TR_tech's banner
TR_tech's profile picture

TR_tech

@T_Nblty11,313 subscribers

The defense technologies with special focus on Turkiye. Unique compilations and comparisons among sub/systems and bring Turkiye to the forefront as it deserves

Shorts

Gürz new variant

Gürz new variant

72,629 views

The TÜBİTAK 2025 Activity Report stated that 1,700 HGK-84 guidance kits were delivered to the Turkish Air Force in 2025

The TÜBİTAK 2025 Activity Report stated that 1,700 HGK-84 guidance kits were delivered to the Turkish Air Force in 2025

13,568 views

"There is no surface-to-air missile system in the world that we cannot hit" This fact, emphasised by the Turkish army officer, is underpinned by the strength it draws from Turkish industry. The following products are the jet-powered kamikaze and decoy systems which are in inventory (?). The supersonic kamikaze and decoy drones have not yet been demonstrated Şimşek Şimşek-M Super Şimşek Super Şimşek in military exercise

"There is no surface-to-air missile system in the world that we cannot hit" This fact, emphasised by the Turkish army officer, is underpinned by the strength it draws from Turkish industry. The following products are the jet-powered kamikaze and decoy systems which are in inventory (?). The supersonic kamikaze and decoy drones have not yet been demonstrated Şimşek Şimşek-M Super Şimşek Super Şimşek in military exercise

33,626 views

Ministry of National Defense: “A number of SUPER ŞİMŞEK aircraft, developed by TUSAŞ using domestic and national capabilities, have been added to the inventory of our Air Force.” The phrase used by Turkish air force pilot in charge of the presentation to describe the capabilities of Super Şimşek during the exercise; “There is no surface-to-air missile system in the world that we cannot hit”

Ministry of National Defense: “A number of SUPER ŞİMŞEK aircraft, developed by TUSAŞ using domestic and national capabilities, have been added to the inventory of our Air Force.” The phrase used by Turkish air force pilot in charge of the presentation to describe the capabilities of Super Şimşek during the exercise; “There is no surface-to-air missile system in the world that we cannot hit”

16,370 views

The length of the MUGEM national aircraft carrier (under construction) has been increased from 285 meters to 300 meters ☄️

The length of the MUGEM national aircraft carrier (under construction) has been increased from 285 meters to 300 meters ☄️

12,640 views

Sungur (8+km) Hisar-A (15+km) Hisar-O/Rf (25+km) Hisar-O/Rf ER (40+km) (No image yet)

Sungur (8+km) Hisar-A (15+km) Hisar-O/Rf (25+km) Hisar-O/Rf ER (40+km) (No image yet)

15,379 views

Videos

T_Nblty's profile picture

It is impossible for all NATO allies to be like Turkiye. Why? This is because there are some countries within the alliance that demand all kinds of assistance without assuming any operational responsibility or join missions, and some has been engaging in hostile actions and lobbying efforts for years with the aim of hindering the progress of other NATO countries. Not only has this country failed to make any financial or military contributions to NATO, but it is also attempting to weaken NATO from within in order to hinder the progress of countries like Turkiye—which carry out NATO missions under the NATO flag from the Baltic states to Eastern Europe. Let’s turn to the other aspect of the issue: the question of being like Turkiye. Just think about it this way; What business does a country that can’t even build a cheap commercial ship have in the same military alliance as one that can produce over 50 warships including destroyers, aircraft carriers and submarines at the same time? Can the perception of power and alliance ever be the same between a country capable of delivering thousands of AG munitions in a single shipment and a country that is delighted even to purchase just 30–40 AG munitions? Can a country with only 150-170 tanks that could be considered "modern" in its inventory be the same as one that is building facilities capable of delivering 100 tanks a year? Can there be a spirit of unity between a country that can develop and fly a 5th-generation fighter jet, and build facilities to produce 24+9 KAAN fighter jets/year and a country that, upon purchasing 20-25 4th-generation aircraft, immediately thinks of provocation, illegal actions and violating treaties for expanding ? As long as NATO fails to purge own parasites within its union, other countries will be forced to walk with a burden on their backs. Without these types of freeloaders—who don’t shoulder any of the alliance’s burdens—NATO could be a much stronger military organization. They're of no use—at least we'd be spared the harm they cause. Imagine flying side by side in battle with the incompetents who crashed a plane into parked fighter jets during a NATO exercise or caused a helicopter to crash into the sea in other exercise while flying at low altitude. May God grant us ease.

TR_tech

18,247 views • 1 month ago