Letting Michael keep improvising sounds expensive. At $0.003 per... generated second, Vivix W1 at least makes the video part more manageable. That's why his switch from “pick two” to “pick three” lands: a real-time interactive video model needs to afford the next unscripted moment while generating quickly and maintaining comparable visual quality. Watching Dwight spray him, I'm less confident the office has budgeted for everything else.show more

This snowy skiing scene makes me want to explore... every turn, and Vivix W1 $0.003/sec pricing makes that idea even more compelling. A real-time interactive video model should let you explore new paths without generating fresh footage every time, while keeping generation fast, visual quality consistent, and costs low. This is where Vivix W1’s potential gets interesting.show more

$0.003 per second for video generation, without compromising on... speed or visual quality? The supplied comparisons put Vivix W1 alongside leading models on visual quality. It also delivers eight seconds of video in roughly eight seconds. But the bigger story is that W1 is a real-time interactive video model. Every extra minute of interaction means more video to generate and pay for. Making generation this affordable could make interactive stories and live visuals practical to run, not just impressive demos. Live visuals are what I’m most curious about. Generating quickly is one thing; reacting at the right moment is what would make them feel live. Vivix.AI already offers real-time generation through the API; the browser playground currently produces finished clips. A closer look at what could power those live visuals 👇show more

I can already see the tree I'd ski into.... If this perspective became interactive, I'd need cheap attempts more than a heroic opening shot. Vivix W1's $0.003/sec would make another eight generated seconds $0.024, with fast generation and comparable quality. That's a useful starting point for a real-time interactive video model you can actually spend time learning to use. The real-time capability is on its API; the run I'd like to try is still a possibility.show more

1 video with Seedance 2.5. Or 77 with Vivix... W1. Same $1.85 budget. 20× faster generation. Comparable quality. Just $0.003 per second. The playground is live: W1 is built for interactive video. Making it an everyday medium is impossible without high quality, low latency, and low cost. W1 is the first to deliver all three. Under 1/50 the cost. 20× faster generation. Comparable quality. There are still gaps in cinematic fidelity, complex motion, and dense scenes. Full-scale training is underway.show more

$0.003/sec changes the economics of running real-time AI video.... I’ve been testing Vivix W1, and that number is hard to ignore. The comparison shows visual quality on par with the models alongside W1. About a second of generation time per second of footage, too. But W1 isn’t just another video generator. It’s built for real-time interactive video, where the model keeps generating as the experience moves forward. Every second of that experience adds to the generation bill. At $0.003/sec, you can actually start thinking about a story that keeps going as viewers make choices. Vivix.AI already supports real-time generation through the API. The browser playground currently uses offline generation, with real-time browser tools coming soon. Continuous video is one thing. Giving viewers meaningful control is another. If I change my mind halfway through a story, how much can it actually change with me? That’s the interesting challenge. The next plot twist could be yours 👇show more

Same perfume concept. Four video models. The difference becomes... obvious once the scene starts changing. Vivix W1 keeps the subject and product feeling coherent as the studio transitions into the storm. For me, that matters more than how dramatic the storm looks. An eight-second version costs $0.024 to generate. Waiting for it takes roughly eight seconds. This comparison only shows a finished clip. W1 is built for real-time interactive video, not just one-shot generation. Vivix.AI already offers that real-time capability through the API. At $0.003/sec, that also makes experimenting with interactive video workflows a lot more accessible. Letting a viewer influence how a scene unfolds would mean paying for generation throughout the interaction. Worth watching the comparison closely. The model behind the studio-to-storm transition 👇show more

AI video is hitting the same wall AI agents... hit a year ago: The tech works. The economics don't. That's why Vivix.AI caught my attention. Their new real-time interactive video model, W1, generates video for just $0.003/sec while staying surprisingly fast and competitive on quality. To put that in perspective: At the supplied rates, an equal-length Seedance 2.5 clip costs about 77 times as much as a W1 clip. But the interesting part isn't cheaper clips. It's what happens when video becomes cheap enough to run continuously. Interactive stories. Live AI-generated experiences. Visuals that respond in real time. Those products only work if generation costs stay low. W1 still has room to improve on cinematic fidelity and complex scenes, but making real-time video economically viable feels like a much bigger milestone than most people realise. Here’s the W1 rate I’d use in a project estimate:show more

An hour of live AI video generation now costs... $10.80 At $0.003 a second, Vivix W1 generates a full minute for just 18 cents. That price matters because of what W1 is. It's a real-time interactive video model. Through the API, it keeps generating video while the experience is happening, and you can shape what comes next. With a normal clip generator, you pay once and you're done. Real-time interactive video keeps generating as you use it. Every second generated is another second you pay for. At higher per-second rates, that bill can grow quickly. It's hard to ship an interactive product when every user session costs a fortune. With W1, the math starts to look workable. And they didn't buy that price by cutting quality or speed. In Vivix’s supplied tests, eight-second videos averaged 7.7 seconds to generate from text and 8.4 seconds with one reference image. In the side-by-side comparisons, W1 holds its own against Seedance 2.5, Kling 3.0, and H3 Max on the same prompts. An exploding taxi, a skyline shot, a robot serving drinks on a plane. It's not perfect yet: • Cinematic fidelity still has gaps • Complex motion and dense scenes still need work • Full-scale training is still underway, so this is an early checkpoint How to try it: • Real-time generation is live through the API today • The browser playground does offline generation for now. Submit a prompt and you get a finished clip. Real-time browser tools are coming soon My take: I've seen a lot of interactive video demos that would cost a fortune to run in production. This looks priced for something you could actually ship. Once a minute of live video generation costs 18 cents, interactive stories, games, and characters could become an everyday medium instead of a tech demo. What I want to see next from Vivix.AI: better complex motion. Improve that and the use cases open up fast. Put your project’s runtime into the equation 👇show more

LTX 2.5 JUST WENT FASTER THAN REAL TIME LTX... (LTX.io) is already one of the world's most widely used open video models. We just made its latest release, LTX 2.5, fast enough for rapid iteration and affordable enough for production at scale. It’s live on TensorScaleAI now, generating a 5-sec 1080p video in just 3.12s at $0.04 per second. That's faster than real time, at a fraction of the cost! For creative teams, that means less waiting time, more ideas explored, and lower production costs. For robotics and physical AI teams, that means more data generated at scale, more scenarios tested, and shorter development and deployment cycles. Request early access today and we’ll get you onboarded! (link:show more

AI video might be having its own DeepSeek moment,... and Vidu Q4 Preview is making a strong case. But here's what caught my attention: it's not just about cheaper generations. At $0.014/sec, its lowest price per second is approximately half that of comparable models. That means testing 10 different 15-second video concepts could cost just $2.10 at the starting rate. Add support for up to 15 reference images for better character and visual consistency, and creators suddenly have more room to experiment. More ideas tested. More creative freedom. Less pressure on your budget. The real breakthrough isn't just affordability. It's making high-performance AI video accessible to more creators. What matters most to you when choosing an AI video model? #ViduQ4Preview #ViduAI #adshow more

The Warriors are expected to keep the 11th pick... of the draft, per Marc J. Spears "The Warriors have that 11th pick and people wondering can they get in the Giannis mix. From what I'm being told today from several people the Warriors like to keep that pick"show more

This one's been a long time in the making... - Alexander Battaglia delivers his image quality analysis of DLSS on Switch 2. Two models available to devs, one comparable to PC, the other more lightweight and considerably more compromised... but how?show more

Digimon Story Time Stranger on Nintendo Switch 2 features... two graphic options. Select Quality Mode to play in 4K HDR at 30 frames per second. Select Performance Mode to play in full HD at 60 frames per second. Learn more:show more

Introducing A new platform for infinite, interactive AI livestreams.... Pick a channel, prompt what happens next, and watch it generate in real time. You aren't just watching the show. You're directing it.show more

The next 3 months for altcoins are going to... be INSANE. Same breakout as 2020. Same breakout as 2023. But this time, pick quality. The meme casino only makes the house rich. Everyone else gets rekt.show more

Consequences of not paying your players what their owed.... its 3rd and 5 and Jaylon Johnson has great coverage. But when time comes for him to come off his guy and tackle the scrambling QB he pulls up at the last second and Bryce Young is able to pick up the first. I've watched enough of JJ to know thats not his typical style. And I don't blame him for shying away from contact. Why would he put his body on the line for a team that has shown they dont value him? #Bearsshow more

ChatGPT just got a lot more visual—introducing Intelligent UI.... Intelligent UI allows ChatGPT to answer quickly with fully interactive user interfaces that make everyday answers more visual. It makes learning complex topics easier, and it quickly creates tools to solve a task right in the moment. Oh, and also...GPT-6 is coming to ChatGPT. For everyone.show more

My @Robotaxi ride still can't pick me up at... the Austin airport, but I can get it to pick me up at the airport Hotel row. So that's what I did this time. I'm in Austin!show more

I guess this is why the Second Amendment exists.... This video from the active shooter incident at the In-N-Out in Twin Falls, Idaho yesterday appears to show a civilian armed with a handgun engaging the gunman. Witnesses reported seeing a man with an AR-style rifle come out of the drive-thru area, and then a separate individual with a pistol began returning fire on him. The shooter is now confirmed dead by police, with three total fatalities and at least two injured. This is the kind of real-time response the right to keep and bear arms is meant to enable.show more

Pick a color for the next video 🥹