Michael Reiners
@MCRReiners • 9,386 subscribers
Englishman, Writer, Lawyer, Cantab. Co-author of the @asi Freedom of Speech Bill (2026). Redrafting our constitution to fit our people, at: @ReinersProject.
Shorts
Videos
This is how the Blairite constitution works to entrench itself, and maintains itself through devolution, outsourcing, and a form of "mandatory centrism" in political speech. 1) Paralysis of parliament through upward and downward outsourcing. You cannot govern, or provide common law solutions, as these things have been outsourced upward to European institutions (EU/ECHR). Simultaneously, the illusion of local government is created by make-believe regional parliaments and councils - this ensures most decisions have no true responsible party. 2) Entrenchment via devolution. You cannot leave the European institutions fully, as the creation of devolved entities, and nature of the GFA, provide leverage. The invented devolved arrangement creates a direct & parasitic relationship between the Celtic nations and the EU/ECHR, who now consider these essential for their continued existence. 3) Entrenchment via regulation of political speech. When it comes to the region where the population actually lives (England) you cannot address the real issues domestically (demographic terraformation), as you will be branded a criminal, rendered unemployed and forced into the welfare system after your savings are exhausted. Blairite centrism becomes the sole acceptable form of political expression, with all parties emulating it. Regulation of communications and individuals ensures that the press and professionals are obliged to suggest the arrangement is good, in fear of professional ruination or Ofcom penalty. I wrote extensively about this here several years ago, in Reiners Project. Ending this situation forms the basis of my legislative project:
Michael Reiners122,551 次观看 • 1 个月前
Jason Arday epitomises a major opstacle in Britain's quest for the freedom of speech: In this excerpt from the UCL 'BAME Awarding Gap Keynote Lecture, 2021' Jason Arday discusses why speech and language must not just be limited, but "corrected" because we live in a "hyper diverse multicultural society". Accidentally, he concedes that such a society requires such delicate navigation that it can no longer be permitted to speak freely, and naturally, requires men like Arday to determine those limits. The Jason Arday affair, demonstrates that race science remains an area of academic study at Oxbridge and beyond. Its key scholars are people such as as Dr Arday & Kehendie Andrews. The areas of research are: 1) how to demonise Britain's domestic population and occupy its institutions 2) how best to censor/penalise speech in any given space 3) how to advance their own racial in-group (by way of 1 and 2). This has broadly been called the 'decolonise' movement in Oxbridge over the passing decade. It all sounds and looks like this, by the way, and allowing this radical political movement to be academised has done immeasurable harm to our HE institutions and the quality of academics within them. Arday perfectly epitomises it.
Michael Reiners217,634 次观看 • 2 个月前
Have I got news for you (Have I Got News For You) recently had a woman I knew from the Cambridge footlights days on the show. Nobody anywhere near footlights was remotely funny - routine Edinburg fringe attendees - often had second homes in Edinburgh. All very “dads Google history” (clip below). Footlights revues (live sketch shows) were a screamingly pathetic substrate of wokery. Nothing amusing or heroic about this. With that said, if you keep up the act for long enough into adulthood, they will have Ian Hislop reach out.
Michael Reiners302,745 次观看 • 4 个月前
Britain is not a free country. In April 2025, I discussed speech suppression & censorship law with @LeeAlanHal on NTD news' British Thought Leaders In April 2026, with Adam Smith Institute, we drafted a Freedom of Speech Bill (2026), to address the laws which shackle the Englishman's speech.
Michael Reiners78,738 次观看 • 6 个月前
From my interview with Harrison Pitt and Charlie Downes for The New Culture Forum. Here we discuss the mode of operation of ‘Hope Not Hate’, who operate above the law & doxx, defame & are unwittingly uniting the British right against a common enemy. Watch here:
Michael Reiners130,828 次观看 • 1 年前
An Englishman, Welshman, Scotsman walk into a bar.. ..The British Citizenship Act of 1981 states "you're all just British Citizens, with no legal distinction". Such legally reductive thinking has led people to deny the existence of these distinct groups. From my discussion with John Gillam (John Gillam)
Michael Reiners68,715 次观看 • 7 个月前
Our police are fine tuned toward outsider-preference: In this footage, a man heckles a Pro-Palestinian protest in Central Leeds – for context, the North West is the heartland of the grooming scandal, and where these stories first became public knowledge. West Yorkshire Police wait until the precise moment that islamic rape gangs are mentioned – then, move to arrest the man in a team of 3. The arresting officer can be heard here stating simply: "it's a public order offence...it's a racially aggravated public order offence..." This comment suggests that Public Order Act 1986 s4a was the power Police believed they were using, as no other relevant statutory 'Public Order' offence can be racially aggravated (a table is enclosed below). The Public Order Act 1986 ("POA") ought be repealed in full; arrests such as this should not be occurring, they are not the currency of a free country. In our Freedom of Speech Bill (2026), published by Adam Smith Institute, myself Preston Byrne & Legal Style Blog suggest the POA's full repeal among a wide array of other freedom-reasserting measures:
Michael Reiners18,624 次观看 • 3 个月前
Speech in Britain: 1) The Public Order Act (1986) forbids frank discussion of ethnicity 2) The Malicious Communications Act (1988) forbids 'gross offence' 3) The Online Safety Act (2023) forbids April fool's jokes From my interview for British Thought Leaders with Lee Hall
Michael Reiners38,301 次观看 • 1 年前
British speech law: "Why have the Lotus Eaters not been arrested yet?" asks Dan Tubb (Dan 🏴). We discuss how having an independent platform is one of the few affordable defences to censorial law. For the rest, the Adam Smith Institute Freedom of Speech Bill (2026) offers a permanent fix
Michael Reiners13,287 次观看 • 4 个月前
The Lucy Connolly case demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of internet culture from legislators, the judiciary, and the pubic. Online speech should be given the same exemptions from criminality afforded to boxers entering a ring. From my interview for British Thought Leaders.
Michael Reiners26,866 次观看 • 1 年前
The time is ripe for a "Freedom of Speech Act" Various laws have deliberately constrained Britain's national conversation. The first step to addressing Britain's myriad problems is discussing them without fear of criminal penalty, loss of employment or professional regulation. From my discussion with Nick Dixon, on 'The Current Thing' .
Michael Reiners12,790 次观看 • 7 个月前