stevonaj๐ง
@stevonaj โข 4,255 subscribers
๐๐ค๐ ๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ก๐ก ๐ฌ๐ค๐ง๐ ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ค๐ฃ ๐ข๐. ๐๐ฅ๐ท ๐ ๐๐ง๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฉ ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐๐ฃ๐ . ๐๐๐ฎ ๐๐ฉ. ๐๐ฉ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ค๐ฃ ๐๐ฉ. KH | OVO fan #firmfriends#stuck
Shorts
Videos
Drake doesnโt own his musicโ Thatโs false. โข Pre-2018: UMG owns the bulk of the masters, but Drake still owns publishing and retains contractual/master interests. Thatโs real ownership, not zero. โข Post-2018: Drake owns or co-owns his masters. UMG acts as a licensed distributor, not an absolute owner. Thatโs why Drakeโs company has legal standing in court to claim streaming and licensing harm. If he โdidnโt own his music,โ he wouldnโt. โContractual / master interestsโ โ plain English It means Drake has legally enforceable rights tied to the master recordings, even if he does not own 100% of them outright. Letโs break it down clearly. โธป 1๏ธโฃ โMaster interestsโ This refers to any ownership stake or control connected to the sound recordings (the masters). You do not need to own 100% of a master to have a master interest. Examples of master interests: โขPartial ownership (co-ownership) โขBeneficial ownership (economic interest) โขReversionary ownership (ownership that returns after a term) โขApproval or veto rights over certain uses โขA defined share of licensing revenue So when we say Drake has master interests, it means: ๐ he has real, recognized rights in the recordings themselves, not just a paycheck. โธป 2๏ธโฃ โContractual interestsโ This means those rights exist because of contracts, even if the copyright registration lists another owner. Contracts can grant an artist: โขGuaranteed revenue participation tied to the master โขAudit rights โขControl over licensing, sync, or exclusivity โขRestrictions on how recordings are exploited โขRights that expand or revert over time In other words: โขUMG may appear as the owner on paper โขBut Drakeโs contracts limit what UMG can do and guarantee Drakeโs stake Thatโs still ownership in the legal sense, even if itโs not exclusive. โธป 3๏ธโฃ Why this matters legally (and in court) Courts donโt ask: โWho owns 100%?โ They ask: โWho has ownership standing?โ If Drake had: โขonly artist royalties, no ownership โขno contractual master rights He could not claim economic harm tied to streaming or licensing. The fact that his company can assert harm means: โ he holds master-level contractual interests, not just royalties. โธป 4๏ธโฃ Simple analogy (no music jargon) Think of real estate: โขUMG = owns most of the building โขDrake = owns a legally protected share + has rights over how itโs used UMG canโt act like Drake isnโt an owner just because they own more square footage. โธป โ Final, clean definition โContractual/master interestsโ means: Drake has legally enforceable rights and economic ownership tied directly to the master recordings, even if he does not own 100% of them outright. Thatโs why saying โDrake owns nothing pre-2018โ is incorrect.
stevonaj๐ง77,000 gรถrรผntรผleme โข 3 ay รถnce
๐๐๐ should've done a bet over it! On whether he can go without talking about Drake
stevonaj๐ง43,349 gรถrรผntรผleme โข 11 ay รถnce
Like, do yall enjoy looking stupid?๐
stevonajlovingmeโค๏ธ๐บ57,196 gรถrรผntรผleme โข 1 yฤฑl รถnce
The hate only existed on Twitter because of bots and YouTube bots!
stevonaj๐ง32,375 gรถrรผntรผleme โข 8 ay รถnce
"Niggas dont speak my language! How da fuck I'm still up" ๐๐คด๐ฝ He will always be above the rest! You all can stay mad ! Nothing will change what's been set in stone! He's the Goat and will continue to be the one carrying that whole genre on his shoulders!
stevonaj๐ง25,141 gรถrรผntรผleme โข 1 yฤฑl รถnce