Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

1984: AIPAC published it’s college guide to censor anti-Israel speech 2010: AIPAC trains Zionist students to takeover their campus government just like Congress & reverse student votes on Israel boycott 2026: AIPAC gets House to ban Israel boycott

29,936 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

The manufactured meltdown over Rula Jebreal's "AIPAC monkey" gaffe is a cynical psy-op designed to bury the grassroots rebellion against one of the Israel lobby's most critical assets. Grassroots Democrats are in open revolt against Israel, AIPAC and the Gaza genocide, and there is no one more poised to stomp on their faces than Hakeem Jeffries. As the recipient of over $1.4 million in Israel lobby donations, he's one of AIPAC's most important investments. Under no circumstances can he afford to defy the all-White cast of Jewish supremacist millionaires and billionaires who fueled his rise. Jeffries is so thoroughly controlled by Zionist forces that he once paid tribute to apartheid Israel by paraphrasing George Wallace's infamous "segregation forever" inaugural address. He knew exactly what he was doing, and which elements he was pandering to. For her part, Rula Jebreal has no formal role in the Democratic Party, and negligible influence. She's a Palestinian pundit who made her now-notorious comments on the podcast of Wajahat Ali, a Muslim Democratic operative who's generally parotted the pro-war positions of party leadership, but who's drawn the line at the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. The two instantly became punching bags for the most opportunistic factions of Black misleadership, who depend on AIPAC and corporate America to sustain their positions. This includes much of the Congressional Black Caucus, which has traditionally functioned as a mechanism for elite control of Black politics. (Browse the corporate advisory council on the CBC Foundation's website for a quick look at who pulls its strings). If and when Jeffries becomes House Speaker after November, he will present his rise as a landmark of racial progress, and the ratification of his personal vision. But like Barack Obama, whose career was propelled by a pair of wealthy pro-Israel Chicagoland families, Jeffries owes the Zionist billionaire class for his place in history. As Speaker, Jeffries will therefore be expected to ram through wildly unpopular bills supplying arms and aid to Israel's genocide machine, cancelling free speech on campus, and further integrating Israel's military-intelligence apparatus with America's. By making road kill out of Rula and Waj, Jeffries' backers hope to terrify his grassroots opposition into silence. If you even refer to him as AIPAC Shakur, or describe him as a servant of AIPAC, the toxic remnants of KHive will brand you as the bastard love child of Strom Thurmond and Eva Braun, and the CBC and Neera Tanden will boost their attacks in tandem with the NY Post. The DSA, Abdul Seyed, Zohran, and everyone in between have been delivered with marching orders: fall back on the whole Gaza genocide thing, stay in your lane, and most importantly, don't knock the hustle.

Max Blumenthal

134,045 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

BREAKING: FIRE and College Pulse have just released the 2025 College Free Speech Rankings. Surveying 58K+ students from 257 institutions, the results find that free speech has been threatened in historic ways since the Israel-Hamas war began. Expand to learn more ⬇️ 🟡 UVA was ranked as this year’s best school for free speech! Michigan Technological University, Florida State University, Eastern Kentucky University, and Georgia Tech round out the top five. 🔴 Harvard University is ranked as the worst school for free speech for the second year in a row. Columbia University and New York University round out the bottom three — each earning an “abysmal” rating. 🔴 Campus deplatforming attempts spiked by 400% since Hamas’ October 7th attack on Israel. 🔴 7 out of 10 students are uncomfortable publicly disagreeing with a professor about a controversial political topic. 🔴 54% of students report it’s difficult to talk about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. On 17 campuses where this issue was especially contentious, 75% or more marked the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as difficult to discuss. 🔴 1 in 4 students said it was unclear whether their college administration protects free speech. 🔴 1/3 of students approve of the use of violence at least “rarely” to stop campus speakers. 🔴 7 out of 10 students say it's at least “rarely okay” to shout down a speaker. Given all of this, it is unsurprising that American confidence in higher education is at a record low.

FIRE

166,545 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Everyone better brace themselves. Q always told us they were saving Israel for last for a very specific reason. President Nixon was going to expose how the MOSSAD Zionist Jews were drugging people and then those people were raping children and the politicians were being controlled by the MOSSAD Zionist Jews blackmailing the politicians and telling the politicians they would tell and show proof if they didn't do what the Zionist Mossad Jews in Israel ordered them to do. President Nixon had the proof. That's what it was about. Them stealing the proof. So they made Nixon out like the villain so no one would believe him. They usually killed those that were going to expose them. President John Fitzgerald Kennedy required the Zionist American Council to register as foreign agents and then they changed the name to AIPAC and are STILL not registered as foreign agents. AIPAC bought and paid for these TREASONEOUS politicians in our Capitol. They do not Represent us and they do whatever Israel wants. We have a bunch of corrupt TREASONEOUS politicians in our Capitol with dual citizenship with Israel. This literally means they have allegiance to two countries. This cannot be allowed in our NEW REPUBLIC. WE NEED AN AMENDMENT TO PREVENT THAT IN OUR NEW REPUBLIC! "I took an oath to support and defend the CONSTITUTION against all enemies foreign and domestic. I refused to walk down from those stairs, outside of the Capitol, on January 6, 2021, because I believe with, my whole heart and soul, and with every fiber of my being, that we have politicians inside of our Capitol that are DOMESTIC ENEMIES to OUR REPUBLIC masquerading as our Representatives." Micki Lynn Larson-Olson AKA QPATRIOT 21 years United States Air Force Iraq War Veteran Navy Mom PARDONED January 6th inmate 376303. President Donald J. Trump Donald J. Trump il Donaldo Trumpo Dan Scavino Jr.🇺🇸🦅 Elon Musk Grasshopper And We Know©🇺🇸 Joe Rogan Podcast News @TuckerCNews Jesse Watters The White House House Republicans House Democrats Speaker Mike Johnson Leader John Thune @SecDef ( Parody ) John Denver ✌️ OGAn0n661 Weasel Repair Man! Pop goes the weasel! Pam Goose realPeacQck 🩵🕊🩵🙏 HOTROD Kimmie Sue_Q

Micki Larson-Olson

21,080 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Tucker: "Neocons" like Ben Shapiro only care about money for Israel. Fuentes: Jews like Shapiro are only "here" to... get money for Israel. Tucker didn't just interview Fuentes; he has adopted his language and framing, but with "neocons" instead of Jews. In the clips below, both use ad hominem attacks to escape engaging any actual argument over the efficacy of U.S. support for Israel. Of course, Fuentes and Tucker utilize the oldest of anti-Semitic tropes, the notion of Jews (or "neocons") having dual loyalties, which has been weaponized for thousands of years to sow distrust and eventually hatred for thousands of years. Opposing financial support of Israel is an entirely legitimate position that can easily be justified using conservative principles. Plenty of conservatives have been opposed to the U.S. annual military aid to Israel, including figures as diverse as Rand Paul and, yes, Ben Shapiro. Maybe that's why the primary defense of Tucker by Megyn Kelly and others has been that he's somehow just "criticizing Israel." But when Fuentes said in 2023 that Shapiro, Dennis Prager, Mark Levin, and Joel Pollak "are running American media" and are "here (apparently living in the U.S.) to make sure Americans support the country they really care about," what possible argument is he making about policy? The same holds true when Tucker Carlson just this month said that "Shapiro and all of these guys" don't "care" about their own audiences "at all" (or, by implication, America at large) because their supposed tactic is "give us money for our preferred little country, or we're going to denounce you!" Put another way, what could Fuentes or Tucker possibly be trying to advance besides the notion that the views of Shapiro/Jews/"neocons" should not be trusted on any issue, even those having nothing to do with Israel?

Joel Mowbray

165,513 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce