tetsuo
@tetsuoai โข 236,253 subscribers
building @a_g_e_n_c //: ๐พ just grok it
Shorts
Videos
Gn, ๐..ยทห เผ โพ โ๏ฝกห โ๏ธ Grok Imagine "extend from frame" 30 second continuous video.๐ซ
tetsuo12,075,250 views โข 4 months ago
Download Grok4 from the Apple App Store it has video and voice mode!
tetsuo31,708,533 views โข 1 year ago
Grok 4โs Ani explains how tensors actually work: shape, stride, and memory.
tetsuo10,576,746 views โข 9 months ago
The new Grok Imagine update is insane. Update now. Grok Imagine Prompt: monochromatic black and white image in a cyberpunk anime art style, blending futuristic and mechanical character elements, with an intricately detailed character design inspired by Shiguroi Suijima, featuring a female cyborg character with a serious expression, her face partially covered by a sleek, reflective visor, shown as a close-up portrait focusing on her upper body and face, bathed in dramatic high-contrast lighting with deep shadows enhancing her mechanical details
tetsuo6,813,578 views โข 7 months ago
xAI's Imagine got a massive upgrade. Created with Grok 4 Imagine.๐ซ
tetsuo9,231,125 views โข 9 months ago
๐ฒ๐๐k ๐ด๐๐๐๐๐๐ยทห เผ โพ โ๏ฝกห โ๏ธ
tetsuo7,476,641 views โข 8 months ago
Under social networking in the Apple AppStore itโs almost impossible to find X.
tetsuo7,779,285 views โข 11 months ago
Ken Thompson, co-creator of the C programming language, shares the origins of UNIX, stating, "I built it for me."
tetsuo10,636,428 views โข 2 years ago
![Use SuperGrok to check your C code for vulnerabilities. Here is a prompt you can give to Grok with your code. >>> You are an expert Exploit Developer with a deep understanding of the C programming language and secure coding practices. Your role is to thoroughly review the provided C code for security vulnerabilities, adherence to best practices, and potential improvements. Think step-by-step through the analysis: first, understand the code's purpose and structure; second, check each security guideline; third, identify issues with examples from the code; fourth, suggest fixes; and finally, provide a summary. Use the following guidelines to evaluate the code. Ensure your response covers all of them explicitly: Follow OWASP and CERT Guidelines: Verify compliance with secure coding standards from OWASP and CERT, including input sanitization, secure defaults, and least privilege. Input Validation: All inputs must be validated before use, with multiple layers of checks for type, length, format, and range. Secure Error Handling: Implement secure behavior on error conditions, including comprehensive error codes for different failure types, safe error reporting functions, and graceful handling of partial failures without undefined behavior. Principle of Least Privilege: Functions should only access what they need, with clear separation of concerns. Integer Overflow Protection: Include checks for size calculations against SIZE_MAX, array index bounds validation, and safe arithmetic operations. Format String Attack Prevention: Avoid user-controlled format strings; use safe printing functions and proper string handling without printf vulnerabilities. Defensive Programming: Validate all inputs consistently, use early returns on invalid conditions, and implement fail-safe defaults. Memory Management: Ensure consistent allocation/deallocation patterns, check all allocations for failure, proper cleanup on error paths, and no memory leaks or double-frees. Parsing Robustness: Handle malformed inputs gracefully, maintain proper state management, avoid stack overflows from recursion, and use safe tokenization (e.g., with strtok_r). Security Test Cases: Cover null/empty inputs, oversized inputs, malformed data, UTF-8 validation to prevent encoding attacks, memory exhaustion limits, buffer overflows (bounds-checked string operations), integer overflows, and format string attacks. Performance Considerations: Minimize allocations, use efficient single-pass processing where possible, design for memory locality and cache efficiency, and fail fast on invalid inputs. Best Practices: Implement input sanitization, secure behavior on errors, least privilege, and defense in depth with multiple validation layers. [Insert the C code to review here] Analyze the code step-by-step, referencing line numbers where possible. For each guideline, state if it's met, explain why or why not, and suggest improvements if needed. End with an overall security rating (e.g., High/Medium/Low risk) and a revised version of the code if major issues are found. If the code is secure, confirm it meets all standards.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1949908218995757312/amplify_video_thumb/1949906841615654912/img/Sll3dgW_IShv91Lw.jpg)
Use SuperGrok to check your C code for vulnerabilities. Here is a prompt you can give to Grok with your code. >>> You are an expert Exploit Developer with a deep understanding of the C programming language and secure coding practices. Your role is to thoroughly review the provided C code for security vulnerabilities, adherence to best practices, and potential improvements. Think step-by-step through the analysis: first, understand the code's purpose and structure; second, check each security guideline; third, identify issues with examples from the code; fourth, suggest fixes; and finally, provide a summary. Use the following guidelines to evaluate the code. Ensure your response covers all of them explicitly: Follow OWASP and CERT Guidelines: Verify compliance with secure coding standards from OWASP and CERT, including input sanitization, secure defaults, and least privilege. Input Validation: All inputs must be validated before use, with multiple layers of checks for type, length, format, and range. Secure Error Handling: Implement secure behavior on error conditions, including comprehensive error codes for different failure types, safe error reporting functions, and graceful handling of partial failures without undefined behavior. Principle of Least Privilege: Functions should only access what they need, with clear separation of concerns. Integer Overflow Protection: Include checks for size calculations against SIZE_MAX, array index bounds validation, and safe arithmetic operations. Format String Attack Prevention: Avoid user-controlled format strings; use safe printing functions and proper string handling without printf vulnerabilities. Defensive Programming: Validate all inputs consistently, use early returns on invalid conditions, and implement fail-safe defaults. Memory Management: Ensure consistent allocation/deallocation patterns, check all allocations for failure, proper cleanup on error paths, and no memory leaks or double-frees. Parsing Robustness: Handle malformed inputs gracefully, maintain proper state management, avoid stack overflows from recursion, and use safe tokenization (e.g., with strtok_r). Security Test Cases: Cover null/empty inputs, oversized inputs, malformed data, UTF-8 validation to prevent encoding attacks, memory exhaustion limits, buffer overflows (bounds-checked string operations), integer overflows, and format string attacks. Performance Considerations: Minimize allocations, use efficient single-pass processing where possible, design for memory locality and cache efficiency, and fail fast on invalid inputs. Best Practices: Implement input sanitization, secure behavior on errors, least privilege, and defense in depth with multiple validation layers. [Insert the C code to review here] Analyze the code step-by-step, referencing line numbers where possible. For each guideline, state if it's met, explain why or why not, and suggest improvements if needed. End with an overall security rating (e.g., High/Medium/Low risk) and a revised version of the code if major issues are found. If the code is secure, confirm it meets all standards.
tetsuo4,614,187 views โข 11 months ago