正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
2 Years Ago Today, The Largest Document Storage Facility For Wall Street Was Burned To The Ground This Came THE DAY AFTER The Justice Department Announced They Were Launching An Investigation Into Short Sellers They Hauled The Evidence Away ON FIRE, An OSHA Violation 🚨 This Investigation Came Following... show more
10 条评论
I'm sure it has nothing to do with 👇
Exactly, rampant naked short selling that’s still taking place every day in the United States Fraud Market. Counterfeiting all day every day.
@BzztBee It’s astonishing that they removed the debris without extinguishing the fire allowing sufficient time for the rubble to cool down. That was definitely a cover up.
@BzztBee It always boggles my mind how they were hauling it away still on fire, still on fire, and they were hauling it away. It’s beyond incredible, beyond.
Hmm… Kinda reminds me of HRC’s emails & her server
It's just a coincidence that the 'Evidence BBQ' happened right after charges were announced, right? #DeepStateDestruction
It’s all naked short selling. They short shares that don’t exist to screw the average guy.
Smacks of WTC Building 7 on 9/11. 🤔
A short sell is when investors pay a fee and borrow a security from its owners. Next, they sell it. Later, they buy the security back to return it to the owner. They make money if they can buy the security back, to return it to the owner, at a lower price. The borrower “keeps the difference” between the price when they sold it, and when they bought it back. The borrower has an incentive to reduce the price of the stock. Anyone having power to do this is incentivized to try this scheme. The theory of this story is that the people in that building were doing this systematically. This is illegal as it steals wealth from current owners long on the stock. Those people are us. This is one way the plutocrats take our wealth.
Yes. I will forever hate the SEC and govt. they have robbed us out of so much money. When it was all complete, my cost per share for AMC is now 93.00. When did it ever reach that price???? Right, never. Shorts on the dark market drive this as did AA. All criminals.
相关视频
Sensitive content
BREAKING: Bill Ackman just IPO'd his hedge fund. He targeted $25 billion two years ago. He raised $5 billion yesterday. And the retail investors he spent two years courting on X didn't show up. Here's what actually happened, and why it matters for every investor who thinks following a famous name is a strategy. Wednesday, April 29. Bill Ackman rang the opening bell at the New York Stock Exchange. Two listed entities hit the market. Pershing Square USA (PSUS), the closed-end fund. Pershing Square Inc. (PS), the asset manager. PSUS priced at $50 a share. It opened at $42. It closed at $40.90. Down 18% on debut. One of the most famous hedge fund managers on the planet went public, and his fund lost nearly a fifth of its value in a single trading session. Now look at how the money actually came in. Of the $5 billion raised, $2.8 billion came from a private placement. Family offices took 30% of that. Pension funds took 25%. Insurance companies took 22%. Ultra-high-net-worth investors took 12%. Institutional investors accounted for over 85% of total orders. The remaining $2.2 billion came from a public offering of 44 million PSUS shares. Some of that was retail. Most of it was not. Ackman has 2 million followers on X. He spent two years marketing this fund as a way for regular people to access hedge fund returns at $50 a share. He even said it on CNBC the morning of the IPO: "Hedge funds are sort of known for managing money for rich people. And now we have the opportunity for someone with $50, could be a long-term shareholder. Usually, the retail gets cut massively back, the institutions are favored. We did the opposite." The retail audience he was talking to didn't believe him. The institutions did. Two years ago, the original target was $25 billion. Yesterday, the final number was $5 billion. That's an 80% downsize. This is one of the most watched investors in the world. He gets booked on every major financial network. He posts daily to millions of followers. He has been pitching this exact deal since 2024. And the deal still came in 80% smaller than planned. Here's the part nobody is connecting: The retail audience for hedge fund products is fundamentally different from the retail audience for personality content. Ackman built a following by being loud on X. Loud on takeovers. Loud on politics. Loud on universities. Loud on ETFs. Loud on macro calls. Followers love that. They follow. They reply. They retweet. But following someone is free. Wiring money into their closed-end fund at NAV with no performance fees and a fee structure most retail investors can't even read is an entirely different decision. The market just made that distinction for him. Now zoom out, because this is the structural lesson. The $2.8 billion private placement was wrapped up before retail even saw the deal. Family offices. Pension funds. Insurance companies. Sovereign wealth. These are the buyers who get the call before the IPO is announced. They get the term sheet. They negotiate. They commit. By the time the public sees the listing on a Wednesday morning, the institutions have already locked in their allocation. The retail investor sees the same news, gets the same prospectus, and reads the same ticker. Different game. Same name on the door. And then PSUS opened down 16% and closed down 18%. Every retail buyer who put in $50 at the IPO price was sitting on a $9 paper loss before lunch. The institutions had locked in better terms in the private placement. Same fund. Same manager. Two completely different starting positions. This is how the structure of capital markets actually works. Every. Single. Time. The brochure says democratization. The cap table says the institutions got there first. This is the same lesson the Blue Owl and BlackRock private credit stories taught us last year. When a famous money manager opens a vehicle to retail, the fine print and the fee structure and the timing of the allocation all favor the people who already have access. You can have a manager with no performance fee, with bonus shares attached, with two million social followers, and a stage on CNBC. The math of who gets in first and at what price is still the math. So what does this mean for you? It means a famous name on the cover is not a strategy. It means following an investor on X is not the same as being invested with them. It means the retail audience for entertaining finance content is enormous, and the retail audience for actually deploying capital into a complex product is not. The wealthy don't pay famous investors for personality. They build systems that don't depend on a single human being having a good year, or a good fund debut, or a good narrative on social media. Ackman's reputation got him on the front page. It didn't get the stock above its IPO price. The math always catches up. The personality doesn't change the math. Boring? Yes. Effective when a $25 billion vision becomes a $5 billion raise that opens down 18%? Also yes. This is exactly why we built Surmount. Automated, rules-based investment strategies. Built for the retail investor who doesn't want to bet a portfolio on whether a famous fund manager has a good debut:
Logan Weaver
220,960 次观看 • 4 个月前
