Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

21 years old, healthy, strong and extremely active before taking the Pfizer vaccine. After the vaccine, Cody Hudson developed a pulmonary embolism and was given three days to live, He can no longer walk without assistance. How do our medical communities and governments continue to silence what has taken...

89,781 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

They might be in big trouble. Pfizer needed the covid injection recommended to children for liability protection. But the HHS Sec. Robert F Kennedy has just pulled the covid injection off the CDC schedule for healthy children. Pfizer are being exposed to more liability pressure AND Pfizer didn't report Maddie's injury to the FDA, who was in the children's clinical trial. TRANSCRIPT: Robert F Kennedy and Mikhaila Peterson: "So, what are your views on giving this COVID vaccine that they've made to kids? I know I'm from Canada, and I think that they're implementing that in order to go to school in Canada." Robert F Kennedy: "Well, they have to give it to kids because here's why": "They cannot market this vaccine without having an immunity shield. I mean, I sue pharmaceutical companies for a living, and I have enough criminal activity that I know about Pfizer at this point and Moderna that if they went ahead and marketed a vaccine where they end up killing people or injuring them, and I can sue them, they'd be through. So they're never going to market a vaccine, allow people access to a vaccine, an approved vaccine, without getting liability protection. Now, the Emergency Use Authorization vaccines have liability protection under the PREP Act and the CARES Act. So as long as you take an emergency use, you can't sue them. "Once they get approved, now you can sue them, unless they can get it recommended for children." Because all vaccines that are recommended, officially recommended for children, get liability protection, even if an adult gets that vaccine. That's why they're going after kids. They know this is going to kill and injure a huge number of children, but they need to do it for the liability protection." "And here's how they know that it's going to injure kids" "During the Pfizer study, they only tested it on 1,300 children, and one of those, we now know, was a girl called Maddie de Garay. And we only know about this because she and her family came forward and told us what happened.

Humanspective

52,425 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Vaccine-Injured Man Confronts British Prime Minister on GB News JOHN WATTS: "Hi, Rishi Sunak. I've got so much to say but such little time. My name is John Watt, and I'm one of the COVID vaccine injured in this country. "I want you to look into my eyes, Rishi Sunak, and I want you to look at the pain, the trauma, and the regret I have in my eyes. We have been left with no help at all. "Not only am I in here [who's] vaccine injured; there's another man over there whose life's been ruined by that Covid-19 vaccine. I know people who have lost legs — amputations. I know people with heart conditions like myself, Rishi Sunak. "Why have I had to set up a support group in Scotland to look after the people that have been affected by that Covid-19 vaccine? Why are the people who are in charge who told us all to do the right thing have left us all to rot and left me and the thousands and the tens of thousands in this country to rot? "Rishi Sunak, look me in the eye. When are you going to start to do the right thing? The vaccine damage payment scheme is not fit for purpose. In Scotland right now, according to the yellow card system, there are over 30,000 people [who] have had an adverse reaction to that vaccine." PM RISHI SUNAK: "John, thank you very much indeed for your question." JOHN WATTS: "Thank you to start doing the right thing, Mr. Rishi Sunak." PM RISHI SUNAK: "You've made a really strong point, John. Well, I'm very sorry to hear about your personal circumstances, and you said someone over here also seems to have suffered by a similar thing. Now, obviously, I don't know about the individual situation that you're in." JOHN WATTS: "We are silenced, Rishi. On social media and everything. We are silenced! We are the most silenced people in this country!" OTHER VACCINE-INJURED MAN: "Silence in the press because my story in the press — I had to go to the government for comment, and they made them take all that stuff out." MODERATOR: Forgive me both. Sir, you raised some very valid points, I'm sure. What I've got to say is, though, we haven't got you on microphone, and as you know, we've got to get through this. I'm sure we can raise your points with the Prime Minister at a later date, but in the meantime, Prime Minister, if you have not covered the issue." RISHI SUNAK: "I'm very happy to. So there is a vaccine compensation scheme that's in place, as you alluded to, in the NHS. Obviously, everyone individually will work through their cases. It's difficult for me to comment on anyone's individual case. I'm sure you'll appreciate that. "I'm very happy to go and look at the cases, and I'm sure you'll get them to the team here. I'm very saddened and shocked to hear that you've been silenced by anybody. That is surprising to me. "So please do get your details to Stephen and the team, and I will happily take that away. Of course, you should be able to speak about your experience — what's happened to you. And as I said, we have a compensation scheme in place for that, and I'll make sure that we're working through that. "Obviously, I think you'll appreciate it's hard for me to comment on your specific circumstances — just not knowing them. And those things that." (Other Vaccine-Injured Man Begins Speaking) MODERATOR: "Please forgive me, sir. We haven't got a microphone on you, so our viewers and listeners won't be able to hear what you say." RISHI SUNAK: "The last thing I'd say is we went through a pandemic like everyone else at the points when it came to the vaccine. Those decisions were always taken on the basis of medical advice from our medical experts to tell us, as politicians, who are obviously not doctors, about how best to roll out the vaccine, what was in the public health interest, the priority order, how that should be done, who should be eligible. That was something that the doctors recommended on, and that's something that we followed. "Now, obviously, if there are individual circumstances which haven't worked out, then that's why we have the compensation scheme in place and I'll make sure that we follow up on your cases." MODERATOR: "Okay, Prime Minister. Thank you. Gents, both of you, do give us your details. We will get that to the Prime Minister. And as he said, he will, I'm sure, look at that for you."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

956,274 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Deborah Birx, September 5, 2025: "The COVID vaccine was...studied to prevent severe disease...people [were] confused...when we started to make...claims the vaccine did more than what it was studied to [do]...WE DON'T KNOW ABOUT PROTECTION AGAINST INFECTION." (1/2) Why have people been "confused" about the jabs stopping/slowing infection?? Maybe because of all the LIES from authority figures saying that they did just that. See tweet 2. ---------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "Well, I think we all know how important the COVID vaccine was. Um. It was scientifically critically studied to prevent severe disease. I think where people started to get confused is when we started to make potential claims that the vaccine did more than what it was studied to actually show. Remember, all of those original studies, we didn't test patients unless they had symptoms. We only looked for disease. "And so we don't know how many people were asymptomatic. We don't know about protection against infection. What we did know about is protection against severe disease. And clearly, if you look at the mortality in individuals over 75 before vaccination and after vaccination, there was a dramatic difference, even through, Omicron and Delta. "So, yes, the vaccine was highly effective for what it was intended to do, which was prevent. Shouldn't the health secretary know that? You know, I'm not sure that there is so much confusion about the COVID vaccine, what it was studied to do. I just want to make it very clear it was studied to prevent severe disease, and that's what it does. "And then I think the question is, well, who's susceptible to severe disease and who should continue to get the COVID shots? And I think that's what needs to be clearly laid out to the American people."

Sense Receptor

130,653 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten