Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

20-YEAR-OLD GUY SHOWS HOW CLAUDE API CAN TURN 500-VIEW CONTENT INTO A $40K/MONTH CLIENT WORKFLOW Not from a big agency. Not from hiring writers. Just taking the same service people sell every week and wiring Claude API into the boring middle. A topic goes in. It pulls the research,...

gippp69's profile picture

Gipp 🦅

7,682 subscribers

19,254 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

THIS GUY SPENT 5 MINUTES SETTING UP A $20 CLAUDE WORKSPACE AND TURNED 30 MINUTES OF DAILY PROMPT CHAOS INTO A SYSTEM Most people open Claude, type 1 messy prompt, rewrite it 10 times, get the same generic answer and call the model “bad.” He opens Claude Cowork, adds the project rules, past context, working files, examples, decisions and a clean place for the model to remember what it is doing. Same Claude. Same $20 tool. Completely different output. The funny part is there is no magic prompt here. No secret template. No “10x Claude” trick. Just the boring layer Karpathy keeps pointing at: context, memory and structure before output. A setup like this can save 30 minutes a day, which is 15 hours a month. If you use Claude for client work at $50 to $100/hour, that is $750 to $1,500/month in time you stop burning on repeated prompts. The model is real. The output is real. The edge is in not making Claude start from zero every single time.
0:37

THIS GUY SPENT 5 MINUTES SETTING UP A $20 CLAUDE WORKSPACE AND TURNED 30 MINUTES OF DAILY PROMPT CHAOS INTO A SYSTEM Most people open Claude, type 1 messy prompt, rewrite it 10 times, get the same generic answer and call the model “bad.” He opens Claude Cowork, adds the project rules, past context, working files, examples, decisions and a clean place for the model to remember what it is doing. Same Claude. Same $20 tool. Completely different output. The funny part is there is no magic prompt here. No secret template. No “10x Claude” trick. Just the boring layer Karpathy keeps pointing at: context, memory and structure before output. A setup like this can save 30 minutes a day, which is 15 hours a month. If you use Claude for client work at $50 to $100/hour, that is $750 to $1,500/month in time you stop burning on repeated prompts. The model is real. The output is real. The edge is in not making Claude start from zero every single time.

Gipp 🦅

14,871 views • 1 month ago

He started using Claude AI and made $25,000 in his first month The guy could not even hide how much it changed his life. He paid for Claude and treated it like a real business partner. Built workflows that automate client work, content and outreach all in one place. What used to take him 12 hours a day now takes 2. He started taking on triple the clients without burning out once. At $5,000 per client and five clients a month, the numbers move fast. That is $25,000 landing in his account from a tool that costs $20. Most people use Claude to write captions and call it a day. He used it to rebuild his entire income from the ground up. Follow if you want the exact workflows he uses to scale this.
0:46

He started using Claude AI and made $25,000 in his first month The guy could not even hide how much it changed his life. He paid for Claude and treated it like a real business partner. Built workflows that automate client work, content and outreach all in one place. What used to take him 12 hours a day now takes 2. He started taking on triple the clients without burning out once. At $5,000 per client and five clients a month, the numbers move fast. That is $25,000 landing in his account from a tool that costs $20. Most people use Claude to write captions and call it a day. He used it to rebuild his entire income from the ground up. Follow if you want the exact workflows he uses to scale this.

winkle.

21,373 views • 29 days ago

SOMEONE IS CHARGING $5,000/MONTH FOR SOCIAL MEDIA CONTENT THAT CLAUDE WRITES IN 6 HOURS A WEEK no team, no office, just Claude and a scheduling app mid-market companies pay $2,000-$5,000 per month for social media management, and most of them are getting a junior freelancer posting generic content or an agency that barely touches their account one of them runs the whole thing in a weekly workflow: brief Claude on Monday, write posts Tuesday and Wednesday, schedule Thursday, pull numbers Friday another one charged three clients the same $5,000 rate before hiring a single person, that's $180,000/year running on one tool there's a prompt that makes Claude write every post in the client's exact voice by analyzing 5 examples of their existing content, 10 min per post instead of 60 you can land the first client with one outreach message, no portfolio, no case studies, just a specific offer and a 30-minute call the model is already working, the only question is whether you build it or watch someone else do it full breakdown of the workflow, the prompts, and how to find clients in the article below
0:42

SOMEONE IS CHARGING $5,000/MONTH FOR SOCIAL MEDIA CONTENT THAT CLAUDE WRITES IN 6 HOURS A WEEK no team, no office, just Claude and a scheduling app mid-market companies pay $2,000-$5,000 per month for social media management, and most of them are getting a junior freelancer posting generic content or an agency that barely touches their account one of them runs the whole thing in a weekly workflow: brief Claude on Monday, write posts Tuesday and Wednesday, schedule Thursday, pull numbers Friday another one charged three clients the same $5,000 rate before hiring a single person, that's $180,000/year running on one tool there's a prompt that makes Claude write every post in the client's exact voice by analyzing 5 examples of their existing content, 10 min per post instead of 60 you can land the first client with one outreach message, no portfolio, no case studies, just a specific offer and a 30-minute call the model is already working, the only question is whether you build it or watch someone else do it full breakdown of the workflow, the prompts, and how to find clients in the article below

Chrome

13,769 views • 1 month ago

A 20-year-old student built a YouTube machine that runs itself and prints $38,000 a month The whole system runs on Claude and Premiere Pro stitched together. Claude scouts high-CPM niches and writes every script. Python pipes the scripts into Premiere where the videos get cut and exported on their own. The channels were already past a million views on Shorts in the first month. On the side he sells the same pipeline as a service to other creators. $400 per client video, 20 minutes of his actual time per delivery. Around 25 videos a week stacks up to roughly $10,000 from clients alone. Add the channel revenue on top and the whole thing clears $38,000 a month. He's 20, no team, no office, no editor, just a laptop running Claude 24/7. Save this before every faceless YouTuber in your feed switches to the same stack.
0:35

A 20-year-old student built a YouTube machine that runs itself and prints $38,000 a month The whole system runs on Claude and Premiere Pro stitched together. Claude scouts high-CPM niches and writes every script. Python pipes the scripts into Premiere where the videos get cut and exported on their own. The channels were already past a million views on Shorts in the first month. On the side he sells the same pipeline as a service to other creators. $400 per client video, 20 minutes of his actual time per delivery. Around 25 videos a week stacks up to roughly $10,000 from clients alone. Add the channel revenue on top and the whole thing clears $38,000 a month. He's 20, no team, no office, no editor, just a laptop running Claude 24/7. Save this before every faceless YouTuber in your feed switches to the same stack.

winkle.

66,271 views • 1 month ago

THIS GUY CONNECTED CLAUDE TO TRADINGVIEW AND CUT 200+ HOURS OF MANUAL CHART WORK 40 trades a week used to mean the same loop: open the chart, check RSI, compare EMA, write notes and wait for the next setup now Claude reads TradingView 24/7, tracks volume, indicators and price conditions while he is not even at the desk this is not a $20k trading terminal and not a quant fund setup, just one laptop, one chart and one strategy written in plain English the crazy part is not that Claude predicts the market, it is that a regular trader can remove the boring human loop from every setup ↓
0:26

THIS GUY CONNECTED CLAUDE TO TRADINGVIEW AND CUT 200+ HOURS OF MANUAL CHART WORK 40 trades a week used to mean the same loop: open the chart, check RSI, compare EMA, write notes and wait for the next setup now Claude reads TradingView 24/7, tracks volume, indicators and price conditions while he is not even at the desk this is not a $20k trading terminal and not a quant fund setup, just one laptop, one chart and one strategy written in plain English the crazy part is not that Claude predicts the market, it is that a regular trader can remove the boring human loop from every setup ↓

Gipp 🦅

55,377 views • 1 month ago

THIS VETERAN DEVELOPER PUT 2 MAC MINIS ON HIS DESK FOR $1,198 AND TURNED HERMES INTO A LOCAL AI WORKSPACE THAT DOESN’T NEED A $210/MONTH AGENT STACK he is not flexing hardware. he is showing the part most people still miss: once Hermes runs locally, the laptop stops being a chat window and starts acting like a workspace with memory, tools and saved skills two Mac minis, one local setup, zero cloud agent dashboard. research tasks, summaries, client notes and workflow steps stay on his machine instead of disappearing every time a session ends most people keep paying for Claude, wrappers, API calls and automation tools just to repeat the same instructions every day. Hermes cuts the waste by saving the process once and pulling it back when the same job returns the math is ugly for cloud tools. $210/month turns into $2,520/year before you even count extra tokens. his version is hardware once, local workflows after, and no panic when rate limits hit the quiet winners will not be the people with the cleanest chatbot tab. it will be the people who own the machine, the memory and the workflow before everyone else realizes that is the product
2:51

THIS VETERAN DEVELOPER PUT 2 MAC MINIS ON HIS DESK FOR $1,198 AND TURNED HERMES INTO A LOCAL AI WORKSPACE THAT DOESN’T NEED A $210/MONTH AGENT STACK he is not flexing hardware. he is showing the part most people still miss: once Hermes runs locally, the laptop stops being a chat window and starts acting like a workspace with memory, tools and saved skills two Mac minis, one local setup, zero cloud agent dashboard. research tasks, summaries, client notes and workflow steps stay on his machine instead of disappearing every time a session ends most people keep paying for Claude, wrappers, API calls and automation tools just to repeat the same instructions every day. Hermes cuts the waste by saving the process once and pulling it back when the same job returns the math is ugly for cloud tools. $210/month turns into $2,520/year before you even count extra tokens. his version is hardware once, local workflows after, and no panic when rate limits hit the quiet winners will not be the people with the cleanest chatbot tab. it will be the people who own the machine, the memory and the workflow before everyone else realizes that is the product

Gipp 🦅

60,173 views • 1 month ago

There's a built-in agent inside Claude Code you can invoke just by telling Claude to use the claude-code-guide agent Save this... you'll need it It's not a local file in your project. It's a built-in subagent defined in Claude Code's system itself. It answers questions about Claude Code CLI, the Agent SDK, and the Claude API. It uses Glob, Grep, Read, WebFetch, and WebSearch, but can't edit or write files. Its only job is to answer questions.
0:22

There's a built-in agent inside Claude Code you can invoke just by telling Claude to use the claude-code-guide agent Save this... you'll need it It's not a local file in your project. It's a built-in subagent defined in Claude Code's system itself. It answers questions about Claude Code CLI, the Agent SDK, and the Claude API. It uses Glob, Grep, Read, WebFetch, and WebSearch, but can't edit or write files. Its only job is to answer questions.

Daniel San

57,240 views • 4 months ago

CLAUDE DESIGN SKILLS CAN TURN A $20 PLAN INTO A JUNIOR DESIGN SYSTEM ASSISTANT A blank prompt makes Claude judge design like a generalist, one screen at a time, with too much room for random taste and vague feedback Design Skills give it a repeatable way to look at interface work: spacing, hierarchy, contrast, component consistency, states, layout rhythm, and the small visual rules that make a product feel finished That is where it becomes useful for a designer, it can review a rough screen, catch what feels off, suggest a cleaner structure, keep repeated components aligned, and explain the changes in a way that feels closer to a design lead than a prompt response The value is not that Claude becomes "creative" and the value is that its judgment becomes repeatable, so the same design standards can be applied across every screen instead of being rebuilt from scratch in every chat Check the full article about cowork and skills below
0:45

CLAUDE DESIGN SKILLS CAN TURN A $20 PLAN INTO A JUNIOR DESIGN SYSTEM ASSISTANT A blank prompt makes Claude judge design like a generalist, one screen at a time, with too much room for random taste and vague feedback Design Skills give it a repeatable way to look at interface work: spacing, hierarchy, contrast, component consistency, states, layout rhythm, and the small visual rules that make a product feel finished That is where it becomes useful for a designer, it can review a rough screen, catch what feels off, suggest a cleaner structure, keep repeated components aligned, and explain the changes in a way that feels closer to a design lead than a prompt response The value is not that Claude becomes "creative" and the value is that its judgment becomes repeatable, so the same design standards can be applied across every screen instead of being rebuilt from scratch in every chat Check the full article about cowork and skills below

Penguin

10,349 views • 28 days ago

THIS DEVELOPER BOUGHT A $799 MAC MINI AND NOW RUNS 5 FACELESS YOUTUBE CHANNELS FOR $55/MONTH WITH CLAUDE AGENTS the trick is not buying a stronger computer. the trick is giving claude its own 24/7 machine, so it can take over the screen, click through tools, move files, write scripts and keep working while his main laptop stays untouched each channel runs from its own skill. documentary, luxury, gaming, deep sea and infrastructure all have different tones, seo formats and script rules. claude can turn one topic into a 1,600-2,000 word script, 8-10 visual prompts and 3 title options without a new brief every night the whole system costs $799 once and around $55 a month to operate. claude, elevenlabs, midjourney and electricity replace the manual loop most faceless creators get stuck in after month two. the mac mini itself stays online for about $3/month setup takes around 45 minutes. fresh macos install, 32gb ram, claude desktop, computer use permissions, google drive routing, connectors and one dedicated output folder. after that the machine becomes the place where the work happens most people try to scale youtube by adding more channels and more manual work. this flips the model. one box handles research, scripts, prompts, descriptions and scheduling while the human does one review session per week month 6 is where this starts getting dangerous. the channels that survive the first 90 days are not just posting videos anymore. they are running a tiny content factory from a box under the desk
1:07

THIS DEVELOPER BOUGHT A $799 MAC MINI AND NOW RUNS 5 FACELESS YOUTUBE CHANNELS FOR $55/MONTH WITH CLAUDE AGENTS the trick is not buying a stronger computer. the trick is giving claude its own 24/7 machine, so it can take over the screen, click through tools, move files, write scripts and keep working while his main laptop stays untouched each channel runs from its own skill. documentary, luxury, gaming, deep sea and infrastructure all have different tones, seo formats and script rules. claude can turn one topic into a 1,600-2,000 word script, 8-10 visual prompts and 3 title options without a new brief every night the whole system costs $799 once and around $55 a month to operate. claude, elevenlabs, midjourney and electricity replace the manual loop most faceless creators get stuck in after month two. the mac mini itself stays online for about $3/month setup takes around 45 minutes. fresh macos install, 32gb ram, claude desktop, computer use permissions, google drive routing, connectors and one dedicated output folder. after that the machine becomes the place where the work happens most people try to scale youtube by adding more channels and more manual work. this flips the model. one box handles research, scripts, prompts, descriptions and scheduling while the human does one review session per week month 6 is where this starts getting dangerous. the channels that survive the first 90 days are not just posting videos anymore. they are running a tiny content factory from a box under the desk

Gipp 🦅

19,638 views • 1 month ago

Anthropic shipped 125 settings for Claude The official docs cover 40 One developer found the other 85 and his API bill dropped from $340 to $87 - not by using a cheaper model - not by writing shorter prompts just by moving one line in a config file to the right place > memory scoped per project → past clients never bleed into new work > Extended Thinking on Light by default → 18–25% fewer Opus tokens in week one > cache_control moved to the right line → the fix that turned a $340 bill into $87 > plugins and MCP servers toggled off when idle → saved 25–40K tokens per session > per-project model override → Haiku for docs, Sonnet for infra, Opus only where it matters most Claude users are running a $100/month tool at 30% of its actual capability
0:49

Anthropic shipped 125 settings for Claude The official docs cover 40 One developer found the other 85 and his API bill dropped from $340 to $87 - not by using a cheaper model - not by writing shorter prompts just by moving one line in a config file to the right place > memory scoped per project → past clients never bleed into new work > Extended Thinking on Light by default → 18–25% fewer Opus tokens in week one > cache_control moved to the right line → the fix that turned a $340 bill into $87 > plugins and MCP servers toggled off when idle → saved 25–40K tokens per session > per-project model override → Haiku for docs, Sonnet for infra, Opus only where it matters most Claude users are running a $100/month tool at 30% of its actual capability

Shadow Nick

379,589 views • 1 month ago

A 21-year-old clears $35K a month from his bedroom. One laptop. Claude does 90% of the work he charges for. His parents still think he’s “looking for a job.” He stopped looking 8 months ago. Part 1 - Sell automations, not hours. Businesses drown in manual work - invoicing, lead follow-ups, booking reminders. He builds the system that kills the busywork. They pay $2,500 upfront plus $300/mo. Claude writes every workflow. Part 2 - Claude finds the buyers. Point it at a niche - real estate, clinics, contractors. It pulls 200 businesses still running on sticky notes and spreadsheets. The lead list builds itself by morning. Part 3 - One blueprint, every client. Same automation skeleton each time. Claude reads their process, rewires it, swaps the branding. 20 minutes per build instead of a week. Part 4 - The real ramp. Month 1: 3 clients, $7,500. Month 3: 9 clients, $19,000. Month 5: 15 clients, $30,000. Month 7: 20+ clients plus retainers pushing past $35K The $300 monthly fee is the engine. 70 clients on retainer is $21,000 that lands whether he works or not. What keeps everyone else stuck at 21: They wait to feel ready. He shipped client 1 before he felt ready. Claude covered the gaps. His friends are sending out résumés. He’s deciding which clients to fire. The job he was “looking for” pays a quarter of this. If this was useful - follow.
0:20

A 21-year-old clears $35K a month from his bedroom. One laptop. Claude does 90% of the work he charges for. His parents still think he’s “looking for a job.” He stopped looking 8 months ago. Part 1 - Sell automations, not hours. Businesses drown in manual work - invoicing, lead follow-ups, booking reminders. He builds the system that kills the busywork. They pay $2,500 upfront plus $300/mo. Claude writes every workflow. Part 2 - Claude finds the buyers. Point it at a niche - real estate, clinics, contractors. It pulls 200 businesses still running on sticky notes and spreadsheets. The lead list builds itself by morning. Part 3 - One blueprint, every client. Same automation skeleton each time. Claude reads their process, rewires it, swaps the branding. 20 minutes per build instead of a week. Part 4 - The real ramp. Month 1: 3 clients, $7,500. Month 3: 9 clients, $19,000. Month 5: 15 clients, $30,000. Month 7: 20+ clients plus retainers pushing past $35K The $300 monthly fee is the engine. 70 clients on retainer is $21,000 that lands whether he works or not. What keeps everyone else stuck at 21: They wait to feel ready. He shipped client 1 before he felt ready. Claude covered the gaps. His friends are sending out résumés. He’s deciding which clients to fire. The job he was “looking for” pays a quarter of this. If this was useful - follow.

RGK🌹

34,803 views • 24 days ago

1,000,000 views in finance returns about $11,000, the same million in gaming returns $800, that gap is the whole business i've been tracking faceless channels and the niche decides everything. an ai-tools channel doing 200,000 views a month at a $7 rpm pulls ~$1,400 from ads alone > claude writes the full youtube description, chapter timestamps, tiktok hook and reels script from one prompt > the entire operational layer of a video compressed into about two minutes > the cost to run it is roughly $20 a month in tools ship more, into a niche that actually pays, and $3k to $10k a month is a cadence problem, not a talent one
0:31

1,000,000 views in finance returns about $11,000, the same million in gaming returns $800, that gap is the whole business i've been tracking faceless channels and the niche decides everything. an ai-tools channel doing 200,000 views a month at a $7 rpm pulls ~$1,400 from ads alone > claude writes the full youtube description, chapter timestamps, tiktok hook and reels script from one prompt > the entire operational layer of a video compressed into about two minutes > the cost to run it is roughly $20 a month in tools ship more, into a niche that actually pays, and $3k to $10k a month is a cadence problem, not a talent one

Kiyoro

19,487 views • 1 month ago

THIS GUY BUILT AN AUTONOMOUS AI AGENT OUT OF CLAUDE CODE + OBSIDIAN and this is way more interesting than another “use AI to take notes” demo the trick is simple: Obsidian is not the writing app here. it becomes the agent’s memory, task board, and context folder. Claude Code is not just answering prompts. it reads the vault, edits files, follows instructions, and keeps moving through the work like a junior operator with a filesystem. the reusable setup looks like this: 1. create an Obsidian vault for one project 2. keep goals, rules, tasks, decisions, and references as markdown files 3. point Claude Code at the folder 4. give it a clear operating loop: read context → choose next task → execute → write back what changed 5. use the notes as persistent memory instead of re-explaining the project every chat that’s the part people miss. the “agent” is not magic. it’s the boring combination of: - local files - explicit rules - task state - write access - a model that can run through the repo/vault Obsidian makes the memory human-readable. Claude Code makes the memory executable. that combo is why the video worked: it turns a notes app into an operating surface for actual work. best use cases: - content systems - research vaults - coding projects - client ops docs - personal knowledge bases that need actions, not just storage the caveat: if your vault is messy, your agent becomes messy too. folders, naming, “done” criteria, and forbidden actions matter more than the prompt. but once the structure is clean, this is one of the easiest ways to build an agent that remembers what happened yesterday without paying for a full custom app.
10:19

THIS GUY BUILT AN AUTONOMOUS AI AGENT OUT OF CLAUDE CODE + OBSIDIAN and this is way more interesting than another “use AI to take notes” demo the trick is simple: Obsidian is not the writing app here. it becomes the agent’s memory, task board, and context folder. Claude Code is not just answering prompts. it reads the vault, edits files, follows instructions, and keeps moving through the work like a junior operator with a filesystem. the reusable setup looks like this: 1. create an Obsidian vault for one project 2. keep goals, rules, tasks, decisions, and references as markdown files 3. point Claude Code at the folder 4. give it a clear operating loop: read context → choose next task → execute → write back what changed 5. use the notes as persistent memory instead of re-explaining the project every chat that’s the part people miss. the “agent” is not magic. it’s the boring combination of: - local files - explicit rules - task state - write access - a model that can run through the repo/vault Obsidian makes the memory human-readable. Claude Code makes the memory executable. that combo is why the video worked: it turns a notes app into an operating surface for actual work. best use cases: - content systems - research vaults - coding projects - client ops docs - personal knowledge bases that need actions, not just storage the caveat: if your vault is messy, your agent becomes messy too. folders, naming, “done” criteria, and forbidden actions matter more than the prompt. but once the structure is clean, this is one of the easiest ways to build an agent that remembers what happened yesterday without paying for a full custom app.

kocer

30,403 views • 18 days ago

A CHINESE DEVELOPER ASKED CLAUDE TO FIND A “$1M APP IDEA” AND TURNED IT INTO A $14,800/MONTH APP STORE PORTFOLIO He is not building some huge startup or spending 8 months polishing one perfect product. He picks boring keywords people already search for, opens Claude Code, builds a simple iOS app around one problem, adds onboarding, screenshots and a $6.99 paywall, then ships before the idea gets too complicated. The trick is that every app is almost the same product underneath. Same subscription flow, same settings page, same review prompt, same clean interface. Only the niche changes: plant scanner, receipt cleaner, walking tracker, pet symptom checker, study timer, invoice maker. After 4 months he has 19 apps live, 7 dead ones, and 5 doing most of the money. One app making $300/month looks like nothing, but a few small apps doing $700, $1,200 or $2,000/month becomes real when each build only takes 2-3 days. Claude Code is not the money printer. The money printer is finding demand, shipping fast, and treating every failed app like cheap market research. Small apps. Real system.
1:02

A CHINESE DEVELOPER ASKED CLAUDE TO FIND A “$1M APP IDEA” AND TURNED IT INTO A $14,800/MONTH APP STORE PORTFOLIO He is not building some huge startup or spending 8 months polishing one perfect product. He picks boring keywords people already search for, opens Claude Code, builds a simple iOS app around one problem, adds onboarding, screenshots and a $6.99 paywall, then ships before the idea gets too complicated. The trick is that every app is almost the same product underneath. Same subscription flow, same settings page, same review prompt, same clean interface. Only the niche changes: plant scanner, receipt cleaner, walking tracker, pet symptom checker, study timer, invoice maker. After 4 months he has 19 apps live, 7 dead ones, and 5 doing most of the money. One app making $300/month looks like nothing, but a few small apps doing $700, $1,200 or $2,000/month becomes real when each build only takes 2-3 days. Claude Code is not the money printer. The money printer is finding demand, shipping fast, and treating every failed app like cheap market research. Small apps. Real system.

Gipp 🦅

18,839 views • 1 month ago

THIS CLAUDE WORKFLOW CAN BE TURNED INTO A $2,970/MO DESIGN MACHINE Simple offer: $99 for a pack of banners, thumbnails, article covers or launch visuals for people who need clean graphics fast. The client sends a rough idea. Claude turns it into a proper visual brief: layout, colors, lighting, mood and format. Then the image model turns it into finished visuals in minutes. 30 small orders a month at $99 = $2,970. No opening Figma from zero. No endless prompt tweaking. No long back-and-forth for every small graphic. Most people see another cool AI demo. The better move is turning the workflow into something people can actually buy.
0:36

THIS CLAUDE WORKFLOW CAN BE TURNED INTO A $2,970/MO DESIGN MACHINE Simple offer: $99 for a pack of banners, thumbnails, article covers or launch visuals for people who need clean graphics fast. The client sends a rough idea. Claude turns it into a proper visual brief: layout, colors, lighting, mood and format. Then the image model turns it into finished visuals in minutes. 30 small orders a month at $99 = $2,970. No opening Figma from zero. No endless prompt tweaking. No long back-and-forth for every small graphic. Most people see another cool AI demo. The better move is turning the workflow into something people can actually buy.

Gipp 🦅

12,891 views • 1 month ago

A 20-year-old guy earned $37,250 in a month creating YouTube content and barely even touches the editing software. He set up an autonomous "content factory" where Claude acts as the brain and Premiere Pro serves as the body. The system works 24/7 while he lives his life. Claude analyzes high-CPM niches, writes scripts, and uses Python scripts to trigger voiceovers and video generation. In the first month alone, one of his channels hit hundreds of thousands of views on Shorts. One client video ($400) -> 15 minutes of AI work = $400 profit. 20 videos per week = $8,000. He simply had an idea, and Claude took care of everything: from the first word of the script to the final render.
0:24

A 20-year-old guy earned $37,250 in a month creating YouTube content and barely even touches the editing software. He set up an autonomous "content factory" where Claude acts as the brain and Premiere Pro serves as the body. The system works 24/7 while he lives his life. Claude analyzes high-CPM niches, writes scripts, and uses Python scripts to trigger voiceovers and video generation. In the first month alone, one of his channels hit hundreds of thousands of views on Shorts. One client video ($400) -> 15 minutes of AI work = $400 profit. 20 videos per week = $8,000. He simply had an idea, and Claude took care of everything: from the first word of the script to the final render.

shmidt

1,860,951 views • 2 months ago

This Chinese developer runs 9 agents on Claude Code under a GPT-5.5 orchestrator and they close 500 client tasks a month without a single assistant. His client work is closed without him, on a single laptop and only three subscriptions. The entire system lives on one MacBook Pro M4 with 128 GB of memory and subscriptions to Claude Code and GPT-5.5 cost him approximately $300 a month. There is no CRM, no team, no office only a terminal window with 9 parallel streams. The orchestrator works with a simple system prompt: «You are the orchestrator of a client inbox. Classify every incoming email into 4 categories: code, content, analysis, communication. Delegate to the corresponding worker agent. When the result is ready, check it for completeness, send it to the client on my behalf, and mark the task as closed. Do not ask clarifying questions.» And the orchestrator checks the inbox every 30 seconds, classifies fresh emails, and distributes them to 9 worker agents on Claude Code, each of whom is responsible for their own class of tasks. Here is an example of how one of them closes a request to refactor a client's auth module: Task: refactor user-auth module Broke the monolith into 3 files by responsibilities Added unit tests, coverage increased to 87% Renamed 4 functions to camelCase according to the style guide PR is ready for review, link below» And so about 50 cycles a day. By noon 25 tasks are closed, by dinner 50, and by the end of the month 500. On average, it takes about 7 minutes from the appearance of an email in the inbox to sending the result to the client. This is more than what a live team of 6 developers, copywriters and analysts working 8 hours a day closes. This is no longer an agency. This is a workstation where an orchestrator replaces a manager, and 9 worker agents replace the staff. The pipeline goes from inbox to closing 500 times a month without human participation at any step.
1:32

This Chinese developer runs 9 agents on Claude Code under a GPT-5.5 orchestrator and they close 500 client tasks a month without a single assistant. His client work is closed without him, on a single laptop and only three subscriptions. The entire system lives on one MacBook Pro M4 with 128 GB of memory and subscriptions to Claude Code and GPT-5.5 cost him approximately $300 a month. There is no CRM, no team, no office only a terminal window with 9 parallel streams. The orchestrator works with a simple system prompt: «You are the orchestrator of a client inbox. Classify every incoming email into 4 categories: code, content, analysis, communication. Delegate to the corresponding worker agent. When the result is ready, check it for completeness, send it to the client on my behalf, and mark the task as closed. Do not ask clarifying questions.» And the orchestrator checks the inbox every 30 seconds, classifies fresh emails, and distributes them to 9 worker agents on Claude Code, each of whom is responsible for their own class of tasks. Here is an example of how one of them closes a request to refactor a client's auth module: Task: refactor user-auth module Broke the monolith into 3 files by responsibilities Added unit tests, coverage increased to 87% Renamed 4 functions to camelCase according to the style guide PR is ready for review, link below» And so about 50 cycles a day. By noon 25 tasks are closed, by dinner 50, and by the end of the month 500. On average, it takes about 7 minutes from the appearance of an email in the inbox to sending the result to the client. This is more than what a live team of 6 developers, copywriters and analysts working 8 hours a day closes. This is no longer an agency. This is a workstation where an orchestrator replaces a manager, and 9 worker agents replace the staff. The pipeline goes from inbox to closing 500 times a month without human participation at any step.

Blaze

29,917 views • 2 months ago

16-year-old American launched his own marketing agency and replaced a team of four with one Claude and two tools. ChatGPT writes a video prompt - a hyper-realistic scene of a house after storm damage to the roof. Pastes it into Google Gemini VEO 3. Two minutes and a finished video that didn't exist before. Drops it into CapCut with real footage from the client. Under an hour of editing and a complete ad ready to launch. Then he connected a repo with 139 marketing tactics, 12 SEO playbooks, a CRO framework and a pricing system to Claude - everything a marketing agency charges $10,000 a month to do by hand Claude executes in an hour. While competitors invoice for weeks of work he delivers in a day and charges the client $3,000. An entire agency replaced by one 16-year-old and two tools.
0:55

16-year-old American launched his own marketing agency and replaced a team of four with one Claude and two tools. ChatGPT writes a video prompt - a hyper-realistic scene of a house after storm damage to the roof. Pastes it into Google Gemini VEO 3. Two minutes and a finished video that didn't exist before. Drops it into CapCut with real footage from the client. Under an hour of editing and a complete ad ready to launch. Then he connected a repo with 139 marketing tactics, 12 SEO playbooks, a CRO framework and a pricing system to Claude - everything a marketing agency charges $10,000 a month to do by hand Claude executes in an hour. While competitors invoice for weeks of work he delivers in a day and charges the client $3,000. An entire agency replaced by one 16-year-old and two tools.

Noisy

13,434 views • 2 months ago

A 22-YEAR-OLD FROM BEIJING BUILT A SECOND BRAIN WITH CLAUDE, MAKES $14,000/MONTH AND HIS AI REMEMBERS EVERY DECISION HE'S EVER MADE Most people open ChatGPT, ask a question and start from zero next session, re-explaining the same context every single time and losing 15–40 minutes per session doing it. He built infrastructure where Claude reads, writes and connects everything in Obsidian automatically so it never resets and compounds with every conversation. This morning he needed a client strategy from 3 months ago. Claude pulled it up instantly and drafted a full email reply in under 20 minutes using context it had been building for months across 6,000+ sessions. Every session adds to the last one and the system now saves him 2–3 hours every single day - 30–90 minutes from automated morning briefing alone, before he even opens his laptop. repo: The repo is free. The advantage it creates is not.
1:14

A 22-YEAR-OLD FROM BEIJING BUILT A SECOND BRAIN WITH CLAUDE, MAKES $14,000/MONTH AND HIS AI REMEMBERS EVERY DECISION HE'S EVER MADE Most people open ChatGPT, ask a question and start from zero next session, re-explaining the same context every single time and losing 15–40 minutes per session doing it. He built infrastructure where Claude reads, writes and connects everything in Obsidian automatically so it never resets and compounds with every conversation. This morning he needed a client strategy from 3 months ago. Claude pulled it up instantly and drafted a full email reply in under 20 minutes using context it had been building for months across 6,000+ sessions. Every session adds to the last one and the system now saves him 2–3 hours every single day - 30–90 minutes from automated morning briefing alone, before he even opens his laptop. repo: The repo is free. The advantage it creates is not.

Noisy

23,679 views • 2 months ago

Claude Code creator: "100% of our pull requests at Anrtopic are run by Claude Code. 80–90% of code review too. The feature I’m using the most today is /loops. I’m not prompting Claude anymore - I’m building loops" in this interview he breaks down exactly how a system changes everything: - the memory and context features that turn Claude into a second brain - the knowledge architecture most users don't know Claude can build - the integration layer that connects Claude to your actual workflow - why typing one question at a time is the most expensive way to use Claude if you've been using Claude for months and still start every conversation from scratch with zero context, you don't have a Claude problem. you have a system problem instead of another show tonight, watch this make sure to bookmark it before it gets lost in your feed full guide in the article below
50:12

Claude Code creator: "100% of our pull requests at Anrtopic are run by Claude Code. 80–90% of code review too. The feature I’m using the most today is /loops. I’m not prompting Claude anymore - I’m building loops" in this interview he breaks down exactly how a system changes everything: - the memory and context features that turn Claude into a second brain - the knowledge architecture most users don't know Claude can build - the integration layer that connects Claude to your actual workflow - why typing one question at a time is the most expensive way to use Claude if you've been using Claude for months and still start every conversation from scratch with zero context, you don't have a Claude problem. you have a system problem instead of another show tonight, watch this make sure to bookmark it before it gets lost in your feed full guide in the article below

Khairallah AL-Awady

39,176 views • 29 days ago