Art

I've written 6 published peer-reviewed studies on voter roll irregularities for the Journal of Information Warfare. JIW is focused on cyber security and the use of information to conduct war. The fact that their reviewers decided to publish my papers tells you something: their cyber security experts consider the threat posed by corrupted voter rolls to be so serious that it could be classified as an act of war. And what are the findings? In brief: 1. Count of voters who voted changes with every snapshot for old elections (can't tell who or how many people voted in any election) 2. Presence of substantial numbers of illegal records makes it impossible to know how many qualified voters exist in any state surveyed. 3. Unusual algorithms used in some states to assign ID numbers can be used as covert data channels. 4. Photographically identical signatures on registration applications evidence forgery and identity theft. 5. Backdated registration dates indicate falsified data pertinent to question whether votes made were legal. 6. Presence of purged records creates large pool of records that can be used to generate illegitimate ballots. There is more, but the bottom line is this: The rolls are the heart of any election, yet they are so compromised they aren't fit for use. Would you board a plane with its engines on fire because the airline painted "Completely Safe" on the fuselage? That's what voting with these rolls is like.

11,472 Aufrufe