Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

18 years ago today, Dan Kaminsky Dan Kaminsky disclosed the DNS cache poisoning vulnerability at Black Hat USA 2008, triggering one of the largest coordinated patch efforts in internet history. Before public disclosure, Dan organized multiple vendors to fix the flaw in secret. Many more legendary stories than could... fit here, like how he exposed Sony’s rootkit across more than 568,000 networks and identified critical certificate vulnerabilities. Dan followed what he cared about and his curiosity. As Michael Tiffany Michael J.J. Tiffany put it, “Only Dan thought, ‘I could fix the human eye in software.’” He built DanKam, an augmented-reality app that helped colorblind people see color. Michael hosted Dan while he built the first version and described watching a colorblind houseguest sit at the kitchen table, “crying tears of joy seeing red for the first time.” His mother, Trudy Maurer, may have said it best when she accepted his Lifetime Achievement Award at the 2025 Difference Makers. “Daniel was the catalyst for many achievements across the vast internet spectrum, and I believe Dan truly represented the intersection of technology and humanity.” Mudge, who presented the award, said: “The Lifetime Achievement Award isn’t about what you achieve in your lifetime. That’s part of it. It’s about how many people you influence and bring in and then take it further.” We lost Dan too early from diabetic ketoacidosis in April 2021 at age 42. Some of you are hearing the name Dan Kaminsky for the first time. The coordinated, community-first spirit Dan modeled is the bar. If you're in Vegas this week, you're walking the streets that the legends of security who came before you walked, when they also had no idea what they were doing, facing problems nobody had solved before. They had to figure it out as they went. Just like you're going to do. Thanks to those who contributed to this tribute video: Jeff Moss Jeff Moss, Paul Vixie, Gadi Evron, Lena Smart, Derek Hinch and the many others who shared here.show more

Rob T. Lee

26,818 subscribers

46,767 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Kunst Wissenschaft & Technologie Bildung

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

It seems that Lieutenant Dan pulled a fast one on the world. Videos popped up of Dan before hurricane Milton was to hit Florida, with Dan stating that he would ride out the storm in his boat. Dan made sure that on the video, his Go Fund Me link was linked in the video posters profile so that people could donate. We saw videos posted during the hurricane of Dan in his boat. During this time the Mayor had been contacted and the Mayor stated that Dan was in a shelter. We later saw another video update of Dan on his boat. Well Dan, you messed up! What I saw were two different sets of videos. They were staged weeks apart. I assume that Dan was really in a shelter when the mayor said. Videos that were prerecorded were posted as updates while Dan sat inside a concrete building. Dan had spent ten years in prison for kidnapping and r*pe previous to his boat adventure, and made over $20k in donations to his go fund me, all according to source. My proof that leads me to all of these assumptions is that Dan didn’t cut his hair after the first set of videos and that growth had to take time.

Matthew Rife

667,402 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

💥💥💥💥💥💥 Judge Jeanine Pirro US Attorney Pirro on Benghazi: PIRRO: “And Bakoush in particular, you know, there's one thing, Dan, that I'm going to share with you that I really haven't told anyone. And I don't know if you recall, but in 2012, we were all talking about Benghazi. And unfortunately, you know, the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens and the other three operatives who were there, at the CIA, at the compound there. The truth is that we fought talking about whether or not it was a peaceful protest that went awry, or whether it was, you know, people just weren't there to burn down the embassy. And when I got into the office, I said, pull the Benghazi file. And so we pulled it and we had drones. Dan, we knew what was going on. And I looked at these drones. And it was clear to me, Dan, that there was no peaceful protest. There was no one who got there and said, you know, we object to the United States being here. These MOs, they're MFers, they came in with rocket-propelled grenades because they knew what they were going to do. And when they couldn't break into the Ambassador’s residence, they went out and they got fueled to burn him out. And I remember saying to the prosecutors in the room, Dan, well, the nation and Hillary Clinton, you know, were all fighting it was a peaceful protest. No, it wasn't. Yes, it was. No, it wasn't. We know for a fact that it was not a peaceful protest. The drones made it clear they came there to tear the place down.” Dan Bongino Catch The Dan Bongino Show EVERY WEEKDAY on Rumble 🏴‍☠️ at 10am ET

💥💥💥💥💥💥 Judge Jeanine Pirro US Attorney Pirro on Benghazi: PIRRO: “And Bakoush in particular, you know, there's one thing, Dan, that I'm going to share with you that I really haven't told anyone. And I don't know if you recall, but in 2012, we were all talking about Benghazi. And unfortunately, you know, the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens and the other three operatives who were there, at the CIA, at the compound there. The truth is that we fought talking about whether or not it was a peaceful protest that went awry, or whether it was, you know, people just weren't there to burn down the embassy. And when I got into the office, I said, pull the Benghazi file. And so we pulled it and we had drones. Dan, we knew what was going on. And I looked at these drones. And it was clear to me, Dan, that there was no peaceful protest. There was no one who got there and said, you know, we object to the United States being here. These MOs, they're MFers, they came in with rocket-propelled grenades because they knew what they were going to do. And when they couldn't break into the Ambassador’s residence, they went out and they got fueled to burn him out. And I remember saying to the prosecutors in the room, Dan, well, the nation and Hillary Clinton, you know, were all fighting it was a peaceful protest. No, it wasn't. Yes, it was. No, it wasn't. We know for a fact that it was not a peaceful protest. The drones made it clear they came there to tear the place down.” Dan Bongino Catch The Dan Bongino Show EVERY WEEKDAY on Rumble 🏴‍☠️ at 10am ET

MAGA Kitty

203,970 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I interviewed one of the young men who crossed into Ceuta in the mass border surge at the weekend. He and many others told me the same story they believed that if they could stay inside the enclave for about seven days, they would then get the chance to move to mainland Spain once there, free movement across Europe. Thousands of men arrived at the same time this wasn’t random. Messages and videos had been circulating on social media telling people exactly when to gather and that the border would be easier to cross. They said the gates would effectively be open from around 9 in the morning until 11 at night. Being Morocco’s Throne Day, when the King traditionally issues royal pardons. That coincidence, combined with the coordinated social media information, is why many of them described it as organised rather than spontaneous. This is what the people who actually made the crossing are saying on the ground. Dan Wootton Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧

I interviewed one of the young men who crossed into Ceuta in the mass border surge at the weekend. He and many others told me the same story they believed that if they could stay inside the enclave for about seven days, they would then get the chance to move to mainland Spain once there, free movement across Europe. Thousands of men arrived at the same time this wasn’t random. Messages and videos had been circulating on social media telling people exactly when to gather and that the border would be easier to cross. They said the gates would effectively be open from around 9 in the morning until 11 at night. Being Morocco’s Throne Day, when the King traditionally issues royal pardons. That coincidence, combined with the coordinated social media information, is why many of them described it as organised rather than spontaneous. This is what the people who actually made the crossing are saying on the ground. Dan Wootton Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧

Sarah White

125,175 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The smartest thing Matthew Prince 🌥 did before Cloudflare's IPO was offer shares to people who could help the company in the future. "The most clever thing that we did [for the IPO], and this was advice that I got from Qualtrics Co-Founder Ryan Smith, was he said, 'What are you doing about friends and family?' because you can take 5% of the IPO and allocate it to friends and family. I said we weren't going to do it." "He said, 'No, you're thinking about it wrong. Think about the people, who if they owed you a favor, could make a meaningful difference in the future of Cloudflare, and then offer them the ability to invest in the IPO.'" "I said, 'Some people are going to have conflicts.' He said, 'It doesn't matter. Even just the fact you offered it, even if they can't do it, they'll always remember that super fondly.'"

The smartest thing Matthew Prince 🌥 did before Cloudflare's IPO was offer shares to people who could help the company in the future. "The most clever thing that we did [for the IPO], and this was advice that I got from Qualtrics Co-Founder Ryan Smith, was he said, 'What are you doing about friends and family?' because you can take 5% of the IPO and allocate it to friends and family. I said we weren't going to do it." "He said, 'No, you're thinking about it wrong. Think about the people, who if they owed you a favor, could make a meaningful difference in the future of Cloudflare, and then offer them the ability to invest in the IPO.'" "I said, 'Some people are going to have conflicts.' He said, 'It doesn't matter. Even just the fact you offered it, even if they can't do it, they'll always remember that super fondly.'"

TBPN

61,499 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Dan Lanning explains the leadership trait that separated Nick Saban and Kirby Smart from everyone else: “Coach Saban was the definition of consistency. At times, you almost felt like you were dealing with a robot because of how methodical he was in his approach.” “He just didn’t get flustered.” “The sun was going to come up tomorrow at 7:00 a.m. in Tuscaloosa, and Nick Saban was going to be in the office at 7:30 eating the same snack before the same staff meeting.” “You got to see that level of consistency every single day.” “You also got to watch his decision-making process: ‘We’ve got to fix this. How are we going to make it better?’” “I always felt like he and Kirby Smart both didn’t care who you were. If you had some sort of value you could add to the program, they wanted to know what you knew.” “If you were a janitor in the corner of the room and had a blitz package that was going to be good against that team, he wanted to see it.” “It didn’t matter who the person was. If you could bring value to the organization, he wanted to tap into it.”

Dan Lanning explains the leadership trait that separated Nick Saban and Kirby Smart from everyone else: “Coach Saban was the definition of consistency. At times, you almost felt like you were dealing with a robot because of how methodical he was in his approach.” “He just didn’t get flustered.” “The sun was going to come up tomorrow at 7:00 a.m. in Tuscaloosa, and Nick Saban was going to be in the office at 7:30 eating the same snack before the same staff meeting.” “You got to see that level of consistency every single day.” “You also got to watch his decision-making process: ‘We’ve got to fix this. How are we going to make it better?’” “I always felt like he and Kirby Smart both didn’t care who you were. If you had some sort of value you could add to the program, they wanted to know what you knew.” “If you were a janitor in the corner of the room and had a blitz package that was going to be good against that team, he wanted to see it.” “It didn’t matter who the person was. If you could bring value to the organization, he wanted to tap into it.”

Josh Chambers

98,382 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

💥💥 Buckle up, Buttercups! Vince Coglianese Vince Coglianese hints that Dan Bongino Dan Bongino WILL be spilling the beans on what he encountered at the FBI when he returns to his podcast: COGLIANESE: “I knew that the second Dan decided he would leave the FBI, it was only under that condition I mentioned before: that he had something to show for it. That he had wins on the scoreboard. That he could leave with, and then go on to talk to his audience about what they were able to achieve and WHAT HE ENCOUNTERED inside of that Agency. THAT’S DEFINITELY what I’m looking forward to. I wanna know what HE KNOWS. I wanna know what HE HAS SEEN. I wanna know how difficult that job is. And, by the way, I do know that it’s difficult…”

💥💥 Buckle up, Buttercups! Vince Coglianese Vince Coglianese hints that Dan Bongino Dan Bongino WILL be spilling the beans on what he encountered at the FBI when he returns to his podcast: COGLIANESE: “I knew that the second Dan decided he would leave the FBI, it was only under that condition I mentioned before: that he had something to show for it. That he had wins on the scoreboard. That he could leave with, and then go on to talk to his audience about what they were able to achieve and WHAT HE ENCOUNTERED inside of that Agency. THAT’S DEFINITELY what I’m looking forward to. I wanna know what HE KNOWS. I wanna know what HE HAS SEEN. I wanna know how difficult that job is. And, by the way, I do know that it’s difficult…”

MAGA Kitty

65,554 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

CNN’s Kristen Holmes: “I just want to point out one thing before we get into the power and influential person that Charlie Kirk was..not just a political activist. He was also a father and a husband. And you have to remember something when you talk about Donald Trump's campaign and the team that got him elected, it was a very small, very tight knit group of people. It was loyalists, people who were gathered around Donald Trump working in and out every day. And Charlie Kirk was part of that movement. So, when you're talking to these White House advisers and staffers and friends of the President, it's not just them looking at the death of an icon and a movement leader, as we've heard, it's also them looking at the death of a very close friend and somebody they spent an enormous amount of time with...[T]hat's why you're seeing such a sadness and a disbelief from so many people close to the President. And when it comes to talking strictly about his influence and his power within Washington, I mean, one of the things to keep in mind here is that this is somebody who had a direct line to President Trump who could voice his objections to President Trump at times, he could voice what he thought was important and not being covered enough by the administration. He spoke to many, if not all, of the cabinet secretaries directly. He had a finger on the pulse of the MAGA movement, even more so than some people who are here in Washington who got government positions. If you look at the crowd that had gathered around Kirk, that was just one example of the kind of crowds that Kirk would draw. He was truly a movement leader, as we've heard. He would bring thousands and thousands of people together, and that was why he was so critical beyond just the personal to the campaign to President Trump...So, there are a lot of different levels of all of this. The influence, the power, the — the connection to the base, but also the family and the relationships that Charlie Kirk had built with all of the Trumps. We have seen the children responding each individually about their relationships with Charlie Kirk saying to pray for him and his family.”

CNN’s Kristen Holmes: “I just want to point out one thing before we get into the power and influential person that Charlie Kirk was..not just a political activist. He was also a father and a husband. And you have to remember something when you talk about Donald Trump's campaign and the team that got him elected, it was a very small, very tight knit group of people. It was loyalists, people who were gathered around Donald Trump working in and out every day. And Charlie Kirk was part of that movement. So, when you're talking to these White House advisers and staffers and friends of the President, it's not just them looking at the death of an icon and a movement leader, as we've heard, it's also them looking at the death of a very close friend and somebody they spent an enormous amount of time with...[T]hat's why you're seeing such a sadness and a disbelief from so many people close to the President. And when it comes to talking strictly about his influence and his power within Washington, I mean, one of the things to keep in mind here is that this is somebody who had a direct line to President Trump who could voice his objections to President Trump at times, he could voice what he thought was important and not being covered enough by the administration. He spoke to many, if not all, of the cabinet secretaries directly. He had a finger on the pulse of the MAGA movement, even more so than some people who are here in Washington who got government positions. If you look at the crowd that had gathered around Kirk, that was just one example of the kind of crowds that Kirk would draw. He was truly a movement leader, as we've heard. He would bring thousands and thousands of people together, and that was why he was so critical beyond just the personal to the campaign to President Trump...So, there are a lot of different levels of all of this. The influence, the power, the — the connection to the base, but also the family and the relationships that Charlie Kirk had built with all of the Trumps. We have seen the children responding each individually about their relationships with Charlie Kirk saying to pray for him and his family.”

Curtis Houck

1,160,867 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🚨 NOW: President Trump ERUPTS on Democrats for election meddling in the Alaska Senate race, filing ANOTHER "Dan Sullivan" to oppose GOP Sen. Dan Sullivan "The Democrats put up ANOTHER man named Dan Sullivan, so we have two Dan Sullivans. And by the way, the other man who had never been in politics had never voted!" "He hasn't voted for years. A totally pretty non-political person, I guess, but never had any thought of running. All of a sudden, he's running for the Senate in Alaska." "His name is Dan Sullivan. They have the same name. And that guy got two and a half percent in the recent primary." "And that's, you know, two and a half percent is a lot when it comes to winning elections. And it's a disgrace. They went to the court, and the court made it a little bit easier." "They put an initial or something on the one name, but it's very unfair. I will go to Alaska to help Dan Sullivan get elected."

🚨 NOW: President Trump ERUPTS on Democrats for election meddling in the Alaska Senate race, filing ANOTHER "Dan Sullivan" to oppose GOP Sen. Dan Sullivan "The Democrats put up ANOTHER man named Dan Sullivan, so we have two Dan Sullivans. And by the way, the other man who had never been in politics had never voted!" "He hasn't voted for years. A totally pretty non-political person, I guess, but never had any thought of running. All of a sudden, he's running for the Senate in Alaska." "His name is Dan Sullivan. They have the same name. And that guy got two and a half percent in the recent primary." "And that's, you know, two and a half percent is a lot when it comes to winning elections. And it's a disgrace. They went to the court, and the court made it a little bit easier." "They put an initial or something on the one name, but it's very unfair. I will go to Alaska to help Dan Sullivan get elected."

Eric Daugherty

26,475 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

Catherine Austin Fitts on how psychopaths are able to run the world "people who have no empathy are really good at... organizing for self-benefit" "[So] you have... 3 to 5% sort of psychopath[s] [at the top], [and then] 20 to 25% who are making a lot of money helping them" "then you have the other 60 to 70% [of the population] who can't fathom what's going on. And what the others are doing, what the smaller groups are doing, drives them crazy. And they become neurotic" This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Alix Mayer (Alix Mayer) posted to YouTube on June 3, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "There's a wonderful book called Political Ponerology. Have you ever read it? Okay, so, the, the description of the book is as follows. It was a psychologist who had been a young man during Hitler in Poland. And after the war then Stalin came in and he was at university and he and a group of colleagues decided, you know, because they'd been so traumatized by all this tyranny, they said, we're going to study the intersection of psychopathy with politics. "And that's ponerology, the study of psychopathy mixed— And here's what they— And they wrote the book, he said, three times, tried to get it out from behind the Iron Curtain and then, failed, had to destroy it. And then when he finally got out after '89, he wrote it from memory. "And here's what it said. And what he said was that most people are born with empathy and they can't fathom not only that other people don't have empathy, but that the people who have no empathy are really good at getting together and organizing for self-benefit. "So the people with no empathy are much more effective at conspiracies than the people with empathy. Okay? "So anyway, what he said was about 20 to 25% of the population who are competent at running things are willing to work for the people who don't have empathy as long as they get paid well. "And if you look at the history of America, the way we've gotten here is a lot of people got paid a lot of money, whether with their stocks and bonds or whether their job helping the people who have no empathy do all the evil doing. "I mean, you know that because if you look at what's going on in medicine, you can see it clearly. "So what happens is you have the 3 to 5% sort of psychopathic, then you have the 20 to 25% who are making a lot of money helping them. And then you have the other 60 to 70% who can't fathom what's going on. And what the others are doing, what the smaller groups are doing drives them crazy. And they become neurotic. "They become neurotic about the food, they become neurotic about the healthcare, they become neurotic about programmable money. And until they finally come to understand, you're dealing with psychopathic and you're dealing with people who will help the psychopaths for money. "And what he said was once people could fathom what was going on, suddenly they started being effective."

Catherine Austin Fitts on how psychopaths are able to run the world "people who have no empathy are really good at... organizing for self-benefit" "[So] you have... 3 to 5% sort of psychopath[s] [at the top], [and then] 20 to 25% who are making a lot of money helping them" "then you have the other 60 to 70% [of the population] who can't fathom what's going on. And what the others are doing, what the smaller groups are doing, drives them crazy. And they become neurotic" This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Alix Mayer (Alix Mayer) posted to YouTube on June 3, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "There's a wonderful book called Political Ponerology. Have you ever read it? Okay, so, the, the description of the book is as follows. It was a psychologist who had been a young man during Hitler in Poland. And after the war then Stalin came in and he was at university and he and a group of colleagues decided, you know, because they'd been so traumatized by all this tyranny, they said, we're going to study the intersection of psychopathy with politics. "And that's ponerology, the study of psychopathy mixed— And here's what they— And they wrote the book, he said, three times, tried to get it out from behind the Iron Curtain and then, failed, had to destroy it. And then when he finally got out after '89, he wrote it from memory. "And here's what it said. And what he said was that most people are born with empathy and they can't fathom not only that other people don't have empathy, but that the people who have no empathy are really good at getting together and organizing for self-benefit. "So the people with no empathy are much more effective at conspiracies than the people with empathy. Okay? "So anyway, what he said was about 20 to 25% of the population who are competent at running things are willing to work for the people who don't have empathy as long as they get paid well. "And if you look at the history of America, the way we've gotten here is a lot of people got paid a lot of money, whether with their stocks and bonds or whether their job helping the people who have no empathy do all the evil doing. "I mean, you know that because if you look at what's going on in medicine, you can see it clearly. "So what happens is you have the 3 to 5% sort of psychopathic, then you have the 20 to 25% who are making a lot of money helping them. And then you have the other 60 to 70% who can't fathom what's going on. And what the others are doing, what the smaller groups are doing drives them crazy. And they become neurotic. "They become neurotic about the food, they become neurotic about the healthcare, they become neurotic about programmable money. And until they finally come to understand, you're dealing with psychopathic and you're dealing with people who will help the psychopaths for money. "And what he said was once people could fathom what was going on, suddenly they started being effective."

Sense Receptor

68,550 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Seth Rogen revealed that many studio executives care deeply about being thanked during award speeches because it’s often the only public recognition they receive for their work. Seth Rogen: And we were like, "Oh, no." And then we interviewed almost every head of every studio, kind of past and present, like in the months leading up to the show, and as we were writing the show, we wanted to get a lot of insight. And it was one of the most consistent things that was said to us was, "You just want to be thanked at an award show, by first and last name." Because, and it makes sense, a lot of people don't realize this, and I didn't even like think about it this way like, their names are not on the movies. Like, and they feel like they've really contributed to them, and sometimes spent years of their lives working on these things. But if you work at the studio, you don't get your name in the actual credits of the movie. And unless someone like Googles who was the head of the studio during the years that movie came out, no one would ever know you had anything to do with it. So, it is the only like way to set in stone that you... (laughs) had anything to do with the movie, was to be, is to be thanked at an award show. And...

Seth Rogen revealed that many studio executives care deeply about being thanked during award speeches because it’s often the only public recognition they receive for their work. Seth Rogen: And we were like, "Oh, no." And then we interviewed almost every head of every studio, kind of past and present, like in the months leading up to the show, and as we were writing the show, we wanted to get a lot of insight. And it was one of the most consistent things that was said to us was, "You just want to be thanked at an award show, by first and last name." Because, and it makes sense, a lot of people don't realize this, and I didn't even like think about it this way like, their names are not on the movies. Like, and they feel like they've really contributed to them, and sometimes spent years of their lives working on these things. But if you work at the studio, you don't get your name in the actual credits of the movie. And unless someone like Googles who was the head of the studio during the years that movie came out, no one would ever know you had anything to do with it. So, it is the only like way to set in stone that you... (laughs) had anything to do with the movie, was to be, is to be thanked at an award show. And...

Ruzy.hl

246,598 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

CNN’s Scott Jennings on Vice President JD Vance’s speech at #AmFest2025 and the right's support for Israel: “Well, JD Vance was and is trying to appeal to the most people possible because he anticipates being the nominee of the Republican Party in 2028 and he has had relationships with a lot of the people whose names you heard on the stage. You know, there's more information today than we had yesterday. They took a straw poll of all the people who went to Turning Point’s event. So, this is thousands and thousands of people, 87% of them in the straw poll said that Israel was either a top ally or an ally of the United States. On top of that, they asked the people who were there, what are the biggest issues facing the United States? Number one, radical Islam. So, when you look at what the people who were in the audience think, it sounds like they were really more with Ben Shapiro than they were with some of the other people who were attacking Ben Shapiro. There were rather clear eyed about who our friends are and the difference between right and wrong, at least as it relates to the people who were in the crowd.”

CNN’s Scott Jennings on Vice President JD Vance’s speech at #AmFest2025 and the right's support for Israel: “Well, JD Vance was and is trying to appeal to the most people possible because he anticipates being the nominee of the Republican Party in 2028 and he has had relationships with a lot of the people whose names you heard on the stage. You know, there's more information today than we had yesterday. They took a straw poll of all the people who went to Turning Point’s event. So, this is thousands and thousands of people, 87% of them in the straw poll said that Israel was either a top ally or an ally of the United States. On top of that, they asked the people who were there, what are the biggest issues facing the United States? Number one, radical Islam. So, when you look at what the people who were in the audience think, it sounds like they were really more with Ben Shapiro than they were with some of the other people who were attacking Ben Shapiro. There were rather clear eyed about who our friends are and the difference between right and wrong, at least as it relates to the people who were in the crowd.”

Curtis Houck

10,776 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

The Michael Jackson biopic will soon be released in Japan. When I was little, I loved Captain EO. I went to Disneyland to see it again and again, because we lived nearby and my parents took me there many times. But at some point, the image of Michael Jackson changed. The media around the world began portraying him as: a freak, a plastic surgery monster, an eccentric, someone who wanted to become white, a pedophile. Japan was no exception. They reported it the same way — often in a mocking, sensationalized tone. But the real picture of Michael Jackson was far more complicated. He had a childhood shaped by an abusive father. He suffered physical aftereffects from accidents. He had vitiligo, an autoimmune skin condition that causes loss of skin pigmentation — something later confirmed in his autopsy. He was found not guilty in the 2005 child molestation trial. There were years of investigations and FBI files related to the allegations. There were changes in the accusers’ stories, money-related issues, and possible financial motives. He expressed a deep desire for peace through many of his songs. He also donated large sums of money and supported many charitable causes, especially for children. Yet many of these facts were hardly reported in Japan. Because they were not profitable for the media. Of course, I do not know the absolute truth about whether child abuse ever occurred. But now that we have seen so many examples of media bias, manipulation, and the dark structure of the Japanese media, I cannot help but wonder: How much of Michael Jackson’s image was manufactured by the media? How much was he turned into a “monster” for public consumption? And were there people who saw his message of peace, delivered through his enormous influence, as something inconvenient? For people who are about to discover Michael Jackson for the first time, I want them to know this. And I want them to think about it. Michael Jackson is also said to have loved Japan. He visited Japan in 2007, just two years before his death. Before judging him through the image created by the media, I hope people will look at the whole story. #MichaelJackson #MichaelMovie #MJInnocent #MediaBias #CaptainEO #KingOfPop #JapanLovesMichael #TruthMatters

The Michael Jackson biopic will soon be released in Japan. When I was little, I loved Captain EO. I went to Disneyland to see it again and again, because we lived nearby and my parents took me there many times. But at some point, the image of Michael Jackson changed. The media around the world began portraying him as: a freak, a plastic surgery monster, an eccentric, someone who wanted to become white, a pedophile. Japan was no exception. They reported it the same way — often in a mocking, sensationalized tone. But the real picture of Michael Jackson was far more complicated. He had a childhood shaped by an abusive father. He suffered physical aftereffects from accidents. He had vitiligo, an autoimmune skin condition that causes loss of skin pigmentation — something later confirmed in his autopsy. He was found not guilty in the 2005 child molestation trial. There were years of investigations and FBI files related to the allegations. There were changes in the accusers’ stories, money-related issues, and possible financial motives. He expressed a deep desire for peace through many of his songs. He also donated large sums of money and supported many charitable causes, especially for children. Yet many of these facts were hardly reported in Japan. Because they were not profitable for the media. Of course, I do not know the absolute truth about whether child abuse ever occurred. But now that we have seen so many examples of media bias, manipulation, and the dark structure of the Japanese media, I cannot help but wonder: How much of Michael Jackson’s image was manufactured by the media? How much was he turned into a “monster” for public consumption? And were there people who saw his message of peace, delivered through his enormous influence, as something inconvenient? For people who are about to discover Michael Jackson for the first time, I want them to know this. And I want them to think about it. Michael Jackson is also said to have loved Japan. He visited Japan in 2007, just two years before his death. Before judging him through the image created by the media, I hope people will look at the whole story. #MichaelJackson #MichaelMovie #MJInnocent #MediaBias #CaptainEO #KingOfPop #JapanLovesMichael #TruthMatters

Rutaso.Japan🇯🇵🐶

319,259 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Jon Bernthal defends the Shia LaBeouf interview and speaks about why he has no regrets doing the interview "And you know just the fact that I had Shia Labeouf on I've got an enormous amount of backlash, for the first time really as like a public person, kinda hatred." "And the fact that I had given somebody who could have, who may have done these things that this woman says, you know that really hurt people, and I felt fucking terrible about that man." "Did you wish you hadn't done it? No, because after talking to him and then going around and talking to women who have been victims themselves." "What I found was that so many people have reached out who said like 'I was in that place, like I was in that place where he was, in that place where I was wether I was abusive or not abusive I was getting there, and the drugs and the alcohol were getting the better of me.'" "He was 2 years sober at the time I had him on and I felt really what it was, was like a real meditation in shame, you know."

Jon Bernthal defends the Shia LaBeouf interview and speaks about why he has no regrets doing the interview "And you know just the fact that I had Shia Labeouf on I've got an enormous amount of backlash, for the first time really as like a public person, kinda hatred." "And the fact that I had given somebody who could have, who may have done these things that this woman says, you know that really hurt people, and I felt fucking terrible about that man." "Did you wish you hadn't done it? No, because after talking to him and then going around and talking to women who have been victims themselves." "What I found was that so many people have reached out who said like 'I was in that place, like I was in that place where he was, in that place where I was wether I was abusive or not abusive I was getting there, and the drugs and the alcohol were getting the better of me.'" "He was 2 years sober at the time I had him on and I felt really what it was, was like a real meditation in shame, you know."

ramagazzi

370,785 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Jimmy Dore: You said we have a Jew problem and instead of saying we have a Zionist problem. And do you think that maybe it would be smart for your campaign to try to temper [your language] so people don’t get the wrong idea? Dan Bilzerian: Nope, nope. One thing about my campaign is I’m not going to craft my message in any way, shape, or form [to appeal / etc.]. This is amazing on two levels. First, Jimmy Dore is literally spoon-feeding Dumbass Dan the palatable version of Jew-hate he himself uses ("hey idiot, here's the trick, you have to say it like this"). And secondly Dan, instead of interjecting with "no like I said it's only a "Jewish supremacy" problem not a "Jew problem" like I just said before", he instead just rolls with the "Jew problem" characterization and doubles down on it. And to be fair, Dan is basically just an honest representation of all these other deranged fucks who slather their Jew hate in such plausible deniability. He's profoundly evil, but at least he's honest about it.

Jimmy Dore: You said we have a Jew problem and instead of saying we have a Zionist problem. And do you think that maybe it would be smart for your campaign to try to temper [your language] so people don’t get the wrong idea? Dan Bilzerian: Nope, nope. One thing about my campaign is I’m not going to craft my message in any way, shape, or form [to appeal / etc.]. This is amazing on two levels. First, Jimmy Dore is literally spoon-feeding Dumbass Dan the palatable version of Jew-hate he himself uses ("hey idiot, here's the trick, you have to say it like this"). And secondly Dan, instead of interjecting with "no like I said it's only a "Jewish supremacy" problem not a "Jew problem" like I just said before", he instead just rolls with the "Jew problem" characterization and doubles down on it. And to be fair, Dan is basically just an honest representation of all these other deranged fucks who slather their Jew hate in such plausible deniability. He's profoundly evil, but at least he's honest about it.

Avi Bitterman, MD

127,040 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

From Eric Vishria on how the top AI founders are building products completely opposite of the SaaS era: "One of the things that is really different in the AI world versus the SaaS world, is that in the SaaS world, over and over again, you had people who really understood the customer. And the problem. And then they understood a domain. They understood what the technology was more or less capable of. But it wasn't a real question of if you could build something or not. For example, take Salesforce, Workday, and ServiceNow. CRM existed before Salesforce. HR management existed before Workday. Same thing with ServiceNow. So in every case, Salesforce followed Siebel. Workday followed Peoplesoft. ServiceNow followed Peregrine and Remedy, and others. So they were just kind of, cloud SaaS versions of the prior generation product. They just understood the customers. They understood the problem. And they were just like, here's a better version. And that evolved a little bit over time in SaaS land. But that's what it is. And so product development in that way was done by people who really understood the customer and the problems. And then just took advantage of the next wave. And this is almost diametrically opposite of product development in the AI era. When I look at the teams that are having the most success today, they have intimate knowledge of the models. They are right on the frontier of understanding which models are better at what, and why, and when. And what they're going to be good at and what they're not going to be good at. And what they're spending their time on, is figuring out how do I apply this capability of this model to this domain or to this user. So they're actually working inside out or technology out, versus customer problem in. And of course, they understand the customer problem. And a lot of times they have firsthand knowledge of it. But they're really close to the metal and capability, and they're applying it. And I think this is a really different way to develop products than in SaaS. I started my career as a product manager a long time ago, and it's almost the complete opposite of everything you learned. "Listen to the customer, understand it, then bring it back to the engineering and product teams." If you did that right now, ask a bunch of customers what they want out of AI, and you brought it back, for the most part, it may not be possible today with today's technology. Whereas the teams that are winning right now really understand the technology and are applying it out. And so I think this reversal matters. I think it's a big difference in terms of how companies are getting built. And maybe even the types of entrepreneurs that will be successful. I'm not sure. You're seeing some real change there. Look at the Bret Taylor's at Sierra. That's a super, super technical founder who really gets it. Brett and Clay really get it. You look at Michael and his co-founders at Cursor. They're super technical founders and they get it. They all really understand what these things can and can't do. And that's a pretty different dynamic relative to the way the best SaaS companies got built." Link in bio for the full conversation going deep on the current class of startups going from zero to $100m+ in ARR within 12 months.

From Eric Vishria on how the top AI founders are building products completely opposite of the SaaS era: "One of the things that is really different in the AI world versus the SaaS world, is that in the SaaS world, over and over again, you had people who really understood the customer. And the problem. And then they understood a domain. They understood what the technology was more or less capable of. But it wasn't a real question of if you could build something or not. For example, take Salesforce, Workday, and ServiceNow. CRM existed before Salesforce. HR management existed before Workday. Same thing with ServiceNow. So in every case, Salesforce followed Siebel. Workday followed Peoplesoft. ServiceNow followed Peregrine and Remedy, and others. So they were just kind of, cloud SaaS versions of the prior generation product. They just understood the customers. They understood the problem. And they were just like, here's a better version. And that evolved a little bit over time in SaaS land. But that's what it is. And so product development in that way was done by people who really understood the customer and the problems. And then just took advantage of the next wave. And this is almost diametrically opposite of product development in the AI era. When I look at the teams that are having the most success today, they have intimate knowledge of the models. They are right on the frontier of understanding which models are better at what, and why, and when. And what they're going to be good at and what they're not going to be good at. And what they're spending their time on, is figuring out how do I apply this capability of this model to this domain or to this user. So they're actually working inside out or technology out, versus customer problem in. And of course, they understand the customer problem. And a lot of times they have firsthand knowledge of it. But they're really close to the metal and capability, and they're applying it. And I think this is a really different way to develop products than in SaaS. I started my career as a product manager a long time ago, and it's almost the complete opposite of everything you learned. "Listen to the customer, understand it, then bring it back to the engineering and product teams." If you did that right now, ask a bunch of customers what they want out of AI, and you brought it back, for the most part, it may not be possible today with today's technology. Whereas the teams that are winning right now really understand the technology and are applying it out. And so I think this reversal matters. I think it's a big difference in terms of how companies are getting built. And maybe even the types of entrepreneurs that will be successful. I'm not sure. You're seeing some real change there. Look at the Bret Taylor's at Sierra. That's a super, super technical founder who really gets it. Brett and Clay really get it. You look at Michael and his co-founders at Cursor. They're super technical founders and they get it. They all really understand what these things can and can't do. And that's a pretty different dynamic relative to the way the best SaaS companies got built." Link in bio for the full conversation going deep on the current class of startups going from zero to $100m+ in ARR within 12 months.

The Peel

209,752 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING: FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino confirms there were “multiple warning signs” ahead of Tyler Robinson’s assassination of Charlie Kirk: "There appeared to have been multiple warning signs." "It appears from the data we've accumulated and the channel and that that that note, which we have some evidence may have existed before based on the communications in that channel, that his target was obviously going to be Charlie and that people knew in advance." "There were people in his network, friends and family, who had stated that he had become more political, that he had become at some parts, I believe some of his coworkers had stated that he had kind of detached himself when the topic of politics came up and walked away from them."

BREAKING: FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino confirms there were “multiple warning signs” ahead of Tyler Robinson’s assassination of Charlie Kirk: "There appeared to have been multiple warning signs." "It appears from the data we've accumulated and the channel and that that that note, which we have some evidence may have existed before based on the communications in that channel, that his target was obviously going to be Charlie and that people knew in advance." "There were people in his network, friends and family, who had stated that he had become more political, that he had become at some parts, I believe some of his coworkers had stated that he had kind of detached himself when the topic of politics came up and walked away from them."

Benny Johnson

1,239,467 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

*EXCLUSIVE* British TV host of GB News channel #DanWootton has just announced on live television that he now believes in Michael Jackson’s innocence and that he was “completely snookered” by the manipulation of Leaving Neverland. He said this in an interview with US News host Megyn Kelly only moments ago (below). To many fans and supporters of MJ’s innocence in the global community, this will never be enough to forgive Wootton for his vile condemnation of Michael in the fallout of LN’s release - using a horrendous term to describe him on live television. It was utterly deplorable. Unforgivable to the many who watched it. The team at MJI are relieved that he has finally seen the error of his ways and we hope that he continues to speak out publicly about the fraudulent efforts by Channel 4 and Dan Reed to manipulate viewers into believing two proven liars claims they had been victims of abuse. When in reality they had schemed together to extort money from MJ’s Estate, exploiting the fact that he is not here to defend himself. Maybe it was the accusations that Wootton himself experienced recently that helped him see the error of his ways - to be on the receiving end of such heinous claims? Thank you #MegynKelly for your efforts in continuing to fight against these false accusations in the hope that one day these liars can be brought to justice for all the damage they have done to #MichaelJackson’s family. Dan Wootton GB News #MJInnocent ✊🏾

EXCLUSIVE British TV host of GB News channel #DanWootton has just announced on live television that he now believes in Michael Jackson’s innocence and that he was “completely snookered” by the manipulation of Leaving Neverland. He said this in an interview with US News host Megyn Kelly only moments ago (below). To many fans and supporters of MJ’s innocence in the global community, this will never be enough to forgive Wootton for his vile condemnation of Michael in the fallout of LN’s release - using a horrendous term to describe him on live television. It was utterly deplorable. Unforgivable to the many who watched it. The team at MJI are relieved that he has finally seen the error of his ways and we hope that he continues to speak out publicly about the fraudulent efforts by Channel 4 and Dan Reed to manipulate viewers into believing two proven liars claims they had been victims of abuse. When in reality they had schemed together to extort money from MJ’s Estate, exploiting the fact that he is not here to defend himself. Maybe it was the accusations that Wootton himself experienced recently that helped him see the error of his ways - to be on the receiving end of such heinous claims? Thank you #MegynKelly for your efforts in continuing to fight against these false accusations in the hope that one day these liars can be brought to justice for all the damage they have done to #MichaelJackson’s family. Dan Wootton GB News #MJInnocent ✊🏾

#MJINNOCENT

273,843 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

#jinxmanhwa I want to talk about the person in this video because she's been criticizing Jinx since the beginning, and I bet most of the other critics think the same way or something similar. First of all, those of us who have been harshly criticized since the manhwa started are the people who like Jinx and enjoy reading it. Jinx's haters are literally the ones who get the most support on all social media. You literally just have to make a post saying you hate Jinx and you'll get thousands of likes… Second, why are you getting so worked up over a simple BL manhwa? It's a FICTIONAL STORY. What the author wants to happen will happen, and in the way she wants. Why would you have to write thousands of academic analyses and even theses criticizing Mingwa's work to the point of exhaustion? You can just say you don't like Jinx and leave it, but you decide to make all this drama? Can't you stand to see an author achieve so much success? Third, chapter 91 wasn't bad at all. You wonder, "How is it possible that Dan has feelings for Jaekyung? When did he develop them?" And I ask myself... haven't we been seeing those feelings develop for 91 chapters? Maybe it's because Jaekyung has been the only person who has consistently cared for Dan and never left him alone? Wasn't Kim Dan a lonely person without any support, who literally wondered in the first chapter of the manhwa if he would ever have someone to support him? Jaekyung has been many things to Dan, both good and bad, but you can't deny that it's entirely possible that Dan has fallen in love with Jaekyung. 🤷‍♀️ Do you think the chapter was bad just because Dan took the initiative for once and is actually doing something he desperately wants? The fact that Kim Dan is starting to gain confidence and let go without holding back is a huge step forward for the character, and I don't understand why you'd be so upset about it… Does it bother you that Jaekyung started drinking a little in that episode? Jaekyung literally starts to feel depressed; he's completely devastated after realizing the consequences of his actions. He can't forgive himself and hates himself. Obviously, he was going to be sad and down at that moment. What did you expect, that he'd talk to Dan like some kind of communication expert? Jaekyung's character is literally defined by being terrible at communicating. The guy doesn't know how to express himself, and he gets frustrated when he has to. Obviously, he had to drink some alcohol.

#jinxmanhwa I want to talk about the person in this video because she's been criticizing Jinx since the beginning, and I bet most of the other critics think the same way or something similar. First of all, those of us who have been harshly criticized since the manhwa started are the people who like Jinx and enjoy reading it. Jinx's haters are literally the ones who get the most support on all social media. You literally just have to make a post saying you hate Jinx and you'll get thousands of likes… Second, why are you getting so worked up over a simple BL manhwa? It's a FICTIONAL STORY. What the author wants to happen will happen, and in the way she wants. Why would you have to write thousands of academic analyses and even theses criticizing Mingwa's work to the point of exhaustion? You can just say you don't like Jinx and leave it, but you decide to make all this drama? Can't you stand to see an author achieve so much success? Third, chapter 91 wasn't bad at all. You wonder, "How is it possible that Dan has feelings for Jaekyung? When did he develop them?" And I ask myself... haven't we been seeing those feelings develop for 91 chapters? Maybe it's because Jaekyung has been the only person who has consistently cared for Dan and never left him alone? Wasn't Kim Dan a lonely person without any support, who literally wondered in the first chapter of the manhwa if he would ever have someone to support him? Jaekyung has been many things to Dan, both good and bad, but you can't deny that it's entirely possible that Dan has fallen in love with Jaekyung. 🤷‍♀️ Do you think the chapter was bad just because Dan took the initiative for once and is actually doing something he desperately wants? The fact that Kim Dan is starting to gain confidence and let go without holding back is a huge step forward for the character, and I don't understand why you'd be so upset about it… Does it bother you that Jaekyung started drinking a little in that episode? Jaekyung literally starts to feel depressed; he's completely devastated after realizing the consequences of his actions. He can't forgive himself and hates himself. Obviously, he was going to be sad and down at that moment. What did you expect, that he'd talk to Dan like some kind of communication expert? Jaekyung's character is literally defined by being terrible at communicating. The guy doesn't know how to express himself, and he gets frustrated when he has to. Obviously, he had to drink some alcohol.

Ccyellow

28,655 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten