Mr. Gerald Wayne's banner
Mr. Gerald Wayne's profile picture

Mr. Gerald Wayne

@MisterWayne • 5,446 subscribers

Accountability | Veterans | Heroes | Cold Cases | Sports | Geopolitics

Shorts

WHAT IF THE $300K WAS NEVER ABOUT THE DEBATE? Here’s a different angle worth asking. Andrew Wilson reportedly put up $300,000 to debate Candace Owens, and Patrick Bet-David moderated the August 14 showdown. But watching it, Andrew looked strangely underprepared for somebody willing to put that kind of money on the table. So what exactly was $300,000 buying? Because the debate took place inside Candace’s personal studio. Now I want to be clear. I have seen ZERO evidence Andrew, Patrick, or anyone on their teams planted surveillance equipment, compromised her network, or collected data from devices inside the house. But from a security perspective, access matters. If multiple outside production teams, electronics, cameras, microphones, laptops, phones and networking equipment enter a private residence, you better know exactly what came in and exactly what left. That isn't accusing somebody of espionage. It's asking why anyone in Candace’s position wouldn't treat the entire event like a security problem. Especially when the people involved have spent months maneuvering through public accusations, negotiations and media narratives. Maybe Andrew simply paid $300K for a debate he barely prepared for. Or perhaps the bigger lesson has nothing to do with Andrew at all. Never confuse somebody being invited into your house with somebody earning your trust. My name is Mr. Wayne. RedLines Out. #CandaceOwens #Media #Politics

WHAT IF THE $300K WAS NEVER ABOUT THE DEBATE? Here’s a different angle worth asking. Andrew Wilson reportedly put up $300,000 to debate Candace Owens, and Patrick Bet-David moderated the August 14 showdown. But watching it, Andrew looked strangely underprepared for somebody willing to put that kind of money on the table. So what exactly was $300,000 buying? Because the debate took place inside Candace’s personal studio. Now I want to be clear. I have seen ZERO evidence Andrew, Patrick, or anyone on their teams planted surveillance equipment, compromised her network, or collected data from devices inside the house. But from a security perspective, access matters. If multiple outside production teams, electronics, cameras, microphones, laptops, phones and networking equipment enter a private residence, you better know exactly what came in and exactly what left. That isn't accusing somebody of espionage. It's asking why anyone in Candace’s position wouldn't treat the entire event like a security problem. Especially when the people involved have spent months maneuvering through public accusations, negotiations and media narratives. Maybe Andrew simply paid $300K for a debate he barely prepared for. Or perhaps the bigger lesson has nothing to do with Andrew at all. Never confuse somebody being invited into your house with somebody earning your trust. My name is Mr. Wayne. RedLines Out. #CandaceOwens #Media #Politics

230,164 Aufrufe

Of course you do. You all usually stick together. And im not talking about jews, im referring to predators and deviants. Kraft gets nabbed in an asia sex parlor contributing to human trafficking and then goes on to get lawyer advice from Jeffery Epstein aka Mr Sleazeball himself. And let's not forget about your comments as well Dave. “I never condone r*pe, but if you’re a size 6 and you’re wearing skinny jeans, you kind of deserve to be r*ped.”

Sensitive content

Of course you do. You all usually stick together. And im not talking about jews, im referring to predators and deviants. Kraft gets nabbed in an asia sex parlor contributing to human trafficking and then goes on to get lawyer advice from Jeffery Epstein aka Mr Sleazeball himself. And let's not forget about your comments as well Dave. “I never condone r*pe, but if you’re a size 6 and you’re wearing skinny jeans, you kind of deserve to be r*ped.”

71,239 Aufrufe

The DC Gaslighter Every time I hear Green Lantern I always think of this lol

The DC Gaslighter Every time I hear Green Lantern I always think of this lol

465,077 Aufrufe

BREAKING: This admin and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth are keeping this quiet for some stupid reason but there are numerous United States KIA and WIA spread through the dozen US bases that were struck: 30+ KIA to include at least 15 officers. 2+ Lieutenant Colonels, 1 Colonel. And a possible 1 star(not confirmed 100% yet) 100+ WIA This is coming from numerous military sources at DOHA and other important places taking in the injured. Confirm the report Secretary. #israel #Iranian

BREAKING: This admin and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth are keeping this quiet for some stupid reason but there are numerous United States KIA and WIA spread through the dozen US bases that were struck: 30+ KIA to include at least 15 officers. 2+ Lieutenant Colonels, 1 Colonel. And a possible 1 star(not confirmed 100% yet) 100+ WIA This is coming from numerous military sources at DOHA and other important places taking in the injured. Confirm the report Secretary. #israel #Iranian

30,776 Aufrufe

Videos

MisterWayne's profile picture

🚨 VIDEO FRAME ANALYSIS. WHAT THE CAMERA ACTUALLY SHOWS 🚨 This still is from ICE Agent Johnathan David Ross's own cellphone footage. It matters bc perspective matters. First. Camera angle. The phone is already canted off the driver side. That means the agent was not directly in front of the vehicle. He’s offset. Side angle. Not a head-on threat. Second. Steering input. Look at the driver’s hands. That is a classic hand-over-hand steering motion. That’s how u turn a wheel to redirect a vehicle. Not how u accelerate straight into someone. The motion is consistent with turning away, not charging forward. Third. Vehicle movement. From the camera’s perspective the vehicle is angling away from the agent, not tracking directly toward him. The front wheels are turned. The hood line shifts laterally. Physics doesn’t lie even when press releases do. Fourth. Agent positioning. Federal use-of-force training is explicit. Do not cross in front of a moving vehicle. Officers are trained to angle off. create distance. disengage. Stepping into the path of a car collapses the decision tree into lethal force. That’s called manufacturing a threat. Fifth. Policy. ICE follows DHS Use of Force Policy. It mirrors DOJ standards. Firearms are not to be discharged at moving vehicles unless deadly force is unavoidable. Officers are expected to move out of the vehicle’s path when feasible. Standing in front of a car then firing violates core training doctrine. Bottom line. The camera angle shows he wasn’t squarely in front. The driver’s hands show she was turning. The vehicle trajectory shows lateral movement away. The agent crossed in front anyway. This isn’t hindsight quarterbacking. This is video. geometry. and the policy ICE agents are trained to follow. Spin fades. Frames don’t. What's your thoughts?

Mr. Gerald Wayne

28,914 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Keine weiteren Inhalte verfügbar