Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

1—Rula Jebreal used racist language. She was wrong. She instantly apologized. 2—When Congress enters, incl. Randy Fine commending CBC—it’s NOT about those words 3—It’s her OTHER words on Israeli g-cide—incl. Anti-Black racism she/her family faced growing up as Afro-Palestinian (video) & her critique on the sterilization of Ethiopian Jews...

ChuckModi1's profile picture

#StopCopCity

67,395 subscribers

17,780 просмотров • 13 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Marc Lamont Hill and the Joe Budden Podcast managed to accuse Caitlin Clark’s supporters of racism... and then immediately began searching her face for evidence that she might secretly be racist. “She got the look.” “She got that nose.” “A racist nose.” They laughed while racially profiling a 24-year-old woman based on her physical features, called her an “asshole,” labeled her a “Karen” and speculated that she might be privately racist... without producing a single racist word or action from her. This is bigotry. Imagine a group of white commentators examining a Black athlete’s nose, declaring that she “looked racist” and laughing about the supposed racial meaning of her facial features. Every participant would be condemned... and deservedly so. The standard does not change because Caitlin Clark is white or because the people ridiculing her believe themselves incapable of prejudice. They began by claiming the conversation surrounding Clark “feels racist.” Then, within seconds, they demonstrated exactly what racial prejudice sounds like: reducing someone to her appearance, assigning character to her facial features and convicting her of beliefs for which there is no evidence. Caitlin Clark has never needed anyone to invent racism on her behalf. But she should not be expected to absorb it quietly simply because it comes from the culturally approved direction. The WNBA has repeatedly issued statements condemning racism, hatred and personal attacks when other players have been targeted. We now await the same unequivocal defense of Caitlin Clark. No qualifiers. No silence. No convenient distinction based on the race of the victim. If the league’s principles are genuine, they must apply universally. Racially profiling a woman by examining her face, mocking her nose and suggesting that she “looks racist” is racial prejudice... regardless of who says it or in which direction it travels. Marc Lamont Hill wanted to discuss America’s most “unlikable” athletes. He may want to replay this segment and reconsider who is the most unlikable. The WNBA has spent years demanding that fans believe racism is never acceptable. This is its opportunity to prove it. Because if the WNBA condemns racism only when the victim fits its preferred narrative, it is not opposing racism.
1:33

Marc Lamont Hill and the Joe Budden Podcast managed to accuse Caitlin Clark’s supporters of racism... and then immediately began searching her face for evidence that she might secretly be racist. “She got the look.” “She got that nose.” “A racist nose.” They laughed while racially profiling a 24-year-old woman based on her physical features, called her an “asshole,” labeled her a “Karen” and speculated that she might be privately racist... without producing a single racist word or action from her. This is bigotry. Imagine a group of white commentators examining a Black athlete’s nose, declaring that she “looked racist” and laughing about the supposed racial meaning of her facial features. Every participant would be condemned... and deservedly so. The standard does not change because Caitlin Clark is white or because the people ridiculing her believe themselves incapable of prejudice. They began by claiming the conversation surrounding Clark “feels racist.” Then, within seconds, they demonstrated exactly what racial prejudice sounds like: reducing someone to her appearance, assigning character to her facial features and convicting her of beliefs for which there is no evidence. Caitlin Clark has never needed anyone to invent racism on her behalf. But she should not be expected to absorb it quietly simply because it comes from the culturally approved direction. The WNBA has repeatedly issued statements condemning racism, hatred and personal attacks when other players have been targeted. We now await the same unequivocal defense of Caitlin Clark. No qualifiers. No silence. No convenient distinction based on the race of the victim. If the league’s principles are genuine, they must apply universally. Racially profiling a woman by examining her face, mocking her nose and suggesting that she “looks racist” is racial prejudice... regardless of who says it or in which direction it travels. Marc Lamont Hill wanted to discuss America’s most “unlikable” athletes. He may want to replay this segment and reconsider who is the most unlikable. The WNBA has spent years demanding that fans believe racism is never acceptable. This is its opportunity to prove it. Because if the WNBA condemns racism only when the victim fits its preferred narrative, it is not opposing racism.

Sports Patriot

20,019 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Frances has blocked me because she knows I am telling the truth. I watched the video in full and here is the clip in question. While it is true that *earlier* in the video, Ash defined antisemitism as racism - with specific mention to the Holocaust and the fact that Jews are still targeted for violence (although no reference to just how disproportionately) - she does not rebuke Myriam’s description of ‘hyper-privileged’ Jew, nor does she contest the dangerous antisemitic ideology that Jews were siphoning funds from their more deserving compatriots. Instead, as you can see, she ignores it completely. Instead, she focuses on Myriam’s final point (that the interests of the Jewish community were overriding the interests of other more deserving groups and that said interests aligned with ‘political and economic elites’ and that of a ‘genocidal government’) and says ‘but I think this point is the really really important one’. She then lambastes the Jewish community for its conduct towards anti-Zionist Jews, before continuing to say that ‘pro-Israel advocacy’ is racism presenting itself as anti-racism, before equating it with people who lament about anti-white racism. It’s all there. Watch it and judge for yourself. Everything I said stands: I do not believe Ash is an antisemite and indeed received significant pushback for being overly charitable to her in my original post. My sole point was that she did not challenge the specific Nazi-esque rhetoric of Jews being a ‘hyper-privileged’ group that is commandeering State funds (which are used for tragically essential security purposes) from the more deserving in society. She did not. As I said, this is how extreme antisemitic ideologies are normalised.
2:39

Frances has blocked me because she knows I am telling the truth. I watched the video in full and here is the clip in question. While it is true that *earlier* in the video, Ash defined antisemitism as racism - with specific mention to the Holocaust and the fact that Jews are still targeted for violence (although no reference to just how disproportionately) - she does not rebuke Myriam’s description of ‘hyper-privileged’ Jew, nor does she contest the dangerous antisemitic ideology that Jews were siphoning funds from their more deserving compatriots. Instead, as you can see, she ignores it completely. Instead, she focuses on Myriam’s final point (that the interests of the Jewish community were overriding the interests of other more deserving groups and that said interests aligned with ‘political and economic elites’ and that of a ‘genocidal government’) and says ‘but I think this point is the really really important one’. She then lambastes the Jewish community for its conduct towards anti-Zionist Jews, before continuing to say that ‘pro-Israel advocacy’ is racism presenting itself as anti-racism, before equating it with people who lament about anti-white racism. It’s all there. Watch it and judge for yourself. Everything I said stands: I do not believe Ash is an antisemite and indeed received significant pushback for being overly charitable to her in my original post. My sole point was that she did not challenge the specific Nazi-esque rhetoric of Jews being a ‘hyper-privileged’ group that is commandeering State funds (which are used for tragically essential security purposes) from the more deserving in society. She did not. As I said, this is how extreme antisemitic ideologies are normalised.

Rachel Moiselle

21,954 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Nomy lost her mother when she was just 11 years old. Her mum was a single mum and the only parent that she knew. Experiencing grief at such a young age is not something that is easy to navigate, in fact you never fully heal from it. This is why she keeps to herself because she has had to navigate this world on her own. She has had disagreements with housemates and she has never insulted anyone so passionately. Saying anything about her mum is a trigger and calling her a motherless hoe is definitely something that she wouldn’t take lightly. Using the fact that someone has lost a parent as an insult is extremely painful. No one would react positively to that. All she wishes for is to see her mum again and coming at her because of her mum’s death is a big trigger. This is why she refused to open up, somehow the housemates got wind of the fact that her mum is not alive and want to use it against her. Disagreements would always occur, but you cannot control how the other party would react. Cc: Big Brother Naija #BBNaija #NomyNation #Nomy
0:56

Nomy lost her mother when she was just 11 years old. Her mum was a single mum and the only parent that she knew. Experiencing grief at such a young age is not something that is easy to navigate, in fact you never fully heal from it. This is why she keeps to herself because she has had to navigate this world on her own. She has had disagreements with housemates and she has never insulted anyone so passionately. Saying anything about her mum is a trigger and calling her a motherless hoe is definitely something that she wouldn’t take lightly. Using the fact that someone has lost a parent as an insult is extremely painful. No one would react positively to that. All she wishes for is to see her mum again and coming at her because of her mum’s death is a big trigger. This is why she refused to open up, somehow the housemates got wind of the fact that her mum is not alive and want to use it against her. Disagreements would always occur, but you cannot control how the other party would react. Cc: Big Brother Naija #BBNaija #NomyNation #Nomy

NOMY #BBNaija

150,275 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I will address this one last time because I’m tired of seeing y’all tear myself and my good friend down. Yesterday afternoon, someone on my campaign staff sent out a message dictated by me on the wrong account. Mistakes happen. But do not get it twisted, I stand by every word of that message: - Kamala Harris is a fraud - as a Black woman who has been Black all her life, I will NOT be voting for her. The Left is desperate to attack that message by focusing on the error rather than on the substance. I’m not surprised by that one bit. They hate the fact Black Republican women exist. @JoeyMannarinoUS is a friend who has helped on my campaign and a politics advisor to me for years, but only Lavern Spicer speaks for Lavern Spicer. All the words you see on my page are from me. It is disgusting and racist to see people say my words are from a White man just so that they can discredit me and also try to harm his character and paint him as a racist. I stand by my friends - Joey is not and has never been racist. Wake up and understand that Black people are not falling for Kamala Harris and her nonsense. I cannot wait to vote for Donald J Trump again in November - and no Leftist conspiracy theory can stop that!
3:21

I will address this one last time because I’m tired of seeing y’all tear myself and my good friend down. Yesterday afternoon, someone on my campaign staff sent out a message dictated by me on the wrong account. Mistakes happen. But do not get it twisted, I stand by every word of that message: - Kamala Harris is a fraud - as a Black woman who has been Black all her life, I will NOT be voting for her. The Left is desperate to attack that message by focusing on the error rather than on the substance. I’m not surprised by that one bit. They hate the fact Black Republican women exist. @JoeyMannarinoUS is a friend who has helped on my campaign and a politics advisor to me for years, but only Lavern Spicer speaks for Lavern Spicer. All the words you see on my page are from me. It is disgusting and racist to see people say my words are from a White man just so that they can discredit me and also try to harm his character and paint him as a racist. I stand by my friends - Joey is not and has never been racist. Wake up and understand that Black people are not falling for Kamala Harris and her nonsense. I cannot wait to vote for Donald J Trump again in November - and no Leftist conspiracy theory can stop that!

Lavern Spicer 🇺🇸

838,611 просмотров • 2 лет назад

“I made that statement, and the White House hasn’t disputed it!” “The silence on things that are just so easy to respond to. Like if someone messaged me and said, ‘hey Candace, we heard that back when you were working in New York City that you had keys to a white house and you were ushering in models,’ I’d be like, ‘I have no idea what you’re talking about. This is not true.’ Erika’s not doing that!” One thing Candace hates more than anything else—even more than people laughing at or making jokes about her—is when big-name people ignore her. She CANNOT STAND that Erika is currently ignoring her and won’t respond to questions any longer, just like she has never been able to stand that the White House didn’t make a statement on her allegations that the Macrons took a hit out on her life as well as the fact that Trump hasn’t said anything about the Macrons suing her She can’t stand it. She tries to paint their silence as evidence of their guilt (because that’s just how dishonest and manipulative she is), but you can tell it’s eating her up inside by the way she references it over and over and over again for weeks and months now.
0:53

“I made that statement, and the White House hasn’t disputed it!” “The silence on things that are just so easy to respond to. Like if someone messaged me and said, ‘hey Candace, we heard that back when you were working in New York City that you had keys to a white house and you were ushering in models,’ I’d be like, ‘I have no idea what you’re talking about. This is not true.’ Erika’s not doing that!” One thing Candace hates more than anything else—even more than people laughing at or making jokes about her—is when big-name people ignore her. She CANNOT STAND that Erika is currently ignoring her and won’t respond to questions any longer, just like she has never been able to stand that the White House didn’t make a statement on her allegations that the Macrons took a hit out on her life as well as the fact that Trump hasn’t said anything about the Macrons suing her She can’t stand it. She tries to paint their silence as evidence of their guilt (because that’s just how dishonest and manipulative she is), but you can tell it’s eating her up inside by the way she references it over and over and over again for weeks and months now.

Natalie Jean Beisner

29,746 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

#山根涼羽 Zunchan was clarifying something she said in her seitansai speech that seems to have been misunderstood after only a certain part was clipped and shared online. What she meant was never that AKB was “better” than KLP, or that she was criticizing KLP, Malaysia, or the people around her there. She explained that she is genuinely grateful for the environment she had in KLP, and at the same time, her experience in Malaysia made her realize how many things in AKB she had previously taken for granted. With KLP, they were essentially building a 48 Group and its idol culture from the ground up in a place where that system and environment were not already established. There were a lot of fun experiences, but naturally there were also difficult things that came with having to create something from scratch. Because she went through that experience, when she returned to AKB, she became more aware of all the things that were already established and prepared for the members there, and it made her feel grateful for the AKB environment as well. She specifically emphasized that this was NOT about saying one place was better than the other. She said that both places were wonderful to her, both were places she loved, and that was what she had wanted to convey. She also mentioned that some Malaysian fans had misunderstood what she meant, and clarified that she never intended for her words to be used to attack anyone. So I hope people can listen to what she is actually saying here rather than judging her based only on a clipped portion of her speech. Her point was about gaining a new appreciation for both environments through her experiences in each of them, not putting one down to praise the other.
1:47

#山根涼羽 Zunchan was clarifying something she said in her seitansai speech that seems to have been misunderstood after only a certain part was clipped and shared online. What she meant was never that AKB was “better” than KLP, or that she was criticizing KLP, Malaysia, or the people around her there. She explained that she is genuinely grateful for the environment she had in KLP, and at the same time, her experience in Malaysia made her realize how many things in AKB she had previously taken for granted. With KLP, they were essentially building a 48 Group and its idol culture from the ground up in a place where that system and environment were not already established. There were a lot of fun experiences, but naturally there were also difficult things that came with having to create something from scratch. Because she went through that experience, when she returned to AKB, she became more aware of all the things that were already established and prepared for the members there, and it made her feel grateful for the AKB environment as well. She specifically emphasized that this was NOT about saying one place was better than the other. She said that both places were wonderful to her, both were places she loved, and that was what she had wanted to convey. She also mentioned that some Malaysian fans had misunderstood what she meant, and clarified that she never intended for her words to be used to attack anyone. So I hope people can listen to what she is actually saying here rather than judging her based only on a clipped portion of her speech. Her point was about gaining a new appreciation for both environments through her experiences in each of them, not putting one down to praise the other.

Tina 🍉

17,578 просмотров • 24 дней назад

#Kwibuka32 Mimi TESTIMONY ———————————————— Her name is Mimi. She survived the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda because of the courage and humanity of a man named Ndahigwa. During those dark days, Mimi was found as an infant, still breastfeeding from her mother—who had been brutally killed and lay among piles of bodies at Saint Famille, on the primary school football field. It was a heartbreaking and unimaginable scene, one that no child should ever be part of. Yet, from that tragedy, a life was saved. Ndahigwa, who was not himself targeted during the genocide and worked with the Red Cross, chose compassion over fear. In a time when many turned away, he stepped forward. He rescued Mimi and raised her as his own, caring for her from infancy through adulthood. He gave her not only a chance to live, but a chance to grow, to be loved, and to belong. He stood by her side through the years, supporting her until she eventually got married. However, her marriage did not last, as her husband constantly pressured and mistreated her, questioning her about a family she never had the chance to know. Today, Mimi is alive, but she lives with a deep and painful absence—she does not know her biological family, nor does she have any known relatives. She carries unanswered questions about her identity and her roots. With hope in her heart, she is reaching out to anyone who might recognize her story or have any information about her family, asking for help in reconnecting with her origins. At the same time, Mimi is a mother, doing her best to raise her children under difficult circumstances. She is struggling financially and humbly asks for support from anyone who is able to help, no matter how small the contribution. Her story is one of survival, loss, love, and resilience. And today, she is not only searching for her past—but also fighting to build a better future for her children.
8:41

#Kwibuka32 Mimi TESTIMONY ———————————————— Her name is Mimi. She survived the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda because of the courage and humanity of a man named Ndahigwa. During those dark days, Mimi was found as an infant, still breastfeeding from her mother—who had been brutally killed and lay among piles of bodies at Saint Famille, on the primary school football field. It was a heartbreaking and unimaginable scene, one that no child should ever be part of. Yet, from that tragedy, a life was saved. Ndahigwa, who was not himself targeted during the genocide and worked with the Red Cross, chose compassion over fear. In a time when many turned away, he stepped forward. He rescued Mimi and raised her as his own, caring for her from infancy through adulthood. He gave her not only a chance to live, but a chance to grow, to be loved, and to belong. He stood by her side through the years, supporting her until she eventually got married. However, her marriage did not last, as her husband constantly pressured and mistreated her, questioning her about a family she never had the chance to know. Today, Mimi is alive, but she lives with a deep and painful absence—she does not know her biological family, nor does she have any known relatives. She carries unanswered questions about her identity and her roots. With hope in her heart, she is reaching out to anyone who might recognize her story or have any information about her family, asking for help in reconnecting with her origins. At the same time, Mimi is a mother, doing her best to raise her children under difficult circumstances. She is struggling financially and humbly asks for support from anyone who is able to help, no matter how small the contribution. Her story is one of survival, loss, love, and resilience. And today, she is not only searching for her past—but also fighting to build a better future for her children.

Sniper

13,497 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Thank you Evans for this. I have always said this and I love that more people are seeing it as well. When Meg lied on Oprah that a senior royal has worried about what colour of skin Archie would be, I always said It was herself she was talking about. Narcissists ALWAYS accuse their victims of doing what they do themselves. They projects constantly. Every accusation is a self confession and you can clearly see Meg's desperation to be seen as a White british royal; She is desperate🔥 That is why she writes the titles everywhere even on her own clothes and front door rug🤡 She is not trying to be relatable, she treats americans like "illiterate villagers"; and she sees herself as the british royal there to teach them about life and impress her "Lofty" knowledge on "peasant americans." That is how she treated her guests who all had to sing how pretty she is and how great she is; that is how she treats Serena and all her "Friends". She is superior, they are there to do her bidding and worship her😏 Yet the general public can see what an incredibly insecure woman she is. She has done everything she could to "white pass" and erased her black carribean roots from her mother. At one point Meg even claimed yo be italian; Anything but accepting her afro carribean and american roots🤦🏽‍♀️ She only use Doria as a "black card" when she needs to attack the RF and cosplay a victim of Racism. But in real life Meghan is desperate to be seen as a white british royal. She is so desperate that she sat on Drew Barrymore show and pretended that her children, born and raise in the US; by an american mother and a black carribean grandmother "Still have british accent" STILL?!!!🤡 The boy left the UK when he was 6 months and has never been back. The daughter was born in the US and Has never been to the UK. Harry's british accent has become so washed out it is embarrassing. So what British Accent do they STILL have?!🤡 This donkey is so delusional and obsessed with Great Britian, it is embarrasing how pathologically she lies. Meghan has never taken pride in her black features: she had surgery to correct her nose and she permanently altered her curls chemically to look more White. She has one daughter and did not bother to name that daughter after her black mother or any black family member or black feminists. She picked two white british women🤡 More to the point, while living in California, she dresses or rather photoshop that girl wearing english garments with tights exactly like Princess Charlotte dressed as a little girl. But remember this is the Meghan who refused and mocked Catherine for wanting the bridesmaids to wear tights at her wedding🤡 Meg has never praised Archie's features or brown eyes, but she has been gushing about her daughter blue eyes "like Diana". She has never praised ANY feature that could be associated with the black skin🔥 But she quasi-orgasmed on Netflix about her daughter blue eyes and red hair Screaming "Blue blue blue eyes!"🤦🏽‍♀️ My goodness... how embarrasing. No Meg has never wanted to be relatable or black; she wants to feel superior and wants to be identified as a white british royal. This is why she clinge to those titles like glue. She takes zero pride in her black caribbean or american roots; None. Yes, she was the one who worried, Doria's blood would come through and show in her children🤡 She sat there days and nights worrying Archie might not be white enough to fit her ideal of the perfect little white boy...maybe blond with "blue, blue, blue eyes" looking so eerily like Diana..😏☕️ 📹Queer Lips of Truth II 🇸🇱🇬🇧
1:36

Thank you Evans for this. I have always said this and I love that more people are seeing it as well. When Meg lied on Oprah that a senior royal has worried about what colour of skin Archie would be, I always said It was herself she was talking about. Narcissists ALWAYS accuse their victims of doing what they do themselves. They projects constantly. Every accusation is a self confession and you can clearly see Meg's desperation to be seen as a White british royal; She is desperate🔥 That is why she writes the titles everywhere even on her own clothes and front door rug🤡 She is not trying to be relatable, she treats americans like "illiterate villagers"; and she sees herself as the british royal there to teach them about life and impress her "Lofty" knowledge on "peasant americans." That is how she treated her guests who all had to sing how pretty she is and how great she is; that is how she treats Serena and all her "Friends". She is superior, they are there to do her bidding and worship her😏 Yet the general public can see what an incredibly insecure woman she is. She has done everything she could to "white pass" and erased her black carribean roots from her mother. At one point Meg even claimed yo be italian; Anything but accepting her afro carribean and american roots🤦🏽‍♀️ She only use Doria as a "black card" when she needs to attack the RF and cosplay a victim of Racism. But in real life Meghan is desperate to be seen as a white british royal. She is so desperate that she sat on Drew Barrymore show and pretended that her children, born and raise in the US; by an american mother and a black carribean grandmother "Still have british accent" STILL?!!!🤡 The boy left the UK when he was 6 months and has never been back. The daughter was born in the US and Has never been to the UK. Harry's british accent has become so washed out it is embarrassing. So what British Accent do they STILL have?!🤡 This donkey is so delusional and obsessed with Great Britian, it is embarrasing how pathologically she lies. Meghan has never taken pride in her black features: she had surgery to correct her nose and she permanently altered her curls chemically to look more White. She has one daughter and did not bother to name that daughter after her black mother or any black family member or black feminists. She picked two white british women🤡 More to the point, while living in California, she dresses or rather photoshop that girl wearing english garments with tights exactly like Princess Charlotte dressed as a little girl. But remember this is the Meghan who refused and mocked Catherine for wanting the bridesmaids to wear tights at her wedding🤡 Meg has never praised Archie's features or brown eyes, but she has been gushing about her daughter blue eyes "like Diana". She has never praised ANY feature that could be associated with the black skin🔥 But she quasi-orgasmed on Netflix about her daughter blue eyes and red hair Screaming "Blue blue blue eyes!"🤦🏽‍♀️ My goodness... how embarrasing. No Meg has never wanted to be relatable or black; she wants to feel superior and wants to be identified as a white british royal. This is why she clinge to those titles like glue. She takes zero pride in her black caribbean or american roots; None. Yes, she was the one who worried, Doria's blood would come through and show in her children🤡 She sat there days and nights worrying Archie might not be white enough to fit her ideal of the perfect little white boy...maybe blond with "blue, blue, blue eyes" looking so eerily like Diana..😏☕️ 📹Queer Lips of Truth II 🇸🇱🇬🇧

Canellecitadelle

49,242 просмотров • 1 год назад

Sara Nelson, head of the Association of Flight Attendants union, talks about plans to shut down critical infrastructure as part of the insurgency against ICE. What she describes is a textbook case of how unions and other civic organizations use the power of their membership to join insurgencies. "I called on the labor movement to talk about a general strike" in solidarity with the operation against ICE, Nelson says in this February 1 Zoom call. The general strike is planned to take place on May 1, which is International Workers Day (more on that later). What she Nelson says is revealing. It shows the raw emotion and ideological extremism of the flight attendants' union, and how the union leadership exploits the membership to force a strike to support the anti-ICE operation. Pay attention to her use of words: "General strike." In revolutionary practice, a general strike is not to meet economic or labor demands, but to challenge and overthrow the political and economic order by paralyzing the economy and imposing hardship on the public. This is a term of insurrection or insurgency. It creates parallel power structures. Leon Trotsky viewed general strikes as the last step before armed insurrection. "Capitalism unchecked." Anarchists and Marxists have different views of this term, but in general, the term is understood to mean that capitalism is irredeemably evil and oppressive, and that oppression must be resisted or "checked." It does not mean checks and balances in the American sense. It implies the urgency of action to check the oppressor. Repetition of "fight" and "demand." Working-class movements that exhort people to "fight" and "demand" are calling for class struggle against established institutions. The words are not metaphors, but calls for direct action to build toward the overthrow of existing society. Demands are ultimatums that provide focus for the fight. "Jacobin." Nelson recommends a reading from the website about unions organizing against ICE. The Jacobins were he most extreme element of the French Revolution, the Robespierre faction that orchestrated The Terror and the mass beheadings with the guillotine. Marx, Engels, and Lenin praised the Jacobins. In her 11-minute monologue, Nelson dwells heavily on working class history, tying an industry-specific "safety strike" to labor conflicts from 1981 and 1914, and extending solidarity to a larger cause that has nothing to do with the airline industry, safety, or organized labor. She calls for acts of "redemption" for unions' failure to stand by Air Traffic Controllers strike from 44 years ago. She combines "massive inequality" and "capitalism unchecked" with "private prisons," "slavery," and "ICE." She demonizes the entire free enterprise system: "We have to be really clear that Capitalism has no humanity attached whatsoever." Nelson urges people lot read a article about "why unions need to care about this movement and need to make immigration central to the concerns of union members." Her approach is a rehash of Stalin's Comintern-era "popular front" broad coalition strategy: "The capitalists have used racism and sexism to divide us" and "the immigrants and refugees to try to divide us as well." "The only way that we can build up power is if we do it collectively," she adds. Nelson frames the mass hiring of ICE agents in old Marxist class struggle terms. In her words, the Trump administration is providing "good paying jobs" at ICE to be "pitted against the rest of the working class." More pure class struggle words, straight out of Marx and Lenin: "It's also important, as a union leader myself, that we all have to be preparing for a general strike. We all have to be preparing for that strike readiness. That is fundamentally the check on capitalism." The flight attendants' union chief says that many in her organization don't "understand" the urgency: "I have more work to do in my own union on this ... and we are starting to see this seep into our airports" with ICE agents pursuing targets on aircraft. She explains, in her own words, why the Association of Flight Attendants union is tied directly to "mass action" and "getting into the streets": "For the people who are trying to get the tools tonight about what to do next, understand that the only way that we are going to have mass action is if everyone understands what the problem is," Nelson says. "And if everyone understands what the demands are about why we're getting into the streets. The people of Minneapolis understand this very well because the fight was brought to their doorsteps." (Gets emotional, chokes back tears.) There is no alternative but to fight, she says: "People have no choice but to fight." She talks about a 1914 strike of immigrant coal miners. "They were experiencing what Minneapolis is experiencing today. They were experiencing violence from the state." (Chokes up again) Nelson whips up a siege mentality to put people in a fighting mood: "we have to organize. ... we have to talk about the fight that is coming to our doorsteps all across this country. We have to organize around that. We have to set our demands. The people of Minnesota have set their demands, and they're very clear about it. It is immediate demands, about ICE out...." She is not calling for pressure on politicians as much as pressure on the private companies that keep America running. In her words: "this is not about putting pressure on the White House. This is about putting pressure on the people who control our economy. So define the problem, set your demands, back up your demands with what you are willing to do - that is the strike readiness that you're preparing for - and add urgency. And in this moment there could not be more urgency. So we stand with you and we are preparing and having those conversations in our union about how to shut it down ...."
11:18

Sara Nelson, head of the Association of Flight Attendants union, talks about plans to shut down critical infrastructure as part of the insurgency against ICE. What she describes is a textbook case of how unions and other civic organizations use the power of their membership to join insurgencies. "I called on the labor movement to talk about a general strike" in solidarity with the operation against ICE, Nelson says in this February 1 Zoom call. The general strike is planned to take place on May 1, which is International Workers Day (more on that later). What she Nelson says is revealing. It shows the raw emotion and ideological extremism of the flight attendants' union, and how the union leadership exploits the membership to force a strike to support the anti-ICE operation. Pay attention to her use of words: "General strike." In revolutionary practice, a general strike is not to meet economic or labor demands, but to challenge and overthrow the political and economic order by paralyzing the economy and imposing hardship on the public. This is a term of insurrection or insurgency. It creates parallel power structures. Leon Trotsky viewed general strikes as the last step before armed insurrection. "Capitalism unchecked." Anarchists and Marxists have different views of this term, but in general, the term is understood to mean that capitalism is irredeemably evil and oppressive, and that oppression must be resisted or "checked." It does not mean checks and balances in the American sense. It implies the urgency of action to check the oppressor. Repetition of "fight" and "demand." Working-class movements that exhort people to "fight" and "demand" are calling for class struggle against established institutions. The words are not metaphors, but calls for direct action to build toward the overthrow of existing society. Demands are ultimatums that provide focus for the fight. "Jacobin." Nelson recommends a reading from the website about unions organizing against ICE. The Jacobins were he most extreme element of the French Revolution, the Robespierre faction that orchestrated The Terror and the mass beheadings with the guillotine. Marx, Engels, and Lenin praised the Jacobins. In her 11-minute monologue, Nelson dwells heavily on working class history, tying an industry-specific "safety strike" to labor conflicts from 1981 and 1914, and extending solidarity to a larger cause that has nothing to do with the airline industry, safety, or organized labor. She calls for acts of "redemption" for unions' failure to stand by Air Traffic Controllers strike from 44 years ago. She combines "massive inequality" and "capitalism unchecked" with "private prisons," "slavery," and "ICE." She demonizes the entire free enterprise system: "We have to be really clear that Capitalism has no humanity attached whatsoever." Nelson urges people lot read a article about "why unions need to care about this movement and need to make immigration central to the concerns of union members." Her approach is a rehash of Stalin's Comintern-era "popular front" broad coalition strategy: "The capitalists have used racism and sexism to divide us" and "the immigrants and refugees to try to divide us as well." "The only way that we can build up power is if we do it collectively," she adds. Nelson frames the mass hiring of ICE agents in old Marxist class struggle terms. In her words, the Trump administration is providing "good paying jobs" at ICE to be "pitted against the rest of the working class." More pure class struggle words, straight out of Marx and Lenin: "It's also important, as a union leader myself, that we all have to be preparing for a general strike. We all have to be preparing for that strike readiness. That is fundamentally the check on capitalism." The flight attendants' union chief says that many in her organization don't "understand" the urgency: "I have more work to do in my own union on this ... and we are starting to see this seep into our airports" with ICE agents pursuing targets on aircraft. She explains, in her own words, why the Association of Flight Attendants union is tied directly to "mass action" and "getting into the streets": "For the people who are trying to get the tools tonight about what to do next, understand that the only way that we are going to have mass action is if everyone understands what the problem is," Nelson says. "And if everyone understands what the demands are about why we're getting into the streets. The people of Minneapolis understand this very well because the fight was brought to their doorsteps." (Gets emotional, chokes back tears.) There is no alternative but to fight, she says: "People have no choice but to fight." She talks about a 1914 strike of immigrant coal miners. "They were experiencing what Minneapolis is experiencing today. They were experiencing violence from the state." (Chokes up again) Nelson whips up a siege mentality to put people in a fighting mood: "we have to organize. ... we have to talk about the fight that is coming to our doorsteps all across this country. We have to organize around that. We have to set our demands. The people of Minnesota have set their demands, and they're very clear about it. It is immediate demands, about ICE out...." She is not calling for pressure on politicians as much as pressure on the private companies that keep America running. In her words: "this is not about putting pressure on the White House. This is about putting pressure on the people who control our economy. So define the problem, set your demands, back up your demands with what you are willing to do - that is the strike readiness that you're preparing for - and add urgency. And in this moment there could not be more urgency. So we stand with you and we are preparing and having those conversations in our union about how to shut it down ...."

J Michael Waller

90,996 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Together with women around the world, we say no to rape. Remember. The body of Shani Louk on the lorry, with these horrible Hamas men spitting on her and shouting Allahu Akbar, is the most horrible thing. As a woman, as a mother, as a human being and a politician, I felt a deep disgust when I heard the silence of so many powerful people after these October 7 crimes. The crime of these girls in Hamas eyes? Existing. Being Jewish, going to a festival. Shani Louk was young, she wanted to enjoy her life. Instead her life ended in the hands of Hamas. She was thrown onto this lorry, and we saw Hamas men dragging her half-naked with this lorry around and spitting on her, shouting “Allah Akbar”. For me, this image is worth more than 1,000 investigations, this image is stronger than 1,000 words, this image says it all. She and all others were someone’s daughters. How could the world let them down? Anyone who isn’t outraged and doesn’t stand up to what we’ve seen, frankly I don’t know whether that person deserves to be called a feminist or a humanist, but it’s a betrayal. It’s a betrayal of the cause of women and it’s a betrayal of all Jews, it’s a betrayal of humanity. For all the women and girls I joined forces with other women around the world to call for justice. This is our message. For the hostages to return home. For justice. Stop rape. Bring the rapists to justice. #UnitedWeStand
1:40

Together with women around the world, we say no to rape. Remember. The body of Shani Louk on the lorry, with these horrible Hamas men spitting on her and shouting Allahu Akbar, is the most horrible thing. As a woman, as a mother, as a human being and a politician, I felt a deep disgust when I heard the silence of so many powerful people after these October 7 crimes. The crime of these girls in Hamas eyes? Existing. Being Jewish, going to a festival. Shani Louk was young, she wanted to enjoy her life. Instead her life ended in the hands of Hamas. She was thrown onto this lorry, and we saw Hamas men dragging her half-naked with this lorry around and spitting on her, shouting “Allah Akbar”. For me, this image is worth more than 1,000 investigations, this image is stronger than 1,000 words, this image says it all. She and all others were someone’s daughters. How could the world let them down? Anyone who isn’t outraged and doesn’t stand up to what we’ve seen, frankly I don’t know whether that person deserves to be called a feminist or a humanist, but it’s a betrayal. It’s a betrayal of the cause of women and it’s a betrayal of all Jews, it’s a betrayal of humanity. For all the women and girls I joined forces with other women around the world to call for justice. This is our message. For the hostages to return home. For justice. Stop rape. Bring the rapists to justice. #UnitedWeStand

Assita Kanko MEP

532,163 просмотров • 2 лет назад

BREAKING: YES! GET HER! Indian journalist calls out Trump’s alleged mistress Laura Loomer TO HER FACE for her disgusting racism! Laura Loomer is a fringe and unhinged MAGA influencer who somehow still has the ear of the president…and possibly something else, too, if rumors are to be believed. Her career as a right-wing personality kicked off when she was banned from Uber for being racist to a Muslim cab driver, and things have progressed predictably from there. Loomer was in New Delhi today for the India Today Conclave 2026, for some reason, and she was confronted by a reporter, Rajdeep Sardesai, about some of the appalling things she’s said about Indians and Muslims. “You made a statement, ‘if Kamala Harris wins, the White House will smell like curry and speeches will be facilitated via a call centre.’ You then went on to say our country was built by white Europeans, not third world invaders from India. I think you should do more than just express regret.” “From what I can see, you're brazenly racist and Islamophobic. And I'm sorry to say that we have Atithi Devo Bhava in this country where we welcome all, but your comments smack of anti-Indianism, worse still Islamophobia and even worse racism, which has no place, ma'am, in today's world. So get real, ma'am!” “Sorry to say that, but those comments are unacceptable to me as an Indian and as a world citizen!” While Loomer eventually apologized, perhaps reading the room for once in her life, there’s no way she meant it. She is one of the most virulent racists in a MAGAsphere full of them, which is saying a lot. Why she was invited to speak at all is unclear, but thankfully Mr. Sardesai did the right thing and called her out. What an awful woman!
2:22

BREAKING: YES! GET HER! Indian journalist calls out Trump’s alleged mistress Laura Loomer TO HER FACE for her disgusting racism! Laura Loomer is a fringe and unhinged MAGA influencer who somehow still has the ear of the president…and possibly something else, too, if rumors are to be believed. Her career as a right-wing personality kicked off when she was banned from Uber for being racist to a Muslim cab driver, and things have progressed predictably from there. Loomer was in New Delhi today for the India Today Conclave 2026, for some reason, and she was confronted by a reporter, Rajdeep Sardesai, about some of the appalling things she’s said about Indians and Muslims. “You made a statement, ‘if Kamala Harris wins, the White House will smell like curry and speeches will be facilitated via a call centre.’ You then went on to say our country was built by white Europeans, not third world invaders from India. I think you should do more than just express regret.” “From what I can see, you're brazenly racist and Islamophobic. And I'm sorry to say that we have Atithi Devo Bhava in this country where we welcome all, but your comments smack of anti-Indianism, worse still Islamophobia and even worse racism, which has no place, ma'am, in today's world. So get real, ma'am!” “Sorry to say that, but those comments are unacceptable to me as an Indian and as a world citizen!” While Loomer eventually apologized, perhaps reading the room for once in her life, there’s no way she meant it. She is one of the most virulent racists in a MAGAsphere full of them, which is saying a lot. Why she was invited to speak at all is unclear, but thankfully Mr. Sardesai did the right thing and called her out. What an awful woman!

Occupy Democrats

44,155 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Based Black Woman Drops TRUTH BOMB: You CAN Be Racist Against White People And The Left's Hypocrisy Is EXPOSED! Listen up, folks. This sister right here is speaking straight facts from the driver's seat, and it's refreshing as hell in 2026. She's not mincing words: Racism isn't some one-way ticket invented by college professors to guilt-trip Americans. It's judging, hating, or discriminating against someone because of their skin color, period. Whether it's calling all White people "colonizers," saying they have "no culture," denying qualified White kids jobs or scholarships, or straight-up admitting you "don't trust White people"... that's textbook racism. And she's right, it's about NOW, not some endless history lesson used as a shield for anti-White bigotry. The same crowd screaming "racism" 24/7 suddenly goes blind when the target is pale. That's not "anti-racism." That's racism with a special preference for everyone except heritage Americans. America was built on the idea that we're all created equal under God, not this divisive skin-game nonsense pushed by race hustlers. This woman gets it. Real equality means the rules apply the same to everybody — no exceptions, no sacred cows. Who agrees?
1:19

Based Black Woman Drops TRUTH BOMB: You CAN Be Racist Against White People And The Left's Hypocrisy Is EXPOSED! Listen up, folks. This sister right here is speaking straight facts from the driver's seat, and it's refreshing as hell in 2026. She's not mincing words: Racism isn't some one-way ticket invented by college professors to guilt-trip Americans. It's judging, hating, or discriminating against someone because of their skin color, period. Whether it's calling all White people "colonizers," saying they have "no culture," denying qualified White kids jobs or scholarships, or straight-up admitting you "don't trust White people"... that's textbook racism. And she's right, it's about NOW, not some endless history lesson used as a shield for anti-White bigotry. The same crowd screaming "racism" 24/7 suddenly goes blind when the target is pale. That's not "anti-racism." That's racism with a special preference for everyone except heritage Americans. America was built on the idea that we're all created equal under God, not this divisive skin-game nonsense pushed by race hustlers. This woman gets it. Real equality means the rules apply the same to everybody — no exceptions, no sacred cows. Who agrees?

AmericanPapaBear™

55,875 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

“Bill Maher and Rula Jebreal's Debate on Islam Took a Heated Turn Live on Air.” Rula Jebreal: Would you accept an openly anti-Semitic person to give a commencement speech to Jewish students? I actually would not. Bill Maher: Even Reza Aslan says I'm not a bigot, so I resent the idea that I'm comparable to an anti-Semite. All I've ever done is read facts. Rula Jebreal: What facts? You never invited... I'm sorry, Bill. You're comparing Jihadists, Salafists, Sunnis... You don't know the difference. You're putting all Muslims into one bucket, including secular Muslims. And when you talk about them that way, Bill, it's offensive. Bill Maher: But it's okay to be offensive. Speaker: That's what free speech is all about. If free speech is only speech you like, it's not free speech. Rula Jebreal: He was invited to give a commencement speech, not a debate. If you want a debate, I'll gladly join you anywhere. Speaker: He was invited to be a commencement speaker, and then people didn't like what he said. Bill Maher: Can you be gay in Gaza? And live? Rula Jebreal: Yes, you can. Absolutely. You're comparing the majority of Muslim countries to places like Saudi Arabia. Bill Maher: Is there a gay bar in Gaza? Rula Jebreal: I travel the Middle East. This is what I do for a living. You're comparing all Muslim societies as if they're the same. Gen. Wesley Clark: I think this is really about whether someone can be invited to give a speech. People may agree or disagree, but that's the American system. People should be allowed to speak. Rula Jebreal: The Muslim community in this country is being treated like a fifth column, and they're not. They feel threatened, they're underrepresented in the media and politics, and you never invite them here to discuss these issues. Bill Maher: Never invite them? You're here. Reza is here. They're here all the time. Rula Jebreal: On these issues. Bill Maher: Every time I say something you don't like, suddenly it's not a serious conversation or I'm a bigot. That doesn't work for me. Rula Jebreal: I don't want a war on Islam. I want to win the war on terror. But when you repeat the same things Al-Qaeda used to say—that this is a war on Islam—you're doing their work for them. My father was Muslim. He was Sufi. You don't even know the difference between Sufi, Sunni Shafi'i, or Sunni Hanbali. Bill Maher: Yeah, I do. Rula Jebreal: For you, we're all Jihadists. Bill Maher: I know that in many places around the world, if you left your religion, there would be consequences. Would it be okay for someone to say, "You know what? I'm a Presbyterian today?"
3:52

“Bill Maher and Rula Jebreal's Debate on Islam Took a Heated Turn Live on Air.” Rula Jebreal: Would you accept an openly anti-Semitic person to give a commencement speech to Jewish students? I actually would not. Bill Maher: Even Reza Aslan says I'm not a bigot, so I resent the idea that I'm comparable to an anti-Semite. All I've ever done is read facts. Rula Jebreal: What facts? You never invited... I'm sorry, Bill. You're comparing Jihadists, Salafists, Sunnis... You don't know the difference. You're putting all Muslims into one bucket, including secular Muslims. And when you talk about them that way, Bill, it's offensive. Bill Maher: But it's okay to be offensive. Speaker: That's what free speech is all about. If free speech is only speech you like, it's not free speech. Rula Jebreal: He was invited to give a commencement speech, not a debate. If you want a debate, I'll gladly join you anywhere. Speaker: He was invited to be a commencement speaker, and then people didn't like what he said. Bill Maher: Can you be gay in Gaza? And live? Rula Jebreal: Yes, you can. Absolutely. You're comparing the majority of Muslim countries to places like Saudi Arabia. Bill Maher: Is there a gay bar in Gaza? Rula Jebreal: I travel the Middle East. This is what I do for a living. You're comparing all Muslim societies as if they're the same. Gen. Wesley Clark: I think this is really about whether someone can be invited to give a speech. People may agree or disagree, but that's the American system. People should be allowed to speak. Rula Jebreal: The Muslim community in this country is being treated like a fifth column, and they're not. They feel threatened, they're underrepresented in the media and politics, and you never invite them here to discuss these issues. Bill Maher: Never invite them? You're here. Reza is here. They're here all the time. Rula Jebreal: On these issues. Bill Maher: Every time I say something you don't like, suddenly it's not a serious conversation or I'm a bigot. That doesn't work for me. Rula Jebreal: I don't want a war on Islam. I want to win the war on terror. But when you repeat the same things Al-Qaeda used to say—that this is a war on Islam—you're doing their work for them. My father was Muslim. He was Sufi. You don't even know the difference between Sufi, Sunni Shafi'i, or Sunni Hanbali. Bill Maher: Yeah, I do. Rula Jebreal: For you, we're all Jihadists. Bill Maher: I know that in many places around the world, if you left your religion, there would be consequences. Would it be okay for someone to say, "You know what? I'm a Presbyterian today?"

Jeff

780,546 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

There’s only one antiwar, pro-worker campaign in this race. I am running for Congress as an independent antiwar socialist in WA state’s 9th district. There are two Democrats running against me. One is 29-year pro-war incumbent Adam Smith, and another is a candidate named Melissa Chaudhry. I recently attended a candidate interview. Adam Smith refused to attend. Clearly he prefers not to face my campaign which has relentlessly exposed his genocidal, anti-worker record. The other candidate, Chaudhry, would have working people believe that she is running a progressive antiwar campaign. But what are her actual positions? Nowhere has Chaudhry called for an end to military aid for Israel. The words genocide, Palestine, Israel, Gaza, or occupation don’t even appear on her website. I brought this up in the interview, and Chaudhry declined to respond. Nowhere does Chaudhry say anything about the need for universal public healthcare. Chaudhry also fails to say anything in support of trans and queer rights. When pressed, she admitted that she wanted to avoid offending a particular community. This is in the context of the horrific attacks against trans people by Trump and the right wing. Chaudhry is also silent about shutting down ICE and the detention centers. Her silence on all these crucial issues — the genocide, military aid to Israel, universal public healthcare, trans and queer rights, and ICE terror — is anything BUT progressive. Chaudhry recently assured a Democratic Party audience that she is a “team player.” It's clear what she means. She is happy to toe the line of the genocidal, anti-worker, anti-trans Democratic Party leadership to try to make a career for herself. The last thing working people need is another status quo careerist politician. Congress is full of them. What we need is a fighter for working people. If elected, I will use my Congressional office to build mass movements, like I did for a decade with my socialist Seattle City Council office, winning the nation’s highest minimum wage, the Amazon Tax and landmark renters’ rights. Join us to build for the strongest antiwar working-class vote in this primary election that ends August 4th! #socialist #palestine #gaza
2:27

There’s only one antiwar, pro-worker campaign in this race. I am running for Congress as an independent antiwar socialist in WA state’s 9th district. There are two Democrats running against me. One is 29-year pro-war incumbent Adam Smith, and another is a candidate named Melissa Chaudhry. I recently attended a candidate interview. Adam Smith refused to attend. Clearly he prefers not to face my campaign which has relentlessly exposed his genocidal, anti-worker record. The other candidate, Chaudhry, would have working people believe that she is running a progressive antiwar campaign. But what are her actual positions? Nowhere has Chaudhry called for an end to military aid for Israel. The words genocide, Palestine, Israel, Gaza, or occupation don’t even appear on her website. I brought this up in the interview, and Chaudhry declined to respond. Nowhere does Chaudhry say anything about the need for universal public healthcare. Chaudhry also fails to say anything in support of trans and queer rights. When pressed, she admitted that she wanted to avoid offending a particular community. This is in the context of the horrific attacks against trans people by Trump and the right wing. Chaudhry is also silent about shutting down ICE and the detention centers. Her silence on all these crucial issues — the genocide, military aid to Israel, universal public healthcare, trans and queer rights, and ICE terror — is anything BUT progressive. Chaudhry recently assured a Democratic Party audience that she is a “team player.” It's clear what she means. She is happy to toe the line of the genocidal, anti-worker, anti-trans Democratic Party leadership to try to make a career for herself. The last thing working people need is another status quo careerist politician. Congress is full of them. What we need is a fighter for working people. If elected, I will use my Congressional office to build mass movements, like I did for a decade with my socialist Seattle City Council office, winning the nation’s highest minimum wage, the Amazon Tax and landmark renters’ rights. Join us to build for the strongest antiwar working-class vote in this primary election that ends August 4th! #socialist #palestine #gaza

Kshama Sawant

32,964 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Starmer is exploiting the Nowak family's statement to silence necessary debate. The murder of Henry Nowak, and the way he was treated by the police in his dying moments, brought the police's anti-white bias into sharp focus. His killers knew that by crying "racism" the police would take his side. The police treated Henry appallingly because they thought he was a "racist". They took his phone to see if he'd sent any "racist" messages. In court, the killer's family shouted "RACIST" at the victim's family and the judge. But the only racism on show was in police training materials, guidance and policy. In this video, I look at this anti-white ideology and where it came from. I also look at the disgusting "apology" from the killer's family (presumably written by the one remaining member of the family who hadn't tried to cover up the murder or smear Henry). I also look at how left-wing politicians exploited on Henry's father's plea for calm. I’m pretty sure that when Henry Nowak’s father said he did not want his son’s death to create more division, he did not mean: “I want left-wing politicians and commentators to weaponise my grief to shut down debate.” Yet that is exactly what is happening. It’s disgusting to see his words misappropriated as a political battering ram, used to attack anyone who asks difficult questions about the way Henry was treated, and about the anti-white ideology explicitly codified in the public sector. Mr Nowak said other things. He called for a "full, fearless and transparent investigation" of the police. He said "Our family should not have to fight for the truth anymore", "Justice in the eyes of the law has been served but justice alone is not enough" and "We want to use Henry’s heartbreaking story to make change for the better". He said "We want his story to make our streets safer for everyone". And he said that the police treatment of his dying son was “inhumane and degrading”. Perhaps Starmer should pay equal heed to those pleas.
39:55

Starmer is exploiting the Nowak family's statement to silence necessary debate. The murder of Henry Nowak, and the way he was treated by the police in his dying moments, brought the police's anti-white bias into sharp focus. His killers knew that by crying "racism" the police would take his side. The police treated Henry appallingly because they thought he was a "racist". They took his phone to see if he'd sent any "racist" messages. In court, the killer's family shouted "RACIST" at the victim's family and the judge. But the only racism on show was in police training materials, guidance and policy. In this video, I look at this anti-white ideology and where it came from. I also look at the disgusting "apology" from the killer's family (presumably written by the one remaining member of the family who hadn't tried to cover up the murder or smear Henry). I also look at how left-wing politicians exploited on Henry's father's plea for calm. I’m pretty sure that when Henry Nowak’s father said he did not want his son’s death to create more division, he did not mean: “I want left-wing politicians and commentators to weaponise my grief to shut down debate.” Yet that is exactly what is happening. It’s disgusting to see his words misappropriated as a political battering ram, used to attack anyone who asks difficult questions about the way Henry was treated, and about the anti-white ideology explicitly codified in the public sector. Mr Nowak said other things. He called for a "full, fearless and transparent investigation" of the police. He said "Our family should not have to fight for the truth anymore", "Justice in the eyes of the law has been served but justice alone is not enough" and "We want to use Henry’s heartbreaking story to make change for the better". He said "We want his story to make our streets safer for everyone". And he said that the police treatment of his dying son was “inhumane and degrading”. Perhaps Starmer should pay equal heed to those pleas.

Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio

13,061 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

John Mearsheimer on October 7: “It’s consistent with international law for Hamas to want to break out of the concentration camp and engage with Israeli military forces in combat, which means they’re going to kill some of them. So the fact that they killed Israeli soldiers is not a case of murder. Now, there were clearly Israeli civilians who were murdered as well, but I would be willing to bet, in the final analysis, however, that Hamas did not murder many of those Israeli civilians. But be that as it may, whoever murdered those civilians committed a war crime. But I think most of the Israelis who were killed were either soldiers, who were legitimate targets, or they were civilians who were killed by the Israeli forces. I think you cannot underestimate how many Israelis were killed when all that [Israeli] firepower was brought to bear. And if you look at the pictures and you listen to what happened, it’s clear that those Apache helicopters really wreaked havoc on everything that was down on the ground, and of course that included Israeli civilians. [...] What’s also quite stunning about this whole issue is that no one talks about why there was a breakout. Nobody talks about the fact that this was a concentration camp and what was being done to the Palestinians was abhorrent. And of course there was going to be a breakout from that concentration camp at some point. [...] This is not to excuse the murder of civilians that took place at the hands of Palestinians, but the more you look in detail about what happened, the clearer it becomes that Israel bears a great deal of the responsibility for what happened that day”. Full interview on the Katie Halper Show: Katie Halper
3:28

John Mearsheimer on October 7: “It’s consistent with international law for Hamas to want to break out of the concentration camp and engage with Israeli military forces in combat, which means they’re going to kill some of them. So the fact that they killed Israeli soldiers is not a case of murder. Now, there were clearly Israeli civilians who were murdered as well, but I would be willing to bet, in the final analysis, however, that Hamas did not murder many of those Israeli civilians. But be that as it may, whoever murdered those civilians committed a war crime. But I think most of the Israelis who were killed were either soldiers, who were legitimate targets, or they were civilians who were killed by the Israeli forces. I think you cannot underestimate how many Israelis were killed when all that [Israeli] firepower was brought to bear. And if you look at the pictures and you listen to what happened, it’s clear that those Apache helicopters really wreaked havoc on everything that was down on the ground, and of course that included Israeli civilians. [...] What’s also quite stunning about this whole issue is that no one talks about why there was a breakout. Nobody talks about the fact that this was a concentration camp and what was being done to the Palestinians was abhorrent. And of course there was going to be a breakout from that concentration camp at some point. [...] This is not to excuse the murder of civilians that took place at the hands of Palestinians, but the more you look in detail about what happened, the clearer it becomes that Israel bears a great deal of the responsibility for what happened that day”. Full interview on the Katie Halper Show: Katie Halper

Thomas Fazi

385,280 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад