Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

0,1% title should be spec-based aswell for M+

22,103 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von Mes
Mesvor 2 Monaten

Feel like that gets kinda weird for groups though right? Situation where off-meta specs always q with meta specs, but then the meta specs miss out (4/5 in the group end up meta). Does this achieve it's goal at 0.1%? Seems lucrative for booster groups also

Profilbild von Niko
Nikovor 2 Monaten

Every spec has people in title range every season whats bro yappin

Profilbild von Stephano Jenkins
Stephano Jenkinsvor 2 Monaten

spec specific titles just encourage ppl to hard grief and becomes a competition of whether u manage to get invited to a 20 and get carried on the worst spec in the game more than it does your actual skill

Profilbild von Byron
Byronvor 2 Monaten

feels like the obvious solution is to make two titles, one for .1% of spec and the other the current global .1%

Profilbild von Crellis
Crellisvor 2 Monaten

None of this will solve LFG. Most off meta specs inevitably still won’t get invited. The people who get the titles will play meta for a resilient key then swap specs and do each dungeon with the off meta choice. Like arcane > fire. Arms > fury

Profilbild von KiroNoKure
KiroNoKurevor 2 Monaten

Spec based won't solve anything. It'll make boosting for non meta specs even more ridiculous What we need is more active tuning

Profilbild von abzolute
abzolutevor 2 Monaten

title is one of the only prestige achieves they haven’t watered down, leave it alone

Profilbild von Gabu#ggez
Gabu#ggezvor 2 Monaten

blizzard is scared to make any meaningful changes

Profilbild von Topicx
Topicxvor 2 Monaten

100% agree with this. Everyone in the comments makes absolutely no sense with their opposing remarks. This would actually help solve some of the meta issue. Many people ONLY switch to get title. Less people would do that if it was spec based and we would see more diversity.

Ähnliche Videos