Vinay Jain's banner
Vinay Jain's profile picture

Vinay Jain

@vinayjain4042,724 subscribers

Building the autonomous AI agent for paid social | Co-Founder @usenotchai | Ex-Meta

Shorts

just cloned a competitor's 90-day winner into 30 ad variations. never opened meta ad library. signed up. competitors already mapped. their ads already pulled. picked one. hit clone. the entire research → brief → produce → edit workflow just collapsed into one click. here's what the agent does the moment you sign up. → reads your brand. stores it permanently. → maps your competitors automatically. → pulls their running ads. flags anything running 60+ days as proven. → updates daily. no manual scouting. ever. you open the tool. winners are already sitting there. you pick one. hit clone. → agent breaks down the ad. hook. script. pacing. structure. → rewrites 30 variations across cold, warm, and hot audiences. → generates avatars. pulls b-roll. adds voiceover. edits. delivers. one click. 30 finished ads. no brief. no agency. no timeline. you didn't scout. the agent was scouting before you logged in. you didn't script. the agent scripted. you didn't edit. the agent edited. the old loop: scout → screenshot → brief → wait → 3 ads → test → lose money → repeat. the new loop: open the tool → pick a winner already in your feed → clone → launch 30 → read data. same day. the brands that figure this out first won't just move faster. they'll make the old workflow extinct. comment CLONE and i'll send the full setup. (follow for dm)

just cloned a competitor's 90-day winner into 30 ad variations. never opened meta ad library. signed up. competitors already mapped. their ads already pulled. picked one. hit clone. the entire research → brief → produce → edit workflow just collapsed into one click. here's what the agent does the moment you sign up. → reads your brand. stores it permanently. → maps your competitors automatically. → pulls their running ads. flags anything running 60+ days as proven. → updates daily. no manual scouting. ever. you open the tool. winners are already sitting there. you pick one. hit clone. → agent breaks down the ad. hook. script. pacing. structure. → rewrites 30 variations across cold, warm, and hot audiences. → generates avatars. pulls b-roll. adds voiceover. edits. delivers. one click. 30 finished ads. no brief. no agency. no timeline. you didn't scout. the agent was scouting before you logged in. you didn't script. the agent scripted. you didn't edit. the agent edited. the old loop: scout → screenshot → brief → wait → 3 ads → test → lose money → repeat. the new loop: open the tool → pick a winner already in your feed → clone → launch 30 → read data. same day. the brands that figure this out first won't just move faster. they'll make the old workflow extinct. comment CLONE and i'll send the full setup. (follow for dm)

18,052 Aufrufe

The secret to making Agentic Video actually work isn't the agent. I'm sharing what it actually is. Everyone's using the same tools now. Same models. Same agents. Same platforms. So why are some teams producing ads that convert and others producing expensive noise? The agent doesn't decide the quality of the output. The brief does. A lazy brief to an agent produces 50 lazy ads fast. A sharp brief — built on real customer language, real objections, real purchase triggers — produces 50 precision instruments. Here's what a sharp brief looks like before you open Notch Agentic Video: → The customer's exact words when they describe their problem. Not your words. Theirs. → The single objection that's stopping the unconverted customer from buying right now. → The awareness stage you're entering. Cold. Warm. Hot. Each needs a different entry point. → The one emotional outcome they're actually buying. Not the feature. The feeling. Feed that into the agent. It asks you more questions — hook type, actor tone, funnel stage. Then it builds. Voiceover, B-roll, subtitles, music. Fifty variants. One session. Agents didn't make strategy irrelevant. They made it the only thing that matters. Comment "BRIEF" below. I'll send the full framework directly. Try it here -

The secret to making Agentic Video actually work isn't the agent. I'm sharing what it actually is. Everyone's using the same tools now. Same models. Same agents. Same platforms. So why are some teams producing ads that convert and others producing expensive noise? The agent doesn't decide the quality of the output. The brief does. A lazy brief to an agent produces 50 lazy ads fast. A sharp brief — built on real customer language, real objections, real purchase triggers — produces 50 precision instruments. Here's what a sharp brief looks like before you open Notch Agentic Video: → The customer's exact words when they describe their problem. Not your words. Theirs. → The single objection that's stopping the unconverted customer from buying right now. → The awareness stage you're entering. Cold. Warm. Hot. Each needs a different entry point. → The one emotional outcome they're actually buying. Not the feature. The feeling. Feed that into the agent. It asks you more questions — hook type, actor tone, funnel stage. Then it builds. Voiceover, B-roll, subtitles, music. Fifty variants. One session. Agents didn't make strategy irrelevant. They made it the only thing that matters. Comment "BRIEF" below. I'll send the full framework directly. Try it here -

