Peter
@peterpeccavi • 1,273 subscribers
☧ 1689. Churchman. Puritan Hope. Covenant Nationhood. History Nerd. Entrepreneur. ADV Rider: BMW R1300GS / Ural Ranger. Gun aficionado.
Videos
Revisionism is retarded. So Joel & Co says, “Protestantism is the tragic reaction to the abuses of Rome… because the Jews infiltrated the Roman Church.” Except there’s no serious scholarship--Catholic, Protestant, or secular--that explains the Reformation in those terms. It’s not even a minority view. It’s fully outside the bounds of historical method. And the most retarded statement I’ve ever heard: “Atheism is a Jewish project.” Except modern atheism develops out of multiple streams: Enlightenment rationalism (e.g., David Hume), Materialism and political philosophy (e.g., Karl Marx), and Existentialism (e.g., Nietzsche). These figures disagree with each other on practically everything except criticism of religion. They’re not part of a coordinated “Jewish project,” and they’re certainly not unified by ethnicity. Also historically, atheism has appeared in multiple civilizations including ancient Greek philosophy and strands of Indian thought. It’s interesting to watch men who claim to be Reformed abandon the doctrine of God’s providence the moment history gets uncomfortable. Instead of confessing that God sovereignly governs all things, even the rise of error, corruption, and unbelief, they reach for conspiracies to explain what Scripture already accounts for: the sinful reasoning of fallen man. To suggest that events like the Protestant Reformation or the rise of atheism require some hidden ethnic infiltration is not a defense of the faith. It is a denial, in practice, that God ordains whatsoever comes to pass. This is not apologetics, it’s an unsound conspiratorial mind and fear mongering framing everything as a Jewish scapegoat. 2 Tim 1:7 For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind.
Peter13,436 次观看 • 3 个月前
![Only one side argued consistently from Scripture. Excellent work Ruslan GodLogic_GL. Two points I’d like to comment on, being that Joel’s “church” is confessional 1689: Joel & friends said there is no restriction for polygamy in the NT, appealing to natural law as the standard. The 1689 and Scripture disagree: LBCF Chapter 25: Of Marriage, Section 1 Marriage is to be between one man and one woman; neither is it lawful for any man to have more than one wife, nor for any woman to have more than one husband at the same time.[1] [1] Gen 2:24, Mal 2:15, Matt 19:5-6 Joel also completely straw manned at the end, and he doubled down when pressed saying “it was not a strawman” that “it is permissible for a 5 year old boy who has made a credible profession and has been baptized to marry.” Is Joel a pedophile? Scripture and the Reformed faith disagree. It is not lawful, as a 5 year old *boy* is not able with judgement to give consent. They kept appealing to general revelation, except special revelation governs general revelation. LBCF Chapter 25: Of Marriage, Section 3 It is lawful for all sorts of people to marry, who are able with judgment to give their consent;[1] yet it is the duty of Christians to marry in the Lord;[2] and therefore such as profess the true religion, should not marry with infidels, or idolaters; neither should such as are godly, be unequally yoked, by marrying with such as are wicked in their life, or maintain damnable heresy.[3] [1] Heb 13:4, 1 Tim 4:3 [2] 1 Cor 7:39 [3] Neh. 13:25-27](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2012010793919991882/amplify_video_thumb/2012010671811280898/img/EWHNO9VtfmzpZJ4q.jpg)
Only one side argued consistently from Scripture. Excellent work Ruslan GodLogic_GL. Two points I’d like to comment on, being that Joel’s “church” is confessional 1689: Joel & friends said there is no restriction for polygamy in the NT, appealing to natural law as the standard. The 1689 and Scripture disagree: LBCF Chapter 25: Of Marriage, Section 1 Marriage is to be between one man and one woman; neither is it lawful for any man to have more than one wife, nor for any woman to have more than one husband at the same time.[1] [1] Gen 2:24, Mal 2:15, Matt 19:5-6 Joel also completely straw manned at the end, and he doubled down when pressed saying “it was not a strawman” that “it is permissible for a 5 year old boy who has made a credible profession and has been baptized to marry.” Is Joel a pedophile? Scripture and the Reformed faith disagree. It is not lawful, as a 5 year old *boy* is not able with judgement to give consent. They kept appealing to general revelation, except special revelation governs general revelation. LBCF Chapter 25: Of Marriage, Section 3 It is lawful for all sorts of people to marry, who are able with judgment to give their consent;[1] yet it is the duty of Christians to marry in the Lord;[2] and therefore such as profess the true religion, should not marry with infidels, or idolaters; neither should such as are godly, be unequally yoked, by marrying with such as are wicked in their life, or maintain damnable heresy.[3] [1] Heb 13:4, 1 Tim 4:3 [2] 1 Cor 7:39 [3] Neh. 13:25-27
Peter12,194 次观看 • 6 个月前
没有更多内容可加载