Vikas gupta's banner
Vikas gupta's profile picture

Vikas gupta

@vicky_grok • 10,970 subscribers

75K+ Audience on LinkedIn | AI Engineer | Resume Writer | AI Content Creator | AI Enthusiast | Influencer | DM for Promotion

Shorts

🚨 YOUR GPU IS PROBABLY WASTING MORE THAN YOU THINK. vLLM is built to squeeze far more useful work out of your GPU when serving LLMs. Running an LLM at scale isn’t just about having a powerful GPU. The real problem is how efficiently you use its memory and compute. That’s where vLLM comes in. → High-throughput LLM inference and serving → PagedAttention for smarter KV-cache memory management → Continuous batching to keep GPUs busy → Prefix caching + chunked prefill → OpenAI-compatible API out of the box → Supports a huge range of modern LLM architectures → Quantization support for running models more efficiently And the crazy part? You can start an OpenAI-compatible inference server with: `vllm serve ` So your application can talk to your own model almost like it’s talking to OpenAI. The bigger idea: Don’t just buy more GPUs. Make the GPUs you already have work harder. That’s why vLLM has become such a major project in LLM inference. 🔥 #vLLM #AI #LLM #Inference #GPU #MachineLearning #AIInfrastructure #OpenSource #AIAgents #Developers

🚨 YOUR GPU IS PROBABLY WASTING MORE THAN YOU THINK. vLLM is built to squeeze far more useful work out of your GPU when serving LLMs. Running an LLM at scale isn’t just about having a powerful GPU. The real problem is how efficiently you use its memory and compute. That’s where vLLM comes in. → High-throughput LLM inference and serving → PagedAttention for smarter KV-cache memory management → Continuous batching to keep GPUs busy → Prefix caching + chunked prefill → OpenAI-compatible API out of the box → Supports a huge range of modern LLM architectures → Quantization support for running models more efficiently And the crazy part? You can start an OpenAI-compatible inference server with: `vllm serve ` So your application can talk to your own model almost like it’s talking to OpenAI. The bigger idea: Don’t just buy more GPUs. Make the GPUs you already have work harder. That’s why vLLM has become such a major project in LLM inference. 🔥 #vLLM #AI #LLM #Inference #GPU #MachineLearning #AIInfrastructure #OpenSource #AIAgents #Developers

14,138 просмотров

Videos

vicky_grok's profile picture

🚨 THIS IS ACTUALLY INSANE Python developers are still installing five different tools to manage one project. `pip` for packages. `virtualenv` for environments. `pyenv` for Python versions. `pipx` for CLI tools. `poetry` for project management. uv replaces all of them with one tool. And it’s written in Rust. The headline number: 10–100× faster than pip. But speed isn't even the most interesting part. uv can: → Create and manage Python projects → Resolve dependencies with a universal lockfile → Create virtual environments → Install and switch between Python versions → Run standalone Python scripts with dependencies → Install CLI tools with `uvx` → Compile and sync requirements → Manage Cargo-style workspaces The workflow becomes ridiculously simple: `uv init` → create a project `uv add` → add dependencies `uv run` → run your code `uv lock` → lock dependencies `uv sync` → reproduce the environment And if you're already using pip? You don't have to throw your workflow away. The `uv pip` interface is designed as a drop-in replacement while giving you the speed boost. The other clever bit: uv uses a global cache to deduplicate dependencies and save disk space. So instead of assembling a Python toolchain piece by piece, you get one fast CLI that covers the whole workflow. And unlike a lot of newer developer tools, uv is already considered stable and production-ready. If you work with Python, this is one of those tools you should probably try once. You might not go back. #Python #DevTools #Rust #OpenSource #Programming #AIEngineering

Vikas gupta

39,971 просмотров • 12 дней назад

vicky_grok's profile picture

🚨 THIS IS ACTUALLY INSANE Your AI agent can have access to the web. But if it can't reliably read what’s actually on the page, that access is almost useless. We looked at Firecrawl as the web layer for AI agents and the numbers are hard to ignore. The setup is simple: Give it a URL, search query, or website. Firecrawl handles the ugly part — crawling, scraping, rendering, extracting, and turning web content into something an AI model can actually use. The headline numbers: → 173,000+ GitHub stars → Search, scrape and interact with the web at scale → Supports web pages, PDFs, DOCX and other content → Structured data extraction for AI workflows → MCP support for connecting it directly to AI agents The workflow looks like this: Search → Scrape → Crawl → Extract → Feed the agent Three things stand out: 1. Scraping becomes an infrastructure layer Instead of maintaining your own pile of HTTP clients, parsers, browser automation and retry logic, you can treat web access as an API. 2. Agents get more than raw HTML The goal isn't just downloading a webpage. It's turning messy web content into clean context that an LLM can reason over. 3. The same layer works across different agent workflows Research agents. RAG pipelines. AI search. Competitive intelligence. Web-data extraction. The interesting shift: AI agents don't just need better models. They need better access to the information those models are supposed to reason about. Firecrawl is building that layer. Save this repo.

Vikas gupta

20,121 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

vicky_grok's profile picture

🚨 THIS IS ACTUALLY INSANE We benchmarked 4 different AI-agent architectures against the exact same 120-task suite. The winner wasn't the agent with the biggest step budget. It was the one that verified its work. The setup: 12 services. 24 people. 48 incidents. 2 traps deliberately wired into the environment. Same tasks. Same 16-call budget. Four different designs. Here’s what happened: → Single-shot plan: 83.3% success → Closed loop: 87.5% → Loop + semantic memory: 87.5% with 52.5% fewer tool calls → Loop + verification: 100% success Three findings completely changed how I think about agent architecture: 1. More budget ≠ more accuracy The blind planner stayed at 83.3% from 2 to 16 calls. Its problem wasn't the budget. Its ceiling was architectural. 2. Memory is basically free budget The semantic cache hit 68.7% and eliminated 134 of 255 tool calls. Zero drop in success. 3. Verification is cheap insurance Just 41 additional calls across the entire benchmark bought +12.5 percentage points in success. It rescued all 15 trap tasks. That's the part I find most interesting. We're often asking: “How many steps should we give the agent?” Maybe the better question is: “What should the agent spend those steps on?” Planning? Retrieval? Memory? Verification? The architecture matters more than the raw step budget. Save this if you're building AI agents. #AgenticAI #AIAgents #LLM #MachineLearning #AIEngineering

Vikas gupta

18,556 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Больше нет контента для загрузки