Ron Cantor
@RonSCantor • 12,631 subscribers
Messianic Israeli. MTh, Dmin, Pres Shelanu TV in Tel Aviv. Author of 10 books, including Identity Theft, sign up for newsletter at https://t.co/AePiXJTR1x
Shorts
Videos
Disqualified minister JD Hall JD™ told Tucker Carlson that I, Ron Cantor, agreed not to share the gospel with Jewish people in order to have my broadcasting license restored in Israel. This is slanderous and defamatory—and 100% false. I suspect he knows that it is false since he has already been found liable for fabricating stories in the past, found guilty of embezzlement, and was investigated by police for domestic violence with a knife and strangulation. Not a fun guy. For six years, Shelanu TV, our 24/7 Hebrew-language broadcast, has boldly proclaimed Yeshua as the Messiah of Israel with testimonies, apologetics, and more! We exist to share Yeshua with Israelis. I'm not a lawyer, but it appears that this is the legal definition of slander and defamation. Fortunately, I have a lawyer who is smarter than I am, looking into it. In the past, I overlooked his lies, but Carlson is reaching millions of people.
Ron Cantor141,189 views • 6 days ago
My name was mentioned on the #TuckerCarlson podcast — and the guest, JD Hall, made multiple false claims about me on the show and on his Substack. Claims so outlandish that if you've followed my ministry for more than five minutes, you'd immediately know they're fiction. In this video, I respond point by point to Hall's allegations, including: 🤑 That I took money from the Israeli government to stop sharing the gospel with Jewish people 🤐 That I "struck a deal" to muzzle Shelanu TV — comparing me to Judas Iscariot and a Nazi collaborator 😱 That I live in fear of deportation and carefully police my words to stay in the country 🤥 That I never confronted Mike Bickle (IHOPKC) or Dr. Michael Brown — when in fact Tikkun raised $100K for the Bickle investigation and I wrote about it in my book When Shepherds Prey ✝️ That Messianic Jews avoid the word "Christian" because the Israeli government pressures them — when the opposite is actually true
Ron Cantor18,506 views • 5 days ago
If Pastor Greg Locke (#GregLocke) would say the things below to his wife, and then marry her best friend, think of how he will betray you? 🔴REC "If it wasn't for the ministry, I'd divorce you before sun-up." (If the only reason you're not divorcing your wife is that you are in ministry, that's a sign you should not be in ministry!) 🔴REC "You know, Melissa, I just don't want you anymore. If you die and we have a funeral...just shed a few tears over you." (if I understand the recording) 🔴REC "I don't care if you take all the pills in the house," which could be taken as encouraging her to harm herself for his own benefit. All this, according to Melissa Locke's (his first wife's) testimony, which is attached. Greg Locke calls everybody out except himself. He has mercy on himself. And as somebody with 40 years of experience in pasting, it is my opinion that those are the words of a man who is already in love with someone else trying to escape an unhappy marriage. Those are the words of somebody who has no business being in ministry. ,
Ron Cantor76,342 views • 1 month ago
Rick Joyner says regarding Bob Jones's sexual sin: "This happens with men...Get used to it!" Bob Jones used his position as a prophet to manipulate a mother and daughter to take off their shirts and allow him access to their bodies, because he told them that was how they could obtain his anointing. He also told him that they needed to have access to certain parts of his body, which they did, in order to obtain his anointing. He began giving the mother these extraordinary prophecies that she was an end-time handmaiden of God, which was how he enticed him. Does Rick care at all about the turmoil that Bob brought to this family? Do we have to just get used to it? If we express concern, are we the accuser of the brethren? Let me just say that I reject this statement. I refuse to get used to it. Men are not dogs who have no control. This is why nobody should send their children to MorningStar. You have no idea what kind of predator has been restored under Rick's loose oversight, which teaches that we have to get used to men abusing women.
Ron Cantor59,824 views • 10 months ago
31:02
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
Ray is the husband of Kim, who we maintain was groomed into a verbal and erotic relationship with Mike Brown when he was her pastor. Kim's daughter is Jordan. Both of them sent me letters this week asking me to read them online and publish them. The Bible says that we are to be a voice for those without a voice (Prov 31:8). Mike Brown said that he and Kim were peers. The truth is, when he began to groom her in earnest, he was her senior pastor and her husband's employer. Yes, this was SA from her pastor. However, in his first comments, Mike Brown described his relationship with Kim as her being the guilty one. Neither Ray nor Jordan has anything close to the reach that Dr Brown has. And they don't have a friend like Heather Schott, willing to give them an opportunity to respond. We will do our best here. We will later publish the full text of their letters.
