𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦
@OopsGuess • 59,517 subscribers
Resisting oblivion by recording how people remain human in a world collapsing into noise. Clarity is rebellion. Memory is the weapon.
Shorts
Videos
China responds to Trump’s allegations of election fraud in Brazil: You tried to influence the election. Your side lost. Now you call the result “rigged.” We recognize the Brazilian people’s choice. At this point, Washington is no longer being humiliated by others. It is humiliating itself.
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦1,179,700 просмотров • 4 дней назад
Japan complained that China was not showing “appropriate respect” to Sanae Takaichi because Chinese Foreign Ministry briefings have repeatedly referred to her simply as “Sanae Takaichi” rather than “Prime Minister of Japan.” China’s response was one sentence: “China has made its position on the current China-Japan relationship clear on many occasions.” That answer is colder than an insult. Chinese diplomacy is usually rigidly formal. Titles, protocol and ceremonial language are maintained even when relations are terrible. So when Beijing deliberately strips away the title, it is not casual rudeness. It is political demotion. Takaichi declared that “a Taiwan emergency is a Japan emergency,” inserting Japan directly into a question of China’s sovereignty. Beijing’s response is almost surgical: If this is your personal political crusade, China does not have to elevate it into the position of the Japanese state. Calling her “Sanae Takaichi” rather than “Prime Minister Takaichi” creates a line between the individual and the country she claims to speak for. And perhaps that is the real message: Your hostility is yours. Do not assume China has granted it the dignity of becoming Japan’s national position. In diplomacy, insults are emotional. Demotion is structural.
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦779,107 просмотров • 22 дней назад
There is a very small moment in this video that I find unusually tender. During Xi Jinping and Peng Liyuan’s visit to the U.S. National Archives, Xi is speaking with Melania Trump while Peng is trying to look more closely at an exhibit. She does not interrupt him. She simply places a hand lightly at his waist. Xi turns his head just slightly, understands immediately, and quietly shifts forward to make room for her. No words. No performance. No exaggerated affection. Just the kind of instinctive coordination that exists between two people who have spent a very long time beside each other. What I like most is how restrained it is. Peng’s gesture is gentle and almost private. Xi’s response is immediate and equally understated. For a few seconds, the symbolism of power disappears. What remains is something far more ordinary: a wife asking for a little space without saying a word, and a husband understanding her before she has to ask twice. There is something deeply Chinese about that kind of tenderness too — not displayed, not announced, simply understood.
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦530,090 просмотров • 18 дней назад
Now compare that to China in 2023: A woman in Hunan ran around the street swinging two kitchen knives, endangering anyone nearby. Chinese police spent minutes blocking, distancing, shielding, trying to stop her without lethal force, and finally subdued her without killing her. Same “danger,”two completely different doctrines: – China: Contain, de-escalate, protect civilians, preserve life. – USA: Shoot first, justify later, blame the victim, call it “freedom.” So when Americans call China a police state, we calmly reply: If this is “freedom,” we’re fine without it.
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦5,458,913 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад
Same fire. Same destruction. Different vocabulary. Hong Kong, 2019: Macron called for “dialogue,” “restraint” and “de-escalation.” Paris, 2026: Macron condemns the violence, vows there will be “no compromise,” and says rioters, looters and those attacking the Republic must pay the price. Apparently when streets burned in Hong Kong, the answer was dialogue. When streets burn in Paris, the answer is law and order. Violence did not change. The address did. Western principles have always had a postal code.
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦125,227 просмотров • 10 дней назад
In response to Japanese Defense Minister Shinjiro Koizumi’s remarks on China’s nuclear arsenal, Beijing’s retort left him virtually no dignity to salvage: Japanese politicians need remedial lessons in history and international law. In plain English: China’s nuclear status is part of the post-war international order. Japan’s non-nuclear status is also part of the post-war international order. You do not get to erase the distinction between a victorious power and a defeated aggressor simply because that distinction now makes you uncomfortable. You are Japan’s defense minister, yet you apparently lack the basic historical and legal knowledge required to discuss your own country’s post-war status. Go study first. Imagine being Japan’s defense minister and needing China’s Foreign Ministry to explain why a defeated fascist state does not possess the same post-war rights as the victorious power that defeated it.
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦155,044 просмотров • 12 дней назад
Trump hasn’t even landed in Beijing yet, and China has already removed half his props. Taiwan? No. Hong Kong? Internal affair. Iran sanctions? Illegal. Soybeans? Ask the competent authorities. Beautiful. He wanted a deal-making stage. Beijing handed him a rulebook.
