Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

20 Topics To Trigger Your Entire Group Chat! 🔥🍅💥Join Open Panel Grab Bag Tonight 9:15 PM EST Who will be crowned survivor? Who will be democratically executed by your credit card? Only your wallet decides. Should AI development be heavily regulated by governments? Is a cashless society progress or... totalitarian control in disguise? ★ NEW Abortion: absolute bodily autonomy or protection of life? Should transgender women compete in women’s sports? Has modern feminism become anti-men? Does God exist, or is religion just comforting mythology? Are major conspiracy theories suppressed truth? Is free speech absolute, even for “hate speech”? Should social media platforms be liable for content? Arming teachers: smart safety measure or recipe for disaster? ★ NEW Open borders: moral duty or national security threat? Universal Basic Income: fixes inequality or kills ambition? Is cryptocurrency the future or the biggest scam ever? Lab-grown meat: ethical solution or unnatural abomination? Cancel culture: accountability or modern witch hunts? Were vaccine mandates public health or government overreach? Deepfakes: bigger threat to society than nuclear weapons? Should we prioritize space exploration over earthly problems? Is democracy failing in the age of AI and misinformation? Are we living in a simulation?show more

Sara The Raging Tomato

1,924 subscribers

15,194 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Thanks to Trump entering a partnership with CIA-funded Palantir to create a “national data base of all Americans” ALL of the information and data we consume is being categorically catalogued on a MASS scale using AI data centers, and can be USED AGAINST US in the future for “pre-crime”, should we dare to dissent or step out of line. That is why JD Vance was picked to be Trump’s VP, because HE is their golden child to really bring all of this full circle. The powers that be want JD as President more than anything, but are using Trump to initiate the agenda, because of his control once the MAGA base. This wouldn’t be possible with a Democrat, as there would be a swift revolt. The coming social credit system, which will be tied directly to our bank accounts and all digital currency wallets will PUNISH US for questioning certain narratives, or asking questions about certain things…for example, certain FOREIGN influence in American politics, or why we are giving so much aid to said FOREIGN entities. The social credit system will be directly tied into Universal Basic Income, which will be the government subsidy given out to everyone who loses their job to AI. What you buy at the store will be tied directly to this system as well, and your ability to buy or sell will be directly affected by your “behavior” as will your ability to enter or exit any “zones” in the AI smart cites. It will also be tied into the medical system directly, and all of your medical records will be fully accessed by this system, including every prescription you take, or procedure you have. Palantir is the MOST EVIL company in the world, and now has an absolute foothold in multiple government agencies through the DOGE PSYOP, thanks to the Trump Admin and Elon Musk. The endgame is a FULLY totalitarian Technocracy police state run by AI, drones, and robots that will enforce it. That spells the END of what is left of our basic civil liberties and Constitutional rights. This is Donald Trump’s BIGGEST BETRAYAL.

Thanks to Trump entering a partnership with CIA-funded Palantir to create a “national data base of all Americans” ALL of the information and data we consume is being categorically catalogued on a MASS scale using AI data centers, and can be USED AGAINST US in the future for “pre-crime”, should we dare to dissent or step out of line. That is why JD Vance was picked to be Trump’s VP, because HE is their golden child to really bring all of this full circle. The powers that be want JD as President more than anything, but are using Trump to initiate the agenda, because of his control once the MAGA base. This wouldn’t be possible with a Democrat, as there would be a swift revolt. The coming social credit system, which will be tied directly to our bank accounts and all digital currency wallets will PUNISH US for questioning certain narratives, or asking questions about certain things…for example, certain FOREIGN influence in American politics, or why we are giving so much aid to said FOREIGN entities. The social credit system will be directly tied into Universal Basic Income, which will be the government subsidy given out to everyone who loses their job to AI. What you buy at the store will be tied directly to this system as well, and your ability to buy or sell will be directly affected by your “behavior” as will your ability to enter or exit any “zones” in the AI smart cites. It will also be tied into the medical system directly, and all of your medical records will be fully accessed by this system, including every prescription you take, or procedure you have. Palantir is the MOST EVIL company in the world, and now has an absolute foothold in multiple government agencies through the DOGE PSYOP, thanks to the Trump Admin and Elon Musk. The endgame is a FULLY totalitarian Technocracy police state run by AI, drones, and robots that will enforce it. That spells the END of what is left of our basic civil liberties and Constitutional rights. This is Donald Trump’s BIGGEST BETRAYAL.

The Patriot Voice

27,114 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Fundamental Human Right Freedom of religion or belief is a fundamental human right guaranteed by international conventions and the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Every individual has the right to hold, practice, express, and peacefully propagate his or her religion or belief, openly and publicly, without fear, intimidation, or discrimination. In this 21st century an era defined by technology and social media individuals, groups, companies, organizations, and both governmental and non-governmental bodies freely utilize digital platforms to create awareness, educate the public, and broadcast their programmes and values. Religious engagement and propagation in the public space have therefore become a normal and accepted part of modern society. In this same spirit, we, the Muslims of South-Eastern Nigeria, affirm our lawful and peaceful right to practice and propagate Islam. We should not be silenced, intimidated, threatened, or attacked for carrying out our legitimate religious activities in a peaceful and responsible manner. Our faith teaches wisdom, dialogue, and peaceful coexistence, and this remains the foundation of our engagement with society. We strongly reject all forms of harassment, threats, hate speech, and attacks targeted at Muslims or any religious group. Such actions undermine social harmony, violate fundamental human rights, and threaten peaceful coexistence in our diverse society. We therefore say no to intimidation, no to threats, and no to attacks. We also say no to religious bigotry, intolerance, and discrimination. Freedom of religion or belief is not a privilege granted to a few; it is a right owed to all. Mutual respect, understanding, and the rule of law must guide our coexistence in a pluralistic society.

Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Fundamental Human Right Freedom of religion or belief is a fundamental human right guaranteed by international conventions and the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Every individual has the right to hold, practice, express, and peacefully propagate his or her religion or belief, openly and publicly, without fear, intimidation, or discrimination. In this 21st century an era defined by technology and social media individuals, groups, companies, organizations, and both governmental and non-governmental bodies freely utilize digital platforms to create awareness, educate the public, and broadcast their programmes and values. Religious engagement and propagation in the public space have therefore become a normal and accepted part of modern society. In this same spirit, we, the Muslims of South-Eastern Nigeria, affirm our lawful and peaceful right to practice and propagate Islam. We should not be silenced, intimidated, threatened, or attacked for carrying out our legitimate religious activities in a peaceful and responsible manner. Our faith teaches wisdom, dialogue, and peaceful coexistence, and this remains the foundation of our engagement with society. We strongly reject all forms of harassment, threats, hate speech, and attacks targeted at Muslims or any religious group. Such actions undermine social harmony, violate fundamental human rights, and threaten peaceful coexistence in our diverse society. We therefore say no to intimidation, no to threats, and no to attacks. We also say no to religious bigotry, intolerance, and discrimination. Freedom of religion or belief is not a privilege granted to a few; it is a right owed to all. Mutual respect, understanding, and the rule of law must guide our coexistence in a pluralistic society.

Siraj Ugwu (Nwa Nsukka)🕋🇳🇬

28,002 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

On the Brink: A Global Economic Collapse and Energy Catastrophe Jeffrey Sachs: Trump is flailing around because he and Netanyahu have brought the world to the brink of the greatest economic crisis of modern history. We have a government which is in complete breakdown. Where is some control before we have a worldwide, complete, irreversible catastrophe? We are being led by gangsters who are completely out of their depth. You look at Hegseth, or on the economic side, Lutnick, or Bessent or Trump—they’re making things up because they don’t know what they’re doing. And more than that, the professionals in our government who do know what they’re doing are either crushed, forced to leave, thrown out, threatened, or resign. We’re about to have an irrevocable escalation of a disaster, and it should be stopped before that happens. And on the track that we’re on, it’s not going to stop. Internationally, the few grown-ups of international stature in the world, including President Xi, President Putin and Prime Minister Modi, should be speaking to Donald Trump before the world faces this irrevocable disaster. A complete collapse of the world energy supply—that’s all they can achieve. What the consequence of that will be for Americans is mass unemployment, and you think your living standards are in trouble right now—just wait a little while. I’m sorry to tell you.

On the Brink: A Global Economic Collapse and Energy Catastrophe Jeffrey Sachs: Trump is flailing around because he and Netanyahu have brought the world to the brink of the greatest economic crisis of modern history. We have a government which is in complete breakdown. Where is some control before we have a worldwide, complete, irreversible catastrophe? We are being led by gangsters who are completely out of their depth. You look at Hegseth, or on the economic side, Lutnick, or Bessent or Trump—they’re making things up because they don’t know what they’re doing. And more than that, the professionals in our government who do know what they’re doing are either crushed, forced to leave, thrown out, threatened, or resign. We’re about to have an irrevocable escalation of a disaster, and it should be stopped before that happens. And on the track that we’re on, it’s not going to stop. Internationally, the few grown-ups of international stature in the world, including President Xi, President Putin and Prime Minister Modi, should be speaking to Donald Trump before the world faces this irrevocable disaster. A complete collapse of the world energy supply—that’s all they can achieve. What the consequence of that will be for Americans is mass unemployment, and you think your living standards are in trouble right now—just wait a little while. I’m sorry to tell you.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

37,407 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This is a compilation of videos circulating online of women raging or hurting their kids or staring blankly into space while holding their infants, claiming: "I'm so mentally unwell I can't even care for my child, and this is how common postpartum depression is. This is what childbirth does.” “Same, Lindsay.” #Lindsayclancy Many of these posts are tagged with #PPDawareness, pushing the narrative that women have always suffered like this in silence, and that this level of severe instability is just "how common suffering actually is." If this new "awareness" successfully convinces the world that motherhood is an inherently dangerous state that drives women to violent hair-trigger rage or total dysfunction, what does that mean for women? How do we keep children and society safe? Should every woman undergo mandatory psychiatric screening before becoming a mother? Should new mothers be barred from returning to work, or forbidden from serving as doctors, judges, or police officers if they take antidepressants? If women are painted as a demographic capable of snapping without warning and that this is widespread and previously hidden you are describing a group of people no society could safely trust with authority or responsibility. This isn't genuine advocacy, I doubt they care about Clancy or her kids, look how easily they harm their own. This is the aggressive protection of victimhood status. Many supporters of Lindsay Clancy are pushing so hard against the evidence because they are terrified of the alternative: a woman being held legally responsible rather than excused as a "victim of biology." The core premise of this radical ideology is that every woman is inherently capable of greatness, and if she fails or harms her child, she must be a helpless victim of her biology or society. Every woman is loving and if she isn’t- society is asking too much of her. Except this is what women are made to do. If your goal is to protect women's parental autonomy, you cannot take the normal stress and sacrifice we all experience as mothers and elevate it to postpartum rage, psychosis, and depression. Extreme postpartum conditions are just not as common as social media trends make them out to be, and sacrificing accountability to gain victimhood status for an imaginary collective identity - women- will do a lot of harm to your own cause and to everyone.

This is a compilation of videos circulating online of women raging or hurting their kids or staring blankly into space while holding their infants, claiming: "I'm so mentally unwell I can't even care for my child, and this is how common postpartum depression is. This is what childbirth does.” “Same, Lindsay.” #Lindsayclancy Many of these posts are tagged with #PPDawareness, pushing the narrative that women have always suffered like this in silence, and that this level of severe instability is just "how common suffering actually is." If this new "awareness" successfully convinces the world that motherhood is an inherently dangerous state that drives women to violent hair-trigger rage or total dysfunction, what does that mean for women? How do we keep children and society safe? Should every woman undergo mandatory psychiatric screening before becoming a mother? Should new mothers be barred from returning to work, or forbidden from serving as doctors, judges, or police officers if they take antidepressants? If women are painted as a demographic capable of snapping without warning and that this is widespread and previously hidden you are describing a group of people no society could safely trust with authority or responsibility. This isn't genuine advocacy, I doubt they care about Clancy or her kids, look how easily they harm their own. This is the aggressive protection of victimhood status. Many supporters of Lindsay Clancy are pushing so hard against the evidence because they are terrified of the alternative: a woman being held legally responsible rather than excused as a "victim of biology." The core premise of this radical ideology is that every woman is inherently capable of greatness, and if she fails or harms her child, she must be a helpless victim of her biology or society. Every woman is loving and if she isn’t- society is asking too much of her. Except this is what women are made to do. If your goal is to protect women's parental autonomy, you cannot take the normal stress and sacrifice we all experience as mothers and elevate it to postpartum rage, psychosis, and depression. Extreme postpartum conditions are just not as common as social media trends make them out to be, and sacrificing accountability to gain victimhood status for an imaginary collective identity - women- will do a lot of harm to your own cause and to everyone.

Hannah Spier, MD

24,995 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

Neil Oliver paints a picture of the dystopian nightmare digital ID makes possible: "The new world into which we are sleepwalking is one of zero trust... To shop online, you'll have to use your digital ID to prove you are who you are. Just to read your email, to use online banking, even to open your computer will require your digital ID." "All of this can be connected to your carbon footprint and the rest of your social credit score... All of it is [based] on the Chinese model that enables the state to watch, track and record everything you do and everywhere you go... All of this can be tied to a central bank digital currency." "Imagine a future where artificial intelligence watches you try and charge your electric vehicle, or put fuel in your old car, and decides you've already emitted too much CO₂ this month. Result? No power or fuel for you." "Or you try and buy a steak and the AI decides you've consumed enough environment wrecking beef—you can't buy it." "Imagine you want to travel to London for a meeting and the AI decides you've tweeted something the government doesn't like. No ticket for you." "For the longest time, most of us have been slaves to debt. In the future, we are to be digital slaves—our every move under round the clock surveillance and subject to the yes or no of Big Brother." Credit: Neil Oliver

Neil Oliver paints a picture of the dystopian nightmare digital ID makes possible: "The new world into which we are sleepwalking is one of zero trust... To shop online, you'll have to use your digital ID to prove you are who you are. Just to read your email, to use online banking, even to open your computer will require your digital ID." "All of this can be connected to your carbon footprint and the rest of your social credit score... All of it is [based] on the Chinese model that enables the state to watch, track and record everything you do and everywhere you go... All of this can be tied to a central bank digital currency." "Imagine a future where artificial intelligence watches you try and charge your electric vehicle, or put fuel in your old car, and decides you've already emitted too much CO₂ this month. Result? No power or fuel for you." "Or you try and buy a steak and the AI decides you've consumed enough environment wrecking beef—you can't buy it." "Imagine you want to travel to London for a meeting and the AI decides you've tweeted something the government doesn't like. No ticket for you." "For the longest time, most of us have been slaves to debt. In the future, we are to be digital slaves—our every move under round the clock surveillance and subject to the yes or no of Big Brother." Credit: Neil Oliver

Wide Awake Media

198,771 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Who is to blame? The authorities for giving permission and allowing OTC sale, or the pharmacist handing them out without the prescription, or the parent? Victim is the baby, finally! If you ask me, if a medicine is not to be given to some one below 4 years of age, permission should not be given in the first place for these drops. If it is a schedule H drug, OTC sale should not be allowed. Ministry of Health #maxtradrops #sinarestAFdrops #solvincolddrops #zyrtecdrops #sinarestdrops There is nothing like 'cough syrup'. Cough can be because of a lot of congestion,bronchospasm, bronchiolitis, acid reflux, allergy or infection. It can be a habit cough, or due to inflammation of the throat or stress related. Address the underlying cause. Syrups available in India in the name of cough syrups contain either decongestants like phenylephrine (whose side effects are mostly due to overdosing or wrong dosing - increase in heart rate, increase in blood pressure, and arrhythmias), or anti allergy medications like chlorpheniramine and cetirizine (overdosing can cause sedation and respiratory depression- less with Levocetirizine, though), mucus breaking drugs like ambroxol and guaifenesin, bronchodilators like levosalbutamol and Terbutaline(overdosing can cause tremors, increased heart rate and arrhythmias) and cough suppressants like dextromethorphan and codeine(which can cause severe respiratory depression when overdosed). We should not suppress the cough, as it might even help in expelling the germs out. For every medicine there is a minimum age before which we can't give the medicine to the child, especially without the paediatricians's advice. For phenylephrine in India, it is now four years, though most guidelines say it is 2 years. For cetirizine, it is 6 months. In India the combination of Phenylephrine and Chlorpheniramine should not be used below 4 years of age. If a medicine is prescribed by a doctor, If the right dose is given by a mother for a right indication, problems usually don’t happen. The problem of overdosing happens when the parents go and buy over-the-counter medications, and give them randomly without knowing the doses. So, don’t buy the so called cough syrups on your own and decide to give them to the children. If they have a cough, paediatricians are there to address the underlying cause for cough and prescribe the treatment depending on the age group, symptoms, and the etiology. Stick to the doses, read expiry date. Doctors should write the prescriptions clearly, mention composition and tell the parents not to repeat the prescription, explain to them about dangers of wrong dosing, overdosing and repetition of prescription. First aid for cough mainly is compression with a warm cloth. In India many of them give steam directly. That is dangerous. If steam should be given, then the bathroom should be filled with the steam and the kid should be made to sit there.Don't give vicks,eucalyptus oil, Zindatilismath etc. In younger children they can cause seizures, and can worsen the cough and asthma symptoms. If the nose is blocked, put one to two drops of saline nose drops (from the pharmacies) in each nostril. If the cough is severe, the kid is vomiting or coughing continuously, consult the doctor. Drug regulators should avoid giving permission for drops and syrup with the same brand name, for unscientific combinations of medicines, for formulations with different components but the same brand name with a suffix or prefix. We need to have only a few standard brands or generic medicines with strong quality control. Form a panel of paediatricians for the same. Also, Terbutaline and Levosalbutamol shouldn't be part of the combinations. We have specific indications for these medicines. Safer route of administration for Levosalbutamol is using a nebulizer or MDI with or with out spacer, only if advised by the paediatrician when the child has bronchospasm. INFACT, AVOID COMBINATIONS! Dr Sivaranjani Santosh

Dr.Sivaranjini

105,975 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

If you have a son or daughter who's starting to think that socialism is the answer to our problems, I want you to try something and report back: Next time you talk, don't argue. Sit down, ask these questions, and just listen: - When you say "socialism," do you mean that you want the government to pay for a bigger safety net like in Denmark, or that the government owns the means of production? Because those are two very different countries. - You say the system is rigged. Who rigged it? And who should be handed the power to un-rig it? - Who sets the price of bread? If not a single person or corporation, what causes that price to remain steady or go up? - Can you name a country where the state took ownership of the means of production and the poor got richer? - When borders open or the walls fall down, anywhere in the world, which direction do people run? Towards the free market system or the socialist system? And before the boundaries fell, which way were the guns pointed? - Would you rather be poor today, or rich in 1900? By the way, only one of those has antibiotics. - If you and I make a voluntary trade, and we both walk away happy, who got hurt? - Someone has to decide what your work is worth. Would you rather it be you and the person paying you, or a bureaucrat with an army who has never met either of you? Try having this conversation with your kids this week. Don't argue. Only listen. And if you want, call into my radio show and tell me how it went.

If you have a son or daughter who's starting to think that socialism is the answer to our problems, I want you to try something and report back: Next time you talk, don't argue. Sit down, ask these questions, and just listen: - When you say "socialism," do you mean that you want the government to pay for a bigger safety net like in Denmark, or that the government owns the means of production? Because those are two very different countries. - You say the system is rigged. Who rigged it? And who should be handed the power to un-rig it? - Who sets the price of bread? If not a single person or corporation, what causes that price to remain steady or go up? - Can you name a country where the state took ownership of the means of production and the poor got richer? - When borders open or the walls fall down, anywhere in the world, which direction do people run? Towards the free market system or the socialist system? And before the boundaries fell, which way were the guns pointed? - Would you rather be poor today, or rich in 1900? By the way, only one of those has antibiotics. - If you and I make a voluntary trade, and we both walk away happy, who got hurt? - Someone has to decide what your work is worth. Would you rather it be you and the person paying you, or a bureaucrat with an army who has never met either of you? Try having this conversation with your kids this week. Don't argue. Only listen. And if you want, call into my radio show and tell me how it went.

Glenn Beck

826,229 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Geoffrey Hinton, who is known as the godfather of AI, used his 2024 Nobel Prize acceptance speech not to celebrate his creation but to warn humanity of its risks: “AI is already being used by authoritarian governments for mass surveillance. In the near future, AI will be used to create new viruses and lethal weapons that decide by themselves who to kill or maim. There is also a long-term existential threat that will arise…We now have evidence that AI created by companies motivated by short-term profits will not prioritize the safety of humanity. We need research on how to prevent these AI beings from taking control. They are no longer science fiction.” When the pioneer of AI is warning humanity about the existential dangers of his own creation it’s time not just to listen, but to take action by stopping the one thing the billionaires need to power the dystopian AI world they’re trying to create: Data Centers.

Geoffrey Hinton, who is known as the godfather of AI, used his 2024 Nobel Prize acceptance speech not to celebrate his creation but to warn humanity of its risks: “AI is already being used by authoritarian governments for mass surveillance. In the near future, AI will be used to create new viruses and lethal weapons that decide by themselves who to kill or maim. There is also a long-term existential threat that will arise…We now have evidence that AI created by companies motivated by short-term profits will not prioritize the safety of humanity. We need research on how to prevent these AI beings from taking control. They are no longer science fiction.” When the pioneer of AI is warning humanity about the existential dangers of his own creation it’s time not just to listen, but to take action by stopping the one thing the billionaires need to power the dystopian AI world they’re trying to create: Data Centers.

Power to the People ☭🕊

61,682 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Gwadar: Dr. MahRang Baloch, the central organizer of the Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC), is holding a press conference at the Gwadar sit-in. The BYC believes that the state prefers the use of force over negotiations. Therefore, on the one hand, the Deputy Commissioner (DC) Gwadar has been sent to negotiate with us, while on the other hand, the worst kind of force is being used. The use of state force and violence poses a threat to the lives of millions of people in Makuran, and the state is using even more force to escalate this threat. We clearly state to the state of Pakistan that if negotiations are to be held, the use of force and violence must be immediately stopped, and empowered representatives should be sent to negotiate. Our demands are as follows: 1. The FIR of the firing incidents in Mastung, Talar, Gwadar, Nushki, and Turbat, where protesters were martyred and injured by Frontier Corps (FC), should be registered against the Corps Commander. 2. The Home Department should immediately notify that no further use of force or violence by the state military will occur. 3. The Chief Minister and his cabinet should come to Gwadar and acknowledge in a press conference with us that the government of Balochistan is responsible for the damages caused during this entire period. They should admit that they attempted to crush this public peaceful program with violence and passed the order for the use of force. The government of Balochistan should condemn the loss of life and property. 4. All participants of the Baloch National Gathering who have been arrested or forcibly disappeared from peaceful gatherings and their homes should be immediately released, and all FIRs should be quashed. 5. All roads should be reopened, the undeclared curfew in Makuran, including Gwadar, should be immediately lifted, the water supply in Gwadar should be restored, and internet services should be immediately restored across the region. 6. The Government of Pakistan should notify that no participant or helper of the Baloch National Gathering will be harassed, and no further FIR will be filed in this regard. Moreover, no unnecessary force will be used in any future peaceful program. 7. The government of Balochistan should compensate the general public for the financial damages caused by the state military and intelligence agencies during the Baloch National Gathering, including breaking into their homes, burning vehicles, or confiscating personal belongings. (03-August-24) #GwadarIsUnderSiege #WeSupportBalochRaajiMuchi #BalochNationalGathering

Gwadar: Dr. MahRang Baloch, the central organizer of the Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC), is holding a press conference at the Gwadar sit-in. The BYC believes that the state prefers the use of force over negotiations. Therefore, on the one hand, the Deputy Commissioner (DC) Gwadar has been sent to negotiate with us, while on the other hand, the worst kind of force is being used. The use of state force and violence poses a threat to the lives of millions of people in Makuran, and the state is using even more force to escalate this threat. We clearly state to the state of Pakistan that if negotiations are to be held, the use of force and violence must be immediately stopped, and empowered representatives should be sent to negotiate. Our demands are as follows: 1. The FIR of the firing incidents in Mastung, Talar, Gwadar, Nushki, and Turbat, where protesters were martyred and injured by Frontier Corps (FC), should be registered against the Corps Commander. 2. The Home Department should immediately notify that no further use of force or violence by the state military will occur. 3. The Chief Minister and his cabinet should come to Gwadar and acknowledge in a press conference with us that the government of Balochistan is responsible for the damages caused during this entire period. They should admit that they attempted to crush this public peaceful program with violence and passed the order for the use of force. The government of Balochistan should condemn the loss of life and property. 4. All participants of the Baloch National Gathering who have been arrested or forcibly disappeared from peaceful gatherings and their homes should be immediately released, and all FIRs should be quashed. 5. All roads should be reopened, the undeclared curfew in Makuran, including Gwadar, should be immediately lifted, the water supply in Gwadar should be restored, and internet services should be immediately restored across the region. 6. The Government of Pakistan should notify that no participant or helper of the Baloch National Gathering will be harassed, and no further FIR will be filed in this regard. Moreover, no unnecessary force will be used in any future peaceful program. 7. The government of Balochistan should compensate the general public for the financial damages caused by the state military and intelligence agencies during the Baloch National Gathering, including breaking into their homes, burning vehicles, or confiscating personal belongings. (03-August-24) #GwadarIsUnderSiege #WeSupportBalochRaajiMuchi #BalochNationalGathering

Baloch Yakjehti Committee

14,199 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

How many more people must be killed before non-Muslims admit we have a major Jihad problem? Islam isn't hijacked by extremists - it is what inspires them. The ideology that flew planes into the World Trade Center in the U.S., killed innocent Australians in a mall, and murdered over 1200 innocent Israelis is one and the same. In 2014, Geert Wilders tried to warn Australians of the threat of Islam during a television interview on ABC Lateline, Australia; he said... "Look how in societies today where Islam is dominant and prominent, how any non-Islamic person, whether it's a Christian or an apostate or a woman or a critical journalist, how they are treated. This is in a very bad way, often with the death penalty or imprisonment or all those kind of terrible things." Due to an enormous influx of people from Islamic countries in the last decades, he continued, Dutch society has changed and worsened so that, "unfortunately, non-Western immigrants, often Muslims, are over-represented in statistics of crime, of dependency on social benefits, that we have honor killings, that we have genital mutilation, that we have streets where women with headscarves and burqas are not the exception anymore. And that it's getting worse... What I'm trying to do when I visit your beautiful country, Australia is warn Australians that even though it might not be the case today, learn from the mistakes that we made in Europe: be vigilant and look at Islam for what it really is. Islam is not a religion of peace. Islam is a totalitarian ideology. The best example is that if any person, any Muslim, wants to leave Islam, then the penalty is death. It is not even allowed to leave it." Wilders made clear that he was not threatening or attacking anyone for a religious or ethnic identity: "I have nothing against the people. I have nothing against the Indonesian people or the Arab people or the Muslim people. I'm talking about the ideology. And indeed, as long as a country has a culture, a religion, an ideology where Islam is dominant, it will never be a democracy. It's also happening in Indonesia. Look at how they treat Christians in Indonesia or how they treat Christians in any other country where Islam is dominant."..."Why is it not possible to build a church in Saudi Arabia, where, as we in the Netherlands, have almost 500 mosques being built; why is it not possible to buy or sell a Bible in any Muslim or most of the Muslim countries, whereas we can buy a Koran here on every street corner? This is the exact example of the fact that Islam is an intolerant society." Wilders emphasized that there is no moderate or non-moderate Islam, but there are moderate and non-moderate Muslims: "As a matter of fact, the majority of the Muslims living in our society are moderate people. But don't make the mistake that even though there are moderate and radical Muslims that there is a moderate or a radical Islam. There is only one Islam, and that is a totalitarian ideology that has no room for anything but Islam. You see it once again in any country in the world where Islam is dominant."

How many more people must be killed before non-Muslims admit we have a major Jihad problem? Islam isn't hijacked by extremists - it is what inspires them. The ideology that flew planes into the World Trade Center in the U.S., killed innocent Australians in a mall, and murdered over 1200 innocent Israelis is one and the same. In 2014, Geert Wilders tried to warn Australians of the threat of Islam during a television interview on ABC Lateline, Australia; he said... "Look how in societies today where Islam is dominant and prominent, how any non-Islamic person, whether it's a Christian or an apostate or a woman or a critical journalist, how they are treated. This is in a very bad way, often with the death penalty or imprisonment or all those kind of terrible things." Due to an enormous influx of people from Islamic countries in the last decades, he continued, Dutch society has changed and worsened so that, "unfortunately, non-Western immigrants, often Muslims, are over-represented in statistics of crime, of dependency on social benefits, that we have honor killings, that we have genital mutilation, that we have streets where women with headscarves and burqas are not the exception anymore. And that it's getting worse... What I'm trying to do when I visit your beautiful country, Australia is warn Australians that even though it might not be the case today, learn from the mistakes that we made in Europe: be vigilant and look at Islam for what it really is. Islam is not a religion of peace. Islam is a totalitarian ideology. The best example is that if any person, any Muslim, wants to leave Islam, then the penalty is death. It is not even allowed to leave it." Wilders made clear that he was not threatening or attacking anyone for a religious or ethnic identity: "I have nothing against the people. I have nothing against the Indonesian people or the Arab people or the Muslim people. I'm talking about the ideology. And indeed, as long as a country has a culture, a religion, an ideology where Islam is dominant, it will never be a democracy. It's also happening in Indonesia. Look at how they treat Christians in Indonesia or how they treat Christians in any other country where Islam is dominant."..."Why is it not possible to build a church in Saudi Arabia, where, as we in the Netherlands, have almost 500 mosques being built; why is it not possible to buy or sell a Bible in any Muslim or most of the Muslim countries, whereas we can buy a Koran here on every street corner? This is the exact example of the fact that Islam is an intolerant society." Wilders emphasized that there is no moderate or non-moderate Islam, but there are moderate and non-moderate Muslims: "As a matter of fact, the majority of the Muslims living in our society are moderate people. But don't make the mistake that even though there are moderate and radical Muslims that there is a moderate or a radical Islam. There is only one Islam, and that is a totalitarian ideology that has no room for anything but Islam. You see it once again in any country in the world where Islam is dominant."

Amy Mek

209,358 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

ANYONE who wants to be President of Zimbabwe, or to occupy any public office, should do something like this👇🏽. Instead of screaming insults & threatening people, we want to know WHO YOU ARE, WHAT YOU BELIEVE IN, WHAT’S YOUR POLICIES ON KEY ISSUES. The fact that some Zimbabweans just get excited by someone screaming insults & plotting to topple the incumbent says a lot about the political immaturity of the populace. Anyone seeking public office must be GRILLED, no free pass. Their policies & pronouncements must be questioned. They should be made to work hard to earn your vote. Zimbabwe will do much better once we have a population that doesn’t fall for slogan chanters or people with an obsession with protests. It’s troubling that we have people who thought Geza will unlock their lives, HOW??? Did he ever tell you his plans for growing the economy and creating jobs? Selling anger or selling or selling hate is very easy, but modern economies aren’t based on such primitive thinking. You need everyone on board…. Those with money are not enemies, they are the people who can be persuaded to INVEST and create jobs. You all cheer when millionaires from Europe come to establish mines in Zimbabwe but you hate your own fellow citizens who are into mining????? Very troubling mindsets

ANYONE who wants to be President of Zimbabwe, or to occupy any public office, should do something like this👇🏽. Instead of screaming insults & threatening people, we want to know WHO YOU ARE, WHAT YOU BELIEVE IN, WHAT’S YOUR POLICIES ON KEY ISSUES. The fact that some Zimbabweans just get excited by someone screaming insults & plotting to topple the incumbent says a lot about the political immaturity of the populace. Anyone seeking public office must be GRILLED, no free pass. Their policies & pronouncements must be questioned. They should be made to work hard to earn your vote. Zimbabwe will do much better once we have a population that doesn’t fall for slogan chanters or people with an obsession with protests. It’s troubling that we have people who thought Geza will unlock their lives, HOW??? Did he ever tell you his plans for growing the economy and creating jobs? Selling anger or selling or selling hate is very easy, but modern economies aren’t based on such primitive thinking. You need everyone on board…. Those with money are not enemies, they are the people who can be persuaded to INVEST and create jobs. You all cheer when millionaires from Europe come to establish mines in Zimbabwe but you hate your own fellow citizens who are into mining????? Very troubling mindsets

𝑲𝒖𝒅𝒛𝒂𝒊 𝑴𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒔𝒊

25,940 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This infamous portion reads, “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” This is the part that describes both the right and the duty of the people to overthrow or replace a government that has become tyrannical or destructive to the ends of securing life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (especially when a pattern of abuses shows intent toward absolute despotism). I ask you, out of sheer consensus, are we there yet?

This infamous portion reads, “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” This is the part that describes both the right and the duty of the people to overthrow or replace a government that has become tyrannical or destructive to the ends of securing life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (especially when a pattern of abuses shows intent toward absolute despotism). I ask you, out of sheer consensus, are we there yet?

🚫👁️Drinks on Saturday🇺🇸

27,904 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

VERY IMPORTANT POST 📫 Want to become RICH in life .. & Also stay wealthy if you already rich in life.. Sharing a Perfect Astrological Special Remedy with you all today.. As Mood achcha hain aaj.. Trust me this remedy alone does wonders.. Very simply and easy to follow.. Can change your lives.. Read 📚 full & follow.. One humble request 🙏, I am completely shadow banned, and the reach is dead.. So do like and share let it reach max for welfare of all.. How to improve your finances in life.. REMEDY TO IMPROVE Your Finances and financial growth in life .. To improve your wealth, savings, and become more prosperous in life .. Just follow this one basic rule in life always at all times .. STOP ABUSING COMPLETELY in life, whatever the situation may be, Not for fun talks or even while you are angry or otherwise.. Just STOP it completely.. It's not worth it trust me.. And in our Sanatan Culture, there were no abuses at all in any of our languages you won't find it at all .. Bcoz we have always been a culture who worships women and feminine energy as Laxmi or Durga .. It was never the part of our culture and lives until the Mughals arrived .. The culture who treats women in the worst possible ways and just see them as sexual and baby producing factory.. It was their arrival which introduced this worst habit of abuses in our lives .. It is them who even marry their sister or do what not .. And what followed we all know .. Always understand simple basic.. When you abuse, it's against feminine energy, which itself is Laxmi swaroop .. So by abusing in any way you literally destroying your Laxmi.. It could be anyone's mother or sister or wife .. And secondly astrologically your wealth is represented by the second house in vedic birth chart.. Which also is the house of your speech .. So as refined and polite your speech will be in life .. As refined and prosperous, your life will become gradually Don't take this advice lightly.. It can do wonders trust me on this just follow it.. Thank you Har Har Mahadev

VERY IMPORTANT POST 📫 Want to become RICH in life .. & Also stay wealthy if you already rich in life.. Sharing a Perfect Astrological Special Remedy with you all today.. As Mood achcha hain aaj.. Trust me this remedy alone does wonders.. Very simply and easy to follow.. Can change your lives.. Read 📚 full & follow.. One humble request 🙏, I am completely shadow banned, and the reach is dead.. So do like and share let it reach max for welfare of all.. How to improve your finances in life.. REMEDY TO IMPROVE Your Finances and financial growth in life .. To improve your wealth, savings, and become more prosperous in life .. Just follow this one basic rule in life always at all times .. STOP ABUSING COMPLETELY in life, whatever the situation may be, Not for fun talks or even while you are angry or otherwise.. Just STOP it completely.. It's not worth it trust me.. And in our Sanatan Culture, there were no abuses at all in any of our languages you won't find it at all .. Bcoz we have always been a culture who worships women and feminine energy as Laxmi or Durga .. It was never the part of our culture and lives until the Mughals arrived .. The culture who treats women in the worst possible ways and just see them as sexual and baby producing factory.. It was their arrival which introduced this worst habit of abuses in our lives .. It is them who even marry their sister or do what not .. And what followed we all know .. Always understand simple basic.. When you abuse, it's against feminine energy, which itself is Laxmi swaroop .. So by abusing in any way you literally destroying your Laxmi.. It could be anyone's mother or sister or wife .. And secondly astrologically your wealth is represented by the second house in vedic birth chart.. Which also is the house of your speech .. So as refined and polite your speech will be in life .. As refined and prosperous, your life will become gradually Don't take this advice lightly.. It can do wonders trust me on this just follow it.. Thank you Har Har Mahadev

AstroCounselKK 🇮🇳

61,845 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

WATCH: FIRE President and CEO Greg Lukianoff's Opening Remarks to the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government on Tuesday, February 6, 2023 Chairman Jordan, Ranking Member Plaskett, and distinguished members of the select subcommittee: Good morning. My name is Greg Lukianoff, and I am the CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, or “FIRE,” where I’ve worked for 23 years. FIRE is a nonpartisan, nonprofit that uses litigation, scholarship, and public outreach to defend and promote the value of free speech for all Americans. We proudly defend free speech regardless of a speaker’s viewpoint or identity, and we have represented people across the political spectrum. I’m here to address the risk AI and AI regulation pose to freedom of speech and the creation of knowledge. We have good reason to be concerned. FIRE regularly fights government attempts to stifle speech on the internet. FIRE is in federal court challenging a New York law that forces websites to “address” online speech that someone, somewhere finds humiliating or vilifying. We’re challenging a new Utah law that requires age verification of all social media users. We’ve raised concerns about the federal government funding development of AI tools to target speech including microaggressions. And later this week, FIRE will file a brief with the Supreme Court explaining the danger of “jawboning” — the use of government pressure to force social media platforms to censor protected speech. But the most chilling threat that the government poses in the context of emerging AI is regulatory overreach that limits its potential as a tool for contributing to human knowledge. A regulatory panic could result in a small number of Americans deciding for everyone else what speech, ideas, and even questions are permitted in the name of “safety” or “alignment.” I’ve dedicated my life to defending freedom of speech because it is an essential human right. However, free speech is more than that; it’s nothing less than essential to our ability to understand the world. A giant step for human progress was the realization that, despite what our senses tell us, knowledge is hard to attain. It's a never-ending, arduous, necessarily de-centralized process of testing and retesting, of chipping away at falsity to edge a bit closer to truth. It’s not just about the proverbial “marketplace of ideas”; it’s about allowing information—independent of idea or argument—to flow freely so that we can hope to know the world as it really is. This means seeing value in expression even when it appears to be wrongheaded or useless. This process has been aided by new technologies that have made communication easier. From the printing press, to the telegraph and radio, to phones and the internet: each one has accelerated the development of new knowledge by making it easier to share information. But AI offers even greater liberating potential, empowered by First Amendment principles, including freedom to code, academic freedom, and freedom of inquiry. We are on the threshold of a revolution in the creation and discovery of knowledge. AI’s potential is humbling; indeed, even frightening. But as the history of the printing press shows, attempts to put the genie back in the bottle will fail. Despite the profound disruption the printing press caused in Europe in the short term, the long-term contribution to art, science, and again, knowledge was without equal. Yes, we may have some fears about the proliferation of AI. But what those of us who care about civil liberties fear more is a government monopoly on advanced AI. Or, more likely, regulatory capture and a government-empowered oligopoly that privileges a handful of existing players. The end result of pushing too hard on AI regulation will be the concentration of AI influence in an even smaller number of hands. Far from reining in the government’s misuse of AI to censor, we will have created the framework not only to censor but also to dominate and distort the production of knowledge itself. “But why not just let OpenAI or a handful of existing AI engines dominate the space?” you may ask. Trust in expertise and in higher education—another important developer of knowledge—has plummeted in recent years, due largely to self-inflicted wounds borne of the ideological biases shared by much of the expert class. That same bias is often found baked into existing AI, and without competing AI models we may create a massive body of purported official facts that we can’t actually trust. We’ve seen on campus that attempts to regulate hate speech have led to absurd results like punishing people for simply reading about controversial topics like racism; similarly, AI programs flag or refuse to answer questions about prohibited topics. And, of course, the potential end result of America tying the hands of the greatest programmers in the world would be to lose our advantage to our most determined foreign adversaries. But with decentralized development and use of AI, we have a better chance of defeating our staunchest rivals or even Skynet or Big Brother. And it’s what gives us our best chance for understanding the world without being blinded by our current orthodoxies, superstitions, or darkest fears. Thank you for the invitation to testify and I look forward to your questions. 🎥: Weaponization Committee

WATCH: FIRE President and CEO Greg Lukianoff's Opening Remarks to the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government on Tuesday, February 6, 2023 Chairman Jordan, Ranking Member Plaskett, and distinguished members of the select subcommittee: Good morning. My name is Greg Lukianoff, and I am the CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, or “FIRE,” where I’ve worked for 23 years. FIRE is a nonpartisan, nonprofit that uses litigation, scholarship, and public outreach to defend and promote the value of free speech for all Americans. We proudly defend free speech regardless of a speaker’s viewpoint or identity, and we have represented people across the political spectrum. I’m here to address the risk AI and AI regulation pose to freedom of speech and the creation of knowledge. We have good reason to be concerned. FIRE regularly fights government attempts to stifle speech on the internet. FIRE is in federal court challenging a New York law that forces websites to “address” online speech that someone, somewhere finds humiliating or vilifying. We’re challenging a new Utah law that requires age verification of all social media users. We’ve raised concerns about the federal government funding development of AI tools to target speech including microaggressions. And later this week, FIRE will file a brief with the Supreme Court explaining the danger of “jawboning” — the use of government pressure to force social media platforms to censor protected speech. But the most chilling threat that the government poses in the context of emerging AI is regulatory overreach that limits its potential as a tool for contributing to human knowledge. A regulatory panic could result in a small number of Americans deciding for everyone else what speech, ideas, and even questions are permitted in the name of “safety” or “alignment.” I’ve dedicated my life to defending freedom of speech because it is an essential human right. However, free speech is more than that; it’s nothing less than essential to our ability to understand the world. A giant step for human progress was the realization that, despite what our senses tell us, knowledge is hard to attain. It's a never-ending, arduous, necessarily de-centralized process of testing and retesting, of chipping away at falsity to edge a bit closer to truth. It’s not just about the proverbial “marketplace of ideas”; it’s about allowing information—independent of idea or argument—to flow freely so that we can hope to know the world as it really is. This means seeing value in expression even when it appears to be wrongheaded or useless. This process has been aided by new technologies that have made communication easier. From the printing press, to the telegraph and radio, to phones and the internet: each one has accelerated the development of new knowledge by making it easier to share information. But AI offers even greater liberating potential, empowered by First Amendment principles, including freedom to code, academic freedom, and freedom of inquiry. We are on the threshold of a revolution in the creation and discovery of knowledge. AI’s potential is humbling; indeed, even frightening. But as the history of the printing press shows, attempts to put the genie back in the bottle will fail. Despite the profound disruption the printing press caused in Europe in the short term, the long-term contribution to art, science, and again, knowledge was without equal. Yes, we may have some fears about the proliferation of AI. But what those of us who care about civil liberties fear more is a government monopoly on advanced AI. Or, more likely, regulatory capture and a government-empowered oligopoly that privileges a handful of existing players. The end result of pushing too hard on AI regulation will be the concentration of AI influence in an even smaller number of hands. Far from reining in the government’s misuse of AI to censor, we will have created the framework not only to censor but also to dominate and distort the production of knowledge itself. “But why not just let OpenAI or a handful of existing AI engines dominate the space?” you may ask. Trust in expertise and in higher education—another important developer of knowledge—has plummeted in recent years, due largely to self-inflicted wounds borne of the ideological biases shared by much of the expert class. That same bias is often found baked into existing AI, and without competing AI models we may create a massive body of purported official facts that we can’t actually trust. We’ve seen on campus that attempts to regulate hate speech have led to absurd results like punishing people for simply reading about controversial topics like racism; similarly, AI programs flag or refuse to answer questions about prohibited topics. And, of course, the potential end result of America tying the hands of the greatest programmers in the world would be to lose our advantage to our most determined foreign adversaries. But with decentralized development and use of AI, we have a better chance of defeating our staunchest rivals or even Skynet or Big Brother. And it’s what gives us our best chance for understanding the world without being blinded by our current orthodoxies, superstitions, or darkest fears. Thank you for the invitation to testify and I look forward to your questions. 🎥: Weaponization Committee

FIRE

127,842 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

No non-Jewish person my age has a longer or clearer record of support for Israel, sympathy with the Jewish people, or opposition to antisemitism than I do. I regularly refer to antisemitism as a "lie from the pit of Hell," because it is. But I have to disagree with Amb. Friedman here. The First Amendment and our strict freedom of speech is one of America's greatest rights and sets us apart from every other country in the world. One of the central promises of Trump's 2024 campaign was to restore and protect American freedom of speech. Five years ago, our elites tried to destroy free speech in America in order to stop "racism." Immediately and predictably, stopping "racism" became a justification for wrecking our cities and wrecking the lives of people who did nothing wrong. Simultaneously, in the name of stopping "transphobia," they tried to make it impossible to dissent against the mutilation of children or radical gender propaganda in schools. The criminal witch hunts against President Trump by Fanni Willis and Jack Smith both tried to criminalize President Trump's speech, indicting him for making tweets or delivering speeches. Racism and antisemitism are both evil and must be opposed. But a government organized around jailing, impoverishing, or silencing people based on "racism" is what our enemies wanted. We should not repeat their mistakes just because some keffiyeh-wearing communists are protesting on campuses. If you don't like a person's opinion that doesn't mean they are an antisemite. But once "antisemitism" becomes valid grounds to censor or even imprison somebody, there will be frantic efforts to label all kinds of speech as antisemitic — the same way the left labeled all kinds of statements as "racist" to justify silencing their opposition. Not only that, but all of this won't even work: A legal crackdown won't make antisemitism go away. In the long run, it would make it worse! America's free speech tradition is our birthright. We should never get rid of it.

No non-Jewish person my age has a longer or clearer record of support for Israel, sympathy with the Jewish people, or opposition to antisemitism than I do. I regularly refer to antisemitism as a "lie from the pit of Hell," because it is. But I have to disagree with Amb. Friedman here. The First Amendment and our strict freedom of speech is one of America's greatest rights and sets us apart from every other country in the world. One of the central promises of Trump's 2024 campaign was to restore and protect American freedom of speech. Five years ago, our elites tried to destroy free speech in America in order to stop "racism." Immediately and predictably, stopping "racism" became a justification for wrecking our cities and wrecking the lives of people who did nothing wrong. Simultaneously, in the name of stopping "transphobia," they tried to make it impossible to dissent against the mutilation of children or radical gender propaganda in schools. The criminal witch hunts against President Trump by Fanni Willis and Jack Smith both tried to criminalize President Trump's speech, indicting him for making tweets or delivering speeches. Racism and antisemitism are both evil and must be opposed. But a government organized around jailing, impoverishing, or silencing people based on "racism" is what our enemies wanted. We should not repeat their mistakes just because some keffiyeh-wearing communists are protesting on campuses. If you don't like a person's opinion that doesn't mean they are an antisemite. But once "antisemitism" becomes valid grounds to censor or even imprison somebody, there will be frantic efforts to label all kinds of speech as antisemitic — the same way the left labeled all kinds of statements as "racist" to justify silencing their opposition. Not only that, but all of this won't even work: A legal crackdown won't make antisemitism go away. In the long run, it would make it worse! America's free speech tradition is our birthright. We should never get rid of it.

Charlie Kirk

2,046,461 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 JUST IN: STARTING TODAY, US Attorney Jeanine Pirro is prosecuting the PARENTS of "youths" who violate curfew and carry out CRIME and takeovers in DC PRISON time is on the table 🔥 LONG OVERDUE! The parents must be held liable for this THUGGERY. PIRRO: "The penalty is up to six months imprisonment, so if the evidence shows the parent knew, or should have known, or permitted, or failed to prevent participation, we're going to CHARGE THEM!" "Starting today, my office will aggressively prosecute parents under D.C.'s curfew law, and the specific statute that we will use is a violation of D.C. Code 22-811, and it involves contributing to the delinquency of a minor." "This statute makes it unlawful for an adult to enable, facilitate, or permit a minor to engage in delinquent acts." "And if you drop your kid off, and you fail to supervise them, or you let them skip school to join the chaos, you are going to face fines, court-ordered classes, and possible jail time!" "Penalties can be imposed even if the juvenile minor is not prosecuted." "So a parent commits this offense if they permit, or by insufficient control, allow a minor under the age of 18 to violate a curfew." "Now, we're going to be asking the Metropolitan Police Department to issue parental citations whenever a minor's curfew violation is tied to a takeover." "We will seek to pair these citations with mandatory parental notification and court-mandated parental classes or family counseling as a condition of the resolution of the case." Pirro is doing INCREDIBLE work.

🚨 JUST IN: STARTING TODAY, US Attorney Jeanine Pirro is prosecuting the PARENTS of "youths" who violate curfew and carry out CRIME and takeovers in DC PRISON time is on the table 🔥 LONG OVERDUE! The parents must be held liable for this THUGGERY. PIRRO: "The penalty is up to six months imprisonment, so if the evidence shows the parent knew, or should have known, or permitted, or failed to prevent participation, we're going to CHARGE THEM!" "Starting today, my office will aggressively prosecute parents under D.C.'s curfew law, and the specific statute that we will use is a violation of D.C. Code 22-811, and it involves contributing to the delinquency of a minor." "This statute makes it unlawful for an adult to enable, facilitate, or permit a minor to engage in delinquent acts." "And if you drop your kid off, and you fail to supervise them, or you let them skip school to join the chaos, you are going to face fines, court-ordered classes, and possible jail time!" "Penalties can be imposed even if the juvenile minor is not prosecuted." "So a parent commits this offense if they permit, or by insufficient control, allow a minor under the age of 18 to violate a curfew." "Now, we're going to be asking the Metropolitan Police Department to issue parental citations whenever a minor's curfew violation is tied to a takeover." "We will seek to pair these citations with mandatory parental notification and court-mandated parental classes or family counseling as a condition of the resolution of the case." Pirro is doing INCREDIBLE work.

Eric Daugherty

44,011 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

After all the corruption President Trump has exposed for all to see, we need to watch his 2016 campaign video with new ears now that we all have new eyes. Before President Trump came along, our government had been captured by a group of tyrannical radicals that have absolutely NO physical, emotional or spiritual connection to the history & culture of our country, or our people and their only goal is to destroy our way of Life, and our country, in every way imaginable. THERE ARE MORE OF US, THAN THERE ARE OF THEM! "This is a struggle (FIGHT) for the survival of our Nation, and this will be our last chance to save it. This election will determine whether we are a free Nation, or whether we have only the ILLUSION of democracy, but are in fact controlled by a handful of globalists, special interest, rigging the system and the system IS RIGGED - THIS IS REALITY." "Our movement is about replacing a failed & corrupt political establishment with a new government controlled by you, the American people." "The Washington Establishment and the financial and MEDIA corporations that FUND IT, exists for only one reason - to protect and enrich itself." "The Establishment has TRILLIONS of dollars at stake in this next election. For those who control the levers of power in Washington and for the GLOBAL Special Interest (groups), they partner with these people that DON'T have your good in mind." "Our campaign (movement) represents a true existential threat like they haven't seen before. This is not simply another 4 year election, this is a crossroads in the history of our civilization that will determine whether or not We, The People, regain control over our government." "The political establishment that is trying to stop us, is the SAME GROUP responsible for our disastrous trade deals, MASSIVE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION, and economic and foreign policies that have bled our country dry." Thank you for everything you do for us and God Bless you Mr President. 2026 is going to be a HISTORIC year for America! 🇺🇸 💖

After all the corruption President Trump has exposed for all to see, we need to watch his 2016 campaign video with new ears now that we all have new eyes. Before President Trump came along, our government had been captured by a group of tyrannical radicals that have absolutely NO physical, emotional or spiritual connection to the history & culture of our country, or our people and their only goal is to destroy our way of Life, and our country, in every way imaginable. THERE ARE MORE OF US, THAN THERE ARE OF THEM! "This is a struggle (FIGHT) for the survival of our Nation, and this will be our last chance to save it. This election will determine whether we are a free Nation, or whether we have only the ILLUSION of democracy, but are in fact controlled by a handful of globalists, special interest, rigging the system and the system IS RIGGED - THIS IS REALITY." "Our movement is about replacing a failed & corrupt political establishment with a new government controlled by you, the American people." "The Washington Establishment and the financial and MEDIA corporations that FUND IT, exists for only one reason - to protect and enrich itself." "The Establishment has TRILLIONS of dollars at stake in this next election. For those who control the levers of power in Washington and for the GLOBAL Special Interest (groups), they partner with these people that DON'T have your good in mind." "Our campaign (movement) represents a true existential threat like they haven't seen before. This is not simply another 4 year election, this is a crossroads in the history of our civilization that will determine whether or not We, The People, regain control over our government." "The political establishment that is trying to stop us, is the SAME GROUP responsible for our disastrous trade deals, MASSIVE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION, and economic and foreign policies that have bled our country dry." Thank you for everything you do for us and God Bless you Mr President. 2026 is going to be a HISTORIC year for America! 🇺🇸 💖

Bridgett Fertig

59,941 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

WE DATE MEN THAT WE ACTUALLY LIKE! NOT MEN THAT WE NEED. 💋 This is a teachable moment for all women. Dating for love can look like many things. It doesn’t have to look like the “made up” instagram baddie standard that society has created where women are only dating for survival or in exchange for external things. Do not fall into the pressure of confirming to what your life should LOOK like. What’s important is how it FEELS. On social media everyone has their boundaries, morals and life together while watching and judging other. I have yet to see a HOW-TO BE PERFECT book from any of these women. You can date, and still be in the process of finding yourself! In fact, you will ALWAYS be in the process of finding yourself. This is a never ending journey. Just because someone is figuring their self out doesn’t mean they should be deprived of love, quality time or affection or physical touch. The amazing thing about my journey is that I did all the work on my own and I made it out alive! No one was there to save me, except for me! I had to really figure this out alone! And I did just that! And that’s something no one can ever take from me. For those of you who are exactly where I was, keep going! People are going to talk… but later, they’ll be asking you how did you do it! Keep going 💎 ✨

WE DATE MEN THAT WE ACTUALLY LIKE! NOT MEN THAT WE NEED. 💋 This is a teachable moment for all women. Dating for love can look like many things. It doesn’t have to look like the “made up” instagram baddie standard that society has created where women are only dating for survival or in exchange for external things. Do not fall into the pressure of confirming to what your life should LOOK like. What’s important is how it FEELS. On social media everyone has their boundaries, morals and life together while watching and judging other. I have yet to see a HOW-TO BE PERFECT book from any of these women. You can date, and still be in the process of finding yourself! In fact, you will ALWAYS be in the process of finding yourself. This is a never ending journey. Just because someone is figuring their self out doesn’t mean they should be deprived of love, quality time or affection or physical touch. The amazing thing about my journey is that I did all the work on my own and I made it out alive! No one was there to save me, except for me! I had to really figure this out alone! And I did just that! And that’s something no one can ever take from me. For those of you who are exactly where I was, keep going! People are going to talk… but later, they’ll be asking you how did you do it! Keep going 💎 ✨

ItGIRL

105,681 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨 JUST IN: Nick Shirley just got a "USA! USA!" chant going in LONDON in front of THOUSANDS, showing just how much Americans support these British patriots rising up and taking their country back LFG!! 🇺🇸🇬🇧 Nick is unleashing pure TRUTH, he went around Keir Starmer just to get here! "You guys have young women be r*ped by gangs of men and your politicians ALLOWED it because they're afraid of being called a racist or Islamophobic." "That does NOT make you a racist for speaking truth." "There was a sign today that said 'we did not vote for open borders, digital ID, two-tier policing, higher taxes, loss of free speech, p*dophiles and politics, higher cost of living...'" "...now your media will call you far right and your prime minister will call you guys dangerous, but the ideas of freedom of speech are not dangerous, or the idea that you want to know who your neighbor is, does not make you dangerous." Nick shirley Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧

🚨 JUST IN: Nick Shirley just got a "USA! USA!" chant going in LONDON in front of THOUSANDS, showing just how much Americans support these British patriots rising up and taking their country back LFG!! 🇺🇸🇬🇧 Nick is unleashing pure TRUTH, he went around Keir Starmer just to get here! "You guys have young women be rped by gangs of men and your politicians ALLOWED it because they're afraid of being called a racist or Islamophobic." "That does NOT make you a racist for speaking truth." "There was a sign today that said 'we did not vote for open borders, digital ID, two-tier policing, higher taxes, loss of free speech, pdophiles and politics, higher cost of living...'" "...now your media will call you far right and your prime minister will call you guys dangerous, but the ideas of freedom of speech are not dangerous, or the idea that you want to know who your neighbor is, does not make you dangerous." Nick shirley Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧

Eric Daugherty

422,509 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten