Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

100% WIN RATE USING THIS ONE FILTER It made me $170K in 5 days. I probably shouldn’t be giving this away for free. But here’s the full setup 👇 1) Pair age: 24h max Fresh enough to move, but I avoid new launches. 2) Market cap: below $50K Still...

rektfencer's profile picture

Rekt Fencer

349,683 subscribers

78,382 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

FinanzenBildung
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

12 Kommentare

Profilbild von Adrian Sterling | Price Decoder
Adrian Sterling | Price Decodervor 16 Tagen

"100% win rate filters" on micro-caps are the oldest funnel to generate exit liquidity for insider wallets. 99% of these low-cap tokens are designed to extract capital from retail and go straight to zero. paper trading dashboard screenshots don't change the fact that you’re trading player-versus-player against the dev and the deployer bot.

Profilbild von Coin-Rally
Coin-Rallyvor 16 Tagen

Filter says "asymmetric upside", reality says -99% in 5 minutes. Classic Rekt Fencer guide 📉

Profilbild von Pantheist
Pantheistvor 16 Tagen

give us three examples of where this worked for you

Profilbild von KienPhan(O,G)
KienPhan(O,G)vor 16 Tagen

thanks bro

Profilbild von Farreach Dragon
Farreach Dragonvor 16 Tagen

带带弟弟

Profilbild von Catherine Sinclair
Catherine Sinclairvor 16 Tagen

Interesting filter. Pair age plus tiny market cap definitely narrows the field fast, but the risk on names that small can be brutal too. You and @SophiaBlackkod are two of my favorite follows for finding setups worth digging into.

Profilbild von Lynor ⛓️
Lynor ⛓️vor 16 Tagen

Former runners can definitely get interesting again

Profilbild von 𖢻 . ˖
𖢻 . ˖vor 16 Tagen

You'll know when the next Leopardis Tilcayo will be without these advanced filters. Just don't do what I did and throw some dollars into shitcoins that didn't have the right name

Profilbild von Macro Bombastic
Macro Bombasticvor 16 Tagen

$170k in 5 days sounds great until you're the exit liquidity tbh

Profilbild von Catherine Sinclair
Catherine Sinclairvor 16 Tagen

That’s a smart way to narrow the field. Pair age and market cap alone probably cut out a ton of noise before you even get to the deeper work. You and @SophiaBlackkod are two of my favorite follows for finding interesting setups early.

Profilbild von Wallchain Community Hub
Wallchain Community Hubvor 16 Tagen

low cap gems actually hitting different lately

Profilbild von SweetWater ..
SweetWater ..vor 16 Tagen

That filter setup for spotting fresh liquidity and volume returning is a smart way to avoid dead charts. Content like this is why you and @JasonColelfod are two names I always check, breaking down real process instead of just flashing gains.

Ähnliche Videos

HOW I FIND GOOD SMALL CAPS If you’re trading low caps daily, this is a simple filter worth testing: Pair age: 24H+ Market cap: Under $50K Liquidity: $10K+ Volume: $10K+ Once something passes the filter, don’t instantly chase it. Do the research, then wait for a pullback and look for a cleaner entry. I also watch tokens that previously ran to around $200K+ MC, then retraced hard back into the $30K–$40K range. If the structure starts recovering and volume, liquidity and buyers return, that can create a strong setup. Filter → Research → Pullback → Entry
2:01

HOW I FIND GOOD SMALL CAPS If you’re trading low caps daily, this is a simple filter worth testing: Pair age: 24H+ Market cap: Under $50K Liquidity: $10K+ Volume: $10K+ Once something passes the filter, don’t instantly chase it. Do the research, then wait for a pullback and look for a cleaner entry. I also watch tokens that previously ran to around $200K+ MC, then retraced hard back into the $30K–$40K range. If the structure starts recovering and volume, liquidity and buyers return, that can create a strong setup. Filter → Research → Pullback → Entry

soap

32,286 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

HOW TO FIND STRONG & EARLY ENTRIES UNDER $50K MCAP Use this Dexscreener filter → Solana → Liquidity: > $10K → Market Cap: $10K–$50K → Pair Age: > 24H → DEX: PumpSwap + Raydium Then research the setup: → Volume & liquidity → Holder distribution → Chart structure → Buy/sell flow → Dev wallet activity → Narrative & attention potential Goal: Find tokens that are still early but beginning to show strength. Filter → Research → Confirm → Entry A filter doesn’t guarantee a 10x It simply narrows the hunt. Your analysis determines whether the setup is worth taking. DEXSNIPER01 Ilimi Kafin Sa’a
3:40

HOW TO FIND STRONG & EARLY ENTRIES UNDER $50K MCAP Use this Dexscreener filter → Solana → Liquidity: > $10K → Market Cap: $10K–$50K → Pair Age: > 24H → DEX: PumpSwap + Raydium Then research the setup: → Volume & liquidity → Holder distribution → Chart structure → Buy/sell flow → Dev wallet activity → Narrative & attention potential Goal: Find tokens that are still early but beginning to show strength. Filter → Research → Confirm → Entry A filter doesn’t guarantee a 10x It simply narrows the hunt. Your analysis determines whether the setup is worth taking. DEXSNIPER01 Ilimi Kafin Sa’a

Dex sniper

28,555 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

IF YOU TRADE POLITICS ON POLYMARKET, STOP WATCHING RANDOM WALLETS the real alpha is knowing where proven political traders are putting money before you open your own position this is my predict parity filter: Politics only, BUY only, Polymarket, exclude bots, price 5c-95c, size >$10k, volume >$10k, win rate >70%, balance >$10k and positions >$10k. now the noise disappears and i only see large entries from serious traders with strong win rates, volume, balances and real money already in prediction markets on one screen i can track $10k-$30k+ buys across Fed decisions, Trump, Russia-Ukraine, Iran, elections, political leaders and other major politics markets every trade shows the trader, market, YES/NO side, exact entry price, amount and time save the filter and it becomes your own politics smart money feed: find profitable traders → track fresh entries → compare their bets → trade the markets you like directly inside parity no bots. no random $50 trades. just serious money and political prediction market trades Parity is FREE. But enter with invite codes only! Claim invite →
1:21

