Two classes of cryptography. Two quantum outcomes. Public-key encryption... (RSA, ECC): broken by Shor's algorithm. Hash functions (SHA-2, SHA-3): weakened by Grover's, not broken. Security halves, doesn't collapse. DNA Protocol anchors are hashes. That's deliberate. Powered by $XDNA:show more

Each proof generated, verified, or anchored on the XRPL... consumes $XDNA. Privacy is not a feature of DNA Protocol. It is the transaction. Powered by $XDNA:show more

DNA Protocol derives identity proofs that cannot be reversed,... anchors their state on the #XRPL, and resists quantum key recovery by eliminating reusable secrets.show more

DNA Protocol is executing live tests of quantum-safe identity... verification on #XRPL. Verification is proof-based, not key-based. Quantum attack vectors return NOT APPLICABLE by design.show more

$XDNA is the execution gate of DNA Protocol. No... verification runs without it. No proof anchors on XRPL without it.show more

The BIS paper lists zero-knowledge proofs and selective disclosure... as the next extension of its XRPL anchoring design. DNA Protocol is already running ZK-proof anchoring on XRPL testnet. Powered by $XDNA:show more

InfoFi is broken. Pulse sets a new standard. Built... by , powered by $BOOST.show more

Identity and settlement were built on separate rails for... a reason. Neither could carry the other without exposing it. DNA Protocol weaves them: proof off-ledger, anchor on the XRP Ledger. Powered by $XDNA:show more

Claude weakened a quantum-resistant crypto candidate in 60 hours... Anthropic's Frontier Red Team published two cryptanalysis results on Tuesday from Claude Mythos Preview, attacks on the algorithms themselves rather than the implementation bugs it surfaced in April. The first roughly halves the effective key strength of HAWK, a third-round NIST post-quantum signature candidate. The second speeds up a known attack on a seven-round version of AES-128 by 200 to 800 times, while full AES runs ten rounds and stands. Anthropic says that no production system is affected, and nothing here touches SHA-256 (Bitcoin) or ECDSA. A year ago AI models could not do this at all.show more

The rails that clear money are the rails that... should verify digital identity with privacy. Deterministic settlement, verifiable history, trusted counterparties, near-zero cost. XRPL already solved these for value. DNA Protocol applies them to proof. Same ledger. Same guarantees. Zero exposure. Powered by $XDNA:show more

🚨JUST IN: GOOGLE SETS 2029 DEADLINE AS QUANTUM THREAT... LOOMS OVER BITCOIN Google has set a 2029 deadline for post-quantum cryptography migration, warning quantum risks are approaching faster than expected. The company says current encryption standards could eventually be broken. For Bitcoin $BTC, this raises long-term concerns around wallet security and private keys. While no immediate threat exists, “Q-Day” could expose vulnerable addresses.show more

"That's out by about two metres!" Surely not again...#AFLPowerDees

My opinion on this two people fight sha

A proof that can be replayed is a proof... that can be stolen. DNA Protocol binds every proof to a nullifier registry before anchoring on the XRPL. Each proof settles once. A second submission fails at the registry and never reaches the ledger. Powered by $XDNA:show more

Kenyans on TikTok are overworking. SHA SHA SHA haifanyi!

Laboratory transactions processed via DNA Protocol currently incur #XRPL... network fees, which are burned as part of transaction settlement. Once $XDNA enters active circulation, protocol fees transition to a dual-burn model, where both XRPL network fees (paid in XRP) and XDNA (protocol fee) are programmatically burned per validated laboratory workflow.show more

do NOT put on "1 Hour of Silence Occasionally... Broken by Noelle Screaming" 😭😭😭show more

Quantum Threat to Crypto Gets Fresh EU Warning European... financial watchdogs have warned that quantum computing could eventually undermine cryptography securing blockchains. The EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA highlighted quantum computing among emerging technology risks in their latest update. Many cryptocurrencies rely on elliptic curve cryptography to protect transactions and wallet security. A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could theoretically use Shor’s algorithm to break this protection. Google researchers estimate the required resources are roughly 20 times lower than earlier estimates. However, the required quantum hardware does not currently exist. Blockchain developers are therefore exploring post-quantum cryptography before the technology becomes capable of such attacks.show more