Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 130+ Videos. Explosive Allegations. A Demand for an Independent Probe. In a dramatic court hearing, senior advocates alleged that unidentified men in plain clothes, armed with batons, were part of the police action during the Jantar Mantar protest. They questioned the use of force, sought preservation of CCTV,...

LawChakra's profile picture

LawChakra

12,514 subscribers

14,372 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

"Peaceful Protest or Police Excess? In the Supreme Court, petitioners alleged that unarmed students exercising their constitutional rights under Articles 19 and 21 were subjected to excessive force during the July 20 Jantar Mantar protest. They sought FIRs against identifiable officers, preservation of CCTV and body-camera footage, and an independent SIT or judicial probe, arguing that any use of force must be lawful, proportionate, and follow due process under the BNSS. The matter raises a larger constitutional question: where does crowd control end, and excessive state action begin? ⚖️🇮🇳 #SupremeCourt #JantarMantar #NEETProtest #SonamWangchuk #DelhiPolice #Constitution #Article19 #Article21 #RuleOfLaw #LegalNews #LawChakra #IndiaNews #BNSS #HumanRights #justice
11:13

"Peaceful Protest or Police Excess? In the Supreme Court, petitioners alleged that unarmed students exercising their constitutional rights under Articles 19 and 21 were subjected to excessive force during the July 20 Jantar Mantar protest. They sought FIRs against identifiable officers, preservation of CCTV and body-camera footage, and an independent SIT or judicial probe, arguing that any use of force must be lawful, proportionate, and follow due process under the BNSS. The matter raises a larger constitutional question: where does crowd control end, and excessive state action begin? ⚖️🇮🇳 #SupremeCourt #JantarMantar #NEETProtest #SonamWangchuk #DelhiPolice #Constitution #Article19 #Article21 #RuleOfLaw #LegalNews #LawChakra #IndiaNews #BNSS #HumanRights #justice

LawChakra

20,934 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Delhi High Court Orders CCTV & Video Evidence to Be Preserved | Police Action Under Judicial Scrutiny A sharp courtroom contrast unfolded today. While the Supreme Court remarked that it was "not interested in videos," the Delhi High Court accepted a pen drive containing alleged video evidence and directed that CCTV footage and all videography related to the Jantar Mantar protest be preserved. The petitioners alleged excessive use of force, injuries to over 90 students, and misconduct during the police action. The Delhi Police disputed these claims, arguing that the protest turned violent and that social media videos could be manipulated. The High Court made it clear that none of the allegations have been proven at this stage. It has sought responses from the Delhi Police and the Union Government within four weeks and fixed the next hearing for 11 September. One question remains: If officers are not wearing visible name tags, how can accountability be ensured? Share your views respectfully in the comments. Keep the discussion civil. @ranjan000008 #DelhiHighCourt #SupremeCourt #JantarMantar #StudentProtest #DelhiPolice #PoliceAccountability #RuleOfLaw #CivilRights #Constitution #LegalNews #LawChakra #IndianJudiciary #Justice #CCTV #HumanRights #CourtUpdate
2:08

Delhi High Court Orders CCTV & Video Evidence to Be Preserved | Police Action Under Judicial Scrutiny A sharp courtroom contrast unfolded today. While the Supreme Court remarked that it was "not interested in videos," the Delhi High Court accepted a pen drive containing alleged video evidence and directed that CCTV footage and all videography related to the Jantar Mantar protest be preserved. The petitioners alleged excessive use of force, injuries to over 90 students, and misconduct during the police action. The Delhi Police disputed these claims, arguing that the protest turned violent and that social media videos could be manipulated. The High Court made it clear that none of the allegations have been proven at this stage. It has sought responses from the Delhi Police and the Union Government within four weeks and fixed the next hearing for 11 September. One question remains: If officers are not wearing visible name tags, how can accountability be ensured? Share your views respectfully in the comments. Keep the discussion civil. @ranjan000008 #DelhiHighCourt #SupremeCourt #JantarMantar #StudentProtest #DelhiPolice #PoliceAccountability #RuleOfLaw #CivilRights #Constitution #LegalNews #LawChakra #IndianJudiciary #Justice #CCTV #HumanRights #CourtUpdate

LawChakra

28,753 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A fiery courtroom moment unfolded in the Supreme Court of India as Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta clashed during a heated exchange — with Singhvi snapping, “Mr. Mehta, don’t interrupt me!” ⚖️🔥 But beyond the drama, the legal stakes were serious. The Supreme Court refused to extend the transit anticipatory bail earlier granted to Congress leader Pawan Khera by the Telangana High Court in a case filed by Assam Police. The case involves allegations of defamation, forgery, and criminal conspiracy. A Bench of Justices JK Maheshwari and AS Chandurkar made its position clear: 👉 “You go and file a petition in Assam. The court will take up.” This means no immediate relief from the Supreme Court — and Khera must now approach the competent court in Assam for further protection. 💥 Was this just a procedural decision… or a major setback? 💥 Is this about legal discipline or political implications? Watch the full breakdown as we decode the arguments, the courtroom tension, and what this means going forward.Abhishek Singhvi #SupremeCourt #PawanKhera #AbhishekManuSinghvi #TusharMehta #LegalNews #CourtroomDrama #IndianLaw #LawChakra
8:18

A fiery courtroom moment unfolded in the Supreme Court of India as Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta clashed during a heated exchange — with Singhvi snapping, “Mr. Mehta, don’t interrupt me!” ⚖️🔥 But beyond the drama, the legal stakes were serious. The Supreme Court refused to extend the transit anticipatory bail earlier granted to Congress leader Pawan Khera by the Telangana High Court in a case filed by Assam Police. The case involves allegations of defamation, forgery, and criminal conspiracy. A Bench of Justices JK Maheshwari and AS Chandurkar made its position clear: 👉 “You go and file a petition in Assam. The court will take up.” This means no immediate relief from the Supreme Court — and Khera must now approach the competent court in Assam for further protection. 💥 Was this just a procedural decision… or a major setback? 💥 Is this about legal discipline or political implications? Watch the full breakdown as we decode the arguments, the courtroom tension, and what this means going forward.Abhishek Singhvi #SupremeCourt #PawanKhera #AbhishekManuSinghvi #TusharMehta #LegalNews #CourtroomDrama #IndianLaw #LawChakra

LawChakra

66,713 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

VIDEO | Delhi: Advocates at the Supreme Court read the Constitution's Preamble in support of the Jantar Mantar protest and against police action. Advocate Indira Jaising says, "We are here to stand with the students. We are here to stand on the side of justice. We are here to demand justice for the students. We are not here to agitate for ourselves. This is not about us. This concerns the rights of students, and it is the duty of lawyers to stand before the Supreme Court and demand justice for them. The role and function of the Supreme Court of India is to dispense justice. That is why we are here, in the temple of justice, with our demands." (Full video available on PTI Videos -
0:47

VIDEO | Delhi: Advocates at the Supreme Court read the Constitution's Preamble in support of the Jantar Mantar protest and against police action. Advocate Indira Jaising says, "We are here to stand with the students. We are here to stand on the side of justice. We are here to demand justice for the students. We are not here to agitate for ourselves. This is not about us. This concerns the rights of students, and it is the duty of lawyers to stand before the Supreme Court and demand justice for them. The role and function of the Supreme Court of India is to dispense justice. That is why we are here, in the temple of justice, with our demands." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

1,005,254 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

In view of the withdrawal of the police complaint by the parents of the students against the management of Success School, allegedly under pressure, VakeelSaab⚖️ lodging an independent police complaint against the management of Success School. No amount of pressure or intimidation should prevent a fair and impartial investigation. If allegations involving religious coercion of minor students have been made, they deserve to be examined strictly in accordance with law. The police should register the complaint, conduct a fair investigation, and take appropriate legal action based on the evidence, without fear or favour.
0:24

In view of the withdrawal of the police complaint by the parents of the students against the management of Success School, allegedly under pressure, VakeelSaab⚖️ lodging an independent police complaint against the management of Success School. No amount of pressure or intimidation should prevent a fair and impartial investigation. If allegations involving religious coercion of minor students have been made, they deserve to be examined strictly in accordance with law. The police should register the complaint, conduct a fair investigation, and take appropriate legal action based on the evidence, without fear or favour.

𝐒𝐚𝐟𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐧 𝐒𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐫 𝐆𝐨𝐮𝐝

46,999 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The Delhi High Court heard a plea challenging the alleged use of excessive force by Delhi Police during the recent student protest over examination paper leaks. Appearing for the petitioners, Senior Advocate Hariharan N submitted that "brutalities to the largest measure possible" had been inflicted on peaceful protesters. He took the Court through the sequence of events, detailing the alleged instances of police excesses, and placed video recordings on record in support of the allegations. #DelhiHighCourt #StudentProtest #NEET #DelhiPolice #PoliceBrutality #Constitution #FundamentalRights #PaperLeak #JantarMantar Note: The content of this video is for informational and educational purpose only and not for any commercial purpose.
1:55

The Delhi High Court heard a plea challenging the alleged use of excessive force by Delhi Police during the recent student protest over examination paper leaks. Appearing for the petitioners, Senior Advocate Hariharan N submitted that "brutalities to the largest measure possible" had been inflicted on peaceful protesters. He took the Court through the sequence of events, detailing the alleged instances of police excesses, and placed video recordings on record in support of the allegations. #DelhiHighCourt #StudentProtest #NEET #DelhiPolice #PoliceBrutality #Constitution #FundamentalRights #PaperLeak #JantarMantar Note: The content of this video is for informational and educational purpose only and not for any commercial purpose.

The Bar Bulletin

73,550 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

VIDEO | Delhi: On SC declining urgent hearing of plea challenging police action against students during CJP's protest in Delhi, Advocate Narendra Mishra says, "Today, I mentioned before the Court the issue concerning the lakhs of students who are peacefully protesting at Jantar Mantar. The question is why, to suppress this peaceful protest against the various paper leak cases in the country, the Delhi Police resorted to such brutality. The lathicharge on students, the use of tear gas, and the deployment of individuals without uniforms or identification badges to take action against the students are all completely against the Constitution of India." (Full video available on PTI Videos -
1:45

VIDEO | Delhi: On SC declining urgent hearing of plea challenging police action against students during CJP's protest in Delhi, Advocate Narendra Mishra says, "Today, I mentioned before the Court the issue concerning the lakhs of students who are peacefully protesting at Jantar Mantar. The question is why, to suppress this peaceful protest against the various paper leak cases in the country, the Delhi Police resorted to such brutality. The lathicharge on students, the use of tear gas, and the deployment of individuals without uniforms or identification badges to take action against the students are all completely against the Constitution of India." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

148,255 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

#WATCH | Bihar: On the alleged police encounter of 28-year-old Bharat Bhushan Tiwari in Bhojpur district, Advocate Varsha Singh says, “As soon as I learned about the case, I made a video as a practising advocate to inform the public that there is no such thing as an encounter under Indian law. The police are only authorised to use firearms if their own lives are in imminent danger, or if there is absolutely no other way to apprehend a serious offender. However, none of those conditions was applicable in this instance…this is nothing less than murder…the Supreme Court has explicitly ruled that in any case of death resulting from an encounter, the registration of an FIR and an investigation by an independent agency are mandatory…while we welcome the Chief Minister’s direction for a judicial inquiry, it does not address or establish criminal accountability…I hope the court appoints the CBI so that an impartial investigation can ensue. We are currently here to obtain the consent of the family to legally move forward with the case…” (23.06)
2:54

#WATCH | Bihar: On the alleged police encounter of 28-year-old Bharat Bhushan Tiwari in Bhojpur district, Advocate Varsha Singh says, “As soon as I learned about the case, I made a video as a practising advocate to inform the public that there is no such thing as an encounter under Indian law. The police are only authorised to use firearms if their own lives are in imminent danger, or if there is absolutely no other way to apprehend a serious offender. However, none of those conditions was applicable in this instance…this is nothing less than murder…the Supreme Court has explicitly ruled that in any case of death resulting from an encounter, the registration of an FIR and an investigation by an independent agency are mandatory…while we welcome the Chief Minister’s direction for a judicial inquiry, it does not address or establish criminal accountability…I hope the court appoints the CBI so that an impartial investigation can ensue. We are currently here to obtain the consent of the family to legally move forward with the case…” (23.06)

ANI

41,416 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

VIDEO | Delhi: SFI leader Aishe Ghosh on the Patiala House Court hearing in the 2021 case against her and the Supreme Court issuing notice on pleas against the use of pellet guns says, "Yesterday, all of you knew that we had made an application and the court had stayed the warrant. Today, we had our hearing and the court has now given us the next hearing date in November. The proceedings went smoothly. Our legal team and advocates are here and will continue to look into the matter. We will proceed in accordance with the law and do whatever is required." (Full video available on PTI Videos -
2:02

VIDEO | Delhi: SFI leader Aishe Ghosh on the Patiala House Court hearing in the 2021 case against her and the Supreme Court issuing notice on pleas against the use of pellet guns says, "Yesterday, all of you knew that we had made an application and the court had stayed the warrant. Today, we had our hearing and the court has now given us the next hearing date in November. The proceedings went smoothly. Our legal team and advocates are here and will continue to look into the matter. We will proceed in accordance with the law and do whatever is required." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

64,648 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

[MEYERTON POLICE SERGEANT ALLEGEDLY INVOLVED IN STOCK THEFT] In response to a video circulating on social media about a police sergeant from Meyerton Police Station, being accused of stock theft. The SA Police Service 🇿🇦 Management of the Sedibeng District instructed a senior detective to register an enquiry into these serious allegations and to conduct an investigation. The investigating officer is appealing to the people who made the allegations to go to any police station in Gauteng and to register a case of stock theft for investigation. The investigator is for now busy with the enquiry and while investigations are underway, the police need the complainant’s statement to conclude a preliminary report and to register a criminal case. The complainants may also opt to contact the investigating officer, Lt Col Bodibe on 082 319 9430.
3:17

[MEYERTON POLICE SERGEANT ALLEGEDLY INVOLVED IN STOCK THEFT] In response to a video circulating on social media about a police sergeant from Meyerton Police Station, being accused of stock theft. The SA Police Service 🇿🇦 Management of the Sedibeng District instructed a senior detective to register an enquiry into these serious allegations and to conduct an investigation. The investigating officer is appealing to the people who made the allegations to go to any police station in Gauteng and to register a case of stock theft for investigation. The investigator is for now busy with the enquiry and while investigations are underway, the police need the complainant’s statement to conclude a preliminary report and to register a criminal case. The complainants may also opt to contact the investigating officer, Lt Col Bodibe on 082 319 9430.

Justice, Crime Prevention and Security

115,368 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“The capture of the Supreme Court by ruling parties is what worries me the most.” In this conversation, Senior Advocate Indira Jaising joins Manika Raikwar (Manika Raikwar) and raises a fundamental question about judicial independence in India. What happens when political influence begins to shape the legal profession and the functioning of the Supreme Court? And what does it mean for young lawyers entering a system where, as the speaker puts it, “it’s the judges who defer to the lawyers”? The warning is stark: “If you don’t have an independent judiciary, you can’t call yourself an independent country.” A conversation about the Supreme Court, political influence and the future of judicial independence. Full Episode Coming soon only on DeKoder. #SupremeCourt #IndianJudiciary #IndianConstitution #IndianDemocracy #JudicialIndependence
0:53

“The capture of the Supreme Court by ruling parties is what worries me the most.” In this conversation, Senior Advocate Indira Jaising joins Manika Raikwar (Manika Raikwar) and raises a fundamental question about judicial independence in India. What happens when political influence begins to shape the legal profession and the functioning of the Supreme Court? And what does it mean for young lawyers entering a system where, as the speaker puts it, “it’s the judges who defer to the lawyers”? The warning is stark: “If you don’t have an independent judiciary, you can’t call yourself an independent country.” A conversation about the Supreme Court, political influence and the future of judicial independence. Full Episode Coming soon only on DeKoder. #SupremeCourt #IndianJudiciary #IndianConstitution #IndianDemocracy #JudicialIndependence

DeKoder

12,184 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

VIDEO | On Rouse Avenue Court ordering inquiry into alleged CBI custodial torture claims, advocate Prateek Som says, "Today the CBI court has taken a serious view of the allegations of custodian violence against my client Prabhat Kapoor. The medical findings during police custody has revealed serious injuries, like contusion on left thigh, and a blood clot in left ear resulting in the loss of hearing. Today the court has directed the Director CBI to conduct an inquiry against erring officials, including the investigating officer and all the senior officers up till the top who are involved in this particular case. And to file a report within two weeks. If the report reveals the criminal or a departmental misconduct, then the criminal and departmental proceedings has been ordered by the court today." (Source: Third Party) #PrabhatKapoor
0:43

VIDEO | On Rouse Avenue Court ordering inquiry into alleged CBI custodial torture claims, advocate Prateek Som says, "Today the CBI court has taken a serious view of the allegations of custodian violence against my client Prabhat Kapoor. The medical findings during police custody has revealed serious injuries, like contusion on left thigh, and a blood clot in left ear resulting in the loss of hearing. Today the court has directed the Director CBI to conduct an inquiry against erring officials, including the investigating officer and all the senior officers up till the top who are involved in this particular case. And to file a report within two weeks. If the report reveals the criminal or a departmental misconduct, then the criminal and departmental proceedings has been ordered by the court today." (Source: Third Party) #PrabhatKapoor

Press Trust of India

13,780 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

VIDEO | Delhi: After 16 years, a Rohini court acquitted all the accused in the 2009 acid attack case of Panipat MBA student Shaheen Malik. The trial, transferred to Delhi in 2013, involved allegations of harassment and conspiracy behind the attack. Victim’s advocate Madiah Shahjar says, “In the Shaheen Malik case, the court acquitted all the accused, citing insufficient evidence, a faulty and incomplete investigation, and the absence of the victim’s evidence on record, though an inquiry has been ordered against the investigating officer. While the court expressed sympathy, it stated that justice, not sympathy, was sought after a 16-year legal battle. The decision will be challenged in the High Court and, if required, in the Supreme Court.” #AcidAttack (Full video available on PTI Videos -
2:35

VIDEO | Delhi: After 16 years, a Rohini court acquitted all the accused in the 2009 acid attack case of Panipat MBA student Shaheen Malik. The trial, transferred to Delhi in 2013, involved allegations of harassment and conspiracy behind the attack. Victim’s advocate Madiah Shahjar says, “In the Shaheen Malik case, the court acquitted all the accused, citing insufficient evidence, a faulty and incomplete investigation, and the absence of the victim’s evidence on record, though an inquiry has been ordered against the investigating officer. While the court expressed sympathy, it stated that justice, not sympathy, was sought after a 16-year legal battle. The decision will be challenged in the High Court and, if required, in the Supreme Court.” #AcidAttack (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

45,267 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Police investigating the murder of realtor Ketan Agarwal have stated that any confession made by an accused during police interrogation is not admissible as evidence in court and that the case will ultimately depend on legally sustainable evidence. Speaking on the investigation, the Superintendent of Police (Pune Rural) said that while the circumstantial evidence collected so far is strong, investigators are continuing to gather additional proof to establish a logical and legally sound conclusion. The SP emphasized that the investigation is being conducted on the basis of evidence, including witness statements, technical data, and other material collected during the probe. Authorities are working to strengthen the case before presenting their findings in court. The investigation into Ketan Agarwal’s death remains ongoing, with police continuing to examine all available evidence.
0:47

Police investigating the murder of realtor Ketan Agarwal have stated that any confession made by an accused during police interrogation is not admissible as evidence in court and that the case will ultimately depend on legally sustainable evidence. Speaking on the investigation, the Superintendent of Police (Pune Rural) said that while the circumstantial evidence collected so far is strong, investigators are continuing to gather additional proof to establish a logical and legally sound conclusion. The SP emphasized that the investigation is being conducted on the basis of evidence, including witness statements, technical data, and other material collected during the probe. Authorities are working to strengthen the case before presenting their findings in court. The investigation into Ketan Agarwal’s death remains ongoing, with police continuing to examine all available evidence.

Hate Detector 🔍

20,764 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Ketan Murder Probe: Police Seize Siya’s Clothes as Police Remand Nears End In a key development in the Ketan Agarwal murder investigation, Pune Police took Siya to her residence in Kondhwa to seize the clothes she allegedly wore on the day of the incident and complete the required legal formalities. Officers remained at the house for nearly an hour while her family was present. With Siya’s police remand ending on July 3, investigators are treating today as a crucial day in the probe. Based on the evidence collected, questioning conducted so far, and the progress of the investigation, police are expected to decide their next course of action and seek an extension of her police remand before the court. #KetanAgarwal #SiyaGoyal #PunePolice #BreakingNews
1:06

Ketan Murder Probe: Police Seize Siya’s Clothes as Police Remand Nears End In a key development in the Ketan Agarwal murder investigation, Pune Police took Siya to her residence in Kondhwa to seize the clothes she allegedly wore on the day of the incident and complete the required legal formalities. Officers remained at the house for nearly an hour while her family was present. With Siya’s police remand ending on July 3, investigators are treating today as a crucial day in the probe. Based on the evidence collected, questioning conducted so far, and the progress of the investigation, police are expected to decide their next course of action and seek an extension of her police remand before the court. #KetanAgarwal #SiyaGoyal #PunePolice #BreakingNews

Whats In The News

52,743 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

From High Court setback to Supreme Court showdown—Congress leader Pawan Khera knocks on the doors of the Supreme Court of India after the Gauhati High Court denies anticipatory bail in the Assam CM’s wife case. With serious allegations of forged documents, possible custodial interrogation, and claims of political vendetta, the battle now shifts to the apex court. Will the court uphold the High Court’s tough stance or offer limited relief under Article 21? The next hearing could decide whether Khera gets protection—or faces deeper legal trouble. Abhishek Singhvi #pawankhera #legalnews #latestnews #judiciary #supremecourtofindia
7:35

From High Court setback to Supreme Court showdown—Congress leader Pawan Khera knocks on the doors of the Supreme Court of India after the Gauhati High Court denies anticipatory bail in the Assam CM’s wife case. With serious allegations of forged documents, possible custodial interrogation, and claims of political vendetta, the battle now shifts to the apex court. Will the court uphold the High Court’s tough stance or offer limited relief under Article 21? The next hearing could decide whether Khera gets protection—or faces deeper legal trouble. Abhishek Singhvi #pawankhera #legalnews #latestnews #judiciary #supremecourtofindia

LawChakra

15,217 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

SANJIV BHATT: WHEN LAW, POWER, AND PUBLIC TRUST COLLIDE The accompanying material presents the second part of the story surrounding former IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt, focusing on allegations linked to the 2002 Gujarat riots, the custodial death case from 1990, and the sharply contrasting narratives that continue to divide public opinion. According to the source, Bhatt claimed that he possessed information relating to the alleged killers of former Gujarat minister Haren Pandya and that he faced pressure to destroy evidence. He also alleged that he repeatedly warned authorities about the deteriorating situation during the 2002 Gujarat riots, including the danger faced by people at Gulberg Society. These allegations were later placed before investigative agencies and judicial forums. The video also notes that the Special Investigation Team (SIT) did not find sufficient evidence to support these allegations and gave a clean chit to the then Chief Minister, a conclusion later accepted by the Supreme Court. These findings remain an important part of the legal record, even as critics continue to question aspects of the investigation. The second major issue concerns the 1990 custodial death of Prabhudas Vaishnani. The source states that the case was initially closed after investigation but was reopened years later. In 2019, a trial court convicted Bhatt and sentenced him to life imprisonment, a conviction that was upheld by the Gujarat High Court in 2024, while the Supreme Court declined to grant relief. The courts relied on witness testimony and medical evidence in reaching their conclusions. The video also describes Bhatt's tenure as Superintendent of Sabarmati Central Jail, claiming that he introduced reforms that improved prison conditions and earned the respect of many inmates. The source presents this as evidence of the complexity of his public image. Ultimately, the story portrays two competing narratives. One views Sanjiv Bhatt as an honest police officer who suffered for challenging those in power. The other holds that the judicial process established his criminal liability in the custodial death case and that court verdicts must be respected. Whatever one's perspective, the case underscores the importance of independent investigations, judicial transparency, accountability of public officials, and public confidence in the rule of law. In a constitutional democracy, both the pursuit of truth and respect for due process are essential. Where questions remain, they should be addressed through credible evidence, transparent institutions, and impartial justice—not through political loyalty or public emotion alone. Source: Facebook Video:
5:55

SANJIV BHATT: WHEN LAW, POWER, AND PUBLIC TRUST COLLIDE The accompanying material presents the second part of the story surrounding former IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt, focusing on allegations linked to the 2002 Gujarat riots, the custodial death case from 1990, and the sharply contrasting narratives that continue to divide public opinion. According to the source, Bhatt claimed that he possessed information relating to the alleged killers of former Gujarat minister Haren Pandya and that he faced pressure to destroy evidence. He also alleged that he repeatedly warned authorities about the deteriorating situation during the 2002 Gujarat riots, including the danger faced by people at Gulberg Society. These allegations were later placed before investigative agencies and judicial forums. The video also notes that the Special Investigation Team (SIT) did not find sufficient evidence to support these allegations and gave a clean chit to the then Chief Minister, a conclusion later accepted by the Supreme Court. These findings remain an important part of the legal record, even as critics continue to question aspects of the investigation. The second major issue concerns the 1990 custodial death of Prabhudas Vaishnani. The source states that the case was initially closed after investigation but was reopened years later. In 2019, a trial court convicted Bhatt and sentenced him to life imprisonment, a conviction that was upheld by the Gujarat High Court in 2024, while the Supreme Court declined to grant relief. The courts relied on witness testimony and medical evidence in reaching their conclusions. The video also describes Bhatt's tenure as Superintendent of Sabarmati Central Jail, claiming that he introduced reforms that improved prison conditions and earned the respect of many inmates. The source presents this as evidence of the complexity of his public image. Ultimately, the story portrays two competing narratives. One views Sanjiv Bhatt as an honest police officer who suffered for challenging those in power. The other holds that the judicial process established his criminal liability in the custodial death case and that court verdicts must be respected. Whatever one's perspective, the case underscores the importance of independent investigations, judicial transparency, accountability of public officials, and public confidence in the rule of law. In a constitutional democracy, both the pursuit of truth and respect for due process are essential. Where questions remain, they should be addressed through credible evidence, transparent institutions, and impartial justice—not through political loyalty or public emotion alone. Source: Facebook Video:

Ashok Dadhwal

33,015 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Just days after the Central Bureau of Investigation defended Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma in the Delhi High Court, a shocking twist has turned the narrative upside down. A viral expose by Saurav Das has raised serious questions about potential conflict of interest, bringing the debate out of the courtroom and into public scrutiny. With recusal demands by Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia already denied, the spotlight is now on judicial impartiality and institutional credibility. Allegations of unusual judicial conduct and controversial government-linked appointments have intensified concerns around fairness in this high-stakes case. As the hearing approaches, the real question remains — will justice just be done, or will it also be seen to be done? Saurav Das Arvind Kejriwal Manish Sisodia AAP #Delhihighcourt #legalnews #latestnews #judiciary #delhiexcisecase
7:36

Just days after the Central Bureau of Investigation defended Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma in the Delhi High Court, a shocking twist has turned the narrative upside down. A viral expose by Saurav Das has raised serious questions about potential conflict of interest, bringing the debate out of the courtroom and into public scrutiny. With recusal demands by Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia already denied, the spotlight is now on judicial impartiality and institutional credibility. Allegations of unusual judicial conduct and controversial government-linked appointments have intensified concerns around fairness in this high-stakes case. As the hearing approaches, the real question remains — will justice just be done, or will it also be seen to be done? Saurav Das Arvind Kejriwal Manish Sisodia AAP #Delhihighcourt #legalnews #latestnews #judiciary #delhiexcisecase

LawChakra

112,498 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨 WHAT IF ONE OF THE BIGGEST MEDICAL SCANDALS IN HISTORY IS ONLY JUST BEGINNING TO UNFOLD? During testimony, Dr. Lindsey made a series of extraordinary allegations about COVID-19 vaccines, questioning the presence of SV40 DNA sequences, the transparency of regulators, and whether critical safety questions were ignored. She asked: "Why would you redact the data if you were trying to be transparent?" And ended with an emotional plea: "Please protect your citizens." If these allegations are unfounded, they should be disproven with evidence. If they have merit, they demand a full, independent investigation. Either way, the public deserves answers backed by transparent science—not secrecy.
2:25

🚨 WHAT IF ONE OF THE BIGGEST MEDICAL SCANDALS IN HISTORY IS ONLY JUST BEGINNING TO UNFOLD? During testimony, Dr. Lindsey made a series of extraordinary allegations about COVID-19 vaccines, questioning the presence of SV40 DNA sequences, the transparency of regulators, and whether critical safety questions were ignored. She asked: "Why would you redact the data if you were trying to be transparent?" And ended with an emotional plea: "Please protect your citizens." If these allegations are unfounded, they should be disproven with evidence. If they have merit, they demand a full, independent investigation. Either way, the public deserves answers backed by transparent science—not secrecy.

Jim Ferguson

39,039 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

VIDEO | The Supreme Court passes order quashing all the FIRs against protesters during NEET protests. Advocate Vrinda Grover informs, "The honourable Supreme Court of India has today passed a very significant order. As we know that from 20th to 25th July, there were very active protests in Delhi, at Jantar Mantar and in many parts of the country relating to reform in education. During the protests, police across states have launched cases, criminal cases against the protesters, against the youth. There is now an assurance that was given on 25th July by the Union government to the Cockroach Janta Party representatives that they will not pursue any of the criminal proceedings and they will give compensation. In so far as the innumerable FIRs launched across states, from Bihar to West Bengal, UP, Madhya Pradesh, Assam, Delhi, of course. All those FIRs today, by the order of the honourable Supreme Court, and with the applications were moved by the states. So the states and the Union government have said that they will not pursue, they are to be quashed and the court has passed an order quashing the FIRs, all the FIRs. The Supreme Court has invoked its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India because the court says the right to protest, the freedom to protest and express yourself is a fundamental right and that cannot be taken away. What is also significant is that with regards to the compensation they have agreed that it will be formulated and paid in the next three months..." #SupremeCourt #NEETProtests
2:46

VIDEO | The Supreme Court passes order quashing all the FIRs against protesters during NEET protests. Advocate Vrinda Grover informs, "The honourable Supreme Court of India has today passed a very significant order. As we know that from 20th to 25th July, there were very active protests in Delhi, at Jantar Mantar and in many parts of the country relating to reform in education. During the protests, police across states have launched cases, criminal cases against the protesters, against the youth. There is now an assurance that was given on 25th July by the Union government to the Cockroach Janta Party representatives that they will not pursue any of the criminal proceedings and they will give compensation. In so far as the innumerable FIRs launched across states, from Bihar to West Bengal, UP, Madhya Pradesh, Assam, Delhi, of course. All those FIRs today, by the order of the honourable Supreme Court, and with the applications were moved by the states. So the states and the Union government have said that they will not pursue, they are to be quashed and the court has passed an order quashing the FIRs, all the FIRs. The Supreme Court has invoked its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India because the court says the right to protest, the freedom to protest and express yourself is a fundamental right and that cannot be taken away. What is also significant is that with regards to the compensation they have agreed that it will be formulated and paid in the next three months..." #SupremeCourt #NEETProtests

Press Trust of India

92,544 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen