Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

1/10 image-based screening advanced drug discovery but scaling to massive perturbation space is hard! Given a cell image, we asked if we could predict the morphological effect induced by a perturbation! Led by Alessandro Palma & w Fabian Theis we propose IMPA

40,663 просмотров • 3 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Mo Lotfollahi
Mo Lotfollahi3 лет назад

2/n: IMPA uses "style-transfer" to model phenotypic responses in high-content imaging. It decomposes images into perturbation styles and cell contents, generating counterfactual images of perturbed cells.

Фото профиля Mo Lotfollahi
Mo Lotfollahi3 лет назад

3/n: Our model employs an autoencoder with versatile perturbation embeddings derived from pre-trained molecules or gene embedding. IMPA trains on adversarial methods to learn perturbation-specific styles for precise image generation.

Фото профиля Mo Lotfollahi
Mo Lotfollahi3 лет назад

4/n: IMPA on BBBC021 dataset images of perturbed MCF7 cells. Using RDKit drug embeddings, our model predicts morphological changes while preserving content. IMPA accurately generates actin degradation and nuclear integrity loss with Vincristine and Cytochalasin B.

Фото профиля Mo Lotfollahi
Mo Lotfollahi3 лет назад

5/n: CellProfiler (@DrAnneCarpenter) reveals IMPA's ability to capture relevant morphological features, outperforming control cells. The model generates perturbation-specific images that closely match morphological shifts in actual perturbed images.

Фото профиля Mo Lotfollahi
Mo Lotfollahi3 лет назад

6/n: IMPA compares well with existing GAN models for style transfer, exhibiting promising performance in evaluation metrics such as FID, density, and coverage, while maintaining a competitive mode of action generation accuracy.

Фото профиля Mo Lotfollahi
Mo Lotfollahi3 лет назад

7/n: IMPA's smooth style space allows for drug response interpolation. This allows navigation of the style space and studying the associated morphological response and effect similarities between perturbations.

Фото профиля Mo Lotfollahi
Mo Lotfollahi3 лет назад

8/n: IMPA predicts responses to unseen drugs when they are structurally similar to training compounds with the same mode of action. However, IMPA’s accuracy drops when unseen treatments are not structurally related/functionally similar training drugs.

Фото профиля Mo Lotfollahi
Mo Lotfollahi3 лет назад

9/n: We compared IMPA to Mol2Image, showcasing distinct advantages. While Mol2Image generates images from pure noise, IMPA performs style transfer on existing images, enhancing the study of differential morphology and significantly improving overall performance.

Фото профиля Mo Lotfollahi
Mo Lotfollahi3 лет назад

10/n: We applied IMPA to predict gene KO effects on two datasets (BBBC025, RxRx1), using Gene2Vec for embeddings. We showed that the model captures morphological changes caused by active perturbations, correctly identifying subtle changes in less active phenotypes!

Фото профиля Fabian Theis
Fabian Theis3 лет назад

@ale__palmaa Happy that our „image perturbation autoencoder“ approach is out: Led by @ale__palmaa and @mo_lotfollahi, we learn the effect of drug/CRISPR perturbations on cell morphometry. This lets you style-transfer cell images to those under various perturbations.

Похожие видео

Excited to share our new work. Over the past decade, single-cell genomics has transformed our ability to map cellular systems. But a major question remains: Can we predict how perturbations reshape cellular trajectories over time? In 2018, we first showed that it is possible to predict cellular responses to perturbations — ranging from disease signals to chemical treatments — even in unseen contexts. In 2022, we introduced CPA (MSB 2022; NeurIPS 2022), extending this idea to predict responses to unseen chemical and genetic perturbations, including their combinations. Since then, the field of perturbation modeling has grown enormously. The community has pushed the space forward with many creative ideas and powerful models. It’s exciting to see how fast things are moving — even though many fundamental challenges remain. One of the biggest is that cells are not static. They move through trajectories during development, immune responses, and disease. Yet most current models still predict perturbation effects within a single state, rather than how early perturbations propagate across future states and reshape downstream outcomes. To address this, we developed PerturbGen, a trajectory-aware generative AI model that predicts how genetic perturbations reshape downstream cellular states. Huge credit to the people who made this work possible. Thanks to co-first authors Kevin Ly, Adib Miraki, Tomoya Isobe, AmirHoss3in Vahidi, Delshad Vaghari & Anthony Rostron. Special recognition to Kevin Ly and Adib Miraki for driving this work over the finish line. Grateful for our outstanding collaborators from Haniffa Lab, Bertie Gottgens lab Gosia Trynka and many others — a true cross-institute effort across Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Open Targets ,Wellcome Sanger Institute and Cambridge University.🎉 PerturbGen learns transcriptional dynamics across cellular trajectories. By introducing perturbations at an early source state, it can simulate how these effects propagate into future states along differentiation trajectories. Scaling this across genes enables the creation of dynamic in silico perturbation atlases — maps of how perturbations reshape biological trajectories over time. We explored this idea across three biological questions. First, in a human in vivo LPS immune challenge, PerturbGen predicted that perturbing a transient IL1B signal dampens downstream inflammatory programs in myeloid cells, with pathway changes reversing signatures observed in an independent IL-1β stimulation experiment. Second, in human hematopoiesis, PerturbGen predicted transcriptional responses to CRISPR transcription factor knockouts and enabled construction of perturbation atlases revealing lineage- and age-specific regulatory programs. These programs could also be linked to human genetics and blood diseases, including recapitulation of signatures associated with ETV6-related thrombocytopenia. Finally, we asked whether perturbation modeling could help improve complex tissue models. We built a dynamic perturbation atlas of human skin organoids to identify perturbations that could guideorganoid cells towardhuman fetal skin states. PerturbGen prioritized activation of Wnt signaling via GSK3β inhibition. Experimental validation confirmed the prediction: treatment with CHIR99021 induced stromal gene programs and shifted organoid fibroblasts toward transcriptional states observed in fetal skin stroma. Together, these results show how trajectory-aware perturbation modeling can connect gene perturbations to developmental programs, human genetics, disease mechanisms, and experimental interventions. More broadly, we think these point toward a future where single-cell atlases become predictive systems. As atlases expand across tissues, developmental windows, and modalities, models like PerturbGen could enable dynamic, virtual perturbation atlases— allowing us to simulate interventions, generate hypotheses, and design experiments before stepping into the lab. Preprint Code Excited to see how the community builds on this work.

Mo Lotfollahi

17,003 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад