Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

15 genius DIY fixes that actually work ‼️ Rope pulley from an old wheel, bottle hose holder, perfect screw trick, rebar tie, car snow shield, and a dozen more clever hacks that save time and money. Which one are you trying first?" #DIYHacks #LifeHacks #HandyTips

🔥⭐️Edwin⭐️🔥

74,242 subscribers

48,258 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

#DIYHacks #LifeHacks #HandyTips

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

What looks like a bunch of old machinery is actually a clever power system from another era Instead of giving every machine its own motor, one main power source could turn a long rotating shaft. Belts connected that shaft to individual machines, transferring the motion wherever it was needed The interesting part is how simple the idea is. Change the belt position, adjust the pulley size, and you could control which machine received power and how fast it ran

What looks like a bunch of old machinery is actually a clever power system from another era Instead of giving every machine its own motor, one main power source could turn a long rotating shaft. Belts connected that shaft to individual machines, transferring the motion wherever it was needed The interesting part is how simple the idea is. Change the belt position, adjust the pulley size, and you could control which machine received power and how fast it ran

Betsy Gain

29,534 просмотров • 17 дней назад

Justin Herbert says he had every reason to spend like a rich athlete after signing a $262,000,000 contract but has lived below his means and didn’t buy his first car until this year Herbert: "I would say that I've lived pretty below my means. I actually just recently bought my first car. Over the past few years, I was saving all of my contract money, and 75% of my marketing money..." "But there was a time where I was like, 'You know what, I work really hard and I want to be able to enjoy it.'" Q: "But prior to that, were you still driving whatever car you got from that one Oregon dealership, in exchange for an endorsement?" Herbert: "It is an Audi. I had a deal with a dealership in the Northwest, and was fortunate enough to get two dealer cars from them. I still drive this same dealer car."

Justin Herbert says he had every reason to spend like a rich athlete after signing a $262,000,000 contract but has lived below his means and didn’t buy his first car until this year Herbert: "I would say that I've lived pretty below my means. I actually just recently bought my first car. Over the past few years, I was saving all of my contract money, and 75% of my marketing money..." "But there was a time where I was like, 'You know what, I work really hard and I want to be able to enjoy it.'" Q: "But prior to that, were you still driving whatever car you got from that one Oregon dealership, in exchange for an endorsement?" Herbert: "It is an Audi. I had a deal with a dealership in the Northwest, and was fortunate enough to get two dealer cars from them. I still drive this same dealer car."

katsu

560,455 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Charles Barkley says a $300,000 Bentley car costs you way more than you think "When I first got my money, I was an idi*t, I had like three or four cars. Dr. J asked me how many of those cars you got, you drive at the same time? I said, one. He said, well, why you got four?" "This money's got to last you the rest of your life, don't waste all your money on cars, everybody know who you are, you pull up in a Kia, or a Mercedes-Benz or a Rolls-Royce, that's Charles Barkley" "The problem isn't that you can't afford the car, it's that that $300,000 you spent on that Bentley, if you'd bought a cheaper car, you'd have had $200,000 more in the bank, and it would've been growing and growing" "One year, three years, five years, twenty years… that $200,000 is gonna be worth a lot more"

Charles Barkley says a $300,000 Bentley car costs you way more than you think "When I first got my money, I was an idi*t, I had like three or four cars. Dr. J asked me how many of those cars you got, you drive at the same time? I said, one. He said, well, why you got four?" "This money's got to last you the rest of your life, don't waste all your money on cars, everybody know who you are, you pull up in a Kia, or a Mercedes-Benz or a Rolls-Royce, that's Charles Barkley" "The problem isn't that you can't afford the car, it's that that $300,000 you spent on that Bentley, if you'd bought a cheaper car, you'd have had $200,000 more in the bank, and it would've been growing and growing" "One year, three years, five years, twenty years… that $200,000 is gonna be worth a lot more"

katsu

2,309,967 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

I was today years old when I realized half the stuff in my kitchen had secret features this whole time. Turns out we've been making everyday life way harder than it needs to be. From flipping a veggie tray into the perfect serving bowl, to using a Ritz cracker to slice cheese, to draining pasta without dumping it into a colander... these hacks feel like discovering cheat codes for adulthood. And just when you think you've seen it all... you find out a Rolls-Royce hides an umbrella inside the door. Some of these are genius. Some are oddly satisfying. And at least one is guaranteed to make you say, "There's NO way I didn't know that." Which one blew your mind the most? Or do you know an everyday hack that's even better?

I was today years old when I realized half the stuff in my kitchen had secret features this whole time. Turns out we've been making everyday life way harder than it needs to be. From flipping a veggie tray into the perfect serving bowl, to using a Ritz cracker to slice cheese, to draining pasta without dumping it into a colander... these hacks feel like discovering cheat codes for adulthood. And just when you think you've seen it all... you find out a Rolls-Royce hides an umbrella inside the door. Some of these are genius. Some are oddly satisfying. And at least one is guaranteed to make you say, "There's NO way I didn't know that." Which one blew your mind the most? Or do you know an everyday hack that's even better?

PeachProof

403,237 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The biggest mistake I see people make when they start carnivore is the same mistake I made. Trying to do everything perfectly from day one. That is not a plan. That is a setup for failure. Here is what actually works. Stop trying to be perfect and start adding in the good things. More meat. More eggs. More real food. That is it. Something really cool happens when you do that. The more good things you add in, the less room there is for the things you are trying to crowd out. You are not white knuckling it. You are not depriving yourself. You are just filling your plate with better and better things until there is no space left for the rest. Progress is not just good enough. Progress IS the goal. You do not have to be perfect to change your life. You just have to start. 👑

The biggest mistake I see people make when they start carnivore is the same mistake I made. Trying to do everything perfectly from day one. That is not a plan. That is a setup for failure. Here is what actually works. Stop trying to be perfect and start adding in the good things. More meat. More eggs. More real food. That is it. Something really cool happens when you do that. The more good things you add in, the less room there is for the things you are trying to crowd out. You are not white knuckling it. You are not depriving yourself. You are just filling your plate with better and better things until there is no space left for the rest. Progress is not just good enough. Progress IS the goal. You do not have to be perfect to change your life. You just have to start. 👑

Queen of Carni

11,923 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

“I was trying purposefully not to be clever with this. I wanted to get a very simple chorus but one which still had some substance to the harmony and melody. Something that was easy to digest but still had a bit of character to it. So Much is about mortality, getting old, all the bright, cheerful subjects, but I think when you get to my sort of age, you either run away from mortality or you jump into it and try and live life to the full and that always seems to make a lot more sense to me. The countries that seem most alive are those that have death as part of their culture.” - pg

“I was trying purposefully not to be clever with this. I wanted to get a very simple chorus but one which still had some substance to the harmony and melody. Something that was easy to digest but still had a bit of character to it. So Much is about mortality, getting old, all the bright, cheerful subjects, but I think when you get to my sort of age, you either run away from mortality or you jump into it and try and live life to the full and that always seems to make a lot more sense to me. The countries that seem most alive are those that have death as part of their culture.” - pg

Peter Gabriel

54,214 просмотров • 2 лет назад

The games are so FIXED. Crazy not to see that Austria and Algeria definetly had an agreement to tie so both can classify to the next round. How are you gonna tell me both teams start arguing after one scores?? You can see one player motions for the other team to chill that they’ll tie 3-3, Then the ref calls them down by telling them theyll add more time. Which ironically kicked Iran out from qualifying. So since when is football about politics? I wonder how much it cost to manipulate the games.

The games are so FIXED. Crazy not to see that Austria and Algeria definetly had an agreement to tie so both can classify to the next round. How are you gonna tell me both teams start arguing after one scores?? You can see one player motions for the other team to chill that they’ll tie 3-3, Then the ref calls them down by telling them theyll add more time. Which ironically kicked Iran out from qualifying. So since when is football about politics? I wonder how much it cost to manipulate the games.

isa⚡️

51,074 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

There are certain songs that bring an entire room together from the very first note, and “I’m a Believer” is certainly one of them. Every night, I get to look out and see people who first heard it in 1966 singing alongside fans who discovered it decades later. That rush never gets old! I wanna hear from you: Which Monkees song should always have a place in the set? #MickyDolenz #TheMonkees

There are certain songs that bring an entire room together from the very first note, and “I’m a Believer” is certainly one of them. Every night, I get to look out and see people who first heard it in 1966 singing alongside fans who discovered it decades later. That rush never gets old! I wanna hear from you: Which Monkees song should always have a place in the set? #MickyDolenz #TheMonkees

Micky Dolenz

109,899 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

ELON: YOUR TESLA WILL ACTUALLY BE MAKING MONEY FOR YOU “Sometimes people wonder how do you go from this big fleet to actually monetizing the fleet in an autonomous situation? And it's actually a combination. It's like Airbnb and Uber, to some degree. So, there'll be some cars that Tesla owns itself. It's kind of like an Uber fashion. But then, for the fleet, that is owned by our customers, it will be like an Airbnb thing. You can add or subtract your car to the fleet whenever you want. So you can say, I'm going away for a week. Just one tap on your Tesla app, your car gets added to the fleet, and it just makes money for you while you're gone. So you can add it to the fleet for a few hours, for a few days, for a few weeks. Whenever you want it back, you can say, come back. And the car will come right back. And I'm highly confident that the revenue made by the owner of the car will far exceed the actual monthly payment. And then, Tesla will obviously take a revenue share on that, but most of the money will go to the owner of the car. And this is actually going to work. This is what will happen. I mean, mark my words. This is simply a matter of time.” Source: Tesla Shareholder Meeting, June 2024

ELON: YOUR TESLA WILL ACTUALLY BE MAKING MONEY FOR YOU “Sometimes people wonder how do you go from this big fleet to actually monetizing the fleet in an autonomous situation? And it's actually a combination. It's like Airbnb and Uber, to some degree. So, there'll be some cars that Tesla owns itself. It's kind of like an Uber fashion. But then, for the fleet, that is owned by our customers, it will be like an Airbnb thing. You can add or subtract your car to the fleet whenever you want. So you can say, I'm going away for a week. Just one tap on your Tesla app, your car gets added to the fleet, and it just makes money for you while you're gone. So you can add it to the fleet for a few hours, for a few days, for a few weeks. Whenever you want it back, you can say, come back. And the car will come right back. And I'm highly confident that the revenue made by the owner of the car will far exceed the actual monthly payment. And then, Tesla will obviously take a revenue share on that, but most of the money will go to the owner of the car. And this is actually going to work. This is what will happen. I mean, mark my words. This is simply a matter of time.” Source: Tesla Shareholder Meeting, June 2024

Mario Nawfal

2,083,259 просмотров • 1 год назад

😱 Locksmith gets called to unlock a car… Lady locked her keys in and is rushing for a flight. She won’t stop talking while he’s trying to work and condescends him the whole damn time. Locksmith: “I swear… if you say one more word, you’re not gonna make it!” Then: “From now on it’s $20 more for every word you say.” He starts adding to the bill on the spot…and gets the door open after a minute or so. After her first off hand comment, I would have told to her screw off and left.

😱 Locksmith gets called to unlock a car… Lady locked her keys in and is rushing for a flight. She won’t stop talking while he’s trying to work and condescends him the whole damn time. Locksmith: “I swear… if you say one more word, you’re not gonna make it!” Then: “From now on it’s $20 more for every word you say.” He starts adding to the bill on the spot…and gets the door open after a minute or so. After her first off hand comment, I would have told to her screw off and left.

DocumentingLibs

31,599 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Loops vs. Graphs, clearly explained! loops are great, but they have a ceiling: a loop makes one unit of work better. it cannot decide which units exist. so you end up with a very good agent running the wrong three steps, in the wrong order, one at a time. Graph engineering fixes this by moving the decision up a layer: what runs, what runs at the same time, and what never runs at all. you need both. here's how it works: a graph splits your system into two kinds of decision. ↳ inside a unit: the loop. produce, check, correct, repeat until green ↳ between units: the graph. split, fan out, merge, gate, send back Prompts → Context → Harness → Loops → Graphs you get parallel work, isolated contexts, and steps that stop running when nothing needs them. the trick is being selective about what becomes a node. only spend a model where judgment lives. merging, ranking, deduping and schema checks are edges, and edges are code. free, instant, and they cannot be argued out of a verdict. a graph where every edge is an agent pays rent on its own wiring. one thing to know before you scale it. a graph has two return paths, and almost everyone builds one. ↳ the correction edge is short. a gate rejects one unit back to the step that produced it, and it fixes the run you are in ↳ the learning edge is long. an accepted result goes back to the splitter as a constraint, and it fixes every run after skip the second and you get a graph that is fast and never gets smarter. next week it starts from the same place with the same blind spots. and a smaller one that eats whole nights: when a unit fails, return that unit, not the batch. send back four slices because one failed and you have just rewritten three correct ones. do it twice in a run and the run never converges. below i have quoted my full guide on graph engineering. it covers the three topologies, the verifier patterns, and where the gate should actually open. save this and read it below ↓

Loops vs. Graphs, clearly explained! loops are great, but they have a ceiling: a loop makes one unit of work better. it cannot decide which units exist. so you end up with a very good agent running the wrong three steps, in the wrong order, one at a time. Graph engineering fixes this by moving the decision up a layer: what runs, what runs at the same time, and what never runs at all. you need both. here's how it works: a graph splits your system into two kinds of decision. ↳ inside a unit: the loop. produce, check, correct, repeat until green ↳ between units: the graph. split, fan out, merge, gate, send back Prompts → Context → Harness → Loops → Graphs you get parallel work, isolated contexts, and steps that stop running when nothing needs them. the trick is being selective about what becomes a node. only spend a model where judgment lives. merging, ranking, deduping and schema checks are edges, and edges are code. free, instant, and they cannot be argued out of a verdict. a graph where every edge is an agent pays rent on its own wiring. one thing to know before you scale it. a graph has two return paths, and almost everyone builds one. ↳ the correction edge is short. a gate rejects one unit back to the step that produced it, and it fixes the run you are in ↳ the learning edge is long. an accepted result goes back to the splitter as a constraint, and it fixes every run after skip the second and you get a graph that is fast and never gets smarter. next week it starts from the same place with the same blind spots. and a smaller one that eats whole nights: when a unit fails, return that unit, not the batch. send back four slices because one failed and you have just rewritten three correct ones. do it twice in a run and the run never converges. below i have quoted my full guide on graph engineering. it covers the three topologies, the verifier patterns, and where the gate should actually open. save this and read it below ↓

Hanako

73,867 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Michael B. Jordan reveals his first film with Ryan Coogler had a $700,000 budget and was shot in 19 days "Starting out with an independent film where we had like, $700,000 and some duct tape, you know what I'm saying? Shot a film in like 19 days" "Which was the core, the essence of filmmaking and acting, just showing up and trying to do the best work that you can. And his career evolving at the same time I was evolving" "And then going to do a spin-off of legendary franchise Rocky, to do Creed, and knowing that the odds are still stacked against us, but having that familiarity and that comfort to push one another"

Michael B. Jordan reveals his first film with Ryan Coogler had a $700,000 budget and was shot in 19 days "Starting out with an independent film where we had like, $700,000 and some duct tape, you know what I'm saying? Shot a film in like 19 days" "Which was the core, the essence of filmmaking and acting, just showing up and trying to do the best work that you can. And his career evolving at the same time I was evolving" "And then going to do a spin-off of legendary franchise Rocky, to do Creed, and knowing that the odds are still stacked against us, but having that familiarity and that comfort to push one another"

sara

75,053 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Orchestrators vs. Graphs, clearly explained! orchestrators are great, and everyone builds one first. here is the ceiling: an orchestrator sits above the work and routes every message. five agents report to it. it reads all five. it decides what each one does next, and reads all five replies. that is ten trips through one context, and by the fifth agent that context has read four reports, five instructions and its own reasoning about all of them. Graph engineering fixes this by removing the seat: not a better router, but no router at all. you need both, and here is the sentence that resolves the whole confusion: an orchestrator sits above the work and holds all of it. a graph is the shape of the work, and holds none of it. ↳ above the work: one context that has to see everything before anything ships ↳ inside the work: a splitter that hands out and lets go, and a merge that reads nothing Prompts → Context → Harness → Loops → Graphs the coordination did not disappear. it moved into the edges, where it costs nothing and cannot get tired. the trick is noticing what you actually built. if one node has to see every result before the run can finish, you did not remove the bottleneck. you hired it, gave it the longest context in the system, and made it the thing you were counting on to stay sharp. one thing to know before you scale it. an orchestrator degrades in the one way nothing catches. ↳ it does not crash, time out or return an error. it stays up and keeps routing ↳ it just starts routing worse, somewhere around the fifth report, and every downstream agent does exactly what it was told that last one catches careful people. you can have perfect isolation on every worker and still have one window quietly drifting at the top, and the traces will all look clean because each worker did its job. and the one that eats whole nights: the merge is where this shows up first. ranking five findings is not judgment, it is a sort. if a model is doing it, you are paying a model to read five reports so it can put them in an order that three lines of code would have got right, and now that model has read everything too. below i have quoted my full guide on graph engineering. it covers the three topologies, the verifier patterns, and where the gate should actually open. save this and read it below ↓

Orchestrators vs. Graphs, clearly explained! orchestrators are great, and everyone builds one first. here is the ceiling: an orchestrator sits above the work and routes every message. five agents report to it. it reads all five. it decides what each one does next, and reads all five replies. that is ten trips through one context, and by the fifth agent that context has read four reports, five instructions and its own reasoning about all of them. Graph engineering fixes this by removing the seat: not a better router, but no router at all. you need both, and here is the sentence that resolves the whole confusion: an orchestrator sits above the work and holds all of it. a graph is the shape of the work, and holds none of it. ↳ above the work: one context that has to see everything before anything ships ↳ inside the work: a splitter that hands out and lets go, and a merge that reads nothing Prompts → Context → Harness → Loops → Graphs the coordination did not disappear. it moved into the edges, where it costs nothing and cannot get tired. the trick is noticing what you actually built. if one node has to see every result before the run can finish, you did not remove the bottleneck. you hired it, gave it the longest context in the system, and made it the thing you were counting on to stay sharp. one thing to know before you scale it. an orchestrator degrades in the one way nothing catches. ↳ it does not crash, time out or return an error. it stays up and keeps routing ↳ it just starts routing worse, somewhere around the fifth report, and every downstream agent does exactly what it was told that last one catches careful people. you can have perfect isolation on every worker and still have one window quietly drifting at the top, and the traces will all look clean because each worker did its job. and the one that eats whole nights: the merge is where this shows up first. ranking five findings is not judgment, it is a sort. if a model is doing it, you are paying a model to read five reports so it can put them in an order that three lines of code would have got right, and now that model has read everything too. below i have quoted my full guide on graph engineering. it covers the three topologies, the verifier patterns, and where the gate should actually open. save this and read it below ↓

Hanako

43,781 просмотров • 8 дней назад

A DEVELOPER PROVED THE REGEX YOU'VE WRITTEN A THOUSAND TIMES IS SECRETLY A COMPILER AND THAT ALMOST NO ONE WHO USES THEM HAS ANY IDEA WHAT ACTUALLY RUNS 36 minutes from Paul Wankadia, the engineer behind a regex engine that compiles your pattern straight down to raw machine code -- walking through what really happens between the slashes. -> The moment it clicks, regex stops being magic punctuation you paste from Stack Overflow and becomes what it actually is: a tiny machine. Your pattern gets turned into a state machine, and that machine is what runs against every character of your text. That one idea explains everything you never understood. Why one regex returns instantly and a nearly identical one hangs your whole server. Why some patterns are safe and others are a denial-of-service waiting to happen. It was never random -- it's whether the machine underneath is built well or badly. Writing a regex was never the skill -> reading one is. And now that an AI agent hands you dense, clever patterns you'd never write yourself, the person who can see the machine underneath is the one who catches the one that takes down production at 3am. Everyone copies regex and prays. This is the talk that ends the praying. Save it. The next time a pattern "Just works," you'll actually know why ↓

A DEVELOPER PROVED THE REGEX YOU'VE WRITTEN A THOUSAND TIMES IS SECRETLY A COMPILER AND THAT ALMOST NO ONE WHO USES THEM HAS ANY IDEA WHAT ACTUALLY RUNS 36 minutes from Paul Wankadia, the engineer behind a regex engine that compiles your pattern straight down to raw machine code -- walking through what really happens between the slashes. -> The moment it clicks, regex stops being magic punctuation you paste from Stack Overflow and becomes what it actually is: a tiny machine. Your pattern gets turned into a state machine, and that machine is what runs against every character of your text. That one idea explains everything you never understood. Why one regex returns instantly and a nearly identical one hangs your whole server. Why some patterns are safe and others are a denial-of-service waiting to happen. It was never random -- it's whether the machine underneath is built well or badly. Writing a regex was never the skill -> reading one is. And now that an AI agent hands you dense, clever patterns you'd never write yourself, the person who can see the machine underneath is the one who catches the one that takes down production at 3am. Everyone copies regex and prays. This is the talk that ends the praying. Save it. The next time a pattern "Just works," you'll actually know why ↓

slash1s

193,107 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Today I tried VR sim racing for the first time and it completely blew my mind 🔥 After just a few minutes I basically disappeared from my studio and got fully immersed in racing. VR lets you visually sit inside the car, and with the wheel and pedals you actually feel like you’re driving it. At first you’re mostly learning the car and the track. Remembering where to brake, where you can push the speed, how the corners flow. You slowly start to understand the car, feel its limits, and figure out what it’s capable of. That’s so cool. After about 2 hours things slowly started to come together. That feeling when you nail a corner is incredibly satisfying. And when you hit 300 km/h in an F1 car, it looks and feels insane. Honestly this was one of the coolest tech experiences I’ve had in a long time. VR + sim racing hardware is on another level. If you’re into cars, gaming, or VR, I highly recommend trying it at least once.

Today I tried VR sim racing for the first time and it completely blew my mind 🔥 After just a few minutes I basically disappeared from my studio and got fully immersed in racing. VR lets you visually sit inside the car, and with the wheel and pedals you actually feel like you’re driving it. At first you’re mostly learning the car and the track. Remembering where to brake, where you can push the speed, how the corners flow. You slowly start to understand the car, feel its limits, and figure out what it’s capable of. That’s so cool. After about 2 hours things slowly started to come together. That feeling when you nail a corner is incredibly satisfying. And when you hit 300 km/h in an F1 car, it looks and feels insane. Honestly this was one of the coolest tech experiences I’ve had in a long time. VR + sim racing hardware is on another level. If you’re into cars, gaming, or VR, I highly recommend trying it at least once.

Ben Geskin

20,533 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨CHINESE CARS ARE EATING THE SOUTH AFRICAN MARKET AND THE BILL COMES LATER‼️ South Africa is being flooded with cheap Chinese metal🔥 Showrooms full of Haval, Chery, GWM, BYD, Changan, Omoda and the next badge that arrived last month. Big screens, fake-SUV stance, lights that dance and soft leatherette. A price that looks like a bargain next to a Volkswagen, a Toyota, a Suzuki, a BMW or a Mercedes. That is the con‼️ Youth is buying the advert, not the car, not the service book and not the trade-in🔥They see gadgets and think they stole a German interior at half the money. They did not, they bought a pretty box from a market that is being force-fed volume by a country that treats exports like a weapon‼️ Established cars earn their residuals. Toyota and Suzuki start, service and sell again. VW has parts on a shelf in this country. BMW and Mercedes cost more because the used market still respects the badge when you walk into a dealership three years later. That is not snobbery, that is a number on a valuation sheet🔥 Chinese volume brands do the opposite. Day one they look loaded. Day 800 the screen is still shiny and the offer on trade-in is "kak". Buyers discover the hard way that a car is not what it costs new🔥It is what a dealer will pay when you are done with it. That gap is where these brands live. Parts is where the romance dies. Break something on a well-known Japanese or German car and the country already has the pipeline. Break something on one of these new imports and you sit, week or sometimes months‼️ Finance does not pause while a control arm or a screen module sits on a boat. You are the one without a car. That is not “growing pains.” That is the product. This is market manipulation with a smile, flood the segment, undercut the monthly and stuff the cabin with toys. Long warranty on the brochure. Photograph it like an SUV even when the tyres and the drivetrain say city car. Take the young buyer who would have walked into Toyota, Suzuki or VW. Take the family that would have stretched for a used German‼️ Push them into something that looks expensive and depreciates like a phone. South Africa loses twice. First the customer leaves a proven brand. Then the same customer comes back poorer, waiting on parts, staring at a trade-in that does not cover the hole. The “cheap” car was never cheap. The marketing was‼️ Give it two years. That is when the first wave of owners hit real mileage, first serious failures, first refinance, first trade. Then the clever campaign from Beijing stops looking clever. It looks like a dump of disposable product into a market that cannot afford to learn the lesson twice🔥 If you want a toy with a tablet on the dash, buy the toy and admit it. If you want a car that still has a spine when you sell it, buy what this country already knows how to fix: Volkswagen, Toyota, Suzuki, BMW, Mercedes🔥 The rest is a costume. Beautiful in the parking lot but ugly on the valuation and when it breaks, you are not a customer, you are a waiting list‼️

RaiZel

152,998 просмотров • 19 дней назад

People think billionaires are free. They are not. Musk is about to become the first trillionaire, but his wealth is not cash. It's stock. And to actually buy things, he borrows against that stock. Billionaires use this all the time to legally avoid taxes, but there's a catch. Simon Dixon said it plainly. If you owe money, you are owned by that agenda. The richest people on earth are one bad quarter away from losing everything.

People think billionaires are free. They are not. Musk is about to become the first trillionaire, but his wealth is not cash. It's stock. And to actually buy things, he borrows against that stock. Billionaires use this all the time to legally avoid taxes, but there's a catch. Simon Dixon said it plainly. If you owe money, you are owned by that agenda. The richest people on earth are one bad quarter away from losing everything.

Kyle Chassé 🐸

10,885 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

He went from DoorDash to a $1M/year app business at 22. While everyone's chasing $5K influencer deals, he's paying his UGC creators $15 a video and making more money than all of them. I got Ernesto on the My First Dollar pod. The bits worth your time: > How his first app made $20K in 30 days from one influencer deal (2:25) > Why he posts the same Reel 10 times and Instagram still pushes 1.5M views every time (13:22) > The 18-year-old making $10K/month from an AI character that doesn't exist (15:00) > His full playbook if he woke up tomorrow with $0 and a laptop (20:02)

He went from DoorDash to a $1M/year app business at 22. While everyone's chasing $5K influencer deals, he's paying his UGC creators $15 a video and making more money than all of them. I got Ernesto on the My First Dollar pod. The bits worth your time: > How his first app made $20K in 30 days from one influencer deal (2:25) > Why he posts the same Reel 10 times and Instagram still pushes 1.5M views every time (13:22) > The 18-year-old making $10K/month from an AI character that doesn't exist (15:00) > His full playbook if he woke up tomorrow with $0 and a laptop (20:02)

Rob Hallam

38,368 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Right… some personal news. Some of you may know that the magnificent StanleyDino dog died in July this year from Sepsis. We couldn’t save him and neither could the doggie hospital. He was only 5 and a half. It’s taken a long time to recover, he was my greatest friend in the worst of times. But a farm can’t be without a massive ridiculous dog. So meet the new baby. This is Murphy. An 8 week old Italian Spinone. Calm, clever and very like Stanley, only more robust and more ridiculous. I shall keep you updated ❤️

Right… some personal news. Some of you may know that the magnificent StanleyDino dog died in July this year from Sepsis. We couldn’t save him and neither could the doggie hospital. He was only 5 and a half. It’s taken a long time to recover, he was my greatest friend in the worst of times. But a farm can’t be without a massive ridiculous dog. So meet the new baby. This is Murphy. An 8 week old Italian Spinone. Calm, clever and very like Stanley, only more robust and more ridiculous. I shall keep you updated ❤️

Bernie

199,672 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад