stevonaj๐ŸงŠ's banner
stevonaj๐ŸงŠ's profile picture

stevonaj๐ŸงŠ

@stevonaj โ€ข 4,086 subscribers

๐™‚๐™ค๐™™ ๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ก๐™ก ๐™ฌ๐™ค๐™ง๐™ ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™ข๐™š. ๐Ÿ“š๐ŸŽฅ๐Ÿ“ท ๐™„ ๐™˜๐™ง๐™š๐™–๐™ฉ๐™š ๐™ฌ๐™๐™–๐™ฉ ๐™„ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™ . ๐™Ž๐™–๐™ฎ ๐™ž๐™ฉ. ๐™Ž๐™ฉ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™ž๐™ฉ. KH | OVO fan #firmfriends#stuck

Videos

stevonaj's profile picture

Cook!!! So many facts!!

stevonaj๐ŸงŠ

85,647 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 11 ๅคฉๅ‰

stevonaj's profile picture

Drake doesnโ€™t own his musicโ€ Thatโ€™s false. โ€ข Pre-2018: UMG owns the bulk of the masters, but Drake still owns publishing and retains contractual/master interests. Thatโ€™s real ownership, not zero. โ€ข Post-2018: Drake owns or co-owns his masters. UMG acts as a licensed distributor, not an absolute owner. Thatโ€™s why Drakeโ€™s company has legal standing in court to claim streaming and licensing harm. If he โ€œdidnโ€™t own his music,โ€ he wouldnโ€™t. โ€œContractual / master interestsโ€ โ€” plain English It means Drake has legally enforceable rights tied to the master recordings, even if he does not own 100% of them outright. Letโ€™s break it down clearly. โธป 1๏ธโƒฃ โ€œMaster interestsโ€ This refers to any ownership stake or control connected to the sound recordings (the masters). You do not need to own 100% of a master to have a master interest. Examples of master interests: โ€ขPartial ownership (co-ownership) โ€ขBeneficial ownership (economic interest) โ€ขReversionary ownership (ownership that returns after a term) โ€ขApproval or veto rights over certain uses โ€ขA defined share of licensing revenue So when we say Drake has master interests, it means: ๐Ÿ‘‰ he has real, recognized rights in the recordings themselves, not just a paycheck. โธป 2๏ธโƒฃ โ€œContractual interestsโ€ This means those rights exist because of contracts, even if the copyright registration lists another owner. Contracts can grant an artist: โ€ขGuaranteed revenue participation tied to the master โ€ขAudit rights โ€ขControl over licensing, sync, or exclusivity โ€ขRestrictions on how recordings are exploited โ€ขRights that expand or revert over time In other words: โ€ขUMG may appear as the owner on paper โ€ขBut Drakeโ€™s contracts limit what UMG can do and guarantee Drakeโ€™s stake Thatโ€™s still ownership in the legal sense, even if itโ€™s not exclusive. โธป 3๏ธโƒฃ Why this matters legally (and in court) Courts donโ€™t ask: โ€œWho owns 100%?โ€ They ask: โ€œWho has ownership standing?โ€ If Drake had: โ€ขonly artist royalties, no ownership โ€ขno contractual master rights He could not claim economic harm tied to streaming or licensing. The fact that his company can assert harm means: โœ… he holds master-level contractual interests, not just royalties. โธป 4๏ธโƒฃ Simple analogy (no music jargon) Think of real estate: โ€ขUMG = owns most of the building โ€ขDrake = owns a legally protected share + has rights over how itโ€™s used UMG canโ€™t act like Drake isnโ€™t an owner just because they own more square footage. โธป โœ… Final, clean definition โ€œContractual/master interestsโ€ means: Drake has legally enforceable rights and economic ownership tied directly to the master recordings, even if he does not own 100% of them outright. Thatโ€™s why saying โ€œDrake owns nothing pre-2018โ€ is incorrect.

stevonaj๐ŸงŠ

68,639 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 19 ๅคฉๅ‰

stevonaj's profile picture

Some facts for your headtop

stevonaj๐ŸงŠ

105,758 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ๅนดๅ‰

stevonaj's profile picture

Another bar aging like wine from family matters

stevonaj๐ŸงŠ

64,149 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 8 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

stevonaj's profile picture

Attention kbots class is in session!

stevonaj๐ŸงŠ

72,345 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ๅนดๅ‰

stevonaj's profile picture

The hate only existed on Twitter because of bots and YouTube bots!

stevonaj๐ŸงŠ

32,255 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 5 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

stevonaj's profile picture

This is why his fans stand ten toes down for him!

stevonaj๐ŸงŠ

46,512 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ๅนดๅ‰