Sprytix
@Sprytixl • 8,997 subscribers
AI WRITER
Shorts
Videos
THIS IS ACTUAL F*CKING GOLD Anthropic just shared one of the best tricks for Claude Code. The idea: stop treating Claude like one worker. Make Opus 5.5 a commander and give it 12 agents in 4 squads. Same release, two ways: Opus alone was 2% through on one thread. The command center shipped the whole v2.0 in 2 minutes on 12 threads. You just launch Claude Code like this: claude --model opus --command-center 12 "ship v2.0" here's the split: → Opus 5.5 turns "ship v2.0" into 12 tasks across 4 squads → CODE and OPS squads run on Sonnet 5.5, TEST and DOCS on Haiku 5.5 → every agent reports back in one line, never raw logs → Opus only wakes up when something breaks or needs approval the part most people get wrong: the commander watches everything. read 12 agent transcripts and your expensive model becomes the slowest part of the room. here the commander stays at 8k of context the entire run. it plans, it waits, it reads 12 one-line reports, it opens the release gate. REA sits underneath on anything legacy: before a squad touches old code, REA reverse-engineers it into a spec, so agents build from the spec and never from 500 files nobody understands. Opus commands. Sonnet builds. Haiku checks. REA explains the old code. JEV engineering is the same move one layer down: the forks that need no thinker (which squad, which model, retry or stop) go to JEV in milliseconds, and the commander only sees the ones that actually split the full tree > Opus 5.5 runs as commander, splits the mission into tasks and squads > CODE squad on Sonnet 5.5 writes endpoints, refactors auth, migrates the db > TEST squad on Haiku 5.5 runs unit, e2e and load tests > DOCS squad on Haiku 5.5 writes changelog, api docs and release notes OPS squad on Sonnet 5.5 handles staging, health checks and canary rollout REA reverse-engineers any legacy module into a spec before a squad touches it every agent reports one line, the commander never reads raw output Opus 5.5 holds the release gate and waits for all 12 reports JEV routes micro-forks in milliseconds paste the tree and this prompt into Claude Code ↓ "Rebuild my Claude Code setup around this tree: 1. Run the main session on Opus 5.5 as a commander: it plans, assigns and approves, it never writes code. 2. Split work into 4 squads: CODE and OPS on Sonnet 5.5, TEST and DOCS on Haiku 5.5, 12 agents total. 3. Every agent reports a one-line structured result. Raw logs never enter the main session. 4. Before any squad touches legacy code, run REA on it first and have the squad build from the spec, not the old files. 5. Add one rule to CLAUDE.md: nothing ships until every squad has reported and the commander opens the release gate. 6. Route deterministic forks (squad choice, model choice, retries) through JEV. Show me every change as a diff first. No edits until I say go." ↳ save it, you'll use this on every release from now on.
Sprytix132,535 просмотров • 9 дней назад
A 15-year-old American student made $23,000 in a month without leaving his room while his classmates were playing the same game he was getting paid for. He's not a programmer and never was. He just understood that Epic pays for every minute a player spends on his map - and built a tycoon where people get hooked for an hour at a time. 187,000 minutes of playtime in 30 days. One check from Epic. Claude wrote all the Verse code from his descriptions with zero lines written by hand. 10 hours of work over a weekend and the map was ready to publish. 1,000 players a day at 20 minutes each is already $5,000-15,000 a month from one map. And until end of 2026 Epic gives away 100% from direct item sales on your map on top of that. $722 million already paid out. 58 people became millionaires in 2024. And Epic just removed the only barrier that blocked everyone - now Claude writes the code.
Sprytix3,596,359 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад
CHINESE CRYPTO TRADER POSTED A NEURAL NETWORK VISUALIZATION ON TIKTOK AND ACCIDENTALLY SHOWED THE SYSTEM MAKING HIS POLYMARKET TRADES FOR HIM IN REAL TIME Blue connection lines everywhere, hidden layers stacked vertically, neurons firing across the screen and a tiny label in the middle that most people ignored on the first watch - “Bitcoin XVIII”. He framed the video like a normal AI experiment. Virtual aquarium simulation. Reinforcement learning. “Teaching the network survival behavior.” That was the caption. Pause at 0:16 profil: The model was not learning fish behavior. The labels inside the hidden layer matched live Bitcoin prediction markets almost perfectly - price windows, directional probabilities and volatility ranges mapped directly into the network nodes while the simulation kept running in the background. Then people found the wallet. $367,385 profit in 30 days. 1,988 predictions. Biggest single win: $183,000. Almost every active position tied to Bitcoin range markets with entry prices between 94 and 98 cents - exactly the kind of low volatility spreads an automated system farms continuously without human input. The comments turned into a detective board within an hour. Someone slowed the TikTok to 0.25x, stitched together every visible frame of the neural network screen and started matching the hidden layer labels against the active Polymarket positions on the wallet. The timing matched too closely. While viewers thought they were watching an AI visualization, the model was quietly classifying live market conditions in the background and routing trades automatically into different probability buckets depending on short term BTC movement. The TikTok got 11K views. The repost showing the wallet crossed 600,000 overnight. By morning people were already cloning the interface, rebuilding the network layout and trying to figure out why almost every position on the account sat between 96 and 99 cents with unusually high sizing. The original creator deleted nothing. The wallet is still active. Fastest way to copy-trade:
Sprytix2,285,921 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад
ANTHROPIC LEAKED A FILE WHERE 8 ENGINEERS COST $2.40 A DAY INSTEAD OF $120,000 A MONTH Microsoft and Google already run this - the same 8 seats cost them $73 a month. the ring turns once a day, 3 shifts hand off the work, zero meetings. the scout has tomorrow's agenda ready before you sit down. the architect splits the work, 2 builders run parallel branches. contracts get written before the workers - skip that and every worker guesses what the last one meant. with contracts all three read one shape: what goes in, what comes out. 3 branches at once means you pay the slowest lane, not the sum of three. nothing reaches you unrejected: the cheap model asks does it run, the expensive one asks should it merge. a gate that never rejects anything is a status badge, not a gate. the night crew takes the long jobs that never fit a working day. 1 role out of 8 writes back into the file - cut that edge and the rest repeat monday for a year. save this and paste it into Claude Code - you write the file, the file runs the company ↓
Sprytix699,444 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад
1:14
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
20-year-old girl from Mexico made $30,000 in 11 minutes on OnlyFans - and she wasn’t even at her screen when it happened She set up an automated system with Claude, and it runs 24/7 while she sleeps, eats, and lives her life First videos started getting traction after 14 hours, then the orders kicked in 6 days later - $30,000 in 11 minutes She just knew what she was doing and how to set it up, and Claude handled the rest
Sprytix1,266,588 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад
THIS IS ACTUAL F*CKING GOLD Anthropic just shared one of the best tricks for Claude Code. The idea: stop configuring Claude Code by hand. One prompt, 44 seconds, and your whole .claude/ folder writes itself. 7 files, 162 lines, 2 cents. you typed one line and wrote zero of them. You just launch Claude Code like this: claude --model opus "set up this repo: ..." here's the split: → 3 Haiku 5.5 agents scan the repo before a single file gets written → one reads the stack, one reads the npm scripts, one hunts for risky paths → Opus 5.5 takes those three summaries and writes the actual config → 7 files land: CLAUDE.md, 3 agents, permissions, a format hook and a /ship skill the part everyone gets wrong: they write CLAUDE.md from memory. a config written without reading the repo is a guess, and you live with that guess for months. here the risk scan came back with 5 dangerous paths and those went straight into the permissions file, so the agent is blocked from them before it ever runs once. the scripts scan found 5 npm scripts, and the agents got wired to the ones that actually exist in this repo instead of generic placeholders. one prompt from you, 7 files from it, 0 lines written by hand. Haiku reads. Opus writes. You commit. JEV engineering is the same move one layer down: 1,867 forks this run - which file, which agent, allow or ask - resolved in code at 0.97 sharpness, and the split ones (0.59 on "allow or ask") come back to you instead of being guessed the full tree ▸ you paste one prompt describing the setup you want ▸ 3 Haiku 5.5 agents scan stack, scripts and risky paths in parallel ▸ every agent returns a summary, never raw files ▸ Opus 5.5 writes CLAUDE.md, the agents, permissions, the hook and the skill ▸ anything touching permissions comes back to you before it is written ▸ JEV resolves micro-forks in code and escalates only the split ones paste the tree and this prompt into Claude Code ↓ "Set up this repo for me: 1. First scan it with 3 Haiku 5.5 agents in parallel: one reads the stack and manifests, one reads the build and npm scripts, one finds paths that are dangerous to touch. 2. Each agent returns a summary only, never raw file contents. 3. Then write CLAUDE.md, 3 subagents, a permissions file, a format hook and a /ship skill, all based on what the scan actually found, not on defaults. 4. Every risky path from the scan goes into the deny list before anything runs. 5. Ask me before writing anything that grants permissions. Show me every file as a diff first. No writes until I say go." ↳ save it, this is the first thing you run in every new repo.
Sprytix24,378 просмотров • 4 дней назад
ANTHROPIC'S LEAD ENGINEER WON A $1.2M BONUS FOR A SYSTEM THAT TURNS ANY DATA CHAOS INTO A GRAPH IN 8 STEPS raw chaos in - self-updating graph out - and the agent gets +42% productivity from day one Load → Extract → Graph → Index → Query → Memory → Swarm → Update eight steps, one pipeline, graph grows while you sleep documents, code, Slack - everything into one stream through Claude Code - nothing gets lost Fable 5 + Opus 5 extracts entity relationships - Neo4j builds a live structure - zero duplicates three types of search in one answer - vectors, keywords and graph - merged ranking gives accuracy no RAG delivers alone a nightly agent pulls new data and updates the graph automatically - the system gets smarter while you sleep bookmark and paste into Claude Code - a $1.2M system now free
Sprytix487,188 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад
A 19-year-old American student made $10,000 in a month posting rain sounds on YouTube. Not music, not vlogs, not tutorials - just rain with thunder while people sleep. YouTube pays for every thousand views and sleep content keeps viewers for 6-8 hours per session. He goes to Producer AI, types a prompt - "rain with thunder, 8 hours, deep and consistent" - and gets a finished audio file in minutes. Adds a static background image, uploads to YouTube and goes to sleep while the video collects views. Claude writes optimized titles, descriptions and tags for every video so the YouTube algorithm picks them up in search - "rain sounds for sleeping," "thunderstorm 8 hours," "white noise for focus." One channel, a few videos a week, zero appearances on camera. Money drops while he's in class.
Sprytix732,916 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад
ANTHROPIC LEAKED A FILE WHERE 4 AGENTS BUILD A BUSINESS DOING $100K A MONTH IN 60 MINUTES four agents run around the clock, cost $0 and work against a $100,000 target scout → architect → 2 builders → critic → back to root what makes it a team isn't the four agents, it's the three contracts written between them the scout hands the architect who already ships this and what they charge the architect hands the builders a spec with the interfaces named the builders hand the critic a diff and the tests that cover it leave any one of those boundaries vague and the work goes missing exactly there Haiku 4.5 triages cheap, Opus 5 decides expensive, Sonnet 5 builds, Opus 5 judges the most expensive model runs twice: once to plan, once to pass verdict two builders in parallel is two ways to disagree - which is exactly what the gate is for $100,000 is 334 customers at $299, $50,000 is 167, $10,000 is 34 and what you pay isn't even visible on that same scale the cost was never the thing standing in your way save this and paste it into Claude Code - let it write your 3 contracts ↓
Sprytix147,257 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
A guy is making $7,500 a month on Spotify and he doesn't tour, isn't on the radio, and has no label. He just typed a text prompt into Suno, got a finished track in 30 seconds and uploaded it through DistroKid for $23 a year. Telisha Jones did the same thing with a $10 subscription and zero music training. Her track hit 13 million Spotify streams, she landed #3 on the Billboard gospel chart and signed a $3 million deal. At the audition she never turned on her camera. Another anonymous creator on Reddit makes $5,000 a month from a catalog of 80 lo-fi and meditation tracks. Another made $30,000 across four months exclusively from sleep music and study playlists. Nobody wins on Spotify releasing AI pop. The money is where real musicians don't want to work - sleep music, meditation, focus, background playlists. People stream this for hours and royalties drop for every single play. $10 on Suno. $23 a year on DistroKid. A niche nobody is fighting for.
Sprytix613,688 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад
THIS IS A PURE F*CKING GOLDMINE Anthropic just shared one of the best tricks for Claude Code. The idea: keep one expensive brain and make everything else cheap. Opus 5.5 thinks, Haiku 5.5 does the grunt work, and your bill drops 79%. Same task, two ways: all-Opus would have cost $1.13. This run cost $0.23. You just launch Claude Code like this: claude --model opus # agents: model: haiku here's the split: → Opus 5.5 plans, decides and reviews, and burns 40k tokens for $0.21 → 12 Haiku 5.5 agents fan out across read, grep and test lanes → those 12 agents chew through 180k tokens for $0.02 → Opus never reads raw agent output, only 3 summaries at 6k tokens the part most people get wrong: they let the expensive model do the reading. Haiku is 40x cheaper per token. mapping 48 files cost $0.009. doing that on Opus is where the whole budget goes. one catch worth knowing: past 100k of context Haiku jumps to 5x its own price, so every agent is kept under 100k on purpose. that is the whole design. the brain stays small and expensive, the hands stay huge and cheap, and nothing raw ever crosses between them. Opus plans. Haiku reads. Opus reviews. JEV engineering is the same move one layer down: 1,301 forks this run - which file, which agent, retry or stop - resolved in code at 0.90 sharpness, and only the split ones (0.48 on "which agent") ever reach Opus the full tree > Opus 5.5 runs the main session, plans the lanes and decides what happens next > 12 Haiku 5.5 agents fan out across read, grep and test, each kept under 100k context > every agent returns a summary, never raw files or logs > Opus 5.5 reads 3 summaries at 6k tokens and reviews the result > JEV resolves 1,301 micro-forks in code and escalates only the split ones paste the tree and this prompt into Claude Code ↓ "Rebuild my Claude Code setup around this tree: 1. Run the main session on Opus 5.5 for planning, decisions and review only. 2. Set every subagent to Haiku 5.5 and fan the grunt work out across read, grep and test lanes. 3. Keep each agent under 100k of context, split the work further if it goes over. 4. Agents return summaries only, raw files and logs never enter the main session. 5. Add one rule to CLAUDE.md: if a task is reading, searching or running tests, it never runs on Opus. Route deterministic forks (file choice, agent choice, retries) through JEV. Show me every change as a diff first. No edits until I say go." ↳ save it, it'll come in handy.
Sprytix17,928 просмотров • 5 дней назад
ANTHROPIC LEAKED A FILE THAT BUILDS A BUSINESS IN 60 MINUTES - IT HUNTS CUSTOMERS ON ITS OWN AND BRINGS $50K IN THE FIRST MONTH in month one the system pulls 100+ customers, in month two the profit number goes past $100K root → offer → surface → hunt → clock → back into the root the first 12 minutes you write 3 lines no model can write for you: who buys, what we sell, at what price. get those wrong and the next 48 minutes automate the wrong business perfectly. the offer is one page, not a deck: the pain, the objection, the price. the page, the payment link and the replies get built by 3 files in parallel in 6 minutes. the first chain listens where your buyer complains - hundreds of signals scored cheaply, a handful get a real letter. a personal letter to someone who was never buying is a paid guess. the second chain publishes 3 variants a day - one post is a guess, three a day for a month is a distribution. the third chain is the cheapest: every closed deal describes the next one, and tomorrow the hunt runs a narrower list. in the morning you read 3 numbers: conversations, replies, paid - if the first grows and the third doesn't, the offer is the problem. and the honest part: 60 minutes buys distribution attempts, not demand - the machine runs whether or not anyone wants it. save this and paste it into Claude Code - an hour builds the machine, the market decides the number ↓
Sprytix207,629 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад
THIS IS A PURE F*CKING GOLDMINE Anthropic just shared one of the best tricks for Claude Code. The idea: never let build logs touch your main session. One tiny agent runs the build and hands back 3 lines. Same build, two ways: inline it is 40k tokens and $0.09 every single run. Through the builder it is 3 lines and nothing. You just launch Claude Code like this: claude --model sonnet # builder.md: model: haiku here's the split: → Sonnet 5.5 edits code in the main session and never sees a log → a Haiku 5.5 builder runs npm build, tsc and the test suite → it reads all 2k log lines, 227 files and 18 tests itself → it returns 3 lines: what ran, what failed, where the part everyone gets wrong: they run the build in the main session. 40k tokens of log noise per run, and every later message in that session carries it. you pay for that log again on every turn until the context resets. the builder agent is 10 lines of markdown. name, model haiku, tools Bash, and one rule: run the build, fix nothing, return 3 lines. that "fix nothing" is the whole trick. the cheap agent never tries to be clever, it just reports, and the lead decides what to do. one catch worth knowing: past 100k of context Haiku jumps to 5x its own price, so the builder is kept deliberately small. main context grows by +0 instead of +40k. that is the entire win. Sonnet edits. Haiku builds. The log never leaves the agent. JEV engineering is the same move one layer down: 1,301 forks this run - which agent, retry or stop, fix or report - resolved in code at 0.90 sharpness, and only the split ones ever reach Sonnet the full tree ▸ Sonnet 5.5 runs the main session and edits code only ▸ a Haiku 5.5 builder agent runs build, typecheck and tests ▸ the builder reads every log line and returns 3 lines, never the log ▸ the builder fixes nothing, it only reports ▸ Sonnet 5.5 reads those 3 lines and decides the next edit ▸ JEV resolves micro-forks in code and escalates only the split ones paste the tree and this prompt into Claude Code ↓ "Rebuild my Claude Code setup around this tree: 1. Run the main session on Sonnet 5.5 for editing code only. 2. Create a builder subagent with model: haiku and tools: Bash. 3. The builder runs build, typecheck and tests, reads all output itself, and returns at most 3 lines: what ran, what failed, where. 4. The builder never fixes anything, it only reports. 5. Add one rule to CLAUDE.md: build output never enters the main session, no exceptions. 6. Route deterministic forks (which agent, retry or stop, fix or report) through JEV. Show me every change as a diff first. No edits until I say go." ↳ save it, it'll come in handy.
Sprytix10,928 просмотров • 4 дней назад
ANTHROPIC LEAKED A $3.4M FILE THAT BUILDS AN AUTOMATED BUSINESS AIMED AT $100K A MONTH IN 60 MINUTES Microsoft and Google have been running this for a while - and they save $200,000 a month on engineers. the first 12 minutes you write 3 lines no model will write for you: who buys, what we sell, at what price. then the offer is one page - the price and the objection, and nothing else. the landing page, the payment link and the auto-replies get built across 3 parallel lanes in 12 minutes. and only one block out of five looks outward - it finds where your buyer already complains and scores hundreds of signals with the cheap model. a personal letter to someone who was never buying is a paid guess. the last block is the only one that rewrites the first - three numbers every morning, and tomorrow's hunt runs a narrower list. cut that link and you have 4 scripts repeating monday for a year. at minute 60 there's a page, a payment link that works, a week of content and a scored list of signals. buyers aren't on that list - the hour buys distribution attempts, not demand. save this and paste it into Claude Code - the hour builds the machine, the market decides the number ↓
Sprytix133,361 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад
THIS IS A PURE F*CKING GOLDMINE Anthropic just shared one of the best tricks for Claude Code. The idea: let Opus 5.5 write the plan as a script, and let 12 cheap agents run it while Opus sits idle at zero tokens. Same task, two ways: Opus solo was 49% done and still running. The swarm finished in 9 minutes on 165k tokens. You just launch Claude Code like this: claude --model opus --swarm haiku,sonnet here's the split: → Opus 5.5 writes plan.js, then stops reading anything → 6 Haiku 5.5 agents audit every file in parallel → 4 Sonnet 5.5 agents patch each fix in its own isolated copy → 2 Haiku 5.5 agents cross-check, 8 of 9 findings survive Opus only shows up at two moments: → writing the plan before the run → signing off on the verified fixes after it Opus plans. Haiku scans. Sonnet ships. JEV engineering is the same move one layer down: 3,767 forks this run - which model, which lane, retry or stop - resolved in code, and only the genuinely split ones ever reach Opus the full tree > Opus 5.5 runs the main session on xhigh and writes plan.js > scan audits each file on Haiku 5.5, six in parallel > patch applies each fix on Sonnet 5.5 in its own isolated copy > verify cross-checks every finding on Haiku 5.5 > Opus 5.5 reads only what survived, then signs off > JEV resolves micro-forks in milliseconds paste the tree and this prompt into Claude Code ↓ "Rebuild my Claude Code setup around this tree: Run the main session on Opus 5.5 with effort xhigh and swarm haiku,sonnet. Have Opus write the plan as a script: scan on Haiku 5.5, patch on Sonnet 5.5 in isolated copies, verify on Haiku 5.5. Let the phases overlap - each finding moves on as soon as its own stage finishes, no waiting for the batch. Never surface raw agent output to the main session, only verified results. Route deterministic forks (model choice, lane choice, retries) through JEV. Show me every change as a diff first. No edits until I say go." ↳ save it, it’ll come in handy
Sprytix19,727 просмотров • 10 дней назад
ANTHROPIC LEAD ENGINEER MAKING $2.3M/YEAR JUST LEAKED A 12-PAGE DOCUMENT - AND GOT FIRED 15 MINUTES AFTER PUBLISHING most developers build loops - but almost every loop breaks in one of five ways, and each failure has a symptom visible from the outside without reading a single line of code > Blind loop - the agent waits for a human to hand it work every morning - automating execution but not discovery > Tangled loop - parallel agents share one directory and overwrite each other parallelism that destroys instead of multiplies > Nodding loop - the agent grades its own work and approves it every time a loop that has never said no to itself is broken > Amnesiac loop - results live only in the context window every morning the system wakes up with no memory of yesterday > Manual loop - no trigger a human presses the button to start it that is not a loop that is a script waiting for a person a real loop finds its own work - remembers what it did has something that can say no never lets two agents touch the same file and fires itself on a timer remove any one of the five - and the loop either breaks or never starts 12 pages that changed how I build agentic systems today
Sprytix153,908 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад
ANTHROPIC LEAKED A $4.4M FILE WHERE 4 AGENTS BUILD A BUSINESS DOING $120K A MONTH IN 20 MINUTES four agents run for $0, and the business on top of them pulls $120,000 a month without a single salary scout → builder → seller → critic → back to the scout the scout finds who buys and at what price, the builder makes the page and the checkout the seller writes the offer and the outreach, the critic decides whether it ships at all Haiku 4.5 searches, two Sonnet 5 build and sell, Opus 5 passes the verdict no agent grades its own work - each one is checked by the next in the ring and the ring closes: the critic checks the scout one agent always gives itself an A, four in a ring never do a kickoff meeting alone takes 60 minutes, here the whole business is done in 20 $120,000 a month is 401 customers at $299 but all four come from one model family, and they share one blind spot the agents catch the errors at the edges, the one down the middle only you catch save this and paste it into Claude Code - let it build you this ring ↓
Sprytix43,407 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
ANTHROPIC LEAKED A $4.8M FILE WHERE 5 AGENTS BUILD A BUSINESS AIMED AT $120K A MONTH IN 60 MINUTES five agents running at zero hold a business doing $120,000 a month scout → architect → 2 builders → critic → operator all five read one ROOT.md, and you write it exactly once 96 agent-minutes of work fit inside 60 real ones the architect starts before the scout has finished the critic starts before the builders are done none of them got faster - they just stopped standing in a queue and that alone is 1.6x for free there is no human between them, so there is no pause anywhere $120K a month is 400 customers at $299 or 24 clients at $5,000 - arithmetic, not a forecast the hour builds the machine, the offer written in ROOT.md decides the number save this and paste it into Claude Code - let it build you these 5 agents ↓
Sprytix50,437 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
ANTHROPIC LEAKED A $4.2M FILE WHERE 4 AGENTS BUILD THE JEV SYSTEM IN 60 MINUTES, DOING $100K A MONTH four agents cost $0, and the system they assemble in an hour generates $100K a month scout → builder → critic → operator → JEV every agent is pinned to one exact model version, and none of them runs on "latest" the scout on Haiku 4.5 reads the market, the builder on Sonnet 5 builds everything, the critic on Opus 5 decides what ships the operator runs Haiku through the batch API at half price - the one agent that never has to hurry the builder takes 59% of the whole hour, because it's the one writing, and writing costs 5x more than reading short answers are cheap answers - and the whole economics rests on that one rule pin the versions in ROOT.md and next month JEV behaves exactly the same point it at "latest" and the model underneath updates quietly, no error, and the answers start to drift $100K a month is 334 customers at $299 four versions, one system - pin them and JEV stays JEV save this and paste it into Claude Code - let it build you these 4 agents ↓
Sprytix38,104 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
ANTHROPIC LEAKED A SETUP WHERE ONE FILE STARTS 7 LOOPS THAT TURN A PROMPT INTO A WORKING BUSINESS AI engineer drops in 1 file - the other 95% of the work closes automatically without them. spec → tasks → code → tests → docs → release → monitoring → back into the spec you don't write tickets anymore - you write the thing tickets get derived from, and Opus 5 cuts the spec into 6 tasks by itself. a task that fails its test comes back to itself, not to you - and runs a second lap without a single notification. 6 lanes of code run in parallel and none of them wait on you - the critic filters the diff before you ever open it. every new production bug becomes a permanent line in the eval set - the system never steps on it twice. monitoring isn't the end of the line, it's the start of the next spec - those back edges are what make it a graph instead of a conveyor. and one place is left where you say yes - release, 5 minutes instead of 5 hours. save this and paste it into Claude Code - and you get 7 loops that run without you ↓
Sprytix66,333 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад