The Noisy Elephant's banner

The Noisy Elephant

@TheNoisyTrunk • 5,896 subscribers

There are no words, Josephine.

Shorts

Ex-comedian #DaveHughes finds out his career is in DEAD END street, admits he owns a voLVo (WHy?) and turns into ET - "Phone home" - haha, the cooker. Why is he always whinging?

Ex-comedian #DaveHughes finds out his career is in DEAD END street, admits he owns a voLVo (WHy?) and turns into ET - "Phone home" - haha, the cooker. Why is he always whinging?

37,750 次观看

Pauline Hanson and Malcolm Roberts announce... PETROL at $0.27 cents a litre. #OneNation sniffing fumes

Pauline Hanson and Malcolm Roberts announce... PETROL at $0.27 cents a litre. #OneNation sniffing fumes

30,263 次观看

#LindaReynolds "It's all about me" followed by stomp, yell, sob, squeal. Linda 'I sue ' Reynolds is all pissed that she didn't get a mention in the film 'Silenced' From The Australian: In a statement to the Australian on Thursday, Ms Reynolds criticised Silenced for erasing a “critical piece” of her history. "The filmmakers of Silenced said they “respectfully disagree with the claims made by Ms Reynolds about our film”. “Silenced is a film that demonstrates how the law has been used by alleged perpetrators to silence survivors of gender-based violence and the journalists who report on these cases,” they said." Linda, you got a verdict, you bankrupted Brittany Higgins, and you STILL want it ALL TO BE ABOUT YOU. Just fuck off. This is the most incredible part: Reynolds “It cost me my job, my health, my reputation and the Liberal Party the election.” Linda, it didn't cost you your job; you cost yourself your job. You're just using that as an excuse. Furthermore, this didn't lose liberals the election; the fucking liberals did because they're all just like you. JUST. GO. AWAY. Off you fuck.

#LindaReynolds "It's all about me" followed by stomp, yell, sob, squeal. Linda 'I sue ' Reynolds is all pissed that she didn't get a mention in the film 'Silenced' From The Australian: In a statement to the Australian on Thursday, Ms Reynolds criticised Silenced for erasing a “critical piece” of her history. "The filmmakers of Silenced said they “respectfully disagree with the claims made by Ms Reynolds about our film”. “Silenced is a film that demonstrates how the law has been used by alleged perpetrators to silence survivors of gender-based violence and the journalists who report on these cases,” they said." Linda, you got a verdict, you bankrupted Brittany Higgins, and you STILL want it ALL TO BE ABOUT YOU. Just fuck off. This is the most incredible part: Reynolds “It cost me my job, my health, my reputation and the Liberal Party the election.” Linda, it didn't cost you your job; you cost yourself your job. You're just using that as an excuse. Furthermore, this didn't lose liberals the election; the fucking liberals did because they're all just like you. JUST. GO. AWAY. Off you fuck.

20,458 次观看

Pauline Hanson Self-funded retirees will get $35k IF THEY ARE ENTITLED TO? "The Pension age" HAHAHAHAHAH #OneNation cooking

Pauline Hanson Self-funded retirees will get $35k IF THEY ARE ENTITLED TO? "The Pension age" HAHAHAHAHAH #OneNation cooking

16,003 次观看

Kash Patel is confused - Spare me. So let me get this straight. We’ve got Kash Patel (a Hindu) standing next to Governor Cox (a Mormon) talking about Charlie Kirk (a Protestant) … and Patel sends him off with “See you in Valhalla.” Valhalla. The pagan Viking warrior afterlife where you spend eternity getting stabbed, healed, and drunk under Odin’s roof. Translation: A Hindu FBI man just promised a Protestant he’ll meet him in a pagan paradise while a Mormon governor nodded like it was all perfectly normal. American politics isn’t just culture war anymore. It’s mythological fan fiction with bad theology.

Kash Patel is confused - Spare me. So let me get this straight. We’ve got Kash Patel (a Hindu) standing next to Governor Cox (a Mormon) talking about Charlie Kirk (a Protestant) … and Patel sends him off with “See you in Valhalla.” Valhalla. The pagan Viking warrior afterlife where you spend eternity getting stabbed, healed, and drunk under Odin’s roof. Translation: A Hindu FBI man just promised a Protestant he’ll meet him in a pagan paradise while a Mormon governor nodded like it was all perfectly normal. American politics isn’t just culture war anymore. It’s mythological fan fiction with bad theology.

42,951 次观看

When will Linda Reynolds STOP? The Australian Reports "Linda Reynolds launches bankruptcy action on Brittany Higgins" 🐘 THE NOISY TAKE Linda Reynolds was never chasing justice – just blood. She’s now filed bankruptcy proceedings against Brittany Higgins, even after already winning over $1 million in damages and costs. Let’s remember: Before that defamation circus even began, Higgins’ parents offered Reynolds nearly $200,000 to settle - apology and cash on the table. Reynolds said no. Because this was never about closure. It’s about anger and hate. Now she’s trying to claw at the remains of a young woman’s life, even though Brittany’s $2.4m compensation payout was gutted long ago by tax, legal fees, and the price of surviving the media storm Reynolds helped feed. If Reynolds “wins” this, here’s what she gets: A slice of earnings above $87k a year for up to five years. That’s it. No lump sum. No magic money tree. By the time you subtract rent, child expenses, and legal costs, Linda might scrape enough to buy herself a Jenny Craig frozen dinner and call it revenge served cold. And in the public eye? Here’s the plain truth: bankruptcy only bites what’s on paper – the income you can see above about $87k. But in the real world, plenty of people earn through companies, contracts, or future-value setups that keep most of their worth neatly off the PAYG slip. Wages look small, life goes on. Equity here, deferred pay there, a director fee tucked away – all perfectly legitimate, just structured. The books stay clean, the creditor gets crumbs. Linda Reynolds knows this. She’s a Liberal, after all. Brittany walks out looking like a survivor hounded to the end, and Reynolds cements her reputation as the woman who destroyed her own legacy chasing a ghost of vengeance. Even if Reynolds “wins” – she loses. It’s over. All bar the chocolate cake.

When will Linda Reynolds STOP? The Australian Reports "Linda Reynolds launches bankruptcy action on Brittany Higgins" 🐘 THE NOISY TAKE Linda Reynolds was never chasing justice – just blood. She’s now filed bankruptcy proceedings against Brittany Higgins, even after already winning over $1 million in damages and costs. Let’s remember: Before that defamation circus even began, Higgins’ parents offered Reynolds nearly $200,000 to settle - apology and cash on the table. Reynolds said no. Because this was never about closure. It’s about anger and hate. Now she’s trying to claw at the remains of a young woman’s life, even though Brittany’s $2.4m compensation payout was gutted long ago by tax, legal fees, and the price of surviving the media storm Reynolds helped feed. If Reynolds “wins” this, here’s what she gets: A slice of earnings above $87k a year for up to five years. That’s it. No lump sum. No magic money tree. By the time you subtract rent, child expenses, and legal costs, Linda might scrape enough to buy herself a Jenny Craig frozen dinner and call it revenge served cold. And in the public eye? Here’s the plain truth: bankruptcy only bites what’s on paper – the income you can see above about $87k. But in the real world, plenty of people earn through companies, contracts, or future-value setups that keep most of their worth neatly off the PAYG slip. Wages look small, life goes on. Equity here, deferred pay there, a director fee tucked away – all perfectly legitimate, just structured. The books stay clean, the creditor gets crumbs. Linda Reynolds knows this. She’s a Liberal, after all. Brittany walks out looking like a survivor hounded to the end, and Reynolds cements her reputation as the woman who destroyed her own legacy chasing a ghost of vengeance. Even if Reynolds “wins” – she loses. It’s over. All bar the chocolate cake.

37,192 次观看

Linda Reynolds — addicted to outrage, powered by spite. Six years on, and Linda Reynolds still can’t let it go. She’s suing everyone within reach — Higgins, publishers, governments, even the Commonwealth — because anger is all she has left. She leaked confidential material to Janet Albrechtsen out of “incredible anger.” She’s bankrupting a rape survivor while writing letters demanding new inquiries into the same events that broke her career. Every time you think she’s reached closure, she finds a new way to reopen the wound — as long as she can play the victim. At this point, it’s not about justice. It’s about feeding the addiction — fury, self-pity, and vengeance. The cruelty isn’t the byproduct; it’s the point. #NoisyTrunk

Linda Reynolds — addicted to outrage, powered by spite. Six years on, and Linda Reynolds still can’t let it go. She’s suing everyone within reach — Higgins, publishers, governments, even the Commonwealth — because anger is all she has left. She leaked confidential material to Janet Albrechtsen out of “incredible anger.” She’s bankrupting a rape survivor while writing letters demanding new inquiries into the same events that broke her career. Every time you think she’s reached closure, she finds a new way to reopen the wound — as long as she can play the victim. At this point, it’s not about justice. It’s about feeding the addiction — fury, self-pity, and vengeance. The cruelty isn’t the byproduct; it’s the point. #NoisyTrunk

34,737 次观看

We've analysed the #TreasurersDebate on the ABC last night, hosted by Snarky herself, Sarah Ferguson. This is Clip #1 – short clip – of a series where we point out a few interesting things. This isn’t the biggest deal in the scheme of things, but you’ll notice two things straight off: 1️⃣ Ferguson addresses Dr Jim Chalmers with "we’ll start with you", but immediately shifts tone and calls Angus Taylor simply “Angus.” Subtle difference, but it sets the tone. And in our view? Biased as fuck. 2️⃣ When she introduces Dr Jim Chalmers – and yes, he has a PhD – she follows up his point with: “I hope everybody at home heard that clearly.” What’s alarming is what she’s reinforcing isn’t the full context. Dr Chalmers clearly addresses it right after: “...but what that analysis ignores is that our government has engineered the biggest ever single-term improvement in a budget in our history – more than $200 billion. This year’s debt is $177 billion lower... we’ve found $95 billion in savings... and the reason that’s important isn’t just because we’ve delivered two surpluses – we’ve halved the deficit this year.” From that point on, Ferguson got snappier... and more #Glitchflared than usual. 🎓 Just a reminder that the guy steering Australia’s economy has a PhD in political science. That’s Dr Jim Chalmers to you. He doesn’t use the title – because he’s not a drivel-plop – but Ferguson SHOULD. Not a vibe merchant. Not a slogan slinger. A literal doctor of how governments work.

We've analysed the #TreasurersDebate on the ABC last night, hosted by Snarky herself, Sarah Ferguson. This is Clip #1 – short clip – of a series where we point out a few interesting things. This isn’t the biggest deal in the scheme of things, but you’ll notice two things straight off: 1️⃣ Ferguson addresses Dr Jim Chalmers with "we’ll start with you", but immediately shifts tone and calls Angus Taylor simply “Angus.” Subtle difference, but it sets the tone. And in our view? Biased as fuck. 2️⃣ When she introduces Dr Jim Chalmers – and yes, he has a PhD – she follows up his point with: “I hope everybody at home heard that clearly.” What’s alarming is what she’s reinforcing isn’t the full context. Dr Chalmers clearly addresses it right after: “...but what that analysis ignores is that our government has engineered the biggest ever single-term improvement in a budget in our history – more than $200 billion. This year’s debt is $177 billion lower... we’ve found $95 billion in savings... and the reason that’s important isn’t just because we’ve delivered two surpluses – we’ve halved the deficit this year.” From that point on, Ferguson got snappier... and more #Glitchflared than usual. 🎓 Just a reminder that the guy steering Australia’s economy has a PhD in political science. That’s Dr Jim Chalmers to you. He doesn’t use the title – because he’s not a drivel-plop – but Ferguson SHOULD. Not a vibe merchant. Not a slogan slinger. A literal doctor of how governments work.

24,618 次观看

Videos

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.ai•Sponsored•Livecam

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

Exclusive private shows

1.2k viewers online

Private Show

Join now for exclusive access

Free preview available • Premium content

This woman is deranged. LOWER CLASS AISTRALIANS??? = LOW PAID = SQUANDER their money - WTF???? She uses the words "And the lower class Australians, okay, the ones who are not on high wages..." Oh dear, she's going to dig a fucking hole right there. These are "The battlers" she cultivates [Farms] for support. OR she is specifically targeting the #unemployed who actually don't benefit from the tax cuts and live on an income below the poverty line. Meanwhile, SHE got a $105,000 PAY RISE THIS financial year. Pauline Hanson wants you to believe middle-income earners are forgotten, while she pockets: → $349K+ a year, →enjoys free luxury flights, → Private car paid for →Exceptional superannuation → Huge expense account →and cries about tax cuts that handed her $9K+ annually. Newsflash, Pauline: Middle-income earners DO get →Medicare, →tax cuts, →childcare subsidies, →and free hospitals. The only thing they don’t get? →A private jet →and a billionaire sugar mummy to bankroll their lifestyle. Maybe instead of whining about "squandering," you should explain why you’re against policies that help the very people you claim to represent. Or is this just another One Nation con job? THIS IS WHAT SHE SAID: They WANT ME [Oh dear, you're hardly ever at work] to forego tax cuts to give it more to them so they can just squander the money. And the LOWER CLASS Australians, okay, the ones who are not on high wages, they have tax benefit cuts A and B, they have health care, they have prescriptions, they have rental assistance, they have plus, plus, plus. But the middle-income earner [She's NOT a "middle income earner"] doesn't get that. You know, even childcare, the billions that goes into childcare, where's the accountability for that? I have had a gutful. ______ We have had a GUTFUL of you pauline, lying to the base that got you a seat in Farrer, lying to the BATTLERS all while becoming a multi-millionaire by the taxpayer. #PaulineHanson against the poor, against the worker, against #Pensioners #Jobseeker

This woman is deranged. LOWER CLASS AISTRALIANS??? = LOW PAID = SQUANDER their money - WTF???? She uses the words "And the lower class Australians, okay, the ones who are not on high wages..." Oh dear, she's going to dig a fucking hole right there. These are "The battlers" she cultivates [Farms] for support. OR she is specifically targeting the #unemployed who actually don't benefit from the tax cuts and live on an income below the poverty line. Meanwhile, SHE got a $105,000 PAY RISE THIS financial year. Pauline Hanson wants you to believe middle-income earners are forgotten, while she pockets: → $349K+ a year, →enjoys free luxury flights, → Private car paid for →Exceptional superannuation → Huge expense account →and cries about tax cuts that handed her $9K+ annually. Newsflash, Pauline: Middle-income earners DO get →Medicare, →tax cuts, →childcare subsidies, →and free hospitals. The only thing they don’t get? →A private jet →and a billionaire sugar mummy to bankroll their lifestyle. Maybe instead of whining about "squandering," you should explain why you’re against policies that help the very people you claim to represent. Or is this just another One Nation con job? THIS IS WHAT SHE SAID: They WANT ME [Oh dear, you're hardly ever at work] to forego tax cuts to give it more to them so they can just squander the money. And the LOWER CLASS Australians, okay, the ones who are not on high wages, they have tax benefit cuts A and B, they have health care, they have prescriptions, they have rental assistance, they have plus, plus, plus. But the middle-income earner [She's NOT a "middle income earner"] doesn't get that. You know, even childcare, the billions that goes into childcare, where's the accountability for that? I have had a gutful. ______ We have had a GUTFUL of you pauline, lying to the base that got you a seat in Farrer, lying to the BATTLERS all while becoming a multi-millionaire by the taxpayer. #PaulineHanson against the poor, against the worker, against #Pensioners #Jobseeker

The Noisy Elephant

44,717 次观看 • 1 个月前

Have you heard #DaveHughes "Hughesy" RANT on social media? The wealthy property investor, once a funny comedian, beneficiary of #WealthyWelfare, having a fucking whimpering sob about the CGT capital gains tax? Well, not only is he a fiscal fool, he doesn't understand the budget, he doesn't understand finances, and he doesn't understand superannuation. All of which he's now concluded means we should call a fucking election, because he's gonna get hit in the hip pocket, just a tiny little bit more. Here is a man with multiple properties, one of his houses in 2017 was apparently valued at $3.06 million, if that was in my suburb, it would it be worth $5-7 million now. And that's just one of them. And he's fucking carrying on as if he's gonna lose his shirt, which, incidentally, he's never had a nice one. Noisy doesn't hold back:

Have you heard #DaveHughes "Hughesy" RANT on social media? The wealthy property investor, once a funny comedian, beneficiary of #WealthyWelfare, having a fucking whimpering sob about the CGT capital gains tax? Well, not only is he a fiscal fool, he doesn't understand the budget, he doesn't understand finances, and he doesn't understand superannuation. All of which he's now concluded means we should call a fucking election, because he's gonna get hit in the hip pocket, just a tiny little bit more. Here is a man with multiple properties, one of his houses in 2017 was apparently valued at $3.06 million, if that was in my suburb, it would it be worth $5-7 million now. And that's just one of them. And he's fucking carrying on as if he's gonna lose his shirt, which, incidentally, he's never had a nice one. Noisy doesn't hold back:

The Noisy Elephant

41,086 次观看 • 1 个月前

Looks like we TRIGGERED #Hughesy with our post (below) exposing his sudden uptick in social media views. And it's sent him all CRACKED COMEDIAN. LOL Too good. Watch the video of him (taken from his Facebook) melting down, gaslighting and looking like an extra from a horror movie. BONUS + #Noisy 𓃰 #DaveHughes CALL the MAKEUP department quick. You look like a Zombie (maybe you are one?) I saw a clip once of a guy who BLEW a car exhaust and got lips like that.

Looks like we TRIGGERED #Hughesy with our post (below) exposing his sudden uptick in social media views. And it's sent him all CRACKED COMEDIAN. LOL Too good. Watch the video of him (taken from his Facebook) melting down, gaslighting and looking like an extra from a horror movie. BONUS + #Noisy 𓃰 #DaveHughes CALL the MAKEUP department quick. You look like a Zombie (maybe you are one?) I saw a clip once of a guy who BLEW a car exhaust and got lips like that.

The Noisy Elephant

17,006 次观看 • 24 天前

The media reported on Pauline Hanson swearing, and her media advisor telling a female reporter to "Shut Up" aggressively. What they DIDN'T talk about was WHY the ON media baboon told the reporter to shut up. And that was actually the important part. The reporter asked if James Ashby, Pauline Hanson's chief of staff and partner in the business of #OneNation (yes, it IS a business) would be running for the Senate at the next election. And the reason that one nation doesn't want to talk about that right now? is because James Ashby is as toxic as radioactive waste. From the Slipper affair, the court cases, the "teen sex allegations" and more, this is the real story here. Forget the "Fuck" distraction. James Ashby is Gina Rinehart's little pet, and for those of you who think Gina's interest in one nation is recent, it's not, as the video shows: The #MSM bleeped out the swearing - Noisy put it back in.

The media reported on Pauline Hanson swearing, and her media advisor telling a female reporter to "Shut Up" aggressively. What they DIDN'T talk about was WHY the ON media baboon told the reporter to shut up. And that was actually the important part. The reporter asked if James Ashby, Pauline Hanson's chief of staff and partner in the business of #OneNation (yes, it IS a business) would be running for the Senate at the next election. And the reason that one nation doesn't want to talk about that right now? is because James Ashby is as toxic as radioactive waste. From the Slipper affair, the court cases, the "teen sex allegations" and more, this is the real story here. Forget the "Fuck" distraction. James Ashby is Gina Rinehart's little pet, and for those of you who think Gina's interest in one nation is recent, it's not, as the video shows: The #MSM bleeped out the swearing - Noisy put it back in.

The Noisy Elephant

23,673 次观看 • 1 个月前

Pauline Hanson thinks backup batteries in South Australia are for dildos. She said, live on TV, that they only provide power for 6 minutes. She's full of shit and an intellectual pygmy. Here are the facts of what is NOW not the largest battery in SA, The battery has a total storage capacity of 129 MWh and can discharge at 100 MW. Specifically, it is contracted to provide 70 MW for 10 minutes to the government for grid stability, but it also has a 30 MW capacity that can run for 3 hours (90 MWh) for load management. After its expansion, the system can discharge at up to 150 MW into the power grid, further increasing its capability NB - video: This is actually Pauline Hanson talking. We have just changed the voice to save people's ears from the terrible damage that her screeching can do..

Pauline Hanson thinks backup batteries in South Australia are for dildos. She said, live on TV, that they only provide power for 6 minutes. She's full of shit and an intellectual pygmy. Here are the facts of what is NOW not the largest battery in SA, The battery has a total storage capacity of 129 MWh and can discharge at 100 MW. Specifically, it is contracted to provide 70 MW for 10 minutes to the government for grid stability, but it also has a 30 MW capacity that can run for 3 hours (90 MWh) for load management. After its expansion, the system can discharge at up to 150 MW into the power grid, further increasing its capability NB - video: This is actually Pauline Hanson talking. We have just changed the voice to save people's ears from the terrible damage that her screeching can do..

The Noisy Elephant

18,595 次观看 • 1 个月前

And Tim Wilson gave us MORE. As if the "Salon" - which is seemingly a predominantly online business 'run' by an 18-year-old, wasn't enough, he gave us this also: See Speers very specific questions: David Speers asked at the #NPC: David Spears from the ABC. Thanks Tim Wilson for your address. The government says there's a whole lot of misinformation around its capital gains tax changes. I wonder if I could ask you to explain the example you just used in your speech. You talked about Sienna who started Tweenyskin five years ago, done well, business has grown. You said half of her profits will be taken by the silent shareholder, the Prime Minister. Can you just explain how that would happen? The government says existing exemptions for small business would remain. So how exactly would Sienna lose half her profit? And here is what goober TIM replied - Remember, NPC rules mean Speers cannot ask another question so Tim's reply goes unchecked. Read this bullshit, or better still, watch him say it. ▓ Skip the bit BETWEEN the bricks ▓ if you are going to watch the video, but read the explanation below. ▓ Tim's reply and its full of shit: Well it depends on when Sienna chooses to opt out of her business and sell it and for what price. I mean she started from her bedroom, her cost structures were zero so of course she's going to have a maximum uplift associated with her businesses. A lot of the people who are setting up businesses are the treasurers out there today spinning a message, as often he does, highlighting existing exemptions for CGT. Most of those are focused at the back end of people's lives, particularly as they head towards retirement and also based on the price at which they sell. I can't tell you what Sienna's going to sell but I can tell you the work, saving and sacrifice and everything they have put into it could, depending on the exit strategy and price, ultimately face up to 47%. But is it possible she could pay no capital gains tax as well? Well I can't give you, we're dealing with hypotheticals, I'm telling you what her story is. It depends on when she decides to exit, it depends on what she sells for, it depends on what stage of life she's at based on the current application of the law. But there are a lot of small business owners all around the country that are looking at the proposals put in this budget and not just do they think it comes in a tax them, they are looking at it and saying we worked, we sacrificed, we saved, we were there at 2am on a Sunday morning when nobody else was there. And all of a sudden the government, which traditionally takes some of the capital gain, no one's disputing that, is essentially working towards doubling that and in some cases it would be that much. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>▓ 1. The Hypothetical Dodge Tim Wilson explicitly admits his example is hypothetical: "I'm telling you what her story is. It depends on when she decides to exit, it depends on what she sells for, it depends on what stage of life she's at..." Translation: He has no concrete evidence that Sienna (or any small business owner like her) would face a 47% tax under the current or proposed CGT rules. Reality: The government’s proposed changes do not affect small business CGT concessions. Sienna, as a small business owner, would still qualify for: →15-year exemption (100% tax-free if she retires and owned the business for 15+ years). →50% active asset reduction (only 25% of the gain is taxable after discounts). Retirement exemption (up to $500k lifetime exemption). →Roll-over relief (defer CGT by reinvesting). Result: Her effective CGT rate would likely be 0–25%, not 47%. His answer is a word salad to avoid admitting the truth: His example is baseless. 2. The "Silent Shareholder" Myth - Tim claims: "...the government, which traditionally takes some of the capital gain, no one's disputing that, is essentially working towards doubling that and in some cases it would be that much." Reality Check: The current top marginal tax rate is 47% (45% + 2% Medicare levy), but this only applies to salary earners on income over $190k. For small business owners like Sienna: If structured as a company (Probably not she is under 18 or just turned 18, so likely, we will come back to this, 'held' by her ex-beautician mother/family): 25% company tax rate. If selling the business: 0–25% CGT after concessions. No scenario exists where the government takes 47% of her business sale profits under the proposed changes. The "doubling" claim is false. The budget does not double CGT for small businesses. It tightens loopholes for high-income earners (>$450k) and super funds, not small business owners. 3. The Emotional Manipulation Tim leans on melodrama: "...we worked, we sacrificed, we saved, we were there at 2 am on a Sunday morning..." Irrelevant to tax policy. Hard work doesn’t justify false claims about tax rates. Distraction tactic: He avoids the Speers direct question ("How exactly would Sienna lose half her profit?") by appealing to emotion. 4. The Press Club Rules Loophole David Speers couldn’t follow up due to Press Club rules. Tim knew this. He used the format to dodge accountability, knowing he couldn’t be pressed for details. TIM IS SPREADING MISINFORMATION like a PRO COOKER. Quote - Tim Wilson: "We're dealing with hypotheticals"

And Tim Wilson gave us MORE. As if the "Salon" - which is seemingly a predominantly online business 'run' by an 18-year-old, wasn't enough, he gave us this also: See Speers very specific questions: David Speers asked at the #NPC: David Spears from the ABC. Thanks Tim Wilson for your address. The government says there's a whole lot of misinformation around its capital gains tax changes. I wonder if I could ask you to explain the example you just used in your speech. You talked about Sienna who started Tweenyskin five years ago, done well, business has grown. You said half of her profits will be taken by the silent shareholder, the Prime Minister. Can you just explain how that would happen? The government says existing exemptions for small business would remain. So how exactly would Sienna lose half her profit? And here is what goober TIM replied - Remember, NPC rules mean Speers cannot ask another question so Tim's reply goes unchecked. Read this bullshit, or better still, watch him say it. ▓ Skip the bit BETWEEN the bricks ▓ if you are going to watch the video, but read the explanation below. ▓ Tim's reply and its full of shit: Well it depends on when Sienna chooses to opt out of her business and sell it and for what price. I mean she started from her bedroom, her cost structures were zero so of course she's going to have a maximum uplift associated with her businesses. A lot of the people who are setting up businesses are the treasurers out there today spinning a message, as often he does, highlighting existing exemptions for CGT. Most of those are focused at the back end of people's lives, particularly as they head towards retirement and also based on the price at which they sell. I can't tell you what Sienna's going to sell but I can tell you the work, saving and sacrifice and everything they have put into it could, depending on the exit strategy and price, ultimately face up to 47%. But is it possible she could pay no capital gains tax as well? Well I can't give you, we're dealing with hypotheticals, I'm telling you what her story is. It depends on when she decides to exit, it depends on what she sells for, it depends on what stage of life she's at based on the current application of the law. But there are a lot of small business owners all around the country that are looking at the proposals put in this budget and not just do they think it comes in a tax them, they are looking at it and saying we worked, we sacrificed, we saved, we were there at 2am on a Sunday morning when nobody else was there. And all of a sudden the government, which traditionally takes some of the capital gain, no one's disputing that, is essentially working towards doubling that and in some cases it would be that much. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>▓ 1. The Hypothetical Dodge Tim Wilson explicitly admits his example is hypothetical: "I'm telling you what her story is. It depends on when she decides to exit, it depends on what she sells for, it depends on what stage of life she's at..." Translation: He has no concrete evidence that Sienna (or any small business owner like her) would face a 47% tax under the current or proposed CGT rules. Reality: The government’s proposed changes do not affect small business CGT concessions. Sienna, as a small business owner, would still qualify for: →15-year exemption (100% tax-free if she retires and owned the business for 15+ years). →50% active asset reduction (only 25% of the gain is taxable after discounts). Retirement exemption (up to $500k lifetime exemption). →Roll-over relief (defer CGT by reinvesting). Result: Her effective CGT rate would likely be 0–25%, not 47%. His answer is a word salad to avoid admitting the truth: His example is baseless. 2. The "Silent Shareholder" Myth - Tim claims: "...the government, which traditionally takes some of the capital gain, no one's disputing that, is essentially working towards doubling that and in some cases it would be that much." Reality Check: The current top marginal tax rate is 47% (45% + 2% Medicare levy), but this only applies to salary earners on income over $190k. For small business owners like Sienna: If structured as a company (Probably not she is under 18 or just turned 18, so likely, we will come back to this, 'held' by her ex-beautician mother/family): 25% company tax rate. If selling the business: 0–25% CGT after concessions. No scenario exists where the government takes 47% of her business sale profits under the proposed changes. The "doubling" claim is false. The budget does not double CGT for small businesses. It tightens loopholes for high-income earners (>$450k) and super funds, not small business owners. 3. The Emotional Manipulation Tim leans on melodrama: "...we worked, we sacrificed, we saved, we were there at 2 am on a Sunday morning..." Irrelevant to tax policy. Hard work doesn’t justify false claims about tax rates. Distraction tactic: He avoids the Speers direct question ("How exactly would Sienna lose half her profit?") by appealing to emotion. 4. The Press Club Rules Loophole David Speers couldn’t follow up due to Press Club rules. Tim knew this. He used the format to dodge accountability, knowing he couldn’t be pressed for details. TIM IS SPREADING MISINFORMATION like a PRO COOKER. Quote - Tim Wilson: "We're dealing with hypotheticals"

The Noisy Elephant

25,563 次观看 • 2 个月前

The crazy one, leader of the Protest Vote Party is speaking at the National Press Club on June 17th 11:30 am - 1:30 pm. Out of concern for the general public who will no doubt be drawn to this nationally televised fiasco, we felt people needed to be prepared for what is about to be the funniest, if not the most disturbing TV event of the century. The following short clip should help toughen you up for the event. Featuring Andrew Probedher. Cooker Coorey. Karl Stefanoprick.

The crazy one, leader of the Protest Vote Party is speaking at the National Press Club on June 17th 11:30 am - 1:30 pm. Out of concern for the general public who will no doubt be drawn to this nationally televised fiasco, we felt people needed to be prepared for what is about to be the funniest, if not the most disturbing TV event of the century. The following short clip should help toughen you up for the event. Featuring Andrew Probedher. Cooker Coorey. Karl Stefanoprick.

The Noisy Elephant

18,947 次观看 • 1 个月前

Serious question, not being mean, but did #PatriciaKarvelas get some bad news tonight? #ABC #electionresults2025

Serious question, not being mean, but did #PatriciaKarvelas get some bad news tonight? #ABC #electionresults2025

The Noisy Elephant

106,336 次观看 • 1 年前

The journalist's question was fair enough Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺 given you justified using a Billioanores jet with "These flights are no cost to the taxpayer," Senator Hanson said in March." - ABC Thu 30 Apr You defended being OWNED by a billionaire, flying in luxury. So, it is TOTALLY reasonable to be asked that question. Stop sulking and crying just because you don't like the questions. And a reminder, cooker, the #MSM are the very people who are responsible for your current popularity. It's certainly not your work ethic. If you can't handle the scrutiny, get out of politics. You have a terrible long-term habit of trying to dodge the media. If you can't deal with it, go and open the chip shop.

The journalist's question was fair enough Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺 given you justified using a Billioanores jet with "These flights are no cost to the taxpayer," Senator Hanson said in March." - ABC Thu 30 Apr You defended being OWNED by a billionaire, flying in luxury. So, it is TOTALLY reasonable to be asked that question. Stop sulking and crying just because you don't like the questions. And a reminder, cooker, the #MSM are the very people who are responsible for your current popularity. It's certainly not your work ethic. If you can't handle the scrutiny, get out of politics. You have a terrible long-term habit of trying to dodge the media. If you can't deal with it, go and open the chip shop.

The Noisy Elephant

15,742 次观看 • 1 个月前

Sky News, what are they good for? They're so shit they have to change their name. Headline: Labor grilled over massive Snowy Hydro 2.0 cost blowouts NUMPTY'S, Labor inherited the Liberal mess, just like the NBN, inflation, debt, and everything else the LNP fucked up. Katie Gallagher sets the Gotcha grubs straight.

Sky News, what are they good for? They're so shit they have to change their name. Headline: Labor grilled over massive Snowy Hydro 2.0 cost blowouts NUMPTY'S, Labor inherited the Liberal mess, just like the NBN, inflation, debt, and everything else the LNP fucked up. Katie Gallagher sets the Gotcha grubs straight.

The Noisy Elephant

19,650 次观看 • 2 个月前

Guess who got a pay rise of over $107,000 since November last year? Go on #Batters, WHO? Which SENATOR in Australia got an EXTRA $2,057.69 per week - Not pay but INCREASED PAY? Or for you #pensioners who get paid fortnightly, she gets an EXTRA $4,115.38 per fortnight, yes, ON TOP of her 2025 salary - Since November. Yes, darlings, the VERY SAME PERSON who voted against increasing the minimum wage, against increasing #Jobseeker support. The same person who is MISSING from parliament nearly HALF the time. GUESS. WHO.

Guess who got a pay rise of over $107,000 since November last year? Go on #Batters, WHO? Which SENATOR in Australia got an EXTRA $2,057.69 per week - Not pay but INCREASED PAY? Or for you #pensioners who get paid fortnightly, she gets an EXTRA $4,115.38 per fortnight, yes, ON TOP of her 2025 salary - Since November. Yes, darlings, the VERY SAME PERSON who voted against increasing the minimum wage, against increasing #Jobseeker support. The same person who is MISSING from parliament nearly HALF the time. GUESS. WHO.

The Noisy Elephant

13,033 次观看 • 1 个月前

SYDNEY. HARBOUR. BRIDGE. In 2005, they shut down the Sydney Harbour Bridge for five hours… So a Formula One car could do laps on it. The whole stunt lasted a few minutes. That was for a CAR race. Today’s closure? It’s for lives. For hunger. For a humanitarian crisis. So to anyone crying inconvenience — Get the fuck over it. #GazaGenocide‌ #MarchForHumanity

SYDNEY. HARBOUR. BRIDGE. In 2005, they shut down the Sydney Harbour Bridge for five hours… So a Formula One car could do laps on it. The whole stunt lasted a few minutes. That was for a CAR race. Today’s closure? It’s for lives. For hunger. For a humanitarian crisis. So to anyone crying inconvenience — Get the fuck over it. #GazaGenocide‌ #MarchForHumanity

The Noisy Elephant

61,209 次观看 • 11 个月前

#JoshFrydenberg is deeply offended by a man, #JayWeatherill, but wouldn't say it (seething sop). JobKeeper Josh was also felt offended by a Woman, Sarah Ferguson, BUT HE DID SAY IT. We helped Josh with history. "Jay, I'm deeply offended" Seething.

#JoshFrydenberg is deeply offended by a man, #JayWeatherill, but wouldn't say it (seething sop). JobKeeper Josh was also felt offended by a Woman, Sarah Ferguson, BUT HE DID SAY IT. We helped Josh with history. "Jay, I'm deeply offended" Seething.

The Noisy Elephant

41,464 次观看 • 7 个月前

WE DO NOT NEED FLUSTERED in government. This is an example, and it is not an isolated case. How could this woman ever be prime minister if she can't even keep her thoughts together in a simple interview? Video below In this transcript, the leader of the Protest Vote Party gets completely tripped up by her own words. She states that the polls show support for her to 'be leader' and that she hasn't made a final decision yet, even though she is already the established leader of One Nation. What she clearly meant to say was that the polls show support for her to become Prime Minister. However, because she struggles to articulate her thoughts clearly under pressure, she accidentally backtracks and creates a confusing contradiction: asserting she hasn't decided whether to be the leader, while simultaneously reminding everyone that she already is." Essentially, her verbal stumble exposes the awkwardness of her position. By getting confused between being the "leader of the party" and "leader of the country" (Prime Minister), she ends up stating that she hasn't decided whether to take a job she has held for years. We can't wait to hear it at the National Press Club on June 17, 2026, 11:30 am - 1:30 pm. It's going to be hilarious.

WE DO NOT NEED FLUSTERED in government. This is an example, and it is not an isolated case. How could this woman ever be prime minister if she can't even keep her thoughts together in a simple interview? Video below In this transcript, the leader of the Protest Vote Party gets completely tripped up by her own words. She states that the polls show support for her to 'be leader' and that she hasn't made a final decision yet, even though she is already the established leader of One Nation. What she clearly meant to say was that the polls show support for her to become Prime Minister. However, because she struggles to articulate her thoughts clearly under pressure, she accidentally backtracks and creates a confusing contradiction: asserting she hasn't decided whether to be the leader, while simultaneously reminding everyone that she already is." Essentially, her verbal stumble exposes the awkwardness of her position. By getting confused between being the "leader of the party" and "leader of the country" (Prime Minister), she ends up stating that she hasn't decided whether to take a job she has held for years. We can't wait to hear it at the National Press Club on June 17, 2026, 11:30 am - 1:30 pm. It's going to be hilarious.

The Noisy Elephant

12,780 次观看 • 1 个月前

Michaelia Cash forgot it was the Liberal's that sold (leased) the #DarwinPort. But it’s still Albo's fault. Kieran Gilbert forgot to remind her. #MickeyTheNeck python on #skynews

Michaelia Cash forgot it was the Liberal's that sold (leased) the #DarwinPort. But it’s still Albo's fault. Kieran Gilbert forgot to remind her. #MickeyTheNeck python on #skynews

The Noisy Elephant

52,023 次观看 • 1 年前

BREAKING LIVE FOOTAGE (3:15PM AEST 5th Nov 2024): #AndrewClennell LIVE announces #BridgetMcKenzie got not ONE, not ELEVEN, but MORE #Upgrades and some were for PERSONAL flights. How does a Shadow Transport thingie FORGET being upgraded from cramped legs to "DRINK SOME FREE WINE stretch your legs out BUSINESS CLASS" - Clennell asked that, not us.

BREAKING LIVE FOOTAGE (3:15PM AEST 5th Nov 2024): #AndrewClennell LIVE announces #BridgetMcKenzie got not ONE, not ELEVEN, but MORE #Upgrades and some were for PERSONAL flights. How does a Shadow Transport thingie FORGET being upgraded from cramped legs to "DRINK SOME FREE WINE stretch your legs out BUSINESS CLASS" - Clennell asked that, not us.

The Noisy Elephant

73,229 次观看 • 1 年前

MURDOCH and HIS MULCH We received TWO emails within THREE minutes of each other just now (10:46 AM - 10:49AM). BOTH "BREAKING NEWS" in the subject line: The Australian (Murdoch) Breaking news: 'We don't want you here', shout hecklers, as PM cops spray over wind farms Sky News (Also Murdoch) 'We don't want you here': Albanese heckled by locals over offshore wind farms Hang on a minute, did the same person write both headlines? Let's just investigate what the fuck really happened and how #Murdoch's manipulation played this into something that it wasn't. There were two Bogans that turned up at an otherwise normal gathering, and these fuckers call it chaos. They actually use the word CHAOTIC - see footage attached, unbelievable. This is classic Murdoch media manipulation—two outlets under the same corporate umbrella pushing a misleading narrative through selective framing. Let’s break it down and compare Sky News' version with The Australian’s version, and then contrast it with what actually happened. 1. The Reality Albanese visited Lake #Illawarra to introduce #CarolBerry, Labor’s candidate for Whitlam, replacing Stephen Jones. Two bogan-looking men heckled him—literally two—and shouted anti-wind farm remarks. Albanese responded casually with "Nice dog, mate", then continued with the press conference. That’s it. Not a protest. Not "chaotic." Not even a significant disruption. 2. Sky News’ Version – Hyperbolic Sensationalism Headline: "Albanese heckled by angry locals over offshore wind farms" Implied Scale: They say he was "heckled by multiple local residents," exaggerating the situation. Word Choices: "Confronted," "angry locals," "heckled," and "taunting" — designed to create the illusion of a hostile crowd. Visual Trickery: Repeats the same two people multiple times, as if they are a larger group. Agenda: Pushes the anti-renewables narrative while making Albanese look weak or unpopular. 3. The Australian’s Version – Faux Serious Spin Headline: "We don't want you here: PM cops spray as wind farm anger boils over" Implied Scale: "Boiling over" suggests a major protest—when it was two random blokes shouting. Word Choices: "Cops spray," "boils over," "grave concerns" — again, all implying a groundswell of opposition when it was two people with a loud voice. Sneaky Misdirection:Buries Carol Berry’s name deep in the text—likely to downplay the real reason Albo was there. Frames the wind farm inquiry delay as "Labor-Greens controlled Senate holding it up" (ignoring LNP stalling tactics). Covers Trump’s tariffs, China’s fighter jets, and NSW rail strikes to drown out actual context. 4. Murdoch Playbook: How They Manufactured the Outrage Exaggerate a non-event: Two guys shouting = "chaos" and "heckling" Frame it as public backlash: Pretend two hecklers are representative of "the people" Push an agenda: Make offshore wind look unpopular & frame Albanese as weak Bury inconvenient details: Don’t name Carol Berry up front, downplay Albanese’s actual responses Tie in anti-Labor talking points: US tariffs, China, rail strikes—none of which were relevant to the visit Final Verdict This is Murdoch media propaganda 101—a coordinated effort by The Australian and Sky News to manufacture a narrative: 🔹 A "chaotic" visit that never happened. 🔹 A "massive backlash" that was two guys. 🔹 A "heated confrontation" that Albanese brushed off with "Nice dog, mate." If this was #PeterDutton, they’d call it "a spirited exchange with concerned Australians." If this was Morrison, it’d be "Scotty from Marketing greets passionate locals." Instead, because it’s Albanese, it’s "chaos," "heckling," and "boiling anger." Pathetic. Predictable. Murdoch media wankfuckery at its finest. #StaySharp #MediaBias #CarolBerry

MURDOCH and HIS MULCH We received TWO emails within THREE minutes of each other just now (10:46 AM - 10:49AM). BOTH "BREAKING NEWS" in the subject line: The Australian (Murdoch) Breaking news: 'We don't want you here', shout hecklers, as PM cops spray over wind farms Sky News (Also Murdoch) 'We don't want you here': Albanese heckled by locals over offshore wind farms Hang on a minute, did the same person write both headlines? Let's just investigate what the fuck really happened and how #Murdoch's manipulation played this into something that it wasn't. There were two Bogans that turned up at an otherwise normal gathering, and these fuckers call it chaos. They actually use the word CHAOTIC - see footage attached, unbelievable. This is classic Murdoch media manipulation—two outlets under the same corporate umbrella pushing a misleading narrative through selective framing. Let’s break it down and compare Sky News' version with The Australian’s version, and then contrast it with what actually happened. 1. The Reality Albanese visited Lake #Illawarra to introduce #CarolBerry, Labor’s candidate for Whitlam, replacing Stephen Jones. Two bogan-looking men heckled him—literally two—and shouted anti-wind farm remarks. Albanese responded casually with "Nice dog, mate", then continued with the press conference. That’s it. Not a protest. Not "chaotic." Not even a significant disruption. 2. Sky News’ Version – Hyperbolic Sensationalism Headline: "Albanese heckled by angry locals over offshore wind farms" Implied Scale: They say he was "heckled by multiple local residents," exaggerating the situation. Word Choices: "Confronted," "angry locals," "heckled," and "taunting" — designed to create the illusion of a hostile crowd. Visual Trickery: Repeats the same two people multiple times, as if they are a larger group. Agenda: Pushes the anti-renewables narrative while making Albanese look weak or unpopular. 3. The Australian’s Version – Faux Serious Spin Headline: "We don't want you here: PM cops spray as wind farm anger boils over" Implied Scale: "Boiling over" suggests a major protest—when it was two random blokes shouting. Word Choices: "Cops spray," "boils over," "grave concerns" — again, all implying a groundswell of opposition when it was two people with a loud voice. Sneaky Misdirection:Buries Carol Berry’s name deep in the text—likely to downplay the real reason Albo was there. Frames the wind farm inquiry delay as "Labor-Greens controlled Senate holding it up" (ignoring LNP stalling tactics). Covers Trump’s tariffs, China’s fighter jets, and NSW rail strikes to drown out actual context. 4. Murdoch Playbook: How They Manufactured the Outrage Exaggerate a non-event: Two guys shouting = "chaos" and "heckling" Frame it as public backlash: Pretend two hecklers are representative of "the people" Push an agenda: Make offshore wind look unpopular & frame Albanese as weak Bury inconvenient details: Don’t name Carol Berry up front, downplay Albanese’s actual responses Tie in anti-Labor talking points: US tariffs, China, rail strikes—none of which were relevant to the visit Final Verdict This is Murdoch media propaganda 101—a coordinated effort by The Australian and Sky News to manufacture a narrative: 🔹 A "chaotic" visit that never happened. 🔹 A "massive backlash" that was two guys. 🔹 A "heated confrontation" that Albanese brushed off with "Nice dog, mate." If this was #PeterDutton, they’d call it "a spirited exchange with concerned Australians." If this was Morrison, it’d be "Scotty from Marketing greets passionate locals." Instead, because it’s Albanese, it’s "chaos," "heckling," and "boiling anger." Pathetic. Predictable. Murdoch media wankfuckery at its finest. #StaySharp #MediaBias #CarolBerry

The Noisy Elephant

58,417 次观看 • 1 年前

Liberal Leadership OR Labor Sworn in? - The #ABC had a choice, what did they do? 🎥 What you’re about to see is real. It’s taken directly from the ABC’s own YouTube channel — as shown in the clip below. No edits to change the story, just a spotlight on how the stories were told. From start to finish, this segment ran 3 minutes and 33 seconds. And here’s how they used that time: 88.7% was spent on the Liberal leadership circus Just 6.1% covered the Labor Government’s official swearing-in — a historic event And the rest — 5.2% — was neutral filler or transitions That’s 3 minutes and 9 seconds hyping up internal Liberal drama, vs 13 seconds acknowledging the formation of a new government. This wasn’t journalism. It was narrative. And it was bias. Pure and simple. To spare you the boredom of the full Liberal worship session, we’ve sped up their airtime, and played Labor’s 13 seconds at normal speed — to drive home the imbalance. But here's the kicker — even those calling out the lopsided timing missed this: 👉 While the ABC is talking about Liberal leadership drama, they visually overlay footage from the Labor swearing-in ceremony. They visually bury Labor’s history-making moment under a Liberal voiceover dialogue. Ask yourself: Why? This tactic — talking about the Liberals while showing Labor — is a trick straight out of the Sky News playbook. They did it before the election. They’re still doing it now. 📺 Watch closely. 📊 Look at the graphs. 🧠 Then ask: When is the ABC going to admit it’s joined at the hip with Murdoch media? This is not public broadcasting. It’s propaganda. And it’s fkng disgraceful. The full ABC clip remains live on their official YouTube channel — at the link visible in our footage. (We’re not typing it here for obvious reasons). Check it before they delete it.

Liberal Leadership OR Labor Sworn in? - The #ABC had a choice, what did they do? 🎥 What you’re about to see is real. It’s taken directly from the ABC’s own YouTube channel — as shown in the clip below. No edits to change the story, just a spotlight on how the stories were told. From start to finish, this segment ran 3 minutes and 33 seconds. And here’s how they used that time: 88.7% was spent on the Liberal leadership circus Just 6.1% covered the Labor Government’s official swearing-in — a historic event And the rest — 5.2% — was neutral filler or transitions That’s 3 minutes and 9 seconds hyping up internal Liberal drama, vs 13 seconds acknowledging the formation of a new government. This wasn’t journalism. It was narrative. And it was bias. Pure and simple. To spare you the boredom of the full Liberal worship session, we’ve sped up their airtime, and played Labor’s 13 seconds at normal speed — to drive home the imbalance. But here's the kicker — even those calling out the lopsided timing missed this: 👉 While the ABC is talking about Liberal leadership drama, they visually overlay footage from the Labor swearing-in ceremony. They visually bury Labor’s history-making moment under a Liberal voiceover dialogue. Ask yourself: Why? This tactic — talking about the Liberals while showing Labor — is a trick straight out of the Sky News playbook. They did it before the election. They’re still doing it now. 📺 Watch closely. 📊 Look at the graphs. 🧠 Then ask: When is the ABC going to admit it’s joined at the hip with Murdoch media? This is not public broadcasting. It’s propaganda. And it’s fkng disgraceful. The full ABC clip remains live on their official YouTube channel — at the link visible in our footage. (We’re not typing it here for obvious reasons). Check it before they delete it.

The Noisy Elephant

50,412 次观看 • 1 年前

Jacinta Price received just 3,309 personal votes across the entire Northern Territory in the 2022 election. That’s 3.19% of the total formal Senate vote. Just 3,309 people put a number next to her name — that’s it. She wasn’t elected as a local MP. She got in through the Senate — and only because most voters ticked the CLP box above the line. That’s how the system works, but let’s not pretend she had a personal mandate. And yet... Peter Dutton is floating the idea of making her a key minister — in charge of a slash-and-burn portfolio straight out of the Elon Musk, Donald Trump, Dogecoin economic playbook. Cut jobs. Cut services. Put people on the unemployment line. All that power — with just 3,309 personal votes. That might be legal, but does it feel like democracy? And this is the same woman you’ve seen in photos wearing a MAGA cap, clutching a Trump figurine. Is that what you want steering Australia? Someone with almost no individual backing, making decisions that could wreck livelihoods? Think about it — really think — before you vote for Dutton or the Liberal Party.

Jacinta Price received just 3,309 personal votes across the entire Northern Territory in the 2022 election. That’s 3.19% of the total formal Senate vote. Just 3,309 people put a number next to her name — that’s it. She wasn’t elected as a local MP. She got in through the Senate — and only because most voters ticked the CLP box above the line. That’s how the system works, but let’s not pretend she had a personal mandate. And yet... Peter Dutton is floating the idea of making her a key minister — in charge of a slash-and-burn portfolio straight out of the Elon Musk, Donald Trump, Dogecoin economic playbook. Cut jobs. Cut services. Put people on the unemployment line. All that power — with just 3,309 personal votes. That might be legal, but does it feel like democracy? And this is the same woman you’ve seen in photos wearing a MAGA cap, clutching a Trump figurine. Is that what you want steering Australia? Someone with almost no individual backing, making decisions that could wreck livelihoods? Think about it — really think — before you vote for Dutton or the Liberal Party.

The Noisy Elephant

43,349 次观看 • 1 年前