Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
0,1% title should be spec-based aswell for M+
22,103 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 9

Feel like that gets kinda weird for groups though right? Situation where off-meta specs always q with meta specs, but then the meta specs miss out (4/5 in the group end up meta). Does this achieve it's goal at 0.1%? Seems lucrative for booster groups also

Every spec has people in title range every season whats bro yappin

spec specific titles just encourage ppl to hard grief and becomes a competition of whether u manage to get invited to a 20 and get carried on the worst spec in the game more than it does your actual skill

feels like the obvious solution is to make two titles, one for .1% of spec and the other the current global .1%

None of this will solve LFG. Most off meta specs inevitably still won’t get invited. The people who get the titles will play meta for a resilient key then swap specs and do each dungeon with the off meta choice. Like arcane > fire. Arms > fury

Spec based won't solve anything. It'll make boosting for non meta specs even more ridiculous What we need is more active tuning

title is one of the only prestige achieves they haven’t watered down, leave it alone

blizzard is scared to make any meaningful changes

100% agree with this. Everyone in the comments makes absolutely no sense with their opposing remarks. This would actually help solve some of the meta issue. Many people ONLY switch to get title. Less people would do that if it was spec based and we would see more diversity.