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦2,206,165 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад
“This isn’t China,” they say. But the cranes are. The automation system is. Even the dream of “reviving American manufacturing”, was made in China. Fun fact: During Obama’s speech on rebuilding U.S. industry, the ZPMC logo of the Chinese-made cranes behind him was awkwardly covered by an American flag. The wind blew. The logo reappeared. History has a sense of humor.
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦4,796,863 просмотров • 1 год назад
When China’s Foreign Ministry welcomes more foreign tourists to visit the country, there is a certain irony behind the message. China spent years trying to explain itself to the world. Then it discovered that the most effective propaganda was to stop explaining and simply let people come and look. Visa-free travel achieved what official messaging often could not: it turned foreign visitors into accidental witnesses. Western media could describe China from thousands of kilometers away. Tourists could livestream the subways, streets, shops, trains, food, and ordinary life in real time. And reality turned out to be a much better public-relations department than bureaucracy ever was.
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦123,978 просмотров • 14 дней назад
China’s warning to the United States can be translated as: You can overthrow Maduro. You can kidnap him. You can rewrite Venezuela’s politics. You cannot rewrite China’s contracts. China–Venezuela commercial agreements are protected by international law and by the laws of both countries. Washington is not a party to those contracts. Regime change does not magically erase Chinese assets, debts, concessions or commercial rights. And Beijing’s last sentence is the actual warning: China’s lawful rights and interests in Venezuela must be protected. In plain English: Whatever you do to Caracas, keep your fucking hands off China’s property.
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦472,181 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
Sorry, but Chinese athletes really are that confident. Gold medals in hand, laughing, dancing, showing them off. If the Japanese can’t stand the sight of it, that sounds like your own problem. Don’t worry. If you see enough Chinese gold medals, eventually you’ll get used to it.
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦201,518 просмотров • 29 дней назад
China threw the table over at the United Nations, singling out and rebutting—one by one—the UK, Australia, Japan, Ireland, the Czech Republic, and Lithuania for stigmatizing China’s human rights record. The era of the West saying “human rights” and expecting China to bow is over. Chinese people are no longer impressed by moral vocabulary detached from material reality. Fix your poverty. Fix your racism. Fix your collapsing trust. Fix your own people’s lives. China has never needed—and does not need—to model its human rights standards on the West’s so-called human rights. China’s conception of human rights is grounded in a reality where people can live and work with security and dignity, where the country is prosperous and strong, and where national dignity means no one gets to dictate to China or sit in judgment over it. What the West calls “human rights” is not a crown. It is a slogan they keep wearing to hide the cracks underneath. The West turned “human rights” into a certificate it issues to itself. China no longer recognizes the issuing authority.
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦163,554 просмотров • 24 дней назад
While the U.S. is busy renaming "AI" to "SI," China is quietly engineering the future of energy. China has just completed the construction of the world's largest superconducting magnet for thermonuclear devices. Weighing 582 tons and measuring 21 meters in length, the magnet is capable of storing approximately 120 gigajoules of energy. It will be used to confine plasma at temperatures exceeding 100 million degrees Celsius—a key technology for future thermonuclear reactors. They call it “the artificial sun.” Maybe that’s the real enlightenment. ☀️
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦141,370 просмотров • 25 дней назад
So China’s basic response is: If the United States were still confident in its own competitiveness, it would not need to turn every Chinese civilian project into a national security emergency. A port becomes a threat. A railway becomes a threat. A telecom network becomes a threat. Even an undersea cable becomes a weapon. China builds infrastructure. Washington builds panic around it. America no longer asks whether a Chinese project works. It asks how quickly it can be killed before the world notices it works better. When an empire can no longer lead, it tries to cripple those who can.
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦454,420 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад
China was hit harder on its own side and still has hundreds of people unaccounted for. Its first responsibility is obvious: rescue its own citizens, restore access, stabilize the disaster zone, and prevent secondary casualties. That is what a functioning state is supposed to do. And even while dealing with its own losses, China still said it is ready to provide emergency assistance to Nepal if needed. Rescue first. Politics later. The people turning this disaster into anti-China content are the ones doing propaganda.
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦304,269 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад
China has responded to the Philippines’ summoning of the Chinese ambassador. In plain English: stop playing the victim after spending all your time provoking China. Enough with the 贼喊捉贼 routine — provoking first, then screaming “bully” when China answers back.
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦52,785 просмотров • 11 дней назад
Indian media pressed Beijing for details about the “actual cause” of the China-Nepal mudslide disaster and whether Indian tourists had been rescued. Think about that. India’s anti-China propaganda trolls have been relentlessly spreading rumors and slandering China since the disaster began. Now Indian media are asking Beijing whether Indian tourists have been rescued. A glacier collapsed in Nepal. The disaster surged into China. Chinese rescue workers risked their lives searching for both their own citizens and foreign tourists. And even then, India’s anti-China propaganda apparatus kept manufacturing lies and smearing China. Not even after learning that more than 130 of the missing tourists were Indians could they stop. That is what makes this disaster so revealing. One side sent soldiers, engineers and rescue teams into the mud. The other side had propagandists manufacturing anti-China fantasies before their own missing compatriots had even been accounted for. The contrast is not just technological or institutional. It is educational. It is civic. It is moral. And yes, much of this hostility toward China is driven by resentment of a reality they cannot stand: China has outperformed India in industrial capacity, infrastructure, technology, state capacity and disaster response — and no amount of anti-China hysteria can erase that gap. When envy becomes propaganda, and propaganda survives even your own people’s suffering, what remains is not patriotism. It is moral decay wearing nationalism as a costume.
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦290,657 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад
Singapore did not wake up one morning and lose its Chinese cultural continuity. It spent decades teaching ethnic Chinese that Chineseness was merely ancestry. From closing Nanyang University and dismantling the Chinese-medium school system to relegating Mandarin from a language of education, knowledge and public life to a subordinate “mother tongue” subject, Singapore made English the primary gatekeeper of upward mobility, elite status, modernity and national belonging. Only now is Singapore discovering that an identity reduced to a surname and a census category does not reproduce itself. Today, only about a third of Chinese households still use Mandarin at home, and its prime minister is suddenly warning that Singapore must preserve its “Asian identity.” You cannot spend generations cutting the civilizational cord and then act surprised when the language stops being inherited. No matter how flawless your English or how thoroughly Westernized your worldview, in the eyes of mainstream white society in Europe and America, an East Asian face does not magically become “one of us.” This deliberate betrayal and severing of its own civilizational roots deprived Singapore’s Chinese population of the profound confidence rooted in five thousand years of civilization, leaving them as “rootless trees” adrift in the Strait of Malacca. Now, confronted with China’s rise, the arrival of the Asian century, and its own accelerating cultural hollowing-out, Singapore’s leadership is frantically calling for the preservation of “Asian identity” and mother-tongue proficiency. When you drain the soul from a civilization and leave behind only an English-speaking post-colonial shell with a Chinese surname, appeals to “Asian identity” decades later are not cultural revival. They are a band-aid placed over an amputation.
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦308,709 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад
🇨🇳 China is now building cities the way other countries assemble smartphones. A 50-meter “super factory” in Shenzhen is rolling out prefab units where 90% of walls, piping, and systems are completed before they ever reach a construction site. By 2030, 40% of all new buildings in China will come from factories like this. Meanwhile, the United States is still arguing about how to fix a bridge from the 1960s.
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦1,237,117 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад
🇯🇵🇺🇸🇨🇳 Takaichi didn’t “soften” her tone because of Beijing alone. She backed down because she accidentally touched the foundation of the entire US-led postwar order. Recognizing Taiwan’s “legal status” isn’t a China–Japan issue, it would mean Japan is rebelling against the legal structure written into the San Francisco Treaty, the very system the United States built after 1945. No American president, whether Trump, Biden, or anyone else, would protect a Japanese politician trying to rewrite that architecture on a microphone. So Takaichi didn’t retreat from China. She retreated from international law, from Washington’s red lines, and from Japan’s own postwar commitments. This is why she now says: • “We maintain nongovernmental relations with Taiwan.” • “We are not in a position to recognize Taiwan’s legal status.” • “Japan has always maintained constructive dialogue with China.” That’s not diplomacy. That’s someone being pulled back to reality by the collar. And let’s be honest: there were only two adults in the room, China and the U.S.; Tokyo was shouting from the hallway, hoping someone would notice. As for Taiwan? It’s at the bottom of the geopolitical food chain, yet somehow insists it’s the protagonist of the story.
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦1,384,564 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад