Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

2 clips — CLIP 1: (AIPAC-backed) Hakeem Jeffries calling hasanabi’s comments “dangerous, malicious, antisemitic” to (former AIPAC newsletter editor) Wolf Blitzer CLIP 2: What Hasan actually said, which was not anti-Semitic or a threat and actually the opposite of those things

The Tennessee Holler

304,782 subscribers

13,676 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Hakeem Jeffries doubles down on smearing Hasan Piker, calling his recent comments “dangerous, malicious, and anti-Semitic” and saying they “should not be tolerated by anyone in the public square.” Democrats have been attacking Piker over something he never said, while keeping silent when Randy Fine says the most horrendous things about Muslims.

Hakeem Jeffries doubles down on smearing Hasan Piker, calling his recent comments “dangerous, malicious, and anti-Semitic” and saying they “should not be tolerated by anyone in the public square.” Democrats have been attacking Piker over something he never said, while keeping silent when Randy Fine says the most horrendous things about Muslims.

HalalFlow

21,750 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

Hakeem Jeffries addresses Hasan's recent controversial comments and explains why he didn't directly name Piker in his tweet condemning antisemitism "Those comments are dangerous, malicious, and antisemitic, and should not be tolerated by anyone in the public square..everybody, regardless of ideological perspective should be willing to denounce this rise of antisemitic rhetoric, hate crimes, and bigotry, and actually try to move us to a society where we embrace everyone" "Why not call him out by name in ur statement?" - Wolf B "I've just addressed Hasan Piker's comments as it relates to the Jewish community as forcefully as I can, and I will continue to do that" (Via CNN)

Hakeem Jeffries addresses Hasan's recent controversial comments and explains why he didn't directly name Piker in his tweet condemning antisemitism "Those comments are dangerous, malicious, and antisemitic, and should not be tolerated by anyone in the public square..everybody, regardless of ideological perspective should be willing to denounce this rise of antisemitic rhetoric, hate crimes, and bigotry, and actually try to move us to a society where we embrace everyone" "Why not call him out by name in ur statement?" - Wolf B "I've just addressed Hasan Piker's comments as it relates to the Jewish community as forcefully as I can, and I will continue to do that" (Via CNN)

yeet

39,009 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

DNC Chair Ken Martin and House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries continued today to launder a blatantly bad-faith reading of Hasan Piker’s comments, falsely portraying a warning about antisemitism as blaming Jews for violence against themselves. Martin called Piker’s remarks “dangerous, wrong, and antisemitic,” and Jeffries on CNN described them “dangerous, malicious and antisemitic.” Rather than confront Israel’s mass murder and theft in Palestine and the region or the lawmakers enabling it, two of the Democratic Party’s most powerful leaders are instead attacking a leading critic of that policy by adopting the most cynical possible interpretation of his words. Piker’s comments were a warning that tying Jewish identity to the actions of the Israeli state risks fueling antisemitism. He was not endorsing or excusing violence against Jews. A video of Piker’s comments that far right Democratic and Republican politicians are using to manufacture a panic is attached in reply.

DNC Chair Ken Martin and House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries continued today to launder a blatantly bad-faith reading of Hasan Piker’s comments, falsely portraying a warning about antisemitism as blaming Jews for violence against themselves. Martin called Piker’s remarks “dangerous, wrong, and antisemitic,” and Jeffries on CNN described them “dangerous, malicious and antisemitic.” Rather than confront Israel’s mass murder and theft in Palestine and the region or the lawmakers enabling it, two of the Democratic Party’s most powerful leaders are instead attacking a leading critic of that policy by adopting the most cynical possible interpretation of his words. Piker’s comments were a warning that tying Jewish identity to the actions of the Israeli state risks fueling antisemitism. He was not endorsing or excusing violence against Jews. A video of Piker’s comments that far right Democratic and Republican politicians are using to manufacture a panic is attached in reply.

Drop Site

144,949 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries on Graham Platner's Nazi tattoo and tweet with antisemitic trope hitting Collins/AIPAC HEINRICH: Are you concerned that your party has an antisemitism problem? Rep Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY): He's going to have to speak for himself. And that's what any candidate, particularly in a high profile race, is going to be called upon to do. Listen, the effort to crush anti-Semitism in America shouldn't be a partisan issue. It can't be a red or blue issue. It's a red, white and blue issue. It's an American issue.

Jacqui Heinrich

38,134 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

(1) This is clip chimped in multiple places. Here are both of the full clips. In the first clip, Hasan was responding to an anti-Zionist Jewish person that said their temple is "deeply Zionist and it's difficult to even approach trying to change their minds." His response was explaining how Zionists go about conflating anti-Semitism with Israel and weaponize it against those who are anti-Zionist, even if they're Jewish.

(1) This is clip chimped in multiple places. Here are both of the full clips. In the first clip, Hasan was responding to an anti-Zionist Jewish person that said their temple is "deeply Zionist and it's difficult to even approach trying to change their minds." His response was explaining how Zionists go about conflating anti-Semitism with Israel and weaponize it against those who are anti-Zionist, even if they're Jewish.

palki 🌹

48,751 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

On Piers Morgan Uncensored, Cenk Uygur claimed he criticizes foreign lobbies and interference from other countries "all the time" and doesn't only complain about AIPAC (which isn't even a foreign lobby). His argument would be credible, except for the fact that the evidence from his content points the opposite direction, exactly as I stated in the debate. In all of 2024, Cenk has posted on X about AIPAC: 60 times Israel: 313 times Qatar: 2 times Saudi Arabia: 3 times, 2 of which being posts claiming he "criticizes Saudi influence" as much as he criticizes AIPAC Iran: 15 times, none pertaining to disinformation or foreign influence. 94% of Cenk's comments about any of these countries were focused on Israel and AIPAC in all of 2024...while Qatar has poured billions of dollars into American universities, much of it undisclosed, and God knows what else in the United States.

On Piers Morgan Uncensored, Cenk Uygur claimed he criticizes foreign lobbies and interference from other countries "all the time" and doesn't only complain about AIPAC (which isn't even a foreign lobby). His argument would be credible, except for the fact that the evidence from his content points the opposite direction, exactly as I stated in the debate. In all of 2024, Cenk has posted on X about AIPAC: 60 times Israel: 313 times Qatar: 2 times Saudi Arabia: 3 times, 2 of which being posts claiming he "criticizes Saudi influence" as much as he criticizes AIPAC Iran: 15 times, none pertaining to disinformation or foreign influence. 94% of Cenk's comments about any of these countries were focused on Israel and AIPAC in all of 2024...while Qatar has poured billions of dollars into American universities, much of it undisclosed, and God knows what else in the United States.

Emily Schrader - אמילי שריידר امیلی شریدر

56,683 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🇺🇸🇮🇱 REP MTG: MOST OF CONGRESS TAKES CASH FROM AIPAC, I DON'T In a tense sit-down, Rep. MTG defended her lone "no" vote on the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act. The 427-1 House passage (her "no") forced a vote on the Act, signed by Trump, but her AIPAC jab highlights donor influence in a post-Oct. 7 world with 500% U.S. anti-Semitic incidents (ADL). Stahl's "wow" at MTG's "Democrats are pedophiles" line sparked backlash, but Greene's stand reminds: Real fights need grit, not knee-bends, especially when cash calls the shots. She's calling endless denouncement resolutions "an exercise that they force on Congress... I simply got tired of it." Leslie: "Can't you fight without name-calling?" MTG: "They call me racist, anti-Semitic, which is not true. We don't have to get on our knees and say it over and over again. Most members take donations from AIPAC... I don't." Source: Marjorie Taylor Greene, Montellace Greene, 60 Minutes

🇺🇸🇮🇱 REP MTG: MOST OF CONGRESS TAKES CASH FROM AIPAC, I DON'T In a tense sit-down, Rep. MTG defended her lone "no" vote on the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act. The 427-1 House passage (her "no") forced a vote on the Act, signed by Trump, but her AIPAC jab highlights donor influence in a post-Oct. 7 world with 500% U.S. anti-Semitic incidents (ADL). Stahl's "wow" at MTG's "Democrats are pedophiles" line sparked backlash, but Greene's stand reminds: Real fights need grit, not knee-bends, especially when cash calls the shots. She's calling endless denouncement resolutions "an exercise that they force on Congress... I simply got tired of it." Leslie: "Can't you fight without name-calling?" MTG: "They call me racist, anti-Semitic, which is not true. We don't have to get on our knees and say it over and over again. Most members take donations from AIPAC... I don't." Source: Marjorie Taylor Greene, Montellace Greene, 60 Minutes

Mario Nawfal

129,231 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

For those who didn’t actually hear what hon Lesego Chombo said here is the clip, I think in essence she was actually agreeing with Hon Dow and just struggled to articulate it, til we got confused by the concept of peace desks vs peace offices

For those who didn’t actually hear what hon Lesego Chombo said here is the clip, I think in essence she was actually agreeing with Hon Dow and just struggled to articulate it, til we got confused by the concept of peace desks vs peace offices

Mirth

33,154 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

.Mo Elleithee 🇺🇸: "I'm so tired of this... I think there is plenty of hateful rhetoric that I so wish would stop on the left... I actually didn't like Hakeem Jeffries' tone in the clip we just played. But the substance of what he said was not wrong in that this is a White House that refuses to own up. I want everybody to own up." W/ Brad Todd Jeff Zeleny Leigh Ann Caldwell

.Mo Elleithee 🇺🇸: "I'm so tired of this... I think there is plenty of hateful rhetoric that I so wish would stop on the left... I actually didn't like Hakeem Jeffries' tone in the clip we just played. But the substance of what he said was not wrong in that this is a White House that refuses to own up. I want everybody to own up." W/ Brad Todd Jeff Zeleny Leigh Ann Caldwell

The Arena on CNN

57,903 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 JUST IN: In a recent interview with ABC News, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries calls President Trump's threats to withdraw from NATO as a "reckless choice," stating that in a dangerous world the US needs more friends rather than adversaries. Hakeem Jeffries: "Withdrawing from NATO would be reckless choice. This is a dangerous world. We need more friends, not more adversaries. And we should not walk away from an alliance that has actually kept the world and United States as safe as possible in the aftermath of World War 2. President should stop issuing this threats and attacking our allies."

🚨 JUST IN: In a recent interview with ABC News, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries calls President Trump's threats to withdraw from NATO as a "reckless choice," stating that in a dangerous world the US needs more friends rather than adversaries. Hakeem Jeffries: "Withdrawing from NATO would be reckless choice. This is a dangerous world. We need more friends, not more adversaries. And we should not walk away from an alliance that has actually kept the world and United States as safe as possible in the aftermath of World War 2. President should stop issuing this threats and attacking our allies."

WORLD NEWS

14,008 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

They need this and the clip of what was actually said by KC regarding the top couple comment. Also more clips of Zach being messy. He’s gossiped so many lies in that villa. He’s the true villain. Also Aniya constantly just choosing to do what Melanie does

They need this and the clip of what was actually said by KC regarding the top couple comment. Also more clips of Zach being messy. He’s gossiped so many lies in that villa. He’s the true villain. Also Aniya constantly just choosing to do what Melanie does

DeeSims

144,220 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Asmongold could not believe that Hasan thought he was being serious in his response to Soda putting him in the F-tier of his tier list "Wait a minute, does he think my joke..does he think I was being like legit and actually mad? I think he does..I know Chance, this is a joke" "U didn't watch the clip of me saying that I commended Hasan for character development for not malding out..he's actually getting mad about something that the opposite thing happened"

Asmongold could not believe that Hasan thought he was being serious in his response to Soda putting him in the F-tier of his tier list "Wait a minute, does he think my joke..does he think I was being like legit and actually mad? I think he does..I know Chance, this is a joke" "U didn't watch the clip of me saying that I commended Hasan for character development for not malding out..he's actually getting mad about something that the opposite thing happened"

yeet

84,896 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

During 2006, at the time of publication, people had no idea what The Israel Lobby is so it was easy to paint/ attack Professor Mearsheimer and Walt as anti-Semitic, which Dershowitz and Epstein abused. Ppl thought surely it was over-exaggerated. Well…1/2

During 2006, at the time of publication, people had no idea what The Israel Lobby is so it was easy to paint/ attack Professor Mearsheimer and Walt as anti-Semitic, which Dershowitz and Epstein abused. Ppl thought surely it was over-exaggerated. Well…1/2

MJ

163,982 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

This is typical of RTE and the anti-Trump media misrepresenting what was actually said. The reporter wrote, "It was not clear what the former president meant by his remarks." If they actually listened, they would understand exactly what he meant. Here is the clip below for actual context. It's clear he referred to encouraging Christians to vote and that he would fix the issues affecting them over the course of four years, meaning they wouldn't need to vote again in four years. "Fixed" meaning he would correct the woke issues over four years with executive orders.

This is typical of RTE and the anti-Trump media misrepresenting what was actually said. The reporter wrote, "It was not clear what the former president meant by his remarks." If they actually listened, they would understand exactly what he meant. Here is the clip below for actual context. It's clear he referred to encouraging Christians to vote and that he would fix the issues affecting them over the course of four years, meaning they wouldn't need to vote again in four years. "Fixed" meaning he would correct the woke issues over four years with executive orders.

Niall Boylan

30,003 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

If a game has a built-in content editor, it’s almost always a winning combination. Stunts (known to some as 4D Sports Driving) stood out precisely because of this feature. We’d build our own tracks and often compete with others for the best score. Or maybe the score wasn’t what mattered - it was just about having fun. Or, actually, it was all of those things combined.

If a game has a built-in content editor, it’s almost always a winning combination. Stunts (known to some as 4D Sports Driving) stood out precisely because of this feature. We’d build our own tracks and often compete with others for the best score. Or maybe the score wasn’t what mattered - it was just about having fun. Or, actually, it was all of those things combined.

PeteZach

25,977 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Haviv Retting Gur talk about AIPAC: AIPAC is a lobby. It's not the wealthiest. It's not the most influential. It is the one that draws the most attention and you know, that's got a little bit, tiny, forgive me, a tiny bit to do with prejudice. And there's a lot less concern about actual foreign lobbies. Every single dollar AIPAC has ever raised is American Every single member of AIPAC is American. Nobody has the concern about the Qatari lobby and the Saudi lobby and the Chinese lobby in America, which is wealthier and spends more in America than this lobby of Americans saying something that they believe in. A few arguments are made against AIPAC. One argument is that AIPAC always supports the Israeli position. That is not true. AIPAC always supports its membership's position. And here's the problem. Its membership deeply disagrees on Israeli politics. Incidentally, the last time AIPAC criticized the Israeli government was blunt and fierce, and it was about Netanyahu letting Ben-Gvir into the coalition because Ben-Gvir is a racist. And you know why AIPAC could come out with a literal statement coming out against Ben-Gvir entering the government? Because almost the entirety of its membership was horrified. And then AIPAC could speak. Every dollar in Obama's $4 billion, $3.8 billion a year that he gives to Israel has to be spent in the United States. 100% of it. And you know who advocated for increasing the amount that has to be spent back in America to make sure it's an American thing? AIPAC. Iron Dome. AIPAC campaigned for America to help support the building of the Iron Dome technology. And AIPAC itself advocated that, in the actual contract where the Americans send over the money and the Israelis build this technology no American organization knew how to build, that in exchange for the money, America co-owns Iron Dome. Qatar has massive influence campaigns in America, spends hundreds of millions of dollars on lobbying in America, the Attorney General of the United States today was a literal registered lobbyist for Qatar. Nobody makes this campaign, "How dare you accept money from PACs that support the relationship between the Arab world or the Muslim world in America." But it's much deeper than that. Because AIPAC was born in a moment of American Jewish shame. In World War II, American Jews sat silent. By 1943, everybody already knew what was happening. And 400 rabbis—religious rabbis, dressed up in all the getup from Eastern Europe, many of them Yiddish-speaking with bad English, refugee rabbis—came to Washington to meet President Roosevelt and to beg him to do something. And Roosevelt snuck out of the back door of the White House to avoid the meeting. And they went home, horrified, having not even been able to meet the president while Jews are being burned in the gas chambers. And there was a Jewish journalist who accompanied them. That moment was seared into his consciousness. AIPAC was founded by a generation of Jews that said, we will never be silent when other Jews are herded into a gas chamber. And that's treason? The three times that AIPAC literally frontally faced down an American president in Washington? It lost. It is influential because the Pentagon sees handing money to the Israelis in exchange for a technology nobody thought was possible as a workaround of a bloated and unmoving and immovable American defense industry. When AIPAC pushes that, it always, always takes care of the American interest because it's a bunch of Americans. And the demonizing of that is just pure prejudice and bigotry. And AIPAC, by the way, is not going anywhere. Because the very people coming for the Jews are also driving Jews to AIPAC. It's a little bit like Zionism.

Haviv Retting Gur talk about AIPAC: AIPAC is a lobby. It's not the wealthiest. It's not the most influential. It is the one that draws the most attention and you know, that's got a little bit, tiny, forgive me, a tiny bit to do with prejudice. And there's a lot less concern about actual foreign lobbies. Every single dollar AIPAC has ever raised is American Every single member of AIPAC is American. Nobody has the concern about the Qatari lobby and the Saudi lobby and the Chinese lobby in America, which is wealthier and spends more in America than this lobby of Americans saying something that they believe in. A few arguments are made against AIPAC. One argument is that AIPAC always supports the Israeli position. That is not true. AIPAC always supports its membership's position. And here's the problem. Its membership deeply disagrees on Israeli politics. Incidentally, the last time AIPAC criticized the Israeli government was blunt and fierce, and it was about Netanyahu letting Ben-Gvir into the coalition because Ben-Gvir is a racist. And you know why AIPAC could come out with a literal statement coming out against Ben-Gvir entering the government? Because almost the entirety of its membership was horrified. And then AIPAC could speak. Every dollar in Obama's $4 billion, $3.8 billion a year that he gives to Israel has to be spent in the United States. 100% of it. And you know who advocated for increasing the amount that has to be spent back in America to make sure it's an American thing? AIPAC. Iron Dome. AIPAC campaigned for America to help support the building of the Iron Dome technology. And AIPAC itself advocated that, in the actual contract where the Americans send over the money and the Israelis build this technology no American organization knew how to build, that in exchange for the money, America co-owns Iron Dome. Qatar has massive influence campaigns in America, spends hundreds of millions of dollars on lobbying in America, the Attorney General of the United States today was a literal registered lobbyist for Qatar. Nobody makes this campaign, "How dare you accept money from PACs that support the relationship between the Arab world or the Muslim world in America." But it's much deeper than that. Because AIPAC was born in a moment of American Jewish shame. In World War II, American Jews sat silent. By 1943, everybody already knew what was happening. And 400 rabbis—religious rabbis, dressed up in all the getup from Eastern Europe, many of them Yiddish-speaking with bad English, refugee rabbis—came to Washington to meet President Roosevelt and to beg him to do something. And Roosevelt snuck out of the back door of the White House to avoid the meeting. And they went home, horrified, having not even been able to meet the president while Jews are being burned in the gas chambers. And there was a Jewish journalist who accompanied them. That moment was seared into his consciousness. AIPAC was founded by a generation of Jews that said, we will never be silent when other Jews are herded into a gas chamber. And that's treason? The three times that AIPAC literally frontally faced down an American president in Washington? It lost. It is influential because the Pentagon sees handing money to the Israelis in exchange for a technology nobody thought was possible as a workaround of a bloated and unmoving and immovable American defense industry. When AIPAC pushes that, it always, always takes care of the American interest because it's a bunch of Americans. And the demonizing of that is just pure prejudice and bigotry. And AIPAC, by the way, is not going anywhere. Because the very people coming for the Jews are also driving Jews to AIPAC. It's a little bit like Zionism.

Open Source Intel

27,219 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

How is the Kamala camp, CBS News, Mother Jones, the 19th, The Guardian, CNN and MSNBC NOT liable for such a huge booger of a LIE! 🤬 They all said that Trump was talking about abortion rights when he was actually talking about Illegal Immigrations! This is how the Democrat mouthpiece spin the narrative to further their agenda! Look at the clip that Kamala HQ put out and then watch the actual clip of what President Trump said.

How is the Kamala camp, CBS News, Mother Jones, the 19th, The Guardian, CNN and MSNBC NOT liable for such a huge booger of a LIE! 🤬 They all said that Trump was talking about abortion rights when he was actually talking about Illegal Immigrations! This is how the Democrat mouthpiece spin the narrative to further their agenda! Look at the clip that Kamala HQ put out and then watch the actual clip of what President Trump said.

ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

27,466 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Hasan jokes about being the most famous person in India due to how much he gets clipped and misunderstood from those clips "Nowadays the new meta..taking a clip and just lying..they'll just be like in support of thing she is actually against" "Even crazier..they'll put like a min and 30 sec rant that I go..first I was like oh well I'm glad they put the whole thing but no one watches the whole clip..I scroll down to see the one guy hopefully that's like, I actually watched the clip and it's saying the opposite..never" "Buried between like 18 different algorithm hustlers from Bangladesh..who's names are like save the white race..I might legitimately be the most famous guy in India" (Via Fear &)

Hasan jokes about being the most famous person in India due to how much he gets clipped and misunderstood from those clips "Nowadays the new meta..taking a clip and just lying..they'll just be like in support of thing she is actually against" "Even crazier..they'll put like a min and 30 sec rant that I go..first I was like oh well I'm glad they put the whole thing but no one watches the whole clip..I scroll down to see the one guy hopefully that's like, I actually watched the clip and it's saying the opposite..never" "Buried between like 18 different algorithm hustlers from Bangladesh..who's names are like save the white race..I might legitimately be the most famous guy in India" (Via Fear &)

yeet

36,447 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten