) The Online Safety Act (2023) forbids April fool's jokes From my interview for British Thought Leaders with Lee Hall
Michael Reiners38,301 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr
The Lucy Connolly case demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of internet culture from legislators, the judiciary, and the pubic. Online speech should be given the same exemptions from criminality afforded to boxers entering a ring. From my interview for British Thought Leaders.
Michael Reiners26,866 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr
Lucy Connolly's case isn't testing whether the working class can be silenced. Turning the working class, and their valid concerns, into mincemeat is a gleeful and centuries-old hobby for establishment institutions. Instead, this is a test of whether they can bludgeon the increasingly radicalised middle-class in the same manner. "Legal twitter" was delighted to see her convicted. These institutions are fighting for their lives against a tide of normal men & women. Our answer, as I have written extensively, ought be to repeal the Public Order Act (1986). Its use in recent years has been nothing short of an attempt to suppress the natural speech of the Englishman finally, and forever.
Michael Reiners13,234 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr
Keine weiteren Inhalte verfügbar