UsForThemUK 🌟
@UsforThemUK • 41,845 subscribers
High impact, strategic campaigning for children and their futures.
Shorts
Videos
'JCVI Override', kids Covid vaccination, EXCLUSIVE Under FOIA UsForThem has obtained the minutes of meetings held in Sept 2021 in which the UK's four Chief Medical Officers agreed to overrule the JCVI to push through the vaccination of children for C19. The minutes indicate: 🛑significant undeclared conflicts of interest 🛑NO ethical input sought or received by the CMOs 🛑divergence of views between CMOs including concerns over potentially significant unknown harms As we also explain, only one quarter of parents were aware that the JCVI had declined to recommend mass vaccination of 12-15 year olds. Just 1 in 3 say they would still have wanted their kids to be C19 vaccinated had they known this at the time. Our latest video explains what we found in the minutes documenting this incredibly important (not to mention unethical and procedurally unprecedented) decision. The full set of minutes are linked to in comments.
UsForThemUK 🌟545,214 views • 1 year ago
Not Just "a Mistake": ♦️March 2020: Imperial College London published its seminal projections paper advising 'lockdown until vaccination', on the back of which UK Government imposed blanket lockdowns. Public NEVER TOLD that Imperial had just received USD100m from pharmaceutical industry donors. ♦️Jan 2021: UK Government imposed masks-in-class mandate for children without ANY harm assessment. ♦️Summer 2021: UK Government SHUTS DOWN expert ethics committee after it criticises ethics of UK Govt. vaccination policies. Just three of the examples discussed in our latest video of serious pandemic wrongdoing which demands meaningful accountability. ⬇️⬇️
UsForThemUK 🌟227,081 views • 1 year ago
BIG PHARMA, UK REGULATORY FAILURE. In the US, Robert F. Kennedy Jr is poised to tackle regulatory capture by the pharmaceutical industry. This video, the first in our new series of exposés on topics avoided by mainstream press, explains how regulatory oversight of the influential pharma industry in the UK has become similarly broken and corrupted. Did you know that: ◾️Pfizer has been found guilty by the UK regulator of serious breaches of the UK's Industry Code at least 7 times since 2020, in relation to its Covid vaccine alone, yet has incurred no meaningful penalty for these breaches. ◾️Last month Moderna received two notices of the most serious breach of the Code - bringing discredit upon the pharmaceutical industry - in the space of a single week. Again, no meaningful penalty has been imposed. ◾️The CHAIR of the Review Panel of MHRAgovuk, the body which reviews critical decisions and proposals of the UK's medical safety regulator, is ALSO a director of CEPI, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, whose purpose is to advocate for the acceleration of vaccine development and approval. Listen on for more...
UsForThemUK 🌟44,768 views • 1 year ago
While giving the opening statements for the Module 8 hearing on 'Children and Young People' this week, UK Covid-19 Inquiry official counsel, Ms Dobbin, set out a presumption that school closures and lockdowns were an unavoidable or even desirable response: while acknowledging that school closures were "enormously damaging", before hearing any of the evidence, the Inquiry appears to consider that school closures are on balance effective and worthwhile enough to "nonetheless be needed in the future". This flies in the face of the devastating evidence of serious safeguarding issues, stunted attainment and almost universally negative social, educational and health outcomes for the children whose education was affected by school closures. Schools should be given protected status - as Essential Infrastructure - to resist culpable assumptions that our children's life chances can be sacrificed in panicked attempts at infection control.
UsForThemUK 🌟14,202 views • 10 months ago
‼️UK Covid Inquiry, kids jabs A clear error here by the UK's Chief Medical Officer, Chris Whitty who gave evidence to UK Covid-19 Inquiry on Monday. In explaining the decisions around the C19 vaccination of children, Whitty misdescribes JCVI advice as having characterised the risks of vaccination as "EVEN SMALLER" than the marginal benefits at an individual child level. That's not what JCVI said. What they actually said is shown in the comments and includes the following: "the committee is of the opinion that the benefits from vaccination are marginally greater than the potential known harms but acknowledges that there is considerable uncertainty regarding the magnitude of the potential harms." They go on to stress: "in relation to childhood immunisation programmes, the UK public places a higher relative value on safety compared to benefits". Was it an inadvertent slip, a wishful recollection or a deliberate rewrite of history? Either way, the misdescription only benefits Whitty and does a disservice to the JCVI and the 42% of parents who, when polled (JL Partners, 2023), said they wouldn't have wanted their child to have been C19-jabbed had they realised that the JCVI had declined to recommend mass rollout.
UsForThemUK 🌟15,628 views • 1 year ago
No more content to load