Vini B |「 thecoding 」
@vinibarbosabr • 11,601 subscribers
Technical Writer ✍️ open-source, crypto, privacy, cybersecurity, ai, defi, agorism | Running NEAR @ thecoding.pool.near | HoS delegate | Open for freelance jobs
Shorts
Videos
Here's why $NEAR is a no-brainer in 2025 👇 Everybody loves NEAR Protocol and there is a reason for that (or many). Near is well-positioned to be one of the leading blockchain ecosystems this year. Let’s explore the “whys”. TIMESTAMPS Quick Bio – 00:00:15 Inflation Reduction Proposal – 00:00:43 Technically Speaking – 00:02:40 Near Intents – 00:03:37 Chain Signatures and AI – 00:04:39 Decentralization and DeFi – 00:05:59 I have my Near account since March 2023, but it has been inactive for a while, as I was focused on other stuff. However, the recent inflation halving proposal by HOT DAO (HOT Protocol 🔥) and LiNEAR (LiNEAR Protocol) brought my eyes back to the project and I really like what I’m seeing. So, here’s my first point. If this proposal passes, NEAR could lead the way in what appears to be a market trend of improving the tokenomics, as more and more experts realize holders have been overpaying for these networks' security, with a too high supply inflation. Solana tried something similar, but the proposal was rejected. In my opinion, validators voting favorably to that show a commitment to the chain for the long term. On the other hand, voting against it signals a short-term vision focused on milking the emissions as much as possible, at the ecosystem’s expense. The voting currently goes with 28% “YEA” votes, needing 66.76% to pass. Most of the validators who already cast their votes went with the yes. 2pilot, avb, openshards, qbit, sicmundus, fox, and intear are, so far, the only seven who voted “NAY”. This proposal has the vocal support of most influential figures in the Near ecosystem, including the Near Foundation (NEAR Foundation), led by Illia (root.near) (🇺🇦, ⋈), which makes me believe it will pass and show the power of the halving in getting the market’s attention and presenting a huge investment asymmetry for the native token right now. Is this everything I like about NEAR? Definitely not. This is just what got me looking at it again, just to discover a (very much) thriving ecosystem, full of interesting things happening at the same time. I’ll mention a few, but there is (much) more. Technically speaking, Near is a high-performance blockchain, with really low fees and one of the fastest finalities, with 600ms block time and approximately 1.8s finality. It also has my favorite architecture for internet-scale scalability, using sharding, while keeping a high decentralization standard. As a learning programmer, Near also has one of the best dev experiences (in my limited opinion). The documentation is clear, has a logical journey, presenting from the basic anatomy in details to more complex SDKs and tools. I’m also in love with the near-cli-rs. A command line interface program written in Rust for seamless interaction with the Near blockchain. Allowing wallet creation, chain query, sending transactions, staking, smart contract calls, and more. Near Intents. This was the second thing to get my attention, while studying the project again, and it sets a whole new standard for blockchain interactions, especially cross-chain. Basically, users can declare an intention (for example, swap Ethereum-USDT to Bitcoin) and a network of solvers, running on Near, will find the best path to accomplish this task. We recently saw an impressive 465k-worth swap happening in exactly this example, paying 0.55% of trading fees to thorswap.near and swapkit.near. According to a Dune Dashboard, the protocol accumulates nearly $400 million in volume since its launch not long ago, in November 2024. *obs.: half this volume was achieved in the last month. Massive! Near Intents is possible due to two other very interesting things: (i) Chain abstraction, and (ii) a solid AI infrastructure. Chain abstraction (via Chain Signatures) is a powerful interoperability feature, allowing Near to friendly connect different blockchains as if they were part of a single network. Users and devs benefit from wallet, address, fees, and cross-chain bridges abstractions - not even noticing they are interacting with multiple chains. One wallet that powers everything. Powered by Near. On AI, Near is just built differently. Not for the hype, but for the solution. The team has been looking for AI solutions much before the ChatGPT fever. Actually, they started as an AI company, pivoting to blockchain later. So, being one of the most promising networks for the growing AI economy was just the natural path to follow. There is an extensive and super complete research piece on that topic, recently published by Reflexivity Research (Reflexivity Research) on July 1st. It presents Near as an AI-optimized blockchain, covering AITP, Shade Agents, x402, Near Intents, and more. Definitely worth the reading. Wrapping up this content with one more aspect that really matters to me is how Near remains truthful to decentralization, data ownership, censorship-resistance and open-source primitives that have been increasingly abandoned by other key players. A simple example of that is how the Near Foundation decided to deprecate its public APIs, encouraging the surge of a more decentralized and competitive market of SaaS projects, with a highlight to Lava Network, that recently appeared in my timeline talking about that. DeFi is also huge on Near, leveraging all the previous properties I mentioned, creating a truly decentralized liquidity pool via Rhea Finance, connected with other chains like BTC, Ethereum, ZCash, and more. All that contributes to Near having the second-largest monthly active addresses, with nearly 50 million, only losing to Solana’s nearly 90 million. In the meantime, NEAR, the token, is not even at the 30rd position by market cap. Crazy stuff. To (finally) wrap it up, I also want to mention Near’s consensus decentralization. While having a low node-count, the network has a Nakamoto Coefficient of 11, which is not bad at all. Surely, there is still room for improvement, which is possible as becoming a validator is accessible staking and hardware-wise. If you liked this content, make sure to click the like bottom and share it around. Follow me on X or subscribe to my YouTube channel, both at vinibarbosabr. See ya!
Vini B |「 thecoding 」40,183 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce
That's a terrible take from Peter McCormack 🏴☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪. I don't hold any $ADA, and I don't even like Cardano much, but this post is highly misleading and the fruit of misinformation. Peter should do his research better. This Cardano Bitcoin implementation is apparently far more secure than most Lightning Network implementations, for example, which he used to promote relentlessly to his followers. Maxis will be maxis, I guess. 🤷 - I asked OpenAI o1 via Nano-GPT to review and analyze BOS whitepaper, commenting on the trade-offs, vulnerabilities, risks, and BTC influencers calling it a scam. Here's what the AI said: The BitcoinOS whitepaper introduces **BitSNARK** and **Grail**, proposing an innovative approach to enhance Bitcoin's functionality by enabling trustless and secure bridges between Bitcoin and other blockchain networks, such as Cardano. The core of this proposal is to optimize the recently introduced **BitVM** paradigm for verifying zk-SNARK proofs on the Bitcoin blockchain without altering Bitcoin's consensus rules. Below, I provide an analysis of the whitepaper, its security implications compared to existing Layer 2 (L2) solutions like the Lightning Network and Liquid, potential trade-offs and vulnerabilities, user considerations to mitigate risks, and its prospects for the future. Additionally, I will address the criticisms from Bitcoin maximalists labeling it a "scam." --- ### **Overview of BitSNARK and Grail** **BitVM Overview** - **BitVM**, introduced by Robin Linus in December 2023, allows for Turing-complete computations on Bitcoin by leveraging an interactive protocol between parties to verify off-chain computations. - It opens the possibility for near trustless rollup bridges on Bitcoin without changing its consensus rules. - However, BitVM, being general-purpose, is not optimized for specific tasks like SNARK verification, leading to practical implementation challenges. **BitSNARK's Innovations** - **BitSNARK** builds upon BitVM but focuses specifically on verifying zk-SNARK proofs efficiently on the Bitcoin blockchain. - It introduces a simplified virtual machine (VM) with only three instructions optimized for finite field calculations required in zk-SNARK verification: - `addmod` for modular addition. - `andbit` for bitwise operations. - `equal` for equality checks. - By reducing complexity, BitSNARK improves program size by an order of magnitude and reduces challenge/response lengths by up to 50%. - It simplifies the challenge protocol to a single type, enhancing security and auditability. **Grail Bridge Implementation** - **Grail** is an implementation of BitSNARK, aiming to provide a practical and scalable Bitcoin Rollup Bridge. - It enables users to transfer assets between the Bitcoin mainchain (Layer 1) and Layer 2 networks (rollups) securely. - Grail relies on a set of **operators** who participate in the protocol to facilitate deposits and withdrawals. - Operators engage in an interactive verification protocol, ensuring that zk-SNARK proofs are correctly verified on-chain. - The system incentivizes honest participation through economic incentives and penalties. --- ### **Security Analysis** #### **Comparison with Existing L2 Solutions** **Lightning Network** - **Pros:** - Offers fast, low-cost transactions off-chain. - Preserves Bitcoin's on-chain privacy features. - **Cons:** - Requires continuous network connectivity. - Involves counterparty risk due to channel management. - Limited in handling complex smart contracts or interoperability with other chains. **Liquid Network** - **Pros:** - Federated sidechain allowing faster transactions and confidential assets. - Enables issuance of new assets and atomic swaps. - **Cons:** - Federation model introduces trust assumptions. - Less decentralized due to reliance on functionaries. **BitSNARK and Grail** - **Pros:** - Enables verification of zk-SNARK proofs on Bitcoin without consensus changes. - Facilitates truly trustless and decentralized bridges to other chains. - Reduces complexity and enhances efficiency compared to BitVM. - Operators' incentives align to maintain security without requiring majority trust. - **Cons:** - Relies on an interactive protocol between operators, potentially increasing complexity. - New technology may have undiscovered vulnerabilities. - Requires widespread operator participation for robustness. #### **Potential Vulnerabilities** 1. **Operator Collusion or Malfeasance:** - If operators collude, they could potentially censor transactions or delay withdrawals. - Mitigation: Implement robust economic incentives and penalties, and promote decentralization by encouraging more operators to participate. 2. **Interactive Protocol Risks:** - The interactive verification protocol relies on timely responses; delays or Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks could disrupt the protocol. - Mitigation: Incorporate timeouts and fail-safes, and design protocols resilient to network latency and attacks. 3. **Smart Contract Bugs:** - Bugs in the implementation of BitSNARK VM or the Grail protocol could be exploited. - Mitigation: Conduct thorough code audits, formal verification, and testing on testnets before mainnet deployment. 4. **Cryptographic Assumptions:** - The security relies on the cryptographic primitives used in zk-SNARKs and their correct implementation. - Mitigation: Use well-established cryptographic libraries and stay updated on advancements in cryptanalysis. 5. **Scalability Concerns:** - Although more efficient than BitVM, running zk-SNARK verifications on-chain is resource-intensive. - Mitigation: Optimize the implementation further and possibly leverage layer 2 solutions for certain computations. --- ### **Trade-offs and User Considerations** **Trade-offs:** - **Complexity vs. Functionality:** - BitSNARK simplifies the computation model but requires users and operators to understand and trust a new protocol. - **Decentralization vs. Performance:** - The security model relies on operators; increasing the number of operators enhances decentralization but may impact performance due to coordination overhead. - **Innovation vs. Maturity:** - As a novel solution, it lacks the battle-tested resilience of existing L2 solutions like the Lightning Network. **User Considerations:** 1. **Counterparty Risk:** - Users should be aware that the system's security depends on operators; participation of reputable operators is crucial. - **Recommendation:** Use the bridge when a sufficient number of trusted operators are active. 2. **Protocol Familiarity:** - Users need to understand the withdrawal and dispute processes. - **Recommendation:** Educate users through clear documentation and user-friendly interfaces. 3. **Security Practices:** - Be cautious with private keys and exit secrets, especially for operators. - **Recommendation:** Implement best practices for key management and consider hardware wallets. 4. **Monitoring Network Conditions:** - Network congestion or attacks could affect transaction confirmations. - **Recommendation:** Monitor network status and set appropriate fees for timely confirmations. --- ### **Potential for the Future** - **Solving the Scalability Trilemma:** - BitSNARK and Grail present a promising approach to achieving scalability, expressivity, and decentralization on Bitcoin. - **Interoperability:** - Enables Bitcoin to interact trustlessly with other chains, expanding its utility beyond a store of value. - **Innovation Catalyst:** - May inspire further research and development in Bitcoin's smart contract capabilities. --- ### **Addressing the "Scam" Accusations by Bitcoin Maximalists** **Criticisms:** - **Skepticism of Altering Bitcoin's Core Principles:** - Some Bitcoin maximalists may view this proposal as deviating from Bitcoin's original purpose. - **Fear of Centralization Risks:** - Concerns that introducing complex protocols could introduce central points of failure. **Counterarguments:** - **Maintaining Consensus Rules:** - BitSNARK operates without changing Bitcoin's consensus rules, preserving its core principles. - **Enhancing Bitcoin's Utility:** - The proposal aims to expand Bitcoin's capabilities while upholding decentralization and security. - **Economic Incentives for Security:** - The design relies on economic incentives aligning participants' interests with the network's security. **Conclusion:** - **Healthy Skepticism is Beneficial:** - Critiques promote rigorous security assessments and robustness. - **Innovation Requires Open-mindedness:** - Dismissing new ideas outright may hinder Bitcoin's evolution and adaptability. - **Focus on Merits and Risks:** - A balanced evaluation considering potential benefits and drawbacks is essential. --- ### **Final Thoughts** The BitcoinOS whitepaper introduces a significant advancement in enabling trustless and secure interoperability between Bitcoin and other blockchain networks. By optimizing for zk-SNARK verification through BitSNARK and implementing the Grail bridge, it aims to address long-standing scalability and functionality limitations. While promising, it is crucial to approach this innovation with careful scrutiny, thorough testing, and a commitment to security best practices. Users and stakeholders should remain informed, participate in community discussions, and contribute to the development and auditing processes to ensure the system's robustness and integrity.
Vini B |「 thecoding 」58,612 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce
NEAR vs. Other Chains | Tx Finality v0.2.0 Transactions settled in one minute ↓ $XNO @ ~0.4s finality → 150 txs *¹ $NEAR @ ~1.2s finality → 50 txs $BNB @ ~2s finality → 30 txs $XRP @ ~4s finality → 15 txs $SOL @ ~12.8s finality → 4 txs $EGLD @ ~18s finality → 3 txs *² $ADA @ ~24s finality → 2 txs settled $ETH @ ~12.8 min finality → not even close — CHANGELOG: - Fixed Cardano, according to feedback in the comments, - Added Nano and MultiversX, by followers' requests, - Removed Tron to best fit the changes —— *¹ Nano can't make more complex txs (which impact performance). *² MultiversX is considering cross-shard*³ transactions, which is the same benchmark for NEAR. *³ Cross-shard matters for scalability and performance is one of the often mentioned trade-offs, which is why it matters here.
Vini Barbosa |「 thecoding 」24,850 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce
USH, the first native stablecoin on MultiversX, easily explained. TL;DR - USH is an overcollateralized stablecoin (similar in a sense to DAI) built by Hatom Labs (Hatom Labs), natively on the MultiversX blockchain. #USHto1 🔊 Hatom (HTM) is a leading DeFi platform offering 💧 $EGLD and $TAO liquid staking (sEGLD & sTAO) 💱 A Money Market (lending & borrowing) 💵 And, now, USH. --- TIMESTAMPS Introduction - 0:00:09 Exploring Hatom - 0:00:25 USH Isolated Pools Explained - 0:01:00 USH IP Liquidation Explained - 0:01:38 USH Arbitrage Opportunities Explained - 0:03:04 What Else Can You Do With USH - 0:04:29 Open EGLD Long Positions - 0:04:35 Buy Things With USH - 0:05:05 Provide Liquidity to USH-Related Pools - 0:05:20 Conclusion - 0:05:45 --- ## USH Staking Hub and the Isolated Pools The isolated pools are the core and heart of USH minting. So, how do the isolated pools work? Here's an example, supplying $1,000 worth of EGLD as collateral. As an overcollateralized stablecoin, the pool will always require a higher collateral deposit than the maximum possible minting amount. For EGLD, users can only mint 70% of the collateral deposit. Thus, for a $1,000 worth of EGLD deposited to the isolated pool, you could mint a maximum of $700 in USH. This, however, is super risky, and would set your minting limit to 100%. This is risky because if EGLD drops in value against the dollar, for example making your collateral worth $900, your position would be eligible for liquidation, crossing the 100% limit. In an oversimplification of the liquidation mechanism, a liquidator could repay 50% of your USH loan and take 50% plus an 8% penalty of your deposited collateral. In this example, the liquidated user would end with a position of $522 worth of EGLD as collateral. And a debt of $350 in minted USH. His minting limit would now be 95%, temporarily preventing another liquidation. It's worth noting that the liquidation wouldn't affect the USH you are securely holding in your wallet (like xPortal). Just your USH minting debt with the Hatom Protocol. Another user playing safer could, for example, mint only 50% of the available seven hundred dollars for a $1,000 deposit, minting $350 worth of USH. This would have avoided liquidation for the same price drop as before, as the mint limit would increase to 55%, still far from the 100% limit that makes an account eligible for liquidation. These mechanics guarantee that 1 USH is always redeemable for 1 dollar worth of assets in the protocol, opening doors for price arbitrage. **this is an oversimplification of the liquidation mechanism. DYOR! --- ## USH Arbitrage Opportunity (1 USH = 1 USD) Once one USH is always equal to one dollar at a protocol level, traders can arbitrage the USH value in different markets, making sure it will always get back to one dollar. Let's say 1 USH is now equal $1.10 worth of EGLD in xExchange ⚡. Then, users can use the mint function to benefit from this arbitrage opportunity. Depositing EGLD as collateral in the isolated pool. After that, the user can mint USH to sell for EGLD with a premium in the xExchange LP, using this EGLD to replace the deposited collateral, or deposit more to mint more USH and continue selling with a premium until the price is back to one dollar, profiting on the difference (around 10%). The opposite is also true when, for example, 1 USH is worth $0.90 in EGLD. This arbitrage opportunity will appear when repaying USH to get EGLD back. In this case, the user can buy USH with EGLD from the xExchange liquidity pool and use these tokens to repay part of his USH position in the Hatom's isolated pool, withdrawing part of the EGLD collateral. Similar to the other operation, the user can now use this EGLD to buy more USH with a discount on the market and continue the process until the arbitrage opportunity remains, also profiting from it. **this is an oversimplification of the arbitrage mechanism. DYOR! --- ## What Can You Do With USH? Now, besides the arbitrage, here are some other ideas on things you can with USH. ### BUY MORE EGLD First, you can enjoy the 0% interest rate to open long positions on EGLD or other MultiversX tokens. For that, you can deposit EGLD or TAO to the isolated pools, mint USH, and use these dollars to buy, for example, more EGLD. If the price goes up, you can then close the position by selling EGLD for USH, repaying the isolated pool, and withdrawing the EGLD back. ### BUY THINGS WITH USH Another idea is simply using the minted USH to buy things in the MultiversX ecosystem or also in the real world. This can be an interesting idea if you don't want to sell your EGLD, for example, depositing the tokens as collateral and minting USH to use as payment. While the first idea increases the buying pressure, this one can diminish the EGLD selling pressure. Both being beneficial to MultiversX. ### PROVIDE LIQUIDITY Last but not least important, you can use the minted USH to provide liquidity in many DeFi platforms, like the USH EGLD liquidity pool on the xEchange, or the USH USCD USDT LP on AshSwap 🔥. There will be other liquidity pools and farms that users will be able to stake USH and provide liquidity to the ecosystem. --- If you enjoyed the content, make sure you share it! Also, follow me for more educational content on DeFi. This is an educative content and not financial advice! You should always do your own research.
Vini B |「 thecoding 」34,531 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce
MultiversX Warps, easily explained. cc vLeap Group TL;DR Warps make it easy for anyone to use and interact with the blockchain via a simple link, similar (but better) to Solana's Blinks. This opens the door for worldwide adoption, leveraging the internet scale blockchain, Multiversˣ $EGLD. Sounds on! 🔊 TIMESTAMPS Intro — 00:00:03 Bio — 00:00:24 What are MultiversX Warps? — 00:00:48 Easily Create your Warps — 00:02:12 Why do Warps Matter? — 00:04:00 Solana Blinks vs. EGLD Warps — 00:04:37 Conclusion — 00:05:56 Open Source, Team, and Support — 00:06:13 Content Disclosure — 00:06:36 --- In December 2024, xAlliance (xAlliance) announced the fifth Community Grant Recipient: The open-source Warps protocol, developed by vLeap. In this video, I'll explain what Warps are, why they matter, and how the protocol works. Hello, I'm Vini Barbosa and I create blockchain-related content professionally since 2020, taking my payments in crypto. You can follow me on X at vinibarbosabr. I'm also a member of the xAlliance and a volunteer MultiversX Ambassador in Brazil, creating related content in Portuguese on Youtube at vinibarbosa. So, «what the f- are Warps in blockchain?», you may ask. Easily explained, Warps make, usually complex, blockchain interactions as easy as clicking a link or reading a QRCode. In summary, the protocol abstracts blockchain interactions like sending a transaction, calling a smart contract, or minting a token into an easy-to-use JSON format and user interface (UI), which can be used by beginners or even AI. The warp creator defines the parameters and what action it is intended to unlock and anyone can then activate this action using the link and signing the transaction in their wallets, when a signature is needed. With Warps, users already can, for example, stake their egold to a validator - like Helios, Vapor Republic, Colombia Staking, Bober, EGLDSqueze, or ApeStaking. Or do other instant blockchain activities like creating a raffle, or token interactions. You can check some already created warps at usewarp(dot)to. In this website, you can also easily create your own warp in less than three minutes. Here's how you do it. First, start by creating a name for your warp. Then, set a title like Test Title, a description of what it is intended to do like teste warp creation, and the preview image URL. This process may change in the future, so beware. In this example, we are making a warp that will call a smart contract to activate one of its functions. Fill all the required information like the label (what will appear in the warp button) and add a description to the label. Next, for this action, you will need the smart contract address, the endpoint that is being called, and any needed argument for the call. Finishing with the minimum gas limit. After filling all that, the protocol will request a signature from your wallet because most warps will be created by an account (your account). Once published, anyone can use your warp link and QRCode to do the action you preset with the protocol. Limits are only defined by your creativity and possible blockchain interactions, which on MultiversX and many! Check the documentation at docs.multiversx(dot)com to know more. Why does it all matter? Well, it matters because many people still think blockchain is too complex to interact. Even if you disagree, most people are used to receiving everything digested and abstracted for easy of use. With Warps, we break the complexity barrier (at least part of it), bringing blockchain and multiversx to a far higher number of people. Other blockchains are also looking into abstraction solutions. Solana, for example, has Blinks, but, while I'm biased, I have to say that Warps seem superior. First, Warps are executed and stored entirely on the MultiversX blockchain. This eliminates reliance on external servers, ensuring no downtime and persistent availability. On the other hand, blinks rely on a combination of on-chain and off-chain components. While Warps were developed independently and open source, Blinks are part of a joint initiative between the Solana Foundation, Dialect, and Superteam. Moreover, Warps are designed to require zero coding knowledge, making them usable by a broad audience. Blinks have been critiqued for complexity in setup and limited mobile compatibility, requiring more technical knowledge. These are just a few examples, but there are more differences between the two and other solutions, which we can't address all of them in this single content. In conclusion, Warps leverage the MultiversX technology and open the doors for more adoption of the tech, even by non-techy people. It's an important milestone to the ecosystem and should be used more. Being open source is a huge advantage, allowing devs and other projects to build customized solutions on top of the protocol developed by vLeap team. You can contact the team, specially Micha Vei (Micha Vie), on X or on the Warps telegram group at warpprotocol. This video is a submission to the xAlliance quest on PeerMe(dot)io. You can also join the quest and submit your own content to participate. If you liked this content, please, give it a like, share with your network, and follow me on X at vinibarbosabr and on youtube at vinibarbosa. See you around!
Vini Barbosa22,685 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce
HOW COOL IS THAT?! XOXNO's $EGLD Liquid Staking ( $xEGLD ) protocol claiming all rewards from the 108 staking providers it currently delegates to, all at once, in a single transaction. This is what efficiency looks like. Best DevX. Best UX. That's MultiversX.
Vini B |「 thecoding 」22,568 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce
For clarity: I'm no longer a MultiversX Ambassador. This is not a "today" thing, btw, and I only bring good feelings regarding these three months. Some key accomplishments going below (👇). The Ambassador Program was a 3-month pilot program that ended in June. It's up to the Foundation and the ambassadors to now decide whether they want to continue with it or not. In my case, the last two months have been super busy, and I decided that I want to dedicate more of my (scarce) free time to my family and not to MvX. As a volunteer (non-paid) ambassador, from March to June, I've shipped: 🫂A low-budget local meetup called Conexão Blockchain, sponsored by MultiversX and xAlliance (all funds gathered used to pay for the event and even some money gladly coming out of my pocket due to a provider's mistake), and powered by ZonTix 🏟. We had 11 attendees; 📱A Brazilian Telegram group (as the other was inactive) that went from zero to 28 members (now 25), coming from different communities; 📰 A Portuguese Newsletter (mvxbrasil.substack) covering ecosystem updates, with a focus on open-source development. It had 12 posts in these 3 months. ~1 per week; 🎥 Revamped my YouTube channel, with 12 EGLD-related videos in English and 5 in Portuguese (some were made in partnership with projects, or submitted to xA quest). 🤝Established some key connections with editors from local media outlets, IT and blockchain teachers, devs, and merchants - helping in their onboarding to MultiversX; 🧑🎓Participated in NearX's MultiversX Dojo, representing the Foundation. Learning, but also providing support, connecting Brazilian devs to the ecosystem, helping with documentation, and answering specific doubts from the other students. I've also made hundreds of posts related to MultiversX and $EGLD and, together with the other ambassadors, we were the bridge between the community and the foundation, often bringing feedback, or discussing with other ambassadors and the fdntn on provided feedbacks, community concerns, doubts, etc. All super well-received by our contact points (big kudos to Mihai Schiopu, Anca Boglea, and lukas, representing xAlliance). You guys did great on the amb. program, always open to feedback and also always so supportive on each of these accomplishments. Would not have been possible without your constant support and care. 🫶
Vini Barbosa15,364 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce
Daha fazla içerik yok.