Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

“100% Confirmed” - Did They ACTUALLY Just Find Noah’s Ark? Recent articles are claiming researchers have discovered the remains of Noah’s Ark with 100% certainty. Today, I respond to these claims and examine the evidence they came across.

42,386 views • 2 days ago •via X (Twitter)

25 Comments

Ryan Mauro's profile picture
Ryan Mauro2 days ago

There are other severe issues with the new leadership of the Noah’s Ark Scans group that your audience should know about:

Gerid Goudwin's profile picture
Gerid Goudwin2 days ago

Agree with everything said. Much of the data was addressed, pottery, petrified wood. My question is why were the anchors omitted here? Ken never replies here on X. He loves his answers in genesis but doesn’t answer on X.

John's profile picture
John2 days ago

Thanks for posting this Ken.

Wade Weston's profile picture
Wade Weston2 days ago

Common sense tells me that that much wood sitting out in the open would quickly be utilized for non boat uses. Fuel, shelter? Its not staying intact.

John's profile picture
John2 days ago

I think a lot of secular news is jumping on the Duripinar site because it's obviously not Noah's ark and makes Christians look foolish.

Viviana Stankus's profile picture
Viviana Stankus2 days ago

Please explain this. There are gigantic anchors that lead up to this site. These are verified. This is something that needs to be addressed. So what is your comment regarding these?

ConditionSupply's profile picture
ConditionSupply2 days ago

What's the problem, Ken? 'Worried that someone is going to expose your grift and take the attention off your pathetic $$$ BS circus tent?

Carron Rodriguez's profile picture
Carron Rodriguez2 days ago

Thank you, Dr. Ham, for weighing in! I appreciate your biblical perspective.

Passersby's profile picture
Passersby2 days ago

It’s refreshing to see a properly grounded comment on this instead of sensationalism. It is surprising how many people had no idea about this site or the other reported contenders. Easy clickbait = lots of this story on X

fanii's profile picture
fanii1 day ago

My house is right here right now. Yes, as you said, Noah's ark may be here.

stevengarruto's profile picture
stevengarruto2 days ago

@grok Is the durupinar site a geological formation, a syncline ?

SkyDreamsBlue's profile picture
SkyDreamsBlue2 days ago

Doubling down. This is pure stubbornness sadly. And I love AIG's work!!

texas ranger72's profile picture
texas ranger722 days ago

NOPE....a natural muslide or formation.

Ryan B's profile picture
Ryan B2 days ago

They never said they 100% confirmed its Noah's ark. They said they 100% confirmed it's a man-made structure.

Travart's profile picture
Travart2 days ago

Well Ken. Satan refuted the fact that if eve eats of the fruit she shall NOT surely die. What does a refute from Satan, the wicked or modern science have to do with our Creator or eternity?

Andrew Jones's profile picture
Andrew Jones1 day ago

I disagree with your assessment. I believe further studies are necessary and that’s what we are doing.

TroyB's profile picture
TroyB1 day ago

Know what, I've believed its very possible this was the Ark from the day I saw this site. There is history going back thousands of years here. The locals all know it.

Frank's profile picture
Frank1 day ago

If you don’t want to believe, you won’t believe even if it is a matter of faith, not evidence.

Joel's profile picture
Joel2 days ago

Very well said @aigkenham 👍

BillyBob459's profile picture
BillyBob4592 days ago

Claims are 100% speculation.

Edward Davignon's profile picture
Edward Davignon2 days ago

You should be on Joe Rogan

Marco B's profile picture
Marco B2 days ago

100% false!

Pitboxer Creations's profile picture
Pitboxer Creations1 day ago

No. They did not. The Daily Mail turned a wishful thinking comment into a declarative headline. Then other rags quoted the DM

Aussie Sheila 🇦🇺's profile picture
Aussie Sheila 🇦🇺1 day ago

And out come the scoffers .

Gian Augello's profile picture
Gian Augello1 day ago

Why the research is not on Mount Judi/Cudi, Armenia? This one was referenced by Flavius Josephus or Nicolaus of Damascus

Related Videos

WORLD-SHAKING RELEASE: Durupınar Formation Is 100% NOT Geological! Defense Scientist Calls Noah’s Ark “Extraordinary” “If it were geological, we would not have seen it at all!” — Dr. Khosrow Bakhtar Dr. Khosrow Bakhtar’s preliminary report CONFIRMS that the Durupınar Formation is NOT geological, and that an “extraordinary” man-made structure lies beneath the surface. All of us at Noah’s Ark Scans always knew Durupınar was the resting place of Noah’s Ark. We knew we had to prove it. So we put it through the ultimate test. We brought the most credentialed rock-mechanics expert we possibly could to the Mountains of Ararat and ran BakhtarRadar across the formation. This is the most compelling evidence of Noah’s Ark to date — the most advanced technology ever used at the site in the history of its discovery. Dr. Khosrow Bakhtar, ARSM, PE, Ph.D., is a mining/rock-mechanics engineer and electromagnetics specialist with 40+ years in geomechanics, tunneling, low-power RF/microwave sensors, and subsurface detection. He managed 25–35+ U.S. Department of Defense projects as program manager and principal investigator for the Air Force, Navy, and Defense Threat Reduction Agency. He has written over 200 papers. His radar, BakhtarRadar, masks all geological features, making rocks, dirt, and anything geological completely invisible. He found an “extraordinary and massive object” beneath the surface, with organized patterns, corridors, chambers, and a structure he believes could be a space shuttle or a ship. Dr. Bakhtar confirms: the Durupınar Formation is not geological. There is some kind of organized man-made structure beneath the surface. It’s all real. The Bible is real. The Ark is real. More to come as we await the core and soil sample results in the lab. Help us cover the cost of the lab results as we continue to make the evidence of Noah’s Ark irrefutable:

Noahs Ark Scans

399,758 views • 12 hours ago