28,780 Aufrufe

A TikTok account hit 3M followers in just 9 days. AI Influencer. That. Doesn't. Exists. I spent time reverse-engineering it. It’s an on demand influencer engine. Same human. Dancing. Talking. Unboxing. Unlimited variants. Now here’s what’s quietly happening behind the scenes: Brands aren’t just using this. They are exploiting this. AI influencers are becoming ad infrastructure Here’s what the best teams are doing now: → Create one AI influencer with a distinct personality → Keep the face, tone, voice consistent → Change settings, hooks, scenarios every day → Run it organically to build trust signals → Turn the same character into paid ads Same character. Different contexts. Infinite variations. More variations = faster learning Faster learning = cheaper conversions The brands doing this aren’t talking about it. That’s how you know it’s working. Comment "influencer" and I’ll send the exact playbook.

A TikTok account hit 3M followers in just 9 days. AI Influencer. That. Doesn't. Exists. I spent time reverse-engineering it. It’s an on demand influencer engine. Same human. Dancing. Talking. Unboxing. Unlimited variants. Now here’s what’s quietly happening behind the scenes: Brands aren’t just using this. They are exploiting this. AI influencers are becoming ad infrastructure Here’s what the best teams are doing now: → Create one AI influencer with a distinct personality → Keep the face, tone, voice consistent → Change settings, hooks, scenarios every day → Run it organically to build trust signals → Turn the same character into paid ads Same character. Different contexts. Infinite variations. More variations = faster learning Faster learning = cheaper conversions The brands doing this aren’t talking about it. That’s how you know it’s working. Comment "influencer" and I’ll send the exact playbook.

21,261 Aufrufe

Videos

vinayjain404's profile picture

if we fuck up the ad, why should you pay? notch is the one place that doesn't charge for regenerations or edits. one price. one ad. however many tries it takes us to get it right. every "generate" is a slot pull. miss = re-roll = more credits gone. these tools don't sell you ads. they sell you chips. and the house wrote the odds. here's the math nobody runs before they load their card. a 30-second ai ad is never one generation. it's 30 to 40 pulls. → wrong face. re-roll. → hands melt. re-roll. → lip sync drifts a frame. re-roll. → b-roll doesn't match the brand. re-roll. every pull bills you. the winning clip and the garbage clip cost the exact same. you're not paying for the ad. you're paying for the misses on the way to it. the casino model (higgsfield, runway, kling, every per-credit tool): → buy credits up front → pull the lever → pay whether the clip is usable or trash → the agent loops to fix itself? your meter runs faster → you ration generations like chips at a table the finished-ad model (notch): → you direct the ad, not the generations → the agent re-rolls, iterates and fixes itself on its own dime → the misses are our cost, not your wallet → one price for the deliverable. however many pulls it took. per-credit pricing isn't pricing. it's a casino floor. the meter is the product. the ad is just the bait. you should pay for the thing you can actually run. not for the privilege of pulling the lever 40 times to find it. comment your brand below. i'll ship you 10 winning ad variations. on us. no credits. no meter. no catch. or try notch for free today.

Vinay Jain

298,084 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

vinayjain404's profile picture

$27k in 8 days from a sentence buried in a 3-star review. this is the most annoying gadget i have ever bought — written by a customer at 11pm. your best hook is already written. you just haven’t read it. the script: 60-year-old. back pain for decades. accepted it as normal. buys a posture corrector. it buzzes every time she slouches. annoying. every line came from reviews. → most annoying gadget i have ever bought → i was slouching constantly → standing straight without even thinking about it → i wish i had found this decades ago then stitched them into one story arc: → open with contradiction (annoying + best possible way = curiosity loop) → pain identification (slouching constantly, 60 years old, accepted it) → result that feels accidental (without even thinking about it) → emotional regret hook (wish i had found this decades ago) → product name last. not first. the workflow: → agent mines every review source — amazon, reddit, app store, support tickets → extracts sentences where customers describe the problem in their own words → extracts sentences where they describe the moment it worked → maps sentences to a story arc: contradiction → pain → result → regret → product → scripts the ad using their exact language. no polishing. no copywriting. → generates 30 variations. different customer sentences. same arc. controversial take: a copywriter writes: fix your posture in 7 days. a customer writes: this is the most annoying gadget i have ever bought. one sounds like an ad. one sounds real. guess which one people watch. rt + comment "REVIEW" i’ll send the workflow

Vinay Jain

12,903 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Keine weiteren Inhalte verfügbar