Ron Cantor57,036 views • 1 year ago
Twice in less than a week, two different leaders who had endorsed When Shepherds Prey, my new book, asked for their endorsements to be removed. It wasn't because they disagreed with the content of the book—they both claimed that the message was deeply needed in the church today to confront SA in clergy and demand accountability. They were pressured by their own leaders and peers. It actually proves why the book is important. Please consider checking out the book and the reviews at:
Ron Cantor12,299 views • 1 month ago
CHE AHN: "I've NEVER covered up for anyone's sin." His sister-in-law shares her story of violent abuse & cover-up--and freedom and survival. In this powerful conversation, Dr. Ron Cantor and Pia Hugo unpack her story of suffering, violent domestic abuse by her first husband, the brother-in-law of would-be governor Pastor Che Ahn. Pia shares how, despite knowing that her husband could even take her life, Che and Sue Ahn urged her to stay in the marriage. She claims that Che even suggested that the Lord was calling her to be a martyr, in which she would be rewarded in heaven. Ron and Pia discuss the dark realities of abuse within the church, the struggles of women in abusive relationships, and the need for accountability in leadership. NOTE: While we found Pia's story compelling and believable, we are not saying what is true and what is not. We call on Che and Sue Ahn's accountability team to thoroughly investigate the claims and, where needed, make corrections in accordance with 1 Tim 5:19-20. Check out our new book, soon to be released:
Ron Cantor14,847 views • 4 months ago
Rick Joyner says of Todd Bentley: "I assure you ... you're going to hear a lot from #ToddBentley again ... Don't give up on anybody. ... The Lord said as we treat the least of his little ones he's going to take it as the way we treated him. And someone may be the very least of his, the lowliest, weakest of his servants, but as we treat them, the Lord's going to take it as the way we've treated him." Rick thinks that the "little ones" in Matt 18:6 (or the least in Matt 25) are the perverts and liars who get caught. Rick does not seem to care for victims of sexual abuse—just their abusers. In this 40+ minute rant about how the church has given up on predator ministers, he does not mention the word victim, one time. He seems to think that ministers carrying out CSA is a victimless crime. #Sarah #Tammy #Deborah But he imagines that Todd Bentley, a serial sexual abuser, is the victim, "little one," in Matthew 18—never mentioning the people whose lives were traumatized by Bentely's abuse—when in fact, he is the offender of little ones, in danger of a judgment worse than having a millstone tied around your neck and thrown into the sea. In Rick's theology, it is those of us who seek to hold people like Todd accountable who are in danger of judgment. PS ... People who wear sunglasses inside and make videos are hiding something. It's just weird.
Ron Cantor24,049 views • 10 months ago
![Watch this clip by a fellow named Joseph Z (Joseph Z). He says that the Lord showed him that people who seek to hold leaders accountable for sexual sin will eventually become holocaust deniers, antisemites, and Israel haters. To be clear, he did not say that this was his opinion but that God Almighty showed him this. I have a few thoughts. 1. The Bible says that we, the Church, are supposed to judge prophecy. “Do not despise prophecies. Test all things; hold fast what is good” (1 Thessalonians 5:20-21). “Let two or three prophets speak, and let the others judge” (1 Corinthians 14:29). When someone gives a prophecy on the Internet, how does the church judge it? Paul imagined that New Testament prophecy would be primarily inside the local congregation. And that the other prophets would judge it. When he says, “Let the others,” it could mean the others gathered or the other prophets. But the Internet is the wild, wild West of prophecy and sometimes that can be dangerous. This prophecy needs to be judged by a collective group of leaders because it is deeply alarming. I would give you my opinion, which is probably obvious, but it doesn't say let one person judge it, it says, “let the others.” Hopefully, that will happen. 2. He says that because Jesus is the head of the Church, he is the only one who can judge people in the Church. That is not biblical ecclesiology (study of the church). Paul tells the Corinthian church to pronounce judgment on a sexually immoral man who was sleeping with his stepmother. In fact, Paul is angry that the Corinthians have not already done this. Here are Paul’s instructions: “So when you are assembled and I am with you in spirit, and the power of our Lord Jesus is present, hand this man over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved on the day of the Lord” (1 Cor 5:4-5). Furthermore, Paul tells Timothy that he handed over Hymenaeus and Alexander, who were apparently false teachers, “to Satan to be taught not to blaspheme” (1 Tim 1:20). Paul did not wait for Jesus to judge them, but he did as an apostolic leader. And that was the loving thing to do ... see next point. 3. Joseph Z doesn't seem to understand that holding people accountable for gross sin or false teaching is redemptive. Paul's hope for the sexually immoral man is that he will eventually repent, “that his spirit may be saved on the day of the Lord.” If the Church does not judge sexual sin, we are not loving the sinner. Joseph says that it is Jesus's job alone to deal with people involved in immortality. But in truth, it would be far better to fall into the hands of local eldership, or someone on the Internet, than the hands of the living God. The compassionate thing is to judge someone here, so they can deal with it before they get judged there! That is God's grace. 4. If the Church does not judge sexual sin or false teaching/prophecy, then the perpetrator will bring his sin into the Church, affecting others. Paul writes in the same passage to the Corinthians, “Do you not know that a little leaven leavens the whole lump?” (v. 6) Tolerating sexual immorality in the Church will increase sexual immorality in the church. 5. There is a difference between hypocritical judging of one's motives, which Jesus forbids in Matthew 7, and the Church taking its place to judge those who claim to be part of the body of Messiah. Paul says it is absolutely the church’s responsibility to judge those inside. “Is it not those inside the church whom you are to judge? God judges those outside" (1 Cor 5:12–13). 1 Tim 5:17-20 teaches that this is done through eldership, but it is an expression of the entire church. Sadly, eldership often does not want to follow through on its God-given responsibility. The Firefly report reveals that the leadership at IHOPKC was not keen on enforcing standards on its leader. This did nothing to help the prayer movement or the local congregation there. Their unwillingness to enforce 1 Timothy 3 standards has dealt a crushing blow to the body of Messiah (which God can overcome!). In times past, when these things were swept under the rug, there was nothing else a victim or an advocate could do. Social Media has leveled the playing field—and that is terrifying to many celebrity ministers (and I'm sure many men and women have integrity who embrace it). It's messy. It's not perfect. However, it is a response to the lack of leadership in many local congregations. 6. However, to say that “the Lord showed me … it will eventually lead to the greatest deception towards Holocaust deniers. … [I]t’s going to turn into the greatest form of antisemitism, anti-Israel, anti-Holocaust…” is quite strange for me to hear, in particular, because I do consider myself an advocate for those whose have been sexually abused by members of clergy, and because I am Jewish, Israeli, and have my master's degree in Israel advocacy. Is my activism going to turn me into an antisemite? Will the words of this Israeli, Zionist, Israel supporter lead others to hate and attack Israel? That does seem like what my brother is saying. I don't think the church needs to take a stand on every prophecy that comes out of the Internet, but it certainly does need to judge what I would consider prophetic gaslighting, which tells people who are taking a stand for victims of sexual abuse that they actions are leading towards to the greatest form of antisemitism that the world has ever known. I would love to have a conversation with Joseph. I don't know him. He can contact me. But since his video is traveling around the Internet, addressing it publicly is warranted.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1902055923243237849/ext_tw_video_thumb/1902050393397624832/pu/img/m771mPpun6ZtRFoB.jpg)
Watch this clip by a fellow named Joseph Z (Joseph Z). He says that the Lord showed him that people who seek to hold leaders accountable for sexual sin will eventually become holocaust deniers, antisemites, and Israel haters. To be clear, he did not say that this was his opinion but that God Almighty showed him this. I have a few thoughts. 1. The Bible says that we, the Church, are supposed to judge prophecy. “Do not despise prophecies. Test all things; hold fast what is good” (1 Thessalonians 5:20-21). “Let two or three prophets speak, and let the others judge” (1 Corinthians 14:29). When someone gives a prophecy on the Internet, how does the church judge it? Paul imagined that New Testament prophecy would be primarily inside the local congregation. And that the other prophets would judge it. When he says, “Let the others,” it could mean the others gathered or the other prophets. But the Internet is the wild, wild West of prophecy and sometimes that can be dangerous. This prophecy needs to be judged by a collective group of leaders because it is deeply alarming. I would give you my opinion, which is probably obvious, but it doesn't say let one person judge it, it says, “let the others.” Hopefully, that will happen. 2. He says that because Jesus is the head of the Church, he is the only one who can judge people in the Church. That is not biblical ecclesiology (study of the church). Paul tells the Corinthian church to pronounce judgment on a sexually immoral man who was sleeping with his stepmother. In fact, Paul is angry that the Corinthians have not already done this. Here are Paul’s instructions: “So when you are assembled and I am with you in spirit, and the power of our Lord Jesus is present, hand this man over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved on the day of the Lord” (1 Cor 5:4-5). Furthermore, Paul tells Timothy that he handed over Hymenaeus and Alexander, who were apparently false teachers, “to Satan to be taught not to blaspheme” (1 Tim 1:20). Paul did not wait for Jesus to judge them, but he did as an apostolic leader. And that was the loving thing to do ... see next point. 3. Joseph Z doesn't seem to understand that holding people accountable for gross sin or false teaching is redemptive. Paul's hope for the sexually immoral man is that he will eventually repent, “that his spirit may be saved on the day of the Lord.” If the Church does not judge sexual sin, we are not loving the sinner. Joseph says that it is Jesus's job alone to deal with people involved in immortality. But in truth, it would be far better to fall into the hands of local eldership, or someone on the Internet, than the hands of the living God. The compassionate thing is to judge someone here, so they can deal with it before they get judged there! That is God's grace. 4. If the Church does not judge sexual sin or false teaching/prophecy, then the perpetrator will bring his sin into the Church, affecting others. Paul writes in the same passage to the Corinthians, “Do you not know that a little leaven leavens the whole lump?” (v. 6) Tolerating sexual immorality in the Church will increase sexual immorality in the church. 5. There is a difference between hypocritical judging of one's motives, which Jesus forbids in Matthew 7, and the Church taking its place to judge those who claim to be part of the body of Messiah. Paul says it is absolutely the church’s responsibility to judge those inside. “Is it not those inside the church whom you are to judge? God judges those outside" (1 Cor 5:12–13). 1 Tim 5:17-20 teaches that this is done through eldership, but it is an expression of the entire church. Sadly, eldership often does not want to follow through on its God-given responsibility. The Firefly report reveals that the leadership at IHOPKC was not keen on enforcing standards on its leader. This did nothing to help the prayer movement or the local congregation there. Their unwillingness to enforce 1 Timothy 3 standards has dealt a crushing blow to the body of Messiah (which God can overcome!). In times past, when these things were swept under the rug, there was nothing else a victim or an advocate could do. Social Media has leveled the playing field—and that is terrifying to many celebrity ministers (and I'm sure many men and women have integrity who embrace it). It's messy. It's not perfect. However, it is a response to the lack of leadership in many local congregations. 6. However, to say that “the Lord showed me … it will eventually lead to the greatest deception towards Holocaust deniers. … [I]t’s going to turn into the greatest form of antisemitism, anti-Israel, anti-Holocaust…” is quite strange for me to hear, in particular, because I do consider myself an advocate for those whose have been sexually abused by members of clergy, and because I am Jewish, Israeli, and have my master's degree in Israel advocacy. Is my activism going to turn me into an antisemite? Will the words of this Israeli, Zionist, Israel supporter lead others to hate and attack Israel? That does seem like what my brother is saying. I don't think the church needs to take a stand on every prophecy that comes out of the Internet, but it certainly does need to judge what I would consider prophetic gaslighting, which tells people who are taking a stand for victims of sexual abuse that they actions are leading towards to the greatest form of antisemitism that the world has ever known. I would love to have a conversation with Joseph. I don't know him. He can contact me. But since his video is traveling around the Internet, addressing it publicly is warranted.
Ron Cantor30,038 views • 1 year ago
I do not know how these people got from a 46-year-old man smacking his 20-year-old assistant and former student on the rear end in the workplace to men being afraid to change diapers because they're going to be accused of something OR equating it as "separating fathers from their daughters" It's really not the same thing—I am someone who was a champion diaper changer (of female babies), the stinky, smelly ones, who is also against ministers making unwanted physical or sexual contact with those under their spiritual authority (or anyone else for that matter). She wasn't a baby. She wasn't his daughter. Their logic here is that if we decry the 46-year-old man giving unwanted butt slaps to his assistant, it's going to end up keeping fathers from bonding with their actual daughters. That is dumb. It actually makes no sense. (This was after they claimed that if we pursue justice for victims of sexual abuse, it's going to cause believers to take the mark of the beast... I'm not joking...)
Ron Cantor16,369 views • 1 year ago
Heather Schott of Mercy Culture Church dishonestly posts clip of Ron Cantor (me :-) )—Here is what I really said! I was driving to Tel Aviv the other day, listening to this 3 1/2 hour diatribe from Heather Schott and friends, as they defended Michael Brown against the credible allegations of clergy sexual abuse, when I heard my own voice. I was calling myself a "narcissist," and I immediately knew that it was from a recent interview with@TheRemnantRadio. I also knew that they took the clip completely out of context. Take a few minutes to see what I really said—because it was quite the opposite of what she played. It shows that their entire game is dishonest. Mercy Culture Church has an agenda, and they will steamroll the truth to see it fulfilled.
Ron Cantor13,725 views • 1 year ago
Here is what Mercy Culture Church showed, followed by the full clip. It is pretty gross that Heather Schott revictimized (or tried to) #SarahMonk by deceptively slicing a clip from a larger conversation to make it appear that I had an "agenda" to convince her that she was a victim of sexual abuse. And Mike Brown, sits there complicit, even though he knows that I had never spoken to Sarah until October 2024 after she had already given her complete testimony to The Roys Report. She had already told them about the kissing, the hand holding, the butt slapping and the late night meetings. She knew the relationship was romantic and sensual, and that Mike was escalating the physical contact. It is true that most victims of clergy sexual abuse do not realize that they have been victimized and manipulated for quite some time. #TammyWoods, God bless her, realized 40 years later. #DeborahPerkins realized two decades later. If Heather Schott wants to know what happened in my conversation with Sarah, she can give me a call. She can even interview me. But to deceptively copy/paste and harm a survivor is abusive. The reason I contacted Sarah (whom I did not know before) was because Mike resisted efforts to have the situation adjudicated by elders (until his board forced him to agree). He now claims that he told his board to bring on the investigation, he's an open book…but if you look at his emails to me ( you will see that he had no intention of allowing anyone to investigate these claims. Heather and her cohorts present themselves as understanding sexual abuse, but they failed to articulate something that even a novice in this area understands: Victims often blame themselves. Sarah was ashamed that she put herself in a position for Mike to abuse her. The fact that they twisted it only shows that they have an agenda—and it is not to stand with victims of clergy sexual abuse (which is a real thing, Heather), but to stand with the powerful against them.
Ron Cantor10,664 views • 1 year ago
The funny thing about this Mercy Culture Church clip is that they had a Hebrew language scholar with them for the first two hours--they should have asked. Jezebel does not mean: UNSUBMITTED. 1. There is no word for submit in the Hebrew scriptures. In modern Hebrew, we use the word for surrender for submission. להיכנע So no, Jezebel cannot mean unsubmitted. 2. The way you say Jezebel in Hebrew is very different from English. There is no "J" in Hebrew. ē-zevel. אִיזֶבֶל. 3. The original name Jezebel means "Where is ba'al." That makes sense because she was a pagan queen who embraced Ba'al worship. eze (where is) baal (pagan god). It can also mean, "Where is the prince?" 4. There is folklore that her name was changed to make the second part, zevel, which means dung/trash, more pronounced. (see 2 Kings 9:37) Some scholars embrace this (See AYBD). 5. Her father was Ethba'al, which has the same ba'al pagan ending. So now… It absolutely does not mean unsummitted. To quote Dr. Michael Brown, when most people say 'it says this in the original Hebrew,' they're wrong. To be clear, Jezebel was unsubmitted, and that is a significant characteristic when referring to "a Jezebel spirit," which can influence a man or a woman.
Ron Cantor10,397 views • 1 year ago
JEWS ATTACKED IN AMSTERDAM!! Last night in Amsterdam, Israelis were attacked by mobs of Arabs after Israel's Maccabi Tel Aviv played in a soccer match. The attack appeared to be organized and planned. It comes two days before the anniversary of Kristallnacht, when Nazis launched a pogrom against Jews in Germany in 1938. 10 Israelis were injured. Some were unaccounted for for hours. They took refuge in shops, and some hid in hotels. Hey, #amsterdam, really? The Times of Israel reported, "Dutch security forces appeared helpless to protect the tourists as they were ambushed by gangs of masked assailants who shouted pro-Palestiniian slogans as they hunted, beat and harassed the Israelis."
Ron Cantor13,341 views • 1 year ago
No more content to load