Susan Crabtree's banner
Susan Crabtree's profile picture

Susan Crabtree

@susancrabtree150,875 subscribers

@RCPolitics National Correspondent. 2024 Dao Prize Winner. Author Fool’s Gold. Contributor @CityJournal @CaliforniaPost. Send tips: [email protected]

Shorts

🚨JUST DROPPED: Homeland Security Office of Inspector General releases report on “Secret Service Missed Opportunities to Prevent and Disrupt the Attempted Assassination of President Trump on July 13, 2024." One of the top findings confirms one of the big mysteries of the Butler assassination attempt and who is really at fault: The Secret Service didn't use available equipment to block the line of sight between the AGR building and the stage where President Trump spoke, allowing shooter Thomas Crooks a clear 155-yard shot at Trump. This occurred despite extensive Secret Service training that instructs agents to place objects that "enhance light-of-sight coverage" at events, the OIG reports asserts. The OIG also produced the video below to demonstrate just how clear a shot Crooks had of Trump and the stage. Who is at fault for that? In its report, the DHS OIG said the Secret Service WOULD NOT TELL THEM if campaign staff had placed equipment that was already on site at the event locations that would have blocked the line of sight. I have reported, and a report from Sen. Rand Paul's office later reported, that the Secret Service tried to use farm equipment to block that line of sight -- but the Trump campaign objected to the optics of it -- and requested that it be removed. Here's where it gets interesting: The Secret Service complied. It's unclear who in the Secret Service is responsible for failing to stand up to and override the campaign staff who wanted the equipment removed. -Miyo Perez was the USSS agent in charge of security. She was an inexperienced agent and known within the detail as a partier, not a serious. There were two supervisory agents that were supposed to provide oversight to Perez's work, Nick Menster and Nick Olszewski. Those two agents were never punished for their role in Butler's porous security plan and execution. In fact, current Secret Service Director Sean Curran gave them big promotions. Interestingly, it was Curran who was ultimately responsible for all security decisions for the Butler site -- including the decision to remove farm equipment or not place additional equipment to block the line of sight. Curran was the detail leader for the team protecting Trump during the campaign, and he signed off on the site plan. This new OIG report doesn't address whether Curran himself directly approved the removal of farm equipment from the site so the line of site remained unobstructed for Crooks' shot that nearly killed Trump and did murder Corey Comperatore and seriously wound two others, James Copenhaver and David Dutch. Copenhaver and Duth are now suing the Secret Service over the agency's "preventable failures," as their lawsuit asserts. It's possible that OIG investigators asked Curran, and he refused to say. I'll link to the new DHS OIG report below.

🚨JUST DROPPED: Homeland Security Office of Inspector General releases report on “Secret Service Missed Opportunities to Prevent and Disrupt the Attempted Assassination of President Trump on July 13, 2024." One of the top findings confirms one of the big mysteries of the Butler assassination attempt and who is really at fault: The Secret Service didn't use available equipment to block the line of sight between the AGR building and the stage where President Trump spoke, allowing shooter Thomas Crooks a clear 155-yard shot at Trump. This occurred despite extensive Secret Service training that instructs agents to place objects that "enhance light-of-sight coverage" at events, the OIG reports asserts. The OIG also produced the video below to demonstrate just how clear a shot Crooks had of Trump and the stage. Who is at fault for that? In its report, the DHS OIG said the Secret Service WOULD NOT TELL THEM if campaign staff had placed equipment that was already on site at the event locations that would have blocked the line of sight. I have reported, and a report from Sen. Rand Paul's office later reported, that the Secret Service tried to use farm equipment to block that line of sight -- but the Trump campaign objected to the optics of it -- and requested that it be removed. Here's where it gets interesting: The Secret Service complied. It's unclear who in the Secret Service is responsible for failing to stand up to and override the campaign staff who wanted the equipment removed. -Miyo Perez was the USSS agent in charge of security. She was an inexperienced agent and known within the detail as a partier, not a serious. There were two supervisory agents that were supposed to provide oversight to Perez's work, Nick Menster and Nick Olszewski. Those two agents were never punished for their role in Butler's porous security plan and execution. In fact, current Secret Service Director Sean Curran gave them big promotions. Interestingly, it was Curran who was ultimately responsible for all security decisions for the Butler site -- including the decision to remove farm equipment or not place additional equipment to block the line of sight. Curran was the detail leader for the team protecting Trump during the campaign, and he signed off on the site plan. This new OIG report doesn't address whether Curran himself directly approved the removal of farm equipment from the site so the line of site remained unobstructed for Crooks' shot that nearly killed Trump and did murder Corey Comperatore and seriously wound two others, James Copenhaver and David Dutch. Copenhaver and Duth are now suing the Secret Service over the agency's "preventable failures," as their lawsuit asserts. It's possible that OIG investigators asked Curran, and he refused to say. I'll link to the new DHS OIG report below.

227,603 views

Videos

susancrabtree's profile picture

🚨🚨We 100% stand by our Gavin Newsom bronze-bust vanity project story, which my co-author Jedd McFatter uncovered in our new book: "Fool's Gold: The Radicals, Con-Artists, and Traitors Who Killed the California Dream and Now Threaten Us All." "Team Newsom is afraid of the shocking revelations in FOOL’S GOLD—which is backed by more than forty-five pages of endnotes containing more than 1,000 open-source reputable and verifiable citations with zero anonymous sources—and that is why they are trying to smear this book,” said Susan Crabtree, the book's co-author. "The simple fact is that no one knew that Gavin Newsom used a corrupt pay-to-play funding mechanism called ‘behested payments’ to solicit funds from his own companies to erect a monument to himself inside San Francisco City Hall until we followed the money and unearthed the obscure documents,” Crabtree stated. “Furthermore, Newsom’s team has thus far refused to answer whether his companies got a tax break for funding this ‘charitable’ statue; just like Newsom’s wildfire windfalls and shady CCP ties, his statute is a scandal, and we stand by our reporting." To learn all about Newsom’s role in California’s downward spiral, read our book, 💰Fool’s Gold: The Radicals, Con-Artists, and Traitors that Killed the California Dream and Now Threaten Us All💰. Emdorsed by Peter Schweizer and Miranda Devine. Available on Amazon and where most books are sold.

Susan Crabtree

53,265 views • 4 months ago

susancrabtree's profile picture

IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN CALLED SHAMELESS... Brace yourself for the onslaught of excuses and then ask, is Gavin Newsom really a Paradox or is this just a convenient controlled oppo dump on himself at the beginning of his 2028 White House campaign? Then get the real story on Newsom's silver spoon Getty oil $-propelled rise + series of bad choices and policies that annihilated the California Dream -- and how he now wants to make America California -- in my investigative book FOOL'S GOLD 💰: The Radicals, Con Artists and Traitors Who Killed the California Dream and Now Threaten Us All 💰, which I wrote with Government Accountability Institute's Jedd McFatter with a forward from Peter Schweizer + endorsed by Miranda Devine. Available on Amazon and where all books are sold. Unlike Gore's Inconvenient Truth, this is a VERY CONVENIENT 'MISTAKES WERE MADE' PARADOX. I'm sure he'll address at least parts of these problematic life choices: -- Why he had an affair with his best friend's and top campaign aide's wife. --Why he never went to rehab after it even though they both admitted or implied it was alcohol/addiction-related. --What types of addictions he *had* at different points of his life. Then get the real story in Fool's Gold: --Why he lied FOR YEARS about his FIELD OF SCHEMES - stolen baseball valor/varsity blues college entrance that my reporting helped expose. --What was really behind his "rules for thee but not for me" French Laundry dinner during COVID? --And what about this "Up in Smoke" bailout he engineered using taxpayer $$$ for PG&E after the utility was found guilty of manslaughter in a wildfire that took 84 souls -- and AFTER he and his wife took at least $700K from the utility for his campaigns and her gender-justice films. --Why he sold-out California to China and ended up serving as a sommelier to the CCP, pouring his Plumpjack wines to Communist Party officials while getting them trademarked. AND THE LIST OF DISTURBING NEWSOM STORIES WE EXPOSE IN "FOOL'S GOLD" GOES ON AND ON... AMAZON LINK TO PURCHASE ⬇️⬇️⬇️

Susan Crabtree

64,968 views • 7 months ago

No more content to load