IF YOU TRADE POLITICS ON POLYMARKET, STOP WATCHING RANDOM WALLETS the real alpha is knowing where proven political traders are putting money before you open your own position this is my predict parity filter: Politics only, BUY only, Polymarket, exclude bots, price 5c-95c, size >$10k, volume >$10k, win rate >70%, balance >$10k and positions >$10k. now the noise disappears and i only see large entries from serious traders with strong win rates, volume, balances and real money already in prediction markets on one screen i can track $10k-$30k+ buys across Fed decisions, Trump, Russia-Ukraine, Iran, elections, political leaders and other major politics markets every trade shows the trader, market, YES/NO side, exact entry price, amount and time save the filter and it becomes your own politics smart money feed: find profitable traders → track fresh entries → compare their bets → trade the markets you like directly inside parity no bots. no random $50 trades. just serious money and political prediction market trades Parity is FREE. But enter with invite codes only! Claim invite →

PolySuccubus

10,469 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

🚨#XRP TO $15,000? YES, IT’S POSSIBLE!! I KNOW, “MARKET CAP THIS, MARKET CAP THAT” — BUT THINK DIFFERENT!! IT’S ABOUT VOLUME, NOT JUST MARKET CAP!! THE SAME DOLLAR CAN MOVE 1 MILLION TIMES AND CREATE MASSIVE VOLUME! LOOK AT CTF TOKEN — TOP DEFI ON XRPL!! WITH JUST A $20B MARKET CAP, IT JUMPS FROM $0.28 TO $748.50 PER TOKEN!! THAT’S ONLY 20% OF XRP’S CURRENT CAP!! REAL PROJECT. REAL SYSTEM. OVER $3M IN REWARDS VOLUME AND LIVE FOR OVER A YEAR!! AND ON MAY 3RD — THE BURN IS COMING!! TRADE CTF TOKEN ON XRPL: TRADE CTF TOKEN ON MEXC: Website:
0:38

🚨#XRP TO $15,000? YES, IT’S POSSIBLE!! I KNOW, “MARKET CAP THIS, MARKET CAP THAT” — BUT THINK DIFFERENT!! IT’S ABOUT VOLUME, NOT JUST MARKET CAP!! THE SAME DOLLAR CAN MOVE 1 MILLION TIMES AND CREATE MASSIVE VOLUME! LOOK AT CTF TOKEN — TOP DEFI ON XRPL!! WITH JUST A $20B MARKET CAP, IT JUMPS FROM $0.28 TO $748.50 PER TOKEN!! THAT’S ONLY 20% OF XRP’S CURRENT CAP!! REAL PROJECT. REAL SYSTEM. OVER $3M IN REWARDS VOLUME AND LIVE FOR OVER A YEAR!! AND ON MAY 3RD — THE BURN IS COMING!! TRADE CTF TOKEN ON XRPL: TRADE CTF TOKEN ON MEXC: Website:

JackTheRippler ©️

78,698 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Let me walk you through an actual futures trade using our 3-step trading system. This system is what I use for EVERY futures trade—the 3 steps are: Step 1: Break of Structure Step 2: Mark the Zone Step 3: Wait for Entry Let’s dive in… Step 1: Break of Structure On the 5-minute chart, price takes out the previous swing high. Trend = bullish. We're only looking for longs. Step 2: Mark the Zone I draw a demand zone at the lowest consolidation that LED to that break of structure. Now I validate it: • Broke structure ✓ • Created imbalance (gap on 1-minute chart) ✓ • Swept liquidity (double bottom trap for retail) ✓ Step 3: Wait for Entry Price drops back into my zone. Here's the critical part: Retail traders enter immediately. They get excited. They place stops below the low. I do nothing. I wait for price to sweep those stops—the liquidity grab. THEN I enter on the second move up. Here’s my results from a live trade: • Entry: After liquidity sweep • Stop loss: Below sweep candle (10 points) • Take profit: 1:2 ratio (20 points) • Position size: 2 contracts (1% risk on $10K account) Price hesitates. Drops slightly. Then rips to TP. — This is just scratching the surface. In the full 2-hour futures trading masterclass, I break down: • How to calculate exact position sizes • The 3 beginner futures mistakes that cost traders thousands • Live chart examples walking through actual entries and exits step-by-step Just comment "FUTURES" and I'll send you the complete masterclass in the next few minutes.
8:26

Let me walk you through an actual futures trade using our 3-step trading system. This system is what I use for EVERY futures trade—the 3 steps are: Step 1: Break of Structure Step 2: Mark the Zone Step 3: Wait for Entry Let’s dive in… Step 1: Break of Structure On the 5-minute chart, price takes out the previous swing high. Trend = bullish. We're only looking for longs. Step 2: Mark the Zone I draw a demand zone at the lowest consolidation that LED to that break of structure. Now I validate it: • Broke structure ✓ • Created imbalance (gap on 1-minute chart) ✓ • Swept liquidity (double bottom trap for retail) ✓ Step 3: Wait for Entry Price drops back into my zone. Here's the critical part: Retail traders enter immediately. They get excited. They place stops below the low. I do nothing. I wait for price to sweep those stops—the liquidity grab. THEN I enter on the second move up. Here’s my results from a live trade: • Entry: After liquidity sweep • Stop loss: Below sweep candle (10 points) • Take profit: 1:2 ratio (20 points) • Position size: 2 contracts (1% risk on $10K account) Price hesitates. Drops slightly. Then rips to TP. — This is just scratching the surface. In the full 2-hour futures trading masterclass, I break down: • How to calculate exact position sizes • The 3 beginner futures mistakes that cost traders thousands • Live chart examples walking through actual entries and exits step-by-step Just comment "FUTURES" and I'll send you the complete masterclass in the next few minutes.

The Trading Geek (Brad Goh)

30,228 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

After 1,000+ trades, this is the only setup that consistently works in any market condition. It's called liquidity sweep reversal—and it's the highest probability trading strategy I know. Before I show you what it is, here are the two things most traders get wrong with it: 1) They enter too early and get stopped out on the second sweep. 2) They try to predict the LAST sweep with certainty This is a sure-fire way to burn your money. Here's what to do instead: Step 1: Identify market control Look at structure. Higher highs and higher lows? Buyers are in control. We're only trading from demand zones. Step 2: Mark your liquidity zones Find equal lows. When retail sees a "double bottom," they go long because textbooks tell them to. Their stop losses sit right below those lows. Available liquidity for institutions to sweep. Step 3: Wait for the sweep Price drops, sweeps those stops, liquidates retail traders, then creates a sharp V-shaped reaction. This sweep breaks structure. Zoom into 1-hour timeframe - price was making lower highs and lows. After the sweep? Higher highs and higher lows. That sweep zone becomes your institutional demand zone. Step 4: Enter on mitigation Wait for price to pull back to the liquidity zone. Enter there. Stop below the zone. Target 2-3R. Remember: You'll NEVER predict with 100% certainty when it's the LAST liquidity sweep. Sometimes price sweeps 2-3 times before the real move. But that's trading—we trade probabilities, not certainties. Also, keep in mind: If you can't spot the liquidity, you ARE the liquidity. — This is just a breakdown of one of the trading strategies we covered in our 2-hour long cryptocurrency trading course. I also discussed the trend pullback strategy, how to trade breakout retests without getting stopped out on fake moves, and why understanding liquidity is the only way to avoid becoming exit liquidity. Just comment "COURSE" and I'll DM it to you immediately so you can watch it.
7:25

After 1,000+ trades, this is the only setup that consistently works in any market condition. It's called liquidity sweep reversal—and it's the highest probability trading strategy I know. Before I show you what it is, here are the two things most traders get wrong with it: 1) They enter too early and get stopped out on the second sweep. 2) They try to predict the LAST sweep with certainty This is a sure-fire way to burn your money. Here's what to do instead: Step 1: Identify market control Look at structure. Higher highs and higher lows? Buyers are in control. We're only trading from demand zones. Step 2: Mark your liquidity zones Find equal lows. When retail sees a "double bottom," they go long because textbooks tell them to. Their stop losses sit right below those lows. Available liquidity for institutions to sweep. Step 3: Wait for the sweep Price drops, sweeps those stops, liquidates retail traders, then creates a sharp V-shaped reaction. This sweep breaks structure. Zoom into 1-hour timeframe - price was making lower highs and lows. After the sweep? Higher highs and higher lows. That sweep zone becomes your institutional demand zone. Step 4: Enter on mitigation Wait for price to pull back to the liquidity zone. Enter there. Stop below the zone. Target 2-3R. Remember: You'll NEVER predict with 100% certainty when it's the LAST liquidity sweep. Sometimes price sweeps 2-3 times before the real move. But that's trading—we trade probabilities, not certainties. Also, keep in mind: If you can't spot the liquidity, you ARE the liquidity. — This is just a breakdown of one of the trading strategies we covered in our 2-hour long cryptocurrency trading course. I also discussed the trend pullback strategy, how to trade breakout retests without getting stopped out on fake moves, and why understanding liquidity is the only way to avoid becoming exit liquidity. Just comment "COURSE" and I'll DM it to you immediately so you can watch it.

The Trading Geek (Brad Goh)

54,339 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨 SPX IS SETTING UP FOR ONE MORE SHAKEOUT We almost at UTAD, and price is now entering the distribution phase From here, I see one clear risk: The Fed turning hawkish again and raising rates Higher rates = tighter liquidity Tighter liquidity = less appetite for risk That could be the catalyst for a move lower Here's how I see it: 1 - Distribution continues A few more weeks of chop while buyers keep getting trapped 2 - Breakdown + Spring A flush into the green support zone, where weak hands finally capitulate 3 - Re-accumulation If support holds, the market can reverse and start the next major leg higher So yes, I expect some downside first But I don't think the next drop necessarily means the bull market is over It could be the shakeout before the real move begins Follow me to stay tuned!
0:50

🚨 SPX IS SETTING UP FOR ONE MORE SHAKEOUT We almost at UTAD, and price is now entering the distribution phase From here, I see one clear risk: The Fed turning hawkish again and raising rates Higher rates = tighter liquidity Tighter liquidity = less appetite for risk That could be the catalyst for a move lower Here's how I see it: 1 - Distribution continues A few more weeks of chop while buyers keep getting trapped 2 - Breakdown + Spring A flush into the green support zone, where weak hands finally capitulate 3 - Re-accumulation If support holds, the market can reverse and start the next major leg higher So yes, I expect some downside first But I don't think the next drop necessarily means the bull market is over It could be the shakeout before the real move begins Follow me to stay tuned!

NoName

57,644 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I just closed a quick $73.8K trade—but not before nearly botching the whole thing. I set my take profit at 212.70 instead of 212.776. When price started dropping fast, I had to manually close all my positions with speedy fingers before hitting the wrong TP level. lol. Let me break down the trade setup: Price was bearish, then we got a market shift signalling a potential bullish move on the 15-minute structure. After price mitigated the supply zone and created a failed reaction, I knew we had a flip + sweep zone forming. Price pushed hard to the upside, but gravity eventually pulled it back down. I saw bearish momentum forming and knew price was gravitating toward the extreme demand zone below. Instead of waiting for a buy setup (which would happen during New York session—not my time), I decided to trade the pullback itself. Here’s how I entered: I waited for a huge bearish candle, then watched for price to pull back slightly. That pullback created my supply zone. When price mitigated that zone and created a lower high—boom, that's where I entered. Overall thoughts: Honestly, I rate this trade 5/10. Not perfect. I rushed the entry and couldn't use my normal platform. Some positions even filled at non-ideal prices. But here's what I did right: proper stop loss placement and taking profit at the exact point where demand would step in. — This is just one setup from my complete trading framework. I also cover how to spot market shifts before they happen, the exact 3 timeframes I use to confirm every trade, and how to identify high-probability supply and demand zones for entries. Just comment "FRAMEWORK" and I'll send you the full breakdown in your DMs.
5:35

