Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

10,000 US Soldiers VS 1,000,000 Romans + 1,000,000 Spartans + 1,000,000 Vikings + 1,000,000 Persians Alliance !

690,683 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

32 Comments

womn enjoyer's profile picture
womn enjoyer3 months ago

Friendly fire was not discovered at the time of this fight

Dom's profile picture
Dom3 months ago

There’s no gun that has unlimited amp with no reload, and friendly fire would be astronomical.

RAW's profile picture
RAW3 months ago

Wouldn’t the soldiers call for air support and freaking throw grenades as well?

CyberTruck Owner's profile picture
CyberTruck Owner3 months ago

Modern militaries don't need to risk a single ground troop to wipe out ancient armies:

CB™️'s profile picture
CB™️3 months ago

That’s crackling sound in the background is his GPU frying and his fan exploding

Matthew Demel's profile picture
Matthew Demel3 months ago

This is the most stupid thing I have even seen! First off 10k soldiers couldn’t even carry NEAR enough ammunition to take out a 4 million strong army. The bare minimum 10k soldiers would have to have stocked would be well over 12M rounds roughly three rounds for each enemy. Plus to boot this is not how U.S. soldiers fight battles. Where is the artillery, air support, and heavy machine gunners, tanks? Such a stupid permise.

red259's profile picture
red2593 months ago

It doesn’t look like the computer is taking into account the bodies of the romans/ Persians/ Vikings, etc stacking up and becoming too difficult for them to get over.

Paul85's profile picture
Paul853 months ago

Now add in an A-10 and the flying dorito and see who wins. America always wins

Zain. A. H. || 𐩸𐩺𐩬|𐩱|𐩢||زين's profile picture
Zain. A. H. || 𐩸𐩺𐩬|𐩱|𐩢||زين3 months ago

Give them a fair fight, at least a tactical air support.

Ted Shackleford's profile picture
Ted Shackleford3 months ago

Wouldn’t the Roman and Spartans just fight the Persians?

Clarence Parker's profile picture
Clarence Parker3 months ago

Some of these are senseless...4mil vs 10k in open terrain!!!! How fair is that???

Pix's profile picture
Pix3 months ago

Totally inaccurate first 30 seconds an air strike would have been called and it would have been over.

Kay Tea's profile picture
Kay Tea3 months ago

I guess they all have endless ammo lol

WallStreet.au's profile picture
WallStreet.au3 months ago

2 million Americans couldnt even defeat Phuc Yu

0321's profile picture
03213 months ago

This is retarded. All small arms from the US? No air? No arty? Not dug in?

Grammaton Cleric 🇻🇦's profile picture
Grammaton Cleric 🇻🇦3 months ago

In reality once the soldiers start firing fear and panic would grip the enemy at how fast the bullets move Many will flee and stick to long distant strikes which will prove futile in the end

InForTheWin🖕😎🇺🇸's profile picture
InForTheWin🖕😎🇺🇸3 months ago

Tactically, U.S. wins every time. This shit right here is for the retards to cream and dream about

Jack Attackalope's profile picture
Jack Attackalope3 months ago

There was never an ancient army half as large as one of these groups. Pretty F’ing retarded

Lance Lot's profile picture
Lance Lot3 months ago

“…rolling strike package bravo on unknown target Tango Whiskey at time 0300 Zulu… killbox one alpha boogie is in the weeds… bring the the rain”

Jack the Dripper's profile picture
Jack the Dripper3 months ago

Americans have zero chance. Not enough ammo can be carried to kill the millions of enemies, and they ain’t gonna beat ‘em hand-to-hand either.

Ed Burley's profile picture
Ed Burley3 months ago

They wouldn't be able to crawl over the piles of bodies. It would be like GoT.

keen guttoo's profile picture
keen guttoo3 months ago

10 thousand is unfair should atleast be 100k

Bradley Martin's profile picture
Bradley Martin3 months ago

American soldiers would never fight out in the open vs 4 million soldiers. They would be launching mortars, rockets, grenades, sniping them from a far, calling in air strikes. They would break the will of the enemy before they even got close enough to strike them

Brad Greer's profile picture
Brad Greer3 months ago

Yeah, they should just call in airstrikes. A couple hundred cans of napalm would do wonders.

Dennis Davis's profile picture
Dennis Davis3 months ago

That was answered in Japan right before WWII in the pacific was ended.

Dennys's profile picture
Dennys3 months ago

Those guns after certain amount of rounds are unbearable due the heat.

Ohams 🇨🇦 🇳🇬's profile picture
Ohams 🇨🇦 🇳🇬3 months ago

This took too long. They would have reduced their number by half just by arrows alone.

Stone Oreye's profile picture
Stone Oreye3 months ago

There is no way the US solder will win… if you notice there were no arrows Those guys would have launched arrows the moment the surrounded US Soldiers

TACPness's profile picture
TACPness3 months ago

Dude… they never took the high ground for better vantage either.

BΣƬΉΛᄂIZΛ ︻╦̵̵̿╤─ ҉~•'s profile picture
BΣƬΉΛᄂIZΛ ︻╦̵̵̿╤─ ҉~•3 months ago

We would still win, big boy will Come from the sky, flash of light and boom they all die.

reflecting's profile picture
reflecting3 months ago

Nah That’s not how the US army fights Five mile before they get there . The Amy artillery and its air support has already put those armies running away/retreating The US 10K soldiers are just there to take the prisoners

Garth Bowen's profile picture
Garth Bowen3 months ago

The problem is the Americans would need 5 million rounds from 10k soldiers.

Related Videos