ProMint's banner

ProMint

@ProMint_X • 5,972 subscribers

Real alpha no AI-slop Strategic advisor to Web3 founders. Product, GTM, incentive design & crypto-native growth. DMs open

Shorts

Noxa is a cancer that is killing Robinhood NOXA is the largest launchpad on Robinhood It pulled in around $15M in fees over just a few days But now, the platform is consistently getting hit with DDoS attacks every couple of days, and the site goes down. I can’t say for certain, but I know a few people who might be intentionally launching DDoS attacks just to make money. Take a close look at the Top Traders The top 30 traders all share the exact same buying and selling pattern. Buying when the token dips due to a DDoS attack Selling once the token recovers and the site is back up Don’t you think that’s a little too suspicious? Is it possible that the team itself is crashing their own launchpad to profit off of it? AmunPhantom, care to comment on my theory and explain how a project pulling in $15M in fees can’t fend off basic DDoS attacks?

Noxa is a cancer that is killing Robinhood NOXA is the largest launchpad on Robinhood It pulled in around $15M in fees over just a few days But now, the platform is consistently getting hit with DDoS attacks every couple of days, and the site goes down. I can’t say for certain, but I know a few people who might be intentionally launching DDoS attacks just to make money. Take a close look at the Top Traders The top 30 traders all share the exact same buying and selling pattern. Buying when the token dips due to a DDoS attack Selling once the token recovers and the site is back up Don’t you think that’s a little too suspicious? Is it possible that the team itself is crashing their own launchpad to profit off of it? AmunPhantom, care to comment on my theory and explain how a project pulling in $15M in fees can’t fend off basic DDoS attacks?

70,755 views

TOP CEXES ARE BACKING THE $LAB PONZI $LAB lost half its market cap in a single day But 8 hours later, it bounced back by $2B How can a token with zero utility pull off something like this? Everyone knows it's a crime cabal of a few exchanges and MMs But nobody is doing anything about it If you have any positions left in $LAB - sell.

TOP CEXES ARE BACKING THE $LAB PONZI $LAB lost half its market cap in a single day But 8 hours later, it bounced back by $2B How can a token with zero utility pull off something like this? Everyone knows it's a crime cabal of a few exchanges and MMs But nobody is doing anything about it If you have any positions left in $LAB - sell.

19,212 views

Let’s be real - we don’t need anything besides Polymarket and Kalshi But I still made a prediction markets tier list: S tier Polymarket - King Kalshi - CFTC Beast A tier predict.fun - BNB Beast Kairos - a16z Aggregator Melee - Viral Solana sapience.fun - AI Agents B tier fireplace - Social Terminal Triadfi - Solana Hub Earlybird - Pre-IPO King - Conviction Markets C tier Bento.fun - Micro Duels Probable - Zero Fee D tier Reppo - AI Data 42 - Niche Multiplier - Cultural

Let’s be real - we don’t need anything besides Polymarket and Kalshi But I still made a prediction markets tier list: S tier Polymarket - King Kalshi - CFTC Beast A tier predict.fun - BNB Beast Kairos - a16z Aggregator Melee - Viral Solana sapience.fun - AI Agents B tier fireplace - Social Terminal Triadfi - Solana Hub Earlybird - Pre-IPO King - Conviction Markets C tier Bento.fun - Micro Duels Probable - Zero Fee D tier Reppo - AI Data 42 - Niche Multiplier - Cultural

26,976 views

Wild unfair resolution on Polymarket Trump stated on May 29 that the US is lifting the Hormuz blockade and they’re basically at the finish line. Right at that exact moment, the team altered the resolve rules. Polymarket prematurely called it a "YES" at 86%, then later reversed their decision to trigger a dispute. They eventually walked it back and opened a dispute, but the market was never paused or archived - trading just kept running. People got completely wiped out simply because the team decided to shift the goalposts on the fly

Wild unfair resolution on Polymarket Trump stated on May 29 that the US is lifting the Hormuz blockade and they’re basically at the finish line. Right at that exact moment, the team altered the resolve rules. Polymarket prematurely called it a "YES" at 86%, then later reversed their decision to trigger a dispute. They eventually walked it back and opened a dispute, but the market was never paused or archived - trading just kept running. People got completely wiped out simply because the team decided to shift the goalposts on the fly

10,474 views

Videos

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.ai•Sponsored•Livecam

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

Exclusive private shows

1.2k viewers online

Private Show

Join now for exclusive access

Free preview available • Premium content

Ken Griffin don't give a fuck about AI This is what a real investor fucking looks like... Ken Griffin, CEO of Citadel, said AI is slop. They bring him AI-generated industry reports, and they're complete trash, which is why he thinks AI is garbage. Yet today he made hundreds of millions of dollars on AI infrastructure stocks. This man is literally the definition of the Wolf of Wall Street.

Ken Griffin don't give a fuck about AI This is what a real investor fucking looks like... Ken Griffin, CEO of Citadel, said AI is slop. They bring him AI-generated industry reports, and they're complete trash, which is why he thinks AI is garbage. Yet today he made hundreds of millions of dollars on AI infrastructure stocks. This man is literally the definition of the Wolf of Wall Street.

471,241 views • 22 days ago

How Ansem Crimed $ANSEM Bullposting on $SOL and the trenches Pumped the market cap hundreds of x's purely off his name and CT hype His bag is valued at $30M Made $500K in creator fees on Pump.fun Airdropped all creator fees to the community Regained the community's respect after a string of scams He’ll keep the remaining creator fees and dump the rest of his bag He’s going to come out a hero because of the airdrop, while pocketing $1-2M from the dump And after this, people will pile into his next launches with even more confidence, making him even more money Ansem 🐂🀄️ is playing 4D chess right in front of your eyes.

How Ansem Crimed $ANSEM Bullposting on $SOL and the trenches Pumped the market cap hundreds of x's purely off his name and CT hype His bag is valued at $30M Made $500K in creator fees on Pump.fun Airdropped all creator fees to the community Regained the community's respect after a string of scams He’ll keep the remaining creator fees and dump the rest of his bag He’s going to come out a hero because of the airdrop, while pocketing $1-2M from the dump And after this, people will pile into his next launches with even more confidence, making him even more money Ansem 🐂🀄️ is playing 4D chess right in front of your eyes.

363,788 views • 1 month ago

Are you ready to be drained today? se, Co-Founder of fomo, stated that all of Fomo's code was built by AI. Even the non-tech team writes code using AI. For security purposes, all of this code is audited by humans, but don't you think that after a $94M fundraise, the platform should be completely safe for users? Because of vibecode, many people are raising questions. Se Young also stated that the team still hasn't used the money from the latest $75M raise and is growing on revenue. For me, it is completely unclear why a small team that has stable revenue and runs everything on vibecode needs that much money. You don't want to scale the team, and you've had affiliates for a long time. Where do you plan to spend this $75M, and is the platform safe right now? Sw, in the podcast you said you answer all questions on CT and this question is currently the most important one. Funds are safu?

Are you ready to be drained today? se, Co-Founder of fomo, stated that all of Fomo's code was built by AI. Even the non-tech team writes code using AI. For security purposes, all of this code is audited by humans, but don't you think that after a $94M fundraise, the platform should be completely safe for users? Because of vibecode, many people are raising questions. Se Young also stated that the team still hasn't used the money from the latest $75M raise and is growing on revenue. For me, it is completely unclear why a small team that has stable revenue and runs everything on vibecode needs that much money. You don't want to scale the team, and you've had affiliates for a long time. Where do you plan to spend this $75M, and is the platform safe right now? Sw, in the podcast you said you answer all questions on CT and this question is currently the most important one. Funds are safu?

99,654 views • 1 month ago

I know WHY Robinhood Chain died And 99% of people are blaming the wrong thing. The real reason? Snipers + stupid devs = 💀 On NOXA, tokens launched directly into Uniswap V3 pools - with no bonding curve and no liquidity migration. Noxa tried to protect launches with a few temporary restrictions: — You couldn’t buy a token in the same block it was created. — Each individual buy was capped. — All restrictions disappeared after 366 blocks (roughly one hour). The problem? These protections looked much stronger on paper than they were in practice. The 2% supply limit per wallet meant almost nothing when one operator could spread purchases across dozens of fresh wallets. Trading could start at a random interval between 2 and 60 seconds. Anonymous teams were already building and selling tools designed to spam launches and wash trade. Noxa has earned $12M in fees and at least half of that value was captured by snipers. Back on July 11, the Noxa team released an update attempting to address the spam and fake-volume problem. But the clearest example of what was already happening is $ARROW: 200 interconnected wallets. 80% of the supply. None of these wallets had any prior EVM history and they all bought $ARROW within the first three minutes of launch. This entire situation was severely exacerbated by Robinhood's architecture. Robinhood Chain officially uses a first-come, first-served (FCFS) sequencing model. Transaction ordering is determined by the exact time they reach the sequencer, not by who pays a higher gas fee. This means the ultimate advantage didn't go to those who paid more gas, but to those who had the fastest RPCs, automated bundlers and the lowest latency to the sequencer. The block time for RH is up to 100ms, so by flooding every 100ms, you can almost guarantee that you’ll be among the first to buy. Additionally, some optimizations in the sniper smart contract have made flooding cheaper than with others. Anyone who has been in the Robinhood trenches since day one remembers that the space was originally pure PvE. There were no bot wars and even beginners could easily trade. But once the bots entered the game, things became incredibly difficult. Additionally, as far as I know, there was a group of people executing DDoS attacks on the frontend. They would buy the dips and then sell off once the website went down and retail couldn't access it. Ultimately, the Noxa team couldn't handle the combined on-chain and off-chain pressure, which led to their decision to shut down. This is just my theory, as the team hasn't shared any specifics, but it's the most logical explanation considering that 3 different launchpads are consistently running into the exact same issues. By no means am I defending the teams behind NOXA, Pons or vladdotfun. The responsibility lies on them for abusing vibecoding and completely ignoring audits. These factors led to a major chill and the gradual death of the Robinhood. What used to be a place where newcomers could chill in a PvE space and lock in solid gains has unfortunately devolved into the same chaotic casino as the Solana trenches. A big thanks to Kauman for the information from snipers teams!

I know WHY Robinhood Chain died And 99% of people are blaming the wrong thing. The real reason? Snipers + stupid devs = 💀 On NOXA, tokens launched directly into Uniswap V3 pools - with no bonding curve and no liquidity migration. Noxa tried to protect launches with a few temporary restrictions: — You couldn’t buy a token in the same block it was created. — Each individual buy was capped. — All restrictions disappeared after 366 blocks (roughly one hour). The problem? These protections looked much stronger on paper than they were in practice. The 2% supply limit per wallet meant almost nothing when one operator could spread purchases across dozens of fresh wallets. Trading could start at a random interval between 2 and 60 seconds. Anonymous teams were already building and selling tools designed to spam launches and wash trade. Noxa has earned $12M in fees and at least half of that value was captured by snipers. Back on July 11, the Noxa team released an update attempting to address the spam and fake-volume problem. But the clearest example of what was already happening is $ARROW: 200 interconnected wallets. 80% of the supply. None of these wallets had any prior EVM history and they all bought $ARROW within the first three minutes of launch. This entire situation was severely exacerbated by Robinhood's architecture. Robinhood Chain officially uses a first-come, first-served (FCFS) sequencing model. Transaction ordering is determined by the exact time they reach the sequencer, not by who pays a higher gas fee. This means the ultimate advantage didn't go to those who paid more gas, but to those who had the fastest RPCs, automated bundlers and the lowest latency to the sequencer. The block time for RH is up to 100ms, so by flooding every 100ms, you can almost guarantee that you’ll be among the first to buy. Additionally, some optimizations in the sniper smart contract have made flooding cheaper than with others. Anyone who has been in the Robinhood trenches since day one remembers that the space was originally pure PvE. There were no bot wars and even beginners could easily trade. But once the bots entered the game, things became incredibly difficult. Additionally, as far as I know, there was a group of people executing DDoS attacks on the frontend. They would buy the dips and then sell off once the website went down and retail couldn't access it. Ultimately, the Noxa team couldn't handle the combined on-chain and off-chain pressure, which led to their decision to shut down. This is just my theory, as the team hasn't shared any specifics, but it's the most logical explanation considering that 3 different launchpads are consistently running into the exact same issues. By no means am I defending the teams behind NOXA, Pons or vladdotfun. The responsibility lies on them for abusing vibecoding and completely ignoring audits. These factors led to a major chill and the gradual death of the Robinhood. What used to be a place where newcomers could chill in a PvE space and lock in solid gains has unfortunately devolved into the same chaotic casino as the Solana trenches. A big thanks to Kauman for the information from snipers teams!

83,606 views • 1 month ago

How Ansem will rug $ANSEM Hundreds of millions of views about $ANSEM Ansem is loved and respected in CT People are getting tattoos of his face He feels completely untouchable and will crime pump it to $150M Everyone is happy because they made money But long-term holders will lose all in the end The marketing plan is complete, the experiment is a success, the money is made Boss strategy on Ansem

How Ansem will rug $ANSEM Hundreds of millions of views about $ANSEM Ansem is loved and respected in CT People are getting tattoos of his face He feels completely untouchable and will crime pump it to $150M Everyone is happy because they made money But long-term holders will lose all in the end The marketing plan is complete, the experiment is a success, the money is made Boss strategy on Ansem

106,976 views • 1 month ago

No more content to load