Paolo Rosson's banner

Paolo Rosson

@redp314 • 1,631 subscribers

Head of Applied AI at Dext. Building https://t.co/DANgmpZvSA | Quantum physics PhD from Oxford | Former Italian blindfolded Rubik’s cube record holder

Shorts

Dentist did a 3D X-ray of my jaw before a root canal and said I wouldn't be able to open the raw data, it needs specialized software. It's 800 DICOM files. Asked Claude Code to make me a viewer. Two prompts later... this is nicer than what he showed me on his screen.

Dentist did a 3D X-ray of my jaw before a root canal and said I wouldn't be able to open the raw data, it needs specialized software. It's 800 DICOM files. Asked Claude Code to make me a viewer. Two prompts later... this is nicer than what he showed me on his screen.

1,436,230 次观看

Videos

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.ai•Sponsored•Livecam

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

Exclusive private shows

1.2k viewers online

Private Show

Join now for exclusive access

Free preview available • Premium content

got Jev to review my PRs. ~200x cheaper than Claude and it answers in half a second 6 real PRs in the video. $0.00007 each. 1,000 PRs = 7 cents vs ~$14.50 on Opus 5 paste a diff → ONE call to TypeSafe AI → 14 typed checks come back as probabilities: hardcoded secret, sql injection, touches auth, deletes tests, breaks api, migration, debug leftovers, does the description actually match the diff, blast radius, reviewer effort… code turns that into a verdict: BLOCK / security review / nits / merge. anything a critical check isn't sure about (0.35–0.65) gets escalated to a human or a big model instead of guessed

got Jev to review my PRs. ~200x cheaper than Claude and it answers in half a second 6 real PRs in the video. $0.00007 each. 1,000 PRs = 7 cents vs ~$14.50 on Opus 5 paste a diff → ONE call to TypeSafe AI → 14 typed checks come back as probabilities: hardcoded secret, sql injection, touches auth, deletes tests, breaks api, migration, debug leftovers, does the description actually match the diff, blast radius, reviewer effort… code turns that into a verdict: BLOCK / security review / nits / merge. anything a critical check isn't sure about (0.35–0.65) gets escalated to a human or a big model instead of guessed

354,089 次观看 • 4 天前

I got a rubik's cube to solve itself with TypeSafe AI 's Jev and it solves it like a person does, 94 moves, not the 22 move optimal solution. Jev isn't an LLM, it just answers one question in ~250ms with a probability. so I put the beginner method in code (the one you'd learn on youtube: white cross, corners, middle layer, yellow layer) and at every step Jev just looks at the cube and picks which case it's in. code checks every pick. ~4 seconds of model time total. video is slowed down so you can read it!

I got a rubik's cube to solve itself with TypeSafe AI 's Jev and it solves it like a person does, 94 moves, not the 22 move optimal solution. Jev isn't an LLM, it just answers one question in ~250ms with a probability. so I put the beginner method in code (the one you'd learn on youtube: white cross, corners, middle layer, yellow layer) and at every step Jev just looks at the cube and picks which case it's in. code checks every pick. ~4 seconds of model time total. video is slowed down so you can read it!

205,938 次观看 • 4 天前

没有更多内容可加载