Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

20-YEAR-OLD GUY SHOWS HOW CLAUDE API CAN TURN 500-VIEW CONTENT INTO A $40K/MONTH CLIENT WORKFLOW Not from a big agency. Not from hiring writers. Just taking the same service people sell every week and wiring Claude API into the boring middle. A topic goes in. It pulls the research,...

gippp69's profile picture

Gipp 🦅

7,682 subscribers

19,254 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

THIS GUY SPENT 5 MINUTES SETTING UP A $20 CLAUDE WORKSPACE AND TURNED 30 MINUTES OF DAILY PROMPT CHAOS INTO A SYSTEM Most people open Claude, type 1 messy prompt, rewrite it 10 times, get the same generic answer and call the model “bad.” He opens Claude Cowork, adds the project rules, past context, working files, examples, decisions and a clean place for the model to remember what it is doing. Same Claude. Same $20 tool. Completely different output. The funny part is there is no magic prompt here. No secret template. No “10x Claude” trick. Just the boring layer Karpathy keeps pointing at: context, memory and structure before output. A setup like this can save 30 minutes a day, which is 15 hours a month. If you use Claude for client work at $50 to $100/hour, that is $750 to $1,500/month in time you stop burning on repeated prompts. The model is real. The output is real. The edge is in not making Claude start from zero every single time.
0:37

THIS GUY SPENT 5 MINUTES SETTING UP A $20 CLAUDE WORKSPACE AND TURNED 30 MINUTES OF DAILY PROMPT CHAOS INTO A SYSTEM Most people open Claude, type 1 messy prompt, rewrite it 10 times, get the same generic answer and call the model “bad.” He opens Claude Cowork, adds the project rules, past context, working files, examples, decisions and a clean place for the model to remember what it is doing. Same Claude. Same $20 tool. Completely different output. The funny part is there is no magic prompt here. No secret template. No “10x Claude” trick. Just the boring layer Karpathy keeps pointing at: context, memory and structure before output. A setup like this can save 30 minutes a day, which is 15 hours a month. If you use Claude for client work at $50 to $100/hour, that is $750 to $1,500/month in time you stop burning on repeated prompts. The model is real. The output is real. The edge is in not making Claude start from zero every single time.

Gipp 🦅

14,871 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

He started using Claude AI and made $25,000 in his first month The guy could not even hide how much it changed his life. He paid for Claude and treated it like a real business partner. Built workflows that automate client work, content and outreach all in one place. What used to take him 12 hours a day now takes 2. He started taking on triple the clients without burning out once. At $5,000 per client and five clients a month, the numbers move fast. That is $25,000 landing in his account from a tool that costs $20. Most people use Claude to write captions and call it a day. He used it to rebuild his entire income from the ground up. Follow if you want the exact workflows he uses to scale this.
0:46

He started using Claude AI and made $25,000 in his first month The guy could not even hide how much it changed his life. He paid for Claude and treated it like a real business partner. Built workflows that automate client work, content and outreach all in one place. What used to take him 12 hours a day now takes 2. He started taking on triple the clients without burning out once. At $5,000 per client and five clients a month, the numbers move fast. That is $25,000 landing in his account from a tool that costs $20. Most people use Claude to write captions and call it a day. He used it to rebuild his entire income from the ground up. Follow if you want the exact workflows he uses to scale this.

winkle.

21,373 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

THIS GUY TURNED ONE OBSIDIAN VAULT INTO A SHARED BRAIN FOR 5 CLAUDE AGENTS BUILT TO HANDLE 80% OF A SOLO DEVELOPER’S WORK. 00:03 he zooms out and hundreds of connected notes appear on screen. it is the perfect visual for Claude working from one shared project memory instead of starting from zero every session. most developers give Claude 1 file and 1 prompt. this setup gives it the architecture, coding rules, tests, client briefs, and previous decisions before it writes anything. obsidian becomes the memory layer, storing everything in markdown files Claude can read alongside the codebase. every agent works from the same context instead of repeating the same questions. then 5 specialists split the job. one researches, one plans, one codes, one reviews, and one deploys while the developer only controls the important decisions. one vault, 5 agents, 2 model tiers, and a $50 to $150 monthly stack can turn Claude from a chatbot into a small development team.
0:30

THIS GUY TURNED ONE OBSIDIAN VAULT INTO A SHARED BRAIN FOR 5 CLAUDE AGENTS BUILT TO HANDLE 80% OF A SOLO DEVELOPER’S WORK. 00:03 he zooms out and hundreds of connected notes appear on screen. it is the perfect visual for Claude working from one shared project memory instead of starting from zero every session. most developers give Claude 1 file and 1 prompt. this setup gives it the architecture, coding rules, tests, client briefs, and previous decisions before it writes anything. obsidian becomes the memory layer, storing everything in markdown files Claude can read alongside the codebase. every agent works from the same context instead of repeating the same questions. then 5 specialists split the job. one researches, one plans, one codes, one reviews, and one deploys while the developer only controls the important decisions. one vault, 5 agents, 2 model tiers, and a $50 to $150 monthly stack can turn Claude from a chatbot into a small development team.

Gipp 🦅

10,799 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

SOMEONE IS CHARGING $5,000/MONTH FOR SOCIAL MEDIA CONTENT THAT CLAUDE WRITES IN 6 HOURS A WEEK no team, no office, just Claude and a scheduling app mid-market companies pay $2,000-$5,000 per month for social media management, and most of them are getting a junior freelancer posting generic content or an agency that barely touches their account one of them runs the whole thing in a weekly workflow: brief Claude on Monday, write posts Tuesday and Wednesday, schedule Thursday, pull numbers Friday another one charged three clients the same $5,000 rate before hiring a single person, that's $180,000/year running on one tool there's a prompt that makes Claude write every post in the client's exact voice by analyzing 5 examples of their existing content, 10 min per post instead of 60 you can land the first client with one outreach message, no portfolio, no case studies, just a specific offer and a 30-minute call the model is already working, the only question is whether you build it or watch someone else do it full breakdown of the workflow, the prompts, and how to find clients in the article below
0:42

SOMEONE IS CHARGING $5,000/MONTH FOR SOCIAL MEDIA CONTENT THAT CLAUDE WRITES IN 6 HOURS A WEEK no team, no office, just Claude and a scheduling app mid-market companies pay $2,000-$5,000 per month for social media management, and most of them are getting a junior freelancer posting generic content or an agency that barely touches their account one of them runs the whole thing in a weekly workflow: brief Claude on Monday, write posts Tuesday and Wednesday, schedule Thursday, pull numbers Friday another one charged three clients the same $5,000 rate before hiring a single person, that's $180,000/year running on one tool there's a prompt that makes Claude write every post in the client's exact voice by analyzing 5 examples of their existing content, 10 min per post instead of 60 you can land the first client with one outreach message, no portfolio, no case studies, just a specific offer and a 30-minute call the model is already working, the only question is whether you build it or watch someone else do it full breakdown of the workflow, the prompts, and how to find clients in the article below

Chrome

13,769 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

A 20-year-old student built a YouTube machine that runs itself and prints $38,000 a month The whole system runs on Claude and Premiere Pro stitched together. Claude scouts high-CPM niches and writes every script. Python pipes the scripts into Premiere where the videos get cut and exported on their own. The channels were already past a million views on Shorts in the first month. On the side he sells the same pipeline as a service to other creators. $400 per client video, 20 minutes of his actual time per delivery. Around 25 videos a week stacks up to roughly $10,000 from clients alone. Add the channel revenue on top and the whole thing clears $38,000 a month. He's 20, no team, no office, no editor, just a laptop running Claude 24/7. Save this before every faceless YouTuber in your feed switches to the same stack.
0:35

A 20-year-old student built a YouTube machine that runs itself and prints $38,000 a month The whole system runs on Claude and Premiere Pro stitched together. Claude scouts high-CPM niches and writes every script. Python pipes the scripts into Premiere where the videos get cut and exported on their own. The channels were already past a million views on Shorts in the first month. On the side he sells the same pipeline as a service to other creators. $400 per client video, 20 minutes of his actual time per delivery. Around 25 videos a week stacks up to roughly $10,000 from clients alone. Add the channel revenue on top and the whole thing clears $38,000 a month. He's 20, no team, no office, no editor, just a laptop running Claude 24/7. Save this before every faceless YouTuber in your feed switches to the same stack.

winkle.

66,271 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

A DEVELOPER CONNECTED CLAUDE CODE TO OBSIDIAN SO HIS AI AGENT WOULD STOP FORGETTING THE PROJECT EVERY MORNING. Every coding session used to start the same way. Claude would understand the repo, fix the bug, explain the architecture, and then the moment the session ended, all of that context disappeared. Same codebase. Same decisions. Same architecture. Same mistakes repeated again. So he added a memory layer. Instead of treating Claude Code like a smart terminal, he connected it to a local Obsidian vault through MCP. Now Claude can read the repo, open the vault, create notes, link concepts, and write important decisions back into the system. When it studies the codebase, it does not just answer once and forget. It creates notes for the major services, maps how the architecture works, links auth to the database, connects APIs to storage, and records why certain migrations or design choices exist. Obsidian becomes the project graph. Now when he asks why something was built a certain way, Claude does not guess from the current prompt. It reads the decision notes. When he starts a new branch, Claude checks the active context file. When the work is done, it updates what changed, what is blocked, and what the next agent needs to know before touching the repo. That is the real loop: read context, write code, capture decisions, update memory. Most people are still using AI coding tools like disposable chat windows. Ask, patch, close, forget. This setup turns Claude Code into infrastructure. The repo gets a memory layer that survives every session, and multiple AI agents can work from the same project map without stepping on each other. The unlock is not better prompting. The unlock is giving the agent somewhere to remember what it already learned.
4:19

A DEVELOPER CONNECTED CLAUDE CODE TO OBSIDIAN SO HIS AI AGENT WOULD STOP FORGETTING THE PROJECT EVERY MORNING. Every coding session used to start the same way. Claude would understand the repo, fix the bug, explain the architecture, and then the moment the session ended, all of that context disappeared. Same codebase. Same decisions. Same architecture. Same mistakes repeated again. So he added a memory layer. Instead of treating Claude Code like a smart terminal, he connected it to a local Obsidian vault through MCP. Now Claude can read the repo, open the vault, create notes, link concepts, and write important decisions back into the system. When it studies the codebase, it does not just answer once and forget. It creates notes for the major services, maps how the architecture works, links auth to the database, connects APIs to storage, and records why certain migrations or design choices exist. Obsidian becomes the project graph. Now when he asks why something was built a certain way, Claude does not guess from the current prompt. It reads the decision notes. When he starts a new branch, Claude checks the active context file. When the work is done, it updates what changed, what is blocked, and what the next agent needs to know before touching the repo. That is the real loop: read context, write code, capture decisions, update memory. Most people are still using AI coding tools like disposable chat windows. Ask, patch, close, forget. This setup turns Claude Code into infrastructure. The repo gets a memory layer that survives every session, and multiple AI agents can work from the same project map without stepping on each other. The unlock is not better prompting. The unlock is giving the agent somewhere to remember what it already learned.

DegenCalls

20,124 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

THIS VETERAN DEVELOPER PUT 2 MAC MINIS ON HIS DESK FOR $1,198 AND TURNED HERMES INTO A LOCAL AI WORKSPACE THAT DOESN’T NEED A $210/MONTH AGENT STACK he is not flexing hardware. he is showing the part most people still miss: once Hermes runs locally, the laptop stops being a chat window and starts acting like a workspace with memory, tools and saved skills two Mac minis, one local setup, zero cloud agent dashboard. research tasks, summaries, client notes and workflow steps stay on his machine instead of disappearing every time a session ends most people keep paying for Claude, wrappers, API calls and automation tools just to repeat the same instructions every day. Hermes cuts the waste by saving the process once and pulling it back when the same job returns the math is ugly for cloud tools. $210/month turns into $2,520/year before you even count extra tokens. his version is hardware once, local workflows after, and no panic when rate limits hit the quiet winners will not be the people with the cleanest chatbot tab. it will be the people who own the machine, the memory and the workflow before everyone else realizes that is the product
2:51

THIS VETERAN DEVELOPER PUT 2 MAC MINIS ON HIS DESK FOR $1,198 AND TURNED HERMES INTO A LOCAL AI WORKSPACE THAT DOESN’T NEED A $210/MONTH AGENT STACK he is not flexing hardware. he is showing the part most people still miss: once Hermes runs locally, the laptop stops being a chat window and starts acting like a workspace with memory, tools and saved skills two Mac minis, one local setup, zero cloud agent dashboard. research tasks, summaries, client notes and workflow steps stay on his machine instead of disappearing every time a session ends most people keep paying for Claude, wrappers, API calls and automation tools just to repeat the same instructions every day. Hermes cuts the waste by saving the process once and pulling it back when the same job returns the math is ugly for cloud tools. $210/month turns into $2,520/year before you even count extra tokens. his version is hardware once, local workflows after, and no panic when rate limits hit the quiet winners will not be the people with the cleanest chatbot tab. it will be the people who own the machine, the memory and the workflow before everyone else realizes that is the product

Gipp 🦅

60,173 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

THIS GUY CONNECTED CLAUDE TO TRADINGVIEW AND CUT 200+ HOURS OF MANUAL CHART WORK 40 trades a week used to mean the same loop: open the chart, check RSI, compare EMA, write notes and wait for the next setup now Claude reads TradingView 24/7, tracks volume, indicators and price conditions while he is not even at the desk this is not a $20k trading terminal and not a quant fund setup, just one laptop, one chart and one strategy written in plain English the crazy part is not that Claude predicts the market, it is that a regular trader can remove the boring human loop from every setup ↓
0:26

THIS GUY CONNECTED CLAUDE TO TRADINGVIEW AND CUT 200+ HOURS OF MANUAL CHART WORK 40 trades a week used to mean the same loop: open the chart, check RSI, compare EMA, write notes and wait for the next setup now Claude reads TradingView 24/7, tracks volume, indicators and price conditions while he is not even at the desk this is not a $20k trading terminal and not a quant fund setup, just one laptop, one chart and one strategy written in plain English the crazy part is not that Claude predicts the market, it is that a regular trader can remove the boring human loop from every setup ↓

Gipp 🦅

55,610 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

THIS DEVELOPER BOUGHT A $799 MAC MINI AND NOW RUNS 5 FACELESS YOUTUBE CHANNELS FOR $55/MONTH WITH CLAUDE AGENTS the trick is not buying a stronger computer. the trick is giving claude its own 24/7 machine, so it can take over the screen, click through tools, move files, write scripts and keep working while his main laptop stays untouched each channel runs from its own skill. documentary, luxury, gaming, deep sea and infrastructure all have different tones, seo formats and script rules. claude can turn one topic into a 1,600-2,000 word script, 8-10 visual prompts and 3 title options without a new brief every night the whole system costs $799 once and around $55 a month to operate. claude, elevenlabs, midjourney and electricity replace the manual loop most faceless creators get stuck in after month two. the mac mini itself stays online for about $3/month setup takes around 45 minutes. fresh macos install, 32gb ram, claude desktop, computer use permissions, google drive routing, connectors and one dedicated output folder. after that the machine becomes the place where the work happens most people try to scale youtube by adding more channels and more manual work. this flips the model. one box handles research, scripts, prompts, descriptions and scheduling while the human does one review session per week month 6 is where this starts getting dangerous. the channels that survive the first 90 days are not just posting videos anymore. they are running a tiny content factory from a box under the desk
1:07

THIS DEVELOPER BOUGHT A $799 MAC MINI AND NOW RUNS 5 FACELESS YOUTUBE CHANNELS FOR $55/MONTH WITH CLAUDE AGENTS the trick is not buying a stronger computer. the trick is giving claude its own 24/7 machine, so it can take over the screen, click through tools, move files, write scripts and keep working while his main laptop stays untouched each channel runs from its own skill. documentary, luxury, gaming, deep sea and infrastructure all have different tones, seo formats and script rules. claude can turn one topic into a 1,600-2,000 word script, 8-10 visual prompts and 3 title options without a new brief every night the whole system costs $799 once and around $55 a month to operate. claude, elevenlabs, midjourney and electricity replace the manual loop most faceless creators get stuck in after month two. the mac mini itself stays online for about $3/month setup takes around 45 minutes. fresh macos install, 32gb ram, claude desktop, computer use permissions, google drive routing, connectors and one dedicated output folder. after that the machine becomes the place where the work happens most people try to scale youtube by adding more channels and more manual work. this flips the model. one box handles research, scripts, prompts, descriptions and scheduling while the human does one review session per week month 6 is where this starts getting dangerous. the channels that survive the first 90 days are not just posting videos anymore. they are running a tiny content factory from a box under the desk

Gipp 🦅

19,829 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

CLAUDE DESIGN SKILLS CAN TURN A $20 PLAN INTO A JUNIOR DESIGN SYSTEM ASSISTANT A blank prompt makes Claude judge design like a generalist, one screen at a time, with too much room for random taste and vague feedback Design Skills give it a repeatable way to look at interface work: spacing, hierarchy, contrast, component consistency, states, layout rhythm, and the small visual rules that make a product feel finished That is where it becomes useful for a designer, it can review a rough screen, catch what feels off, suggest a cleaner structure, keep repeated components aligned, and explain the changes in a way that feels closer to a design lead than a prompt response The value is not that Claude becomes "creative" and the value is that its judgment becomes repeatable, so the same design standards can be applied across every screen instead of being rebuilt from scratch in every chat Check the full article about cowork and skills below
0:45

CLAUDE DESIGN SKILLS CAN TURN A $20 PLAN INTO A JUNIOR DESIGN SYSTEM ASSISTANT A blank prompt makes Claude judge design like a generalist, one screen at a time, with too much room for random taste and vague feedback Design Skills give it a repeatable way to look at interface work: spacing, hierarchy, contrast, component consistency, states, layout rhythm, and the small visual rules that make a product feel finished That is where it becomes useful for a designer, it can review a rough screen, catch what feels off, suggest a cleaner structure, keep repeated components aligned, and explain the changes in a way that feels closer to a design lead than a prompt response The value is not that Claude becomes "creative" and the value is that its judgment becomes repeatable, so the same design standards can be applied across every screen instead of being rebuilt from scratch in every chat Check the full article about cowork and skills below

Penguin

10,349 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

There's a built-in agent inside Claude Code you can invoke just by telling Claude to use the claude-code-guide agent Save this... you'll need it It's not a local file in your project. It's a built-in subagent defined in Claude Code's system itself. It answers questions about Claude Code CLI, the Agent SDK, and the Claude API. It uses Glob, Grep, Read, WebFetch, and WebSearch, but can't edit or write files. Its only job is to answer questions.
0:22

There's a built-in agent inside Claude Code you can invoke just by telling Claude to use the claude-code-guide agent Save this... you'll need it It's not a local file in your project. It's a built-in subagent defined in Claude Code's system itself. It answers questions about Claude Code CLI, the Agent SDK, and the Claude API. It uses Glob, Grep, Read, WebFetch, and WebSearch, but can't edit or write files. Its only job is to answer questions.

Daniel San

57,240 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Anthropic shipped 125 settings for Claude The official docs cover 40 One developer found the other 85 and his API bill dropped from $340 to $87 - not by using a cheaper model - not by writing shorter prompts just by moving one line in a config file to the right place > memory scoped per project → past clients never bleed into new work > Extended Thinking on Light by default → 18–25% fewer Opus tokens in week one > cache_control moved to the right line → the fix that turned a $340 bill into $87 > plugins and MCP servers toggled off when idle → saved 25–40K tokens per session > per-project model override → Haiku for docs, Sonnet for infra, Opus only where it matters most Claude users are running a $100/month tool at 30% of its actual capability
0:49

Anthropic shipped 125 settings for Claude The official docs cover 40 One developer found the other 85 and his API bill dropped from $340 to $87 - not by using a cheaper model - not by writing shorter prompts just by moving one line in a config file to the right place > memory scoped per project → past clients never bleed into new work > Extended Thinking on Light by default → 18–25% fewer Opus tokens in week one > cache_control moved to the right line → the fix that turned a $340 bill into $87 > plugins and MCP servers toggled off when idle → saved 25–40K tokens per session > per-project model override → Haiku for docs, Sonnet for infra, Opus only where it matters most Claude users are running a $100/month tool at 30% of its actual capability

Shadow Nick

380,211 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

A CHINESE BUILDER TURNED A MAC MINI INTO A PORTABLE AI WORKFLOW BOX THAT CAN RUN 18 HOURS OFF A BATTERY 01:14 he connects the power module to the mac mini and the whole setup stops being a desk computer. now the same tiny machine can run from a battery, drive a portable display, hold extra storage and stay online away from a normal desk. that matters because most ai workflows do not need a giant server. they need a quiet machine that can keep 12-20 background jobs alive, watch folders, move files, clean notes, sync research and process inputs without babysitting. paired with claude, this becomes a portable second brain machine. 3 long lectures can turn into notes, 25 saved articles can become summaries, research folders can get organized, and unfinished drafts can keep moving while the owner is away. the edge is not raw power. it is uptime in a tiny form factor. one small box can run 500-800 micro-tasks a month, while the same workflow inside cloud tools can quietly eat $60-150/month across storage, vps and automation apps. that is why this build is interesting. the chinese guy is not showing a random charger trick, he is showing what happens when a small computer gets enough ports, power and automation to behave like a pocket-sized home server. bookmark this before every desk setup gets a battery.
2:17

A CHINESE BUILDER TURNED A MAC MINI INTO A PORTABLE AI WORKFLOW BOX THAT CAN RUN 18 HOURS OFF A BATTERY 01:14 he connects the power module to the mac mini and the whole setup stops being a desk computer. now the same tiny machine can run from a battery, drive a portable display, hold extra storage and stay online away from a normal desk. that matters because most ai workflows do not need a giant server. they need a quiet machine that can keep 12-20 background jobs alive, watch folders, move files, clean notes, sync research and process inputs without babysitting. paired with claude, this becomes a portable second brain machine. 3 long lectures can turn into notes, 25 saved articles can become summaries, research folders can get organized, and unfinished drafts can keep moving while the owner is away. the edge is not raw power. it is uptime in a tiny form factor. one small box can run 500-800 micro-tasks a month, while the same workflow inside cloud tools can quietly eat $60-150/month across storage, vps and automation apps. that is why this build is interesting. the chinese guy is not showing a random charger trick, he is showing what happens when a small computer gets enough ports, power and automation to behave like a pocket-sized home server. bookmark this before every desk setup gets a battery.

Gipp 🦅

10,641 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

A 21-year-old clears $35K a month from his bedroom. One laptop. Claude does 90% of the work he charges for. His parents still think he’s “looking for a job.” He stopped looking 8 months ago. Part 1 - Sell automations, not hours. Businesses drown in manual work - invoicing, lead follow-ups, booking reminders. He builds the system that kills the busywork. They pay $2,500 upfront plus $300/mo. Claude writes every workflow. Part 2 - Claude finds the buyers. Point it at a niche - real estate, clinics, contractors. It pulls 200 businesses still running on sticky notes and spreadsheets. The lead list builds itself by morning. Part 3 - One blueprint, every client. Same automation skeleton each time. Claude reads their process, rewires it, swaps the branding. 20 minutes per build instead of a week. Part 4 - The real ramp. Month 1: 3 clients, $7,500. Month 3: 9 clients, $19,000. Month 5: 15 clients, $30,000. Month 7: 20+ clients plus retainers pushing past $35K The $300 monthly fee is the engine. 70 clients on retainer is $21,000 that lands whether he works or not. What keeps everyone else stuck at 21: They wait to feel ready. He shipped client 1 before he felt ready. Claude covered the gaps. His friends are sending out résumés. He’s deciding which clients to fire. The job he was “looking for” pays a quarter of this. If this was useful - follow.
0:20

A 21-year-old clears $35K a month from his bedroom. One laptop. Claude does 90% of the work he charges for. His parents still think he’s “looking for a job.” He stopped looking 8 months ago. Part 1 - Sell automations, not hours. Businesses drown in manual work - invoicing, lead follow-ups, booking reminders. He builds the system that kills the busywork. They pay $2,500 upfront plus $300/mo. Claude writes every workflow. Part 2 - Claude finds the buyers. Point it at a niche - real estate, clinics, contractors. It pulls 200 businesses still running on sticky notes and spreadsheets. The lead list builds itself by morning. Part 3 - One blueprint, every client. Same automation skeleton each time. Claude reads their process, rewires it, swaps the branding. 20 minutes per build instead of a week. Part 4 - The real ramp. Month 1: 3 clients, $7,500. Month 3: 9 clients, $19,000. Month 5: 15 clients, $30,000. Month 7: 20+ clients plus retainers pushing past $35K The $300 monthly fee is the engine. 70 clients on retainer is $21,000 that lands whether he works or not. What keeps everyone else stuck at 21: They wait to feel ready. He shipped client 1 before he felt ready. Claude covered the gaps. His friends are sending out résumés. He’s deciding which clients to fire. The job he was “looking for” pays a quarter of this. If this was useful - follow.

RGK

35,183 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

1,000,000 views in finance returns about $11,000, the same million in gaming returns $800, that gap is the whole business i've been tracking faceless channels and the niche decides everything. an ai-tools channel doing 200,000 views a month at a $7 rpm pulls ~$1,400 from ads alone > claude writes the full youtube description, chapter timestamps, tiktok hook and reels script from one prompt > the entire operational layer of a video compressed into about two minutes > the cost to run it is roughly $20 a month in tools ship more, into a niche that actually pays, and $3k to $10k a month is a cadence problem, not a talent one
0:31

1,000,000 views in finance returns about $11,000, the same million in gaming returns $800, that gap is the whole business i've been tracking faceless channels and the niche decides everything. an ai-tools channel doing 200,000 views a month at a $7 rpm pulls ~$1,400 from ads alone > claude writes the full youtube description, chapter timestamps, tiktok hook and reels script from one prompt > the entire operational layer of a video compressed into about two minutes > the cost to run it is roughly $20 a month in tools ship more, into a niche that actually pays, and $3k to $10k a month is a cadence problem, not a talent one

Kiyoro

19,487 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

THIS GUY BUILT AN AUTONOMOUS AI AGENT OUT OF CLAUDE CODE + OBSIDIAN and this is way more interesting than another “use AI to take notes” demo the trick is simple: Obsidian is not the writing app here. it becomes the agent’s memory, task board, and context folder. Claude Code is not just answering prompts. it reads the vault, edits files, follows instructions, and keeps moving through the work like a junior operator with a filesystem. the reusable setup looks like this: 1. create an Obsidian vault for one project 2. keep goals, rules, tasks, decisions, and references as markdown files 3. point Claude Code at the folder 4. give it a clear operating loop: read context → choose next task → execute → write back what changed 5. use the notes as persistent memory instead of re-explaining the project every chat that’s the part people miss. the “agent” is not magic. it’s the boring combination of: - local files - explicit rules - task state - write access - a model that can run through the repo/vault Obsidian makes the memory human-readable. Claude Code makes the memory executable. that combo is why the video worked: it turns a notes app into an operating surface for actual work. best use cases: - content systems - research vaults - coding projects - client ops docs - personal knowledge bases that need actions, not just storage the caveat: if your vault is messy, your agent becomes messy too. folders, naming, “done” criteria, and forbidden actions matter more than the prompt. but once the structure is clean, this is one of the easiest ways to build an agent that remembers what happened yesterday without paying for a full custom app.
10:19

THIS GUY BUILT AN AUTONOMOUS AI AGENT OUT OF CLAUDE CODE + OBSIDIAN and this is way more interesting than another “use AI to take notes” demo the trick is simple: Obsidian is not the writing app here. it becomes the agent’s memory, task board, and context folder. Claude Code is not just answering prompts. it reads the vault, edits files, follows instructions, and keeps moving through the work like a junior operator with a filesystem. the reusable setup looks like this: 1. create an Obsidian vault for one project 2. keep goals, rules, tasks, decisions, and references as markdown files 3. point Claude Code at the folder 4. give it a clear operating loop: read context → choose next task → execute → write back what changed 5. use the notes as persistent memory instead of re-explaining the project every chat that’s the part people miss. the “agent” is not magic. it’s the boring combination of: - local files - explicit rules - task state - write access - a model that can run through the repo/vault Obsidian makes the memory human-readable. Claude Code makes the memory executable. that combo is why the video worked: it turns a notes app into an operating surface for actual work. best use cases: - content systems - research vaults - coding projects - client ops docs - personal knowledge bases that need actions, not just storage the caveat: if your vault is messy, your agent becomes messy too. folders, naming, “done” criteria, and forbidden actions matter more than the prompt. but once the structure is clean, this is one of the easiest ways to build an agent that remembers what happened yesterday without paying for a full custom app.

kocer

30,403 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

A CHINESE DEVELOPER ASKED CLAUDE TO FIND A “$1M APP IDEA” AND TURNED IT INTO A $14,800/MONTH APP STORE PORTFOLIO He is not building some huge startup or spending 8 months polishing one perfect product. He picks boring keywords people already search for, opens Claude Code, builds a simple iOS app around one problem, adds onboarding, screenshots and a $6.99 paywall, then ships before the idea gets too complicated. The trick is that every app is almost the same product underneath. Same subscription flow, same settings page, same review prompt, same clean interface. Only the niche changes: plant scanner, receipt cleaner, walking tracker, pet symptom checker, study timer, invoice maker. After 4 months he has 19 apps live, 7 dead ones, and 5 doing most of the money. One app making $300/month looks like nothing, but a few small apps doing $700, $1,200 or $2,000/month becomes real when each build only takes 2-3 days. Claude Code is not the money printer. The money printer is finding demand, shipping fast, and treating every failed app like cheap market research. Small apps. Real system.
1:02

A CHINESE DEVELOPER ASKED CLAUDE TO FIND A “$1M APP IDEA” AND TURNED IT INTO A $14,800/MONTH APP STORE PORTFOLIO He is not building some huge startup or spending 8 months polishing one perfect product. He picks boring keywords people already search for, opens Claude Code, builds a simple iOS app around one problem, adds onboarding, screenshots and a $6.99 paywall, then ships before the idea gets too complicated. The trick is that every app is almost the same product underneath. Same subscription flow, same settings page, same review prompt, same clean interface. Only the niche changes: plant scanner, receipt cleaner, walking tracker, pet symptom checker, study timer, invoice maker. After 4 months he has 19 apps live, 7 dead ones, and 5 doing most of the money. One app making $300/month looks like nothing, but a few small apps doing $700, $1,200 or $2,000/month becomes real when each build only takes 2-3 days. Claude Code is not the money printer. The money printer is finding demand, shipping fast, and treating every failed app like cheap market research. Small apps. Real system.

Gipp 🦅

18,839 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

THIS CLAUDE WORKFLOW CAN BE TURNED INTO A $2,970/MO DESIGN MACHINE Simple offer: $99 for a pack of banners, thumbnails, article covers or launch visuals for people who need clean graphics fast. The client sends a rough idea. Claude turns it into a proper visual brief: layout, colors, lighting, mood and format. Then the image model turns it into finished visuals in minutes. 30 small orders a month at $99 = $2,970. No opening Figma from zero. No endless prompt tweaking. No long back-and-forth for every small graphic. Most people see another cool AI demo. The better move is turning the workflow into something people can actually buy.
0:36

THIS CLAUDE WORKFLOW CAN BE TURNED INTO A $2,970/MO DESIGN MACHINE Simple offer: $99 for a pack of banners, thumbnails, article covers or launch visuals for people who need clean graphics fast. The client sends a rough idea. Claude turns it into a proper visual brief: layout, colors, lighting, mood and format. Then the image model turns it into finished visuals in minutes. 30 small orders a month at $99 = $2,970. No opening Figma from zero. No endless prompt tweaking. No long back-and-forth for every small graphic. Most people see another cool AI demo. The better move is turning the workflow into something people can actually buy.

Gipp 🦅

12,891 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

A 20-year-old guy earned $37,250 in a month creating YouTube content and barely even touches the editing software. He set up an autonomous "content factory" where Claude acts as the brain and Premiere Pro serves as the body. The system works 24/7 while he lives his life. Claude analyzes high-CPM niches, writes scripts, and uses Python scripts to trigger voiceovers and video generation. In the first month alone, one of his channels hit hundreds of thousands of views on Shorts. One client video ($400) -> 15 minutes of AI work = $400 profit. 20 videos per week = $8,000. He simply had an idea, and Claude took care of everything: from the first word of the script to the final render.
0:24

A 20-year-old guy earned $37,250 in a month creating YouTube content and barely even touches the editing software. He set up an autonomous "content factory" where Claude acts as the brain and Premiere Pro serves as the body. The system works 24/7 while he lives his life. Claude analyzes high-CPM niches, writes scripts, and uses Python scripts to trigger voiceovers and video generation. In the first month alone, one of his channels hit hundreds of thousands of views on Shorts. One client video ($400) -> 15 minutes of AI work = $400 profit. 20 videos per week = $8,000. He simply had an idea, and Claude took care of everything: from the first word of the script to the final render.

shmidt

1,867,442 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Anthropic team: "Most people are prompting Claude wrong" They dropped a 24-minute workshop on how Claude prompts are actually built Free From the people who built the model There are 6 elements in a real Claude prompt Most people use 1 That is why their outputs feel generic Better wording is not enough Claude rewards structure, context, examples, constraints, and feedback I watched it twice Then built a Claude Skill that applies all 6 automatically You write normally The skill structures the prompt before Claude sees it Bookmark and watch this Then save the setup below
24:17

Anthropic team: "Most people are prompting Claude wrong" They dropped a 24-minute workshop on how Claude prompts are actually built Free From the people who built the model There are 6 elements in a real Claude prompt Most people use 1 That is why their outputs feel generic Better wording is not enough Claude rewards structure, context, examples, constraints, and feedback I watched it twice Then built a Claude Skill that applies all 6 automatically You write normally The skill structures the prompt before Claude sees it Bookmark and watch this Then save the setup below

rari

15,655 просмотров • 1 месяц назад