I just closed a quick $73.8K trade—but not before nearly botching the whole thing. I set my take profit at 212.70 instead of 212.776. When price started dropping fast, I had to manually close all my positions with speedy fingers before hitting the wrong TP level. lol. Let me break down the trade setup: Price was bearish, then we got a market shift signalling a potential bullish move on the 15-minute structure. After price mitigated the supply zone and created a failed reaction, I knew we had a flip + sweep zone forming. Price pushed hard to the upside, but gravity eventually pulled it back down. I saw bearish momentum forming and knew price was gravitating toward the extreme demand zone below. Instead of waiting for a buy setup (which would happen during New York session—not my time), I decided to trade the pullback itself. Here’s how I entered: I waited for a huge bearish candle, then watched for price to pull back slightly. That pullback created my supply zone. When price mitigated that zone and created a lower high—boom, that's where I entered. Overall thoughts: Honestly, I rate this trade 5/10. Not perfect. I rushed the entry and couldn't use my normal platform. Some positions even filled at non-ideal prices. But here's what I did right: proper stop loss placement and taking profit at the exact point where demand would step in. — This is just one setup from my complete trading framework. I also cover how to spot market shifts before they happen, the exact 3 timeframes I use to confirm every trade, and how to identify high-probability supply and demand zones for entries. Just comment "FRAMEWORK" and I'll send you the full breakdown in your DMs.

The Trading Geek (Brad Goh)

12,264 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

S&P 500 is quietly repeating the exact same pattern from last year. Same structure. Same sequence. Same liquidity engineering. 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 playing out again like nothing changed. But almost nobody is paying attention. A year ago, this setup ended with a sharp move that caught everyone off guard. And now we’re right back at the same point in the cycle. I already mapped this scenario before it started unfolding. This isn’t randomness - it’s positioning. The market is moving exactly where it needs to, to trap the majority. And if this fractal holds, the move will be aggressive. Turn on notifications. I’ll call it in real time.
0:33

S&P 500 is quietly repeating the exact same pattern from last year. Same structure. Same sequence. Same liquidity engineering. 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 playing out again like nothing changed. But almost nobody is paying attention. A year ago, this setup ended with a sharp move that caught everyone off guard. And now we’re right back at the same point in the cycle. I already mapped this scenario before it started unfolding. This isn’t randomness - it’s positioning. The market is moving exactly where it needs to, to trap the majority. And if this fractal holds, the move will be aggressive. Turn on notifications. I’ll call it in real time.

Kabuki🔴

121,043 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨 BTC IS SETTING UP FOR ONE MORE MAJOR DROP Look at the chart Bitcoin has failed to reclaim $80K, so I don’t think the downside is finished yet The chart is pointing to one more liquidity sweep before the real recovery begins If the pattern holds, the next stop is 65k After that, 57k Then somewhere in the mid 40s, right where long term support actually sits Here's the part most people miss looking at a chart like this Every one of those earlier rejections wasn't the end of the move, it was the setup for the next one The bottom that forms after a leg like this is usually where the real trend actually starts Once that low prints, this same structure points back through 126k, and eventually toward 170k by 2027 I've watched this exact shape play out three times now, always right before the big leg up Be sure to follow me to not miss on updates
0:33

🚨 BTC IS SETTING UP FOR ONE MORE MAJOR DROP Look at the chart Bitcoin has failed to reclaim $80K, so I don’t think the downside is finished yet The chart is pointing to one more liquidity sweep before the real recovery begins If the pattern holds, the next stop is 65k After that, 57k Then somewhere in the mid 40s, right where long term support actually sits Here's the part most people miss looking at a chart like this Every one of those earlier rejections wasn't the end of the move, it was the setup for the next one The bottom that forms after a leg like this is usually where the real trend actually starts Once that low prints, this same structure points back through 126k, and eventually toward 170k by 2027 I've watched this exact shape play out three times now, always right before the big leg up Be sure to follow me to not miss on updates

NoName

23,509 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

My memecoin hunt strategy.. with $ansem's run and the robinhood chain hype after the CEO's tweet, the memecoin wave is officially back. and a lot of you with no insider alpha, who don't research anything, are about to lose a lot of money on chasing memes i'll be honest with you all, i have no insider alpha either. none. but at least i don't ape random tickers shilled in some group or by a kol on x. recently i came across this tool and i run everything through it called GeckoTerminal first, it's free, and this is exactly what i do and what i check... > Step 1 → read the meta before picking coins. the categories page shows where money is actually flowing.. pump fun, meme, "influencer," "animal" coins. think of it like checking which section of the casino is busy before sitting down. you're not guessing the narrative, you're reading it. > step 2 → pick your hunting ground based on risk. the trending tab literally has presets like "very early degens" and "rising mid caps." feeling brave → early degens. want things that already survived a few days → mid caps. simple. and if you want the rawest view, the new pools feed shows launches minutes old. fair warning, it's a horror show → i saw pools two minutes old with a security score of 19 flashing red and $1.8k liquidity. that's literally what you're buying when you ape a random CA from a telegram chat. seeing it once cures you. > step 3 is → the actual check, before anything touches my watchlist. i ran this live on Robinhood Pepe ($REPE), a top gainer when i looked → +1,100% in a day, three days old: security score. it's right there on the list. REPE showed 94, clean. the coin trending right next to it flashed 39, red, with insider bags flagged. same trending list, completely different risk. liquidity vs volume. REPE did $2.2M volume through $139K liquidity. that's like a stadium crowd trying to leave through one door → one decent exit folds the chart. buys vs sells. 6,467 buys against 4,850 sells, +$63k net inflow. momentum's real. for now. still not sure? paste the CA into their rug checker → honeypot risk, creator holdings, buy tax, liquidity locks. the stuff that actually rugs you, checked in one shot.. step 4 → track the survivors. whatever passes goes on the watchlist, and multicharts puts up to 16 charts on one screen. the whole robinhood meta in one view instead of 16 tabs. there's even a revival radar that flags dead coins showing signs of life again.. second-life plays before they reach your timeline. that's the whole system. free, ten minutes a day. and look, passing my filter doesn't make anything a buy. REPE cleared the security check and still has liquidity thin enough to fold on one exit. that's exactly why the filter exists. dyor, always. next time a ticker gets shilled at you - run it through this first.
1:19

My memecoin hunt strategy.. with $ansem's run and the robinhood chain hype after the CEO's tweet, the memecoin wave is officially back. and a lot of you with no insider alpha, who don't research anything, are about to lose a lot of money on chasing memes i'll be honest with you all, i have no insider alpha either. none. but at least i don't ape random tickers shilled in some group or by a kol on x. recently i came across this tool and i run everything through it called GeckoTerminal first, it's free, and this is exactly what i do and what i check... > Step 1 → read the meta before picking coins. the categories page shows where money is actually flowing.. pump fun, meme, "influencer," "animal" coins. think of it like checking which section of the casino is busy before sitting down. you're not guessing the narrative, you're reading it. > step 2 → pick your hunting ground based on risk. the trending tab literally has presets like "very early degens" and "rising mid caps." feeling brave → early degens. want things that already survived a few days → mid caps. simple. and if you want the rawest view, the new pools feed shows launches minutes old. fair warning, it's a horror show → i saw pools two minutes old with a security score of 19 flashing red and $1.8k liquidity. that's literally what you're buying when you ape a random CA from a telegram chat. seeing it once cures you. > step 3 is → the actual check, before anything touches my watchlist. i ran this live on Robinhood Pepe ($REPE), a top gainer when i looked → +1,100% in a day, three days old: security score. it's right there on the list. REPE showed 94, clean. the coin trending right next to it flashed 39, red, with insider bags flagged. same trending list, completely different risk. liquidity vs volume. REPE did $2.2M volume through $139K liquidity. that's like a stadium crowd trying to leave through one door → one decent exit folds the chart. buys vs sells. 6,467 buys against 4,850 sells, +$63k net inflow. momentum's real. for now. still not sure? paste the CA into their rug checker → honeypot risk, creator holdings, buy tax, liquidity locks. the stuff that actually rugs you, checked in one shot.. step 4 → track the survivors. whatever passes goes on the watchlist, and multicharts puts up to 16 charts on one screen. the whole robinhood meta in one view instead of 16 tabs. there's even a revival radar that flags dead coins showing signs of life again.. second-life plays before they reach your timeline. that's the whole system. free, ten minutes a day. and look, passing my filter doesn't make anything a buy. REPE cleared the security check and still has liquidity thin enough to fold on one exit. that's exactly why the filter exists. dyor, always. next time a ticker gets shilled at you - run it through this first.

Axel Bitblaze 🪓

26,429 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

For memecoins traders, this is pretty much the only tab you need open throughout the day.. i just went to Geckoterminal and set my mega filter once based on the kind of coins i want to trade. mine only shows coins launched within 48 hours, with over $30k liquidity, 300+ buys in 24 hours and less than 40% held by the top 10 wallets. nothing scientific about these numbers, just lessons learned the hard way: - 48h because that's where the asymmetry lives.. older than that and the move usually found its crowd without me - $30k liquidity because thin pools fold on one decent exit, and i've been the exit before so.. - 300+ buys because volume can be faked but a real crowd showing up is harder to spoof - under 40% in the top 10 because if a few wallets own the supply, they own my exit too then i leave that tab open. whenever a new coin passes the filter, i open its page and everything is already there.. the chart, liquidity, holders, GT score, bundled buys, top traders and security flags. most get closed immediately.. the few that look interesting go on my watchlist until i find an entry. that’s basically the whole workflow. one tab to find new coins, remove most of the junk and research what’s left. you can use my exact filter here as shown in the video:
0:27

For memecoins traders, this is pretty much the only tab you need open throughout the day.. i just went to Geckoterminal and set my mega filter once based on the kind of coins i want to trade. mine only shows coins launched within 48 hours, with over $30k liquidity, 300+ buys in 24 hours and less than 40% held by the top 10 wallets. nothing scientific about these numbers, just lessons learned the hard way: - 48h because that's where the asymmetry lives.. older than that and the move usually found its crowd without me - $30k liquidity because thin pools fold on one decent exit, and i've been the exit before so.. - 300+ buys because volume can be faked but a real crowd showing up is harder to spoof - under 40% in the top 10 because if a few wallets own the supply, they own my exit too then i leave that tab open. whenever a new coin passes the filter, i open its page and everything is already there.. the chart, liquidity, holders, GT score, bundled buys, top traders and security flags. most get closed immediately.. the few that look interesting go on my watchlist until i find an entry. that’s basically the whole workflow. one tab to find new coins, remove most of the junk and research what’s left. you can use my exact filter here as shown in the video:

Axel Bitblaze 🪓

89,739 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The idea that $XRP was never meant for retail is a bit exaggerated, but as this market matures, it can get serious. Remember that #Ripple doesn't dictate who can buy or use XRP. Their focus for XRP is clear, institutions. I think the biggest obstacle for retail to be a part of the journey is simply price. Today the idea of buying 1 $BTC for the "average" individual is almost impossible. Retail gets left behind in numerous ways, but price is the number 1 obstacle. The real question isn't if #XRP is meant for retail, but if retail will be able to have enough XRP when the time comes. High values for XRP get thrown around often and many laugh at those ideas, but that's okay. Realistically speaking how many people can buy 10K XRP, 50K XRP, 100K XRP, you get the picture. Even at todays prices for XRP it's hard to own large amounts. As institutional adoption happens and utilization increases, I personally believe a lot of these assets will price retail out of owning large amounts. You need to remember that this space is still in it's infancy. That's why I think we all need to take advantage of this market when it gives us incredible opportunities.
1:02

The idea that $XRP was never meant for retail is a bit exaggerated, but as this market matures, it can get serious. Remember that #Ripple doesn't dictate who can buy or use XRP. Their focus for XRP is clear, institutions. I think the biggest obstacle for retail to be a part of the journey is simply price. Today the idea of buying 1 $BTC for the "average" individual is almost impossible. Retail gets left behind in numerous ways, but price is the number 1 obstacle. The real question isn't if #XRP is meant for retail, but if retail will be able to have enough XRP when the time comes. High values for XRP get thrown around often and many laugh at those ideas, but that's okay. Realistically speaking how many people can buy 10K XRP, 50K XRP, 100K XRP, you get the picture. Even at todays prices for XRP it's hard to own large amounts. As institutional adoption happens and utilization increases, I personally believe a lot of these assets will price retail out of owning large amounts. You need to remember that this space is still in it's infancy. That's why I think we all need to take advantage of this market when it gives us incredible opportunities.

Nick | Crypto Crusader

86,428 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

After 115 winning trades in a row with my Polymarket bot, I finally got my first loss. 116 trades total, 115 wins at +1.5%, 1 loss. I honestly didn’t think it could happen, but every downside comes with an upside. Thanks to this loss, I realized I could integrate a stop-loss into the bot. Instead of risking a full loss and losing 100% of the traded amount, I can now cap losses to 20–30% per trade. That’s a good improvement compared to the current setup. Current PnL: > 115 wins at 1.5% → +170% > 1 loss → -100%, but from now on each loss should be limited to -20–30% max A lot of people say that since Polymarket added fees to the 15-minute markets, targeting 1.5% doesn’t make sense anymore. I won’t go into details, but my implementation avoids paying those fees, and actually earns more now because I receive them instead. For the few who already have the bot, I’ll push the stop-loss update later today. If you’re interested in the bot or the logic, feel free to DM me. I don’t want to share it publicly for now to avoid losing the edge.
1:03

After 115 winning trades in a row with my Polymarket bot, I finally got my first loss. 116 trades total, 115 wins at +1.5%, 1 loss. I honestly didn’t think it could happen, but every downside comes with an upside. Thanks to this loss, I realized I could integrate a stop-loss into the bot. Instead of risking a full loss and losing 100% of the traded amount, I can now cap losses to 20–30% per trade. That’s a good improvement compared to the current setup. Current PnL: > 115 wins at 1.5% → +170% > 1 loss → -100%, but from now on each loss should be limited to -20–30% max A lot of people say that since Polymarket added fees to the 15-minute markets, targeting 1.5% doesn’t make sense anymore. I won’t go into details, but my implementation avoids paying those fees, and actually earns more now because I receive them instead. For the few who already have the bot, I’ll push the stop-loss update later today. If you’re interested in the bot or the logic, feel free to DM me. I don’t want to share it publicly for now to avoid losing the edge.

The Smart Ape 🔥

55,484 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

I’m a super holistic ‘crunchy’ mum, but I also use a bit of screen time with my one year old Babies and screens is definitely a polarising topic… Screen time is generally discouraged for children under the age of 5 But it takes a village to raise a child and the reality is A LOT of parents are utilising screen time So how can we use technology in a healthier way? Not all screens are made equal > daylight is a blue light free, zero flicker, monochrome screen computer A few examples of use: - when flying on take off and landing - if I need 10 minutes to go meditate - using a sharp knife in the kitchen when there is a baby beneath me I think it is important to be transparent about the journey online so I will be observing my child’s behaviour and adjust as necessary But so far this feels like a tool for good for us! 🌱
0:51

I’m a super holistic ‘crunchy’ mum, but I also use a bit of screen time with my one year old Babies and screens is definitely a polarising topic… Screen time is generally discouraged for children under the age of 5 But it takes a village to raise a child and the reality is A LOT of parents are utilising screen time So how can we use technology in a healthier way? Not all screens are made equal > daylight is a blue light free, zero flicker, monochrome screen computer A few examples of use: - when flying on take off and landing - if I need 10 minutes to go meditate - using a sharp knife in the kitchen when there is a baby beneath me I think it is important to be transparent about the journey online so I will be observing my child’s behaviour and adjust as necessary But so far this feels like a tool for good for us! 🌱

Shannen Michaela

55,368 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

A good couple examples of a do or die situation. In the first clip, the shortstop took the long hop, fielded it cleanly but wasn’t able to throw the speedy runner out. Normally, sitting back to play the good hop is ideal but because there is speed at the plate, going in to attempt to get it on the short hop would have been the move on this play. In softball, these are incredibly hard decisions to make because the decision needs to be made in a matter of a second. This SS is a stud so no negativity at all - this is just a good visual to show sitting back in softball sometimes isn’t always the best decision, even if it’s the “better hop.” If I actually had footage of me and my playing days (🥴), I could show a handful of times where I decided to play the long hop and the runner was safe. Second clip shows a good example of reacting quickly and going in to get the short hop. I will say though, I always teach if you hesitate for even a second after your pre pitch hop and don’t move in to get the ball, you do have to sit back or the ball really will eat you up.
0:24

A good couple examples of a do or die situation. In the first clip, the shortstop took the long hop, fielded it cleanly but wasn’t able to throw the speedy runner out. Normally, sitting back to play the good hop is ideal but because there is speed at the plate, going in to attempt to get it on the short hop would have been the move on this play. In softball, these are incredibly hard decisions to make because the decision needs to be made in a matter of a second. This SS is a stud so no negativity at all - this is just a good visual to show sitting back in softball sometimes isn’t always the best decision, even if it’s the “better hop.” If I actually had footage of me and my playing days (🥴), I could show a handful of times where I decided to play the long hop and the runner was safe. Second clip shows a good example of reacting quickly and going in to get the short hop. I will say though, I always teach if you hesitate for even a second after your pre pitch hop and don’t move in to get the ball, you do have to sit back or the ball really will eat you up.

Megan Rembielak

52,422 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I think I just stumbled onto the next thing everyone in crypto is about to talk about. It’s called Catapult, and it’s building an all-in-one toolset for token launches and trading on HyperEVM. I’ve been poking around their Turbo mode and the upcoming Hyper mode—and honestly, I’m shocked at how different this feels from the usual “spin up liquidity, pray for volume” routine. Here’s what grabbed me first: with Catapult Turbo, you can launch a token with zero upfront liquidity. You pay $10, hit launch, and you can earn from trading volume right away. Pricing runs on provably fair math, so the mechanics aren’t a black box. And here’s the twist I didn’t expect: top-performing tokens by volume will graduate to real LPs. In other words, if your token actually moves, Catapult helps it level up into a proper liquidity pool. That’s such a clean incentive loop. And then there’s Catapult Hyper. From what I’ve seen, it’s aiming to challenge the status quo for launchpads entirely—new liquidity mechanism, built-in incentives, a reworked bonding process, and multichain out of the gate. If Turbo is the spark, Hyper looks like the accelerant. Why I think people will be all over this soon: I’m seeing the early buzz already creators love the “no liquidity, no upfront cost” angle. No skewed odds: the design aims to reduce lopsided chances and give more tokens a real shot at upside. Aligned incentives: creators get 0.5% of token volume, and there’s a 10% referral revenue share. If you’re building or shilling, that’s meaningful. If you’ve ever hesitated to launch because funding liquidity felt like a cliff—same. That’s why Turbo surprised me. It’s simple, cheap, and actually gives you a path from launch to volume to real LP. TL;DR (and why I’m excited): TURBO is live: launch a token for $10, no upfront liquidity, earn from volume. Fair pricing via GMB; top tokens graduate to LPs. Creator rewards: 0.5% of volume + 10% referral revenue. HYPER: a reimagined launchpad with new liquidity mechanics and built-in incentives. I’m calling it now: this model is going to be everywhere in a minute. If you’re curious or ready to launch get in early and lock your spot. 🔗 Join here 👉
6:17

I think I just stumbled onto the next thing everyone in crypto is about to talk about. It’s called Catapult, and it’s building an all-in-one toolset for token launches and trading on HyperEVM. I’ve been poking around their Turbo mode and the upcoming Hyper mode—and honestly, I’m shocked at how different this feels from the usual “spin up liquidity, pray for volume” routine. Here’s what grabbed me first: with Catapult Turbo, you can launch a token with zero upfront liquidity. You pay $10, hit launch, and you can earn from trading volume right away. Pricing runs on provably fair math, so the mechanics aren’t a black box. And here’s the twist I didn’t expect: top-performing tokens by volume will graduate to real LPs. In other words, if your token actually moves, Catapult helps it level up into a proper liquidity pool. That’s such a clean incentive loop. And then there’s Catapult Hyper. From what I’ve seen, it’s aiming to challenge the status quo for launchpads entirely—new liquidity mechanism, built-in incentives, a reworked bonding process, and multichain out of the gate. If Turbo is the spark, Hyper looks like the accelerant. Why I think people will be all over this soon: I’m seeing the early buzz already creators love the “no liquidity, no upfront cost” angle. No skewed odds: the design aims to reduce lopsided chances and give more tokens a real shot at upside. Aligned incentives: creators get 0.5% of token volume, and there’s a 10% referral revenue share. If you’re building or shilling, that’s meaningful. If you’ve ever hesitated to launch because funding liquidity felt like a cliff—same. That’s why Turbo surprised me. It’s simple, cheap, and actually gives you a path from launch to volume to real LP. TL;DR (and why I’m excited): TURBO is live: launch a token for $10, no upfront liquidity, earn from volume. Fair pricing via GMB; top tokens graduate to LPs. Creator rewards: 0.5% of volume + 10% referral revenue. HYPER: a reimagined launchpad with new liquidity mechanics and built-in incentives. I’m calling it now: this model is going to be everywhere in a minute. If you’re curious or ready to launch get in early and lock your spot. 🔗 Join here 👉

Lunix

15,396 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Don’t get fooled by that big number on your chart, it’s not the price just waiting for you. I want to be clear about that up front. That bold price you see is just where two traders shook hands on a deal. That’s history. Honestly, I used to look at it like it was some live pulse on the market. I’d plan my whole trade around it, hoping to get filled close to that number. More than once, I watched my fill slip further away, and yeah, I used to blame the exchange before I admitted I just misunderstood the book. So let’s get real about what’s actually moving. A buyer can say this is the highest price I'm willing to pay( $100 that's the bid) Right now, the top bid might be $100, while the the seller can say best offer sits at $101. That $1 gap? That’s your spread. The bid and ask is the conversation still happening right in front of you. When you fire off a market order, it doesn’t chase down that last print. It grabs the best available price, and if there’s not enough there, it keeps reaching for the next one in line. The number flashing on your screen and the price you actually get can end up pretty far apart. I used to think that meant something was wrong with my broker, but it’s almost always the market talking. Thin order books, volatile moments, or simply dropping an order bigger than what’s sitting there, any of those will throw your fill off the mark. Usually, a tight spread means buyers and sellers are pushing hard against each other. If the spread’s wide, it’s just more expensive to jump in or out. But here’s something that took me a while to learn. A close bid and ask doesn’t mean there’s real weight behind those numbers. Sometimes, there’s just a tiny sliver of size sitting there, and it can disappear in a blink, leaving you chasing worse prices. The spread doesn’t judge your asset or hand out prizes. It’s just a snapshot of what’s happening right now. Every time I size up for a trade, I check four things: Where’s the best bid? Where’s the best ask? How wide is the spread? And how much size is actually parked at those prices? That’s the difference between being a spectator and actually reading the market. That’s what Opportunity Compass was all about. The gold, stocks, Blbitcoin, doesn’t matter. It’s all just auctions in action. But the feel changes with every market because rules, hours, and liquidity change the look of the book. MEXC rolled out Opportunity Compass to help people read those conditions, not just add another trading pair to their list. Anyone can pull up an order book. Understanding what it’s telling you is how you hear the market speak before your trade becomes the next deal. Last price is just your receipt. Bid and ask is the live discussion. The spread tells you how far apart buyers and sellers really are. Depth shows you how much weight a price can hold before it budges. So tell me, when you hover over that buy button, what grabs your eye first? The last price? The spread? Or the stack behind those numbers? Check Out Full Opportunity Compass path: Not financial advice. DYOR. #MEXC
1:54

Don’t get fooled by that big number on your chart, it’s not the price just waiting for you. I want to be clear about that up front. That bold price you see is just where two traders shook hands on a deal. That’s history. Honestly, I used to look at it like it was some live pulse on the market. I’d plan my whole trade around it, hoping to get filled close to that number. More than once, I watched my fill slip further away, and yeah, I used to blame the exchange before I admitted I just misunderstood the book. So let’s get real about what’s actually moving. A buyer can say this is the highest price I'm willing to pay( $100 that's the bid) Right now, the top bid might be $100, while the the seller can say best offer sits at $101. That $1 gap? That’s your spread. The bid and ask is the conversation still happening right in front of you. When you fire off a market order, it doesn’t chase down that last print. It grabs the best available price, and if there’s not enough there, it keeps reaching for the next one in line. The number flashing on your screen and the price you actually get can end up pretty far apart. I used to think that meant something was wrong with my broker, but it’s almost always the market talking. Thin order books, volatile moments, or simply dropping an order bigger than what’s sitting there, any of those will throw your fill off the mark. Usually, a tight spread means buyers and sellers are pushing hard against each other. If the spread’s wide, it’s just more expensive to jump in or out. But here’s something that took me a while to learn. A close bid and ask doesn’t mean there’s real weight behind those numbers. Sometimes, there’s just a tiny sliver of size sitting there, and it can disappear in a blink, leaving you chasing worse prices. The spread doesn’t judge your asset or hand out prizes. It’s just a snapshot of what’s happening right now. Every time I size up for a trade, I check four things: Where’s the best bid? Where’s the best ask? How wide is the spread? And how much size is actually parked at those prices? That’s the difference between being a spectator and actually reading the market. That’s what Opportunity Compass was all about. The gold, stocks, Blbitcoin, doesn’t matter. It’s all just auctions in action. But the feel changes with every market because rules, hours, and liquidity change the look of the book. MEXC rolled out Opportunity Compass to help people read those conditions, not just add another trading pair to their list. Anyone can pull up an order book. Understanding what it’s telling you is how you hear the market speak before your trade becomes the next deal. Last price is just your receipt. Bid and ask is the live discussion. The spread tells you how far apart buyers and sellers really are. Depth shows you how much weight a price can hold before it budges. So tell me, when you hover over that buy button, what grabs your eye first? The last price? The spread? Or the stack behind those numbers? Check Out Full Opportunity Compass path: Not financial advice. DYOR. #MEXC

Andy Lui

22,294 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

$XRP I called this move. A few weeks ago I said XRP would run about 50% from the exact zone we were sitting in. It did. Most people are now treating $1.35 like a victory lap. That’s a mistake. This is still the setup, not the expansion. Updated roadmap I’m watching: $1.34 → $1.17 (possible liquidity grab) → $1.90 $1.90 → $3.10 → $5.20 If $1.17 shows up, it will probably be the last relatively cheap entry a lot of people ever get. I don’t expect a deep, multi-month dump from here for three reasons: Larger wallets are still accumulating, not distributing. The amount of XRP needed to sit in the top 10% of holders keeps shrinking. Supply is getting tighter, not looser. Real payment volume is growing while the market still prices XRP like a retail trading chip. Retail is arguing about $2 vs $3. The actual question is whether XRP stays a speculation token or becomes settlement infrastructure. Those two valuations are not even in the same universe. The 2017 structure that preceded the violent expansion is still visible. Third retest of that support is the level that matters. A 10–15% shakeout would be normal. A collapse back to the old range would break the structure I’m using. I don’t see that break yet. Question for you: Does XRP take the $1.17 liquidity first, or does it skip it and go straight for $1.90? Drop your number. I want to see where this crowd is actually sitting.
0:22

$XRP I called this move. A few weeks ago I said XRP would run about 50% from the exact zone we were sitting in. It did. Most people are now treating $1.35 like a victory lap. That’s a mistake. This is still the setup, not the expansion. Updated roadmap I’m watching: $1.34 → $1.17 (possible liquidity grab) → $1.90 $1.90 → $3.10 → $5.20 If $1.17 shows up, it will probably be the last relatively cheap entry a lot of people ever get. I don’t expect a deep, multi-month dump from here for three reasons: Larger wallets are still accumulating, not distributing. The amount of XRP needed to sit in the top 10% of holders keeps shrinking. Supply is getting tighter, not looser. Real payment volume is growing while the market still prices XRP like a retail trading chip. Retail is arguing about $2 vs $3. The actual question is whether XRP stays a speculation token or becomes settlement infrastructure. Those two valuations are not even in the same universe. The 2017 structure that preceded the violent expansion is still visible. Third retest of that support is the level that matters. A 10–15% shakeout would be normal. A collapse back to the old range would break the structure I’m using. I don’t see that break yet. Question for you: Does XRP take the $1.17 liquidity first, or does it skip it and go straight for $1.90? Drop your number. I want to see where this crowd is actually sitting.

Claudia Sinclair

36,447 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen