Amita Sachdeva, Advocate
@SachdevaAmita • 41,292 subscribers
Advocate-on-Record (AOR)-Supreme Court of India-MBA Finance-Will pursue legal action against anyone who insults Sanatan Dharma.
Videos
I urge Delhi Police to take immediate action on my pending criminal complaint against Dhruv Rathee under Sections 196 and 299 of the BNS for spreading misinformation about Hindu Deities, including Bhagwan Shri Ram and Sita Maa. The Ld. CJM’s direction to file an Action Taken Report remains uncomplied with by Delhi Police. If action is further delayed, I shall be constrained to approach the Hon’ble Delhi High Court again.
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate493,249 次观看 • 26 天前
Can a sacred place, revered by crores of Hindus, be abused so casually? Neha Bora says that, under the Brahmanical system, even Brahmin women are unsafe, their rape happens, and that pujaris rape women inside temples. These are generalised allegations against the entire class of temple priests and against the sanctity of temples. Why are such statements made so casually and without hesitation? Because for a long there has been a confidence that no one will act. People like Neha Bora have taken advantage of our silence. That silence is over now. Sexual crimes must be investigated and punished wherever they occur. But publicly painting all pujaris as rapists, and temples as places of such crimes, promotes disharmony and enmity between communities. That is exactly why a formal complaint has been filed seeking registration of an FIR under Section 196 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and other applicable provisions. She has to understand her limitations and that her freedom of speech is not absolute. We will pursue this matter until it reaches a logical conclusion.
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate20,723 次观看 • 2 天前
I came across her (Nishu Aazad) derogatory tweets concerning Bhagwan Shri Krishna, Bhagwan Shiv, Maa Durga, and Maa Saraswati yesterday. If you look at our team’s track record, you will see that wherever Sanatan Dharma or Hindu Deities are insulted, we take legal action through constitutional and lawful means. It is your right to believe or not to believe in someone’s Dharma or religion, but you do not have the right to insult or demean someone else’s Dharma. Her tweets may be old, but the period of limitation begins from the date of knowledge. We have also got an FIR registered against Rana Ayyub in relation to her old derogatory tweets concerning Hindu Deities. The police have assured us that they will take the necessary action in accordance with the law. Video credit: IANS
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate218,584 次观看 • 2 个月前
So beautifully expressed by Sr. Adv. Makarand D. Adkar Ji (Makarand Adkar), that we are Sainiks in the service of Dharma. Since November 2024, we have initiated 35 legal proceedings, including securing FIR registrations against Rana Ayyub and Karishma Aziz, obtaining the seizure of offensive paintings by M.F. Husain, and securing an apology from Nikhil Wagle following our legal notice. We are truly blessed and fortunate that Bhagwan Himself is our client. What greater privilege could there be? Our lives have found their true purpose, and our human birth has attained its purpose. Jai Shri Krishna! The Jaipur Dialogues
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate11,691 次观看 • 3 天前
A New Jurisprudential Step Towards Protecting the Dignity of Hindu Deities: The Right of Devotees to Seek Damages for the Defamation of Their Deities We have filed a Suit for Declaration, Injunction and Damages on account of defamation against Dhruv Rathee, as devotees of Bhagwan Shri Ram and Mata Sita, for making defamatory and derogatory statements about our Deities. The Suit has been filed pursuant to the liberty granted by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi to institute an appropriate proceeding seeking appropriate relief against Dhruv Rathee. Through this Suit, we have raised a new jurisprudential question: If a Hindu Deity can sue and be sued, and can even hold property, a devotee of a Hindu Deity should also be entitled to seek damages for defamation arising from defamatory and derogatory statements made against the Deity. Makarand Adkar
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate55,226 次观看 • 22 天前
The apology offered by Mr. Sanjay Raut (Sanjay Raut) appears to have been a mere formality. Despite a show-cause notice already issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in a criminal contempt matter, another post was made on 19.10.2026 that tends to threaten and scandalise the Court. Even after widespread public outrage, the post has not been deleted. This shows a clear and continued disregard for the authority of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. In these circumstances, there was no option but to again approach the Ld. Attorney General seeking fresh consent to initiate criminal contempt proceedings.
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate35,626 次观看 • 15 天前
What happens when the police forget that the Constitution applies to them too? The Hon'ble Karnataka High Court had an answer. Whitefield Police detained Hindu activist 🚩Mohan Gowda🇮🇳 over a social media post concerning the cancellation of Kunal Kamra’s proposed show. The Court didn’t stay silent. It asked the questions that needed to be asked: “Who is giving you instructions?” “Who will voluntarily come to a police station?” “You can’t take the liberty of citizens for granted just because you are in uniform.” And then came the reminder that should echo through every police station: “Standing tall will not make you tall in law. You should bend down to the law.” The Court also questioned why a Section 35(3) BNSS notice was issued after he had already been taken into custody, and flagged the absence of functioning CCTV at the police station. The DGP/IG was directed to issue binding guidelines, with departmental action against officers who violate the law laid down by the Supreme Court. This is what an independent judiciary is supposed to do. - Not protect the powerful. - Not look away. - Not rubber-stamp authority. - But stand between the citizen and the arbitrary exercise of power. - A uniform gives you authority. It does not put you above the Constitution. When the police forget the law, the Court must remind them. Today, it did. Watch:
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate69,654 次观看 • 2 个月前
🚨 Must Watch: Section-wise Exposure of the Draconian Anti-Temple Land Bill Maharashtra’s Devasthan Inam Nirmulan Draft Act 2026 is a direct attack on Hindu temples. In this video, I have explained section by section how this Bill snatches temple lands, legalises encroachments, discriminates against Hindus, and violates our religious rights. Every section is dangerous for Sanatan Dharma. We demand: Complete Withdrawal of this Bill! Please submit your strong objections before 5th June 2026.Jai Bhavani! Jai Shivaji! Protect Temple Lands. Protect Hindu Dharma.#Bill_Against_Temple_Land #WithdrawTheBill #SaveTempleLands #StopTempleLandGrab
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate137,875 次观看 • 5 个月前
This outcome of the court proceedings and the historic judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court would remain incomplete if we do not acknowledge the immense groundwork, dedication, and tireless efforts put in by several individuals even before the commencement of the legal proceedings. Adv. Virendra Ichalkaranjikar Ji (Ichalkaranjikar V.S.) from Hindu Vidhigya Parishad, along with Hindu Janajagruti Samiti (HinduJagrutiOrg), worked tirelessly with Shri Naval Kishore Ji, former Sangh Pracharak and a leading force behind the Bhojshala Mukti Andolan. Their collective efforts played a crucial role in keeping this issue alive at the national level and in building the foundation for the legal battle. Adv. Virendra Ichalkaranjikar Ji made extraordinary efforts by continuously sitting for eight days in the ASI Office at Bhopal and gathering all the relevant documents through RTI applications and detailed research. Those documents played a very significant role in bringing the true facts before the Court. The efforts of Sudarshan News and Shri Suresh Chavhanke Ji (Dr. Suresh Chavhanke “Sudarshan News”) are also highly commendable. They had been consistently raising their voice on the Bhojshala issue long before it became a mainstream subject of discussion. Their persistent efforts helped in creating nationwide awareness regarding the issue. The legal proceedings were then taken to their logical conclusion by Adv. Vishnu Shankar Jain Ji (Vishnu Shankar Jain) and Shri Hari Shankar Jain Ji (Hari Shankar Jain), whose relentless legal efforts and effective representation played a vital role in securing this historic result before the Hon’ble Court. This result is truly the outcome of collective efforts, unwavering dedication, and years of continuous struggle by numerous individuals and organizations. Above all, it is only with the divine grace and blessings of Shri Vag Mata Ji that such a historic result could finally be achieved. 🚩 Ramesh Shinde 🇮🇳
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate139,215 次观看 • 5 个月前
We formed a team that whenever there is an insult to Sanatan Dharma, any Deity, we take it to Court. We are making them answerable. वो जो मौसम था कि कुछ भी बोलो, मगर कोई पूछने वाला नहीं है I That phase, we have come out of it to a great extent, and the journey is still on. Makarand Adkar Aadi Achint 🇮🇳
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate51,296 次观看 • 2 个月前
Dear Delhi Police FIR already registered against Rana Ayyub on our complaint for derogatory, inflammatory & communal posts on Hindu Deities. Application for monitoring the investigation is also pending before the Ld. CJM. The Ld. CJM has directed the police to file a status report on the stage of investigation. The matter is also pending before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court regarding the global injunction issue. She is again fueling the atmosphere by supporting the illegal CJP protest. I urge you to detain & interrogate her along with Dhruv Rathee, and file the status report on the investigation without delay.
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate24,127 次观看 • 26 天前
Dhruv Rathee misread the Sanskrit word māṃsa (मांस) in the verse he cited. In that context, it means the pulp or flesh of a fruit, not meat. By twisting the word and the scripture, he left viewers, including an educated intern who called me afterward, wondering whether Mata Sita and Bhagwan Shri Ram had actually done what the video claimed. We checked the original text and cleared it up within minutes. YouTube has since withheld the video in India pursuant to directions of the Grievance Appellate Committee, following proceedings before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court. A criminal case has also been registered against him concerning the video. I hope this episode has taught him a good lesson, sacred scriptures should be read in their original context and represented accurately, especially when speaking to millions of viewers.
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate21,343 次观看 • 29 天前
Namaskar, The Hon’ble Supreme Court is hearing a case where the Learned Amicus Curiae has suggested reducing the age of consent from 18 to 16 years. This petition originally arose after the Nirbhaya case to ensure women’s safety, not to redefine childhood or consent. Such a proposal goes beyond its scope and risks harming our children. Children aged 16 to 18 are still in school; this is the age to study, not to legalize adult relationships. I am filing an Intervention Application before the Supreme Court opposing this move, with guidance from Sr. Adv. Shri Makarand D. Adkar Ji (Makarand Adkar). #ProtectChildren #ChildSafety #POCSO #NirbhayaCase #SupremeCourt
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate171,262 次观看 • 1 年前
Maa Chamunda Devi, also known as Chamundeshwari, is one of the most powerful and revered manifestations of the Divine Mother in Hindu tradition. She is worshipped as a fierce form of Goddess Durga, symbolizing the victory of good over evil and the protection of devotees from negative energies. Her name comes from the demons Chanda and Munda, whom she defeated during the great battle described in the Devi Mahatmya of the Markandeya Purana. And this joker Ranveer Singh went so far as to call Her a ‘ghost’ - an absolutely shameful remark. Ranveer Singh’s remark is not just disrespectful; it reflects a complete lack of basic decency and values. No responsible individual would make such a comment
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate135,135 次观看 • 11 个月前
A question for Saurav Dass. Today, you are saying that if the FIRs are not withdrawn, you and your team will protest again. But CJP leaders, including Sonam Wangchuk, have stated that those who attacked police personnel, misbehaved with female journalists, and damaged public property were not part of the CJP protest. If that is true, then why are you demanding the withdrawal of those FIRs? Also, FIRs cannot be withdrawn by a mere announcement. There is a legal procedure, and any withdrawal can only take place in accordance with law and with the approval of the competent court wherever required.
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate36,925 次观看 • 3 个月前
A complaint has been filed on behalf of Hindu Janajagruti Samiti (HinduJagrutiOrg) & Supreme Court Advocates. Well said by Sr. Adv. Makarand D. Adkar Ji (Makarand Adkar) that if you will say, "सब बुत उठवाए जाएंगे... बस नाम रहेगा अल्लाह का।" - यह हमें मंज़ूर नहीं 🚩 Ramesh Shinde 🇮🇳
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate35,260 次观看 • 3 个月前
Complaints have already been filed against individuals spreading hate speech, and additional complaints are being prepared. If the police take action on our complaint, it will be appreciated. However, if no action is taken, we will approach the court and pursue the matter to its logical conclusion.
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate32,417 次观看 • 3 个月前
When Our Deities Are Insulted and the System Looks Away I am sharing details of yet another case we are pursuing in court, one that once again exposes the selective outrage and systemic indifference when it comes to the sentiments of Hindus. HinduJagrutiOrg Sanatan Prabhat
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate92,346 次观看 • 1 年前