Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

$23,000 last month. One guy. One channel. No camera. He found the cheat code for YouTube Kids and has been quietly collecting ever since. Opens YouTube. Finds a video with millions of views in the kids niche. Copies the description word for word. Pastes it straight into Claude. Claude...

61,384 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 29

Фото профиля Rowan
Rowan4 месяцев назад

Nice, let's get everyone on board and add more rubbish on YouTube kids to fry their brains... to make some money 😈 cant wait

Фото профиля Mar_C
Mar_C4 месяцев назад

AI

Фото профиля Adel Bucetta
Adel Bucetta4 месяцев назад

the honest answer is, most people still think building an audience on youtubekids involves making content. this guy just leveraged code to bypass that part altogether

Фото профиля BeanBee 🐝
BeanBee 🐝4 месяцев назад

A lot of modern creator workflows are becoming systems for identifying patterns rather than manually producing media.

Фото профиля Cry✨Star
Cry✨Star4 месяцев назад

the description box is doing more work than the whole edit suite lol

Фото профиля Weq
Weq4 месяцев назад

the description box doing all the heavy lifting is actually evil

Фото профиля Mercedes Ballesteros
Mercedes Ballesteros4 месяцев назад

AI

Фото профиля Flexzo
Flexzo4 месяцев назад

So

Фото профиля Manuel
Manuel4 месяцев назад

Ai

Фото профиля Atenov int.
Atenov int.4 месяцев назад

sounds like a formula for a lot of other platforms too

Фото профиля Jennilikespeas
Jennilikespeas4 месяцев назад

So

Фото профиля pingder
pingder4 месяцев назад

bro the description box loophole is nasty

Фото профиля TopShottaAnt
TopShottaAnt4 месяцев назад

👀

Фото профиля BDeMarco
BDeMarco4 месяцев назад

What’s the preferred ai video creator?

Фото профиля Lady Kent 🌻
Lady Kent 🌻4 месяцев назад

AI

Фото профиля SYSBM
SYSBM4 месяцев назад

AI

Фото профиля Dwgs
Dwgs4 месяцев назад

this is basically content arbitrage with extra steps

Фото профиля robert opoka
robert opoka4 месяцев назад

ai

Фото профиля Osas
Osas4 месяцев назад

AI

Фото профиля Junk 🛠️
Junk 🛠️4 месяцев назад

👀

Фото профиля Oz
Oz4 месяцев назад

Ai

Фото профиля Manuel Donkor Jr
Manuel Donkor Jr4 месяцев назад

AI

Фото профиля Goddess Ana
Goddess Ana4 месяцев назад

Ai

Фото профиля sandybrige
sandybrige4 месяцев назад

その方法は本当に驚くべきですね!初めて知ったけど、興味深いです。将来性がありそうです。

Фото профиля dopo.eth 💸
dopo.eth 💸4 месяцев назад

bro the kids ai loop is actually cracked

Фото профиля HeidiTillman
HeidiTillman4 месяцев назад

AI

Фото профиля Ola | 𝚂𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚖𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚔
Ola | 𝚂𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚖𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚔4 месяцев назад

AI

Фото профиля Dantri 👾
Dantri 👾4 месяцев назад

bro the description box loophole is nasty

Фото профиля Robertsaintcarlos
Robertsaintcarlos4 месяцев назад

Ai

Похожие видео

19 YEAR OLD IS RUNNING A YOUTUBE ANIMATION STUDIO FROM HIS BEDROOM. HE HAS NO ANIMATORS. HE CANNOT DRAW. HE IS PRINTING MONEY FROM CHILDREN'S RHYMES. Kids' YouTube channels routinely pull millions of views per video. The platform pays creators between $1,000 and $3,000 for every hundred thousand views in that niche. Before this year, getting a piece of that market required a 3D animation studio, voice actors, and a month of rendering. He does it in under three minutes. His entire studio is a GPT sol and a Claude window. He opens YouTube and finds the most popular nursery rhyme channels. He takes a screenshot of their video feed. He opens Claude. He has a custom tool called Higgsfield MCP connected directly to his chat. He pastes the screenshot. He writes one prompt. Analyze this YouTube channel and generate a week of original content in the exact same style and niche. He hits enter. A few minutes later, the chat window spits out a fully rendered, broadcast-ready 3D animation. A baby playing with blocks, perfectly lit, smoothly animated, and ready to be monetized. He uploads it to his channel. The next day, he does it again. The kids watching on their iPads don't know the video was generated by an AI analyzing a screenshot. The parents who just want five minutes of quiet don't care. The algorithm treats it like a Pixar short. A real animation studio spends $50,000 and two months to produce three minutes of content. He spends zero dollars, takes a screenshot, and goes to make coffee. While the rest of the internet argues about whether AI is a real job, a quiet group of teenagers is pulling market share from massive media companies with a single prompt. Most people will watch his tutorial and complain. A few will open a new tab.

ZER

31,034 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

A girl who openly calls herself kind of stupid made $20,000 last month, and her face never appeared on screen once. She wasn't selling talent. She was running a loop with Claude that anyone reading this could start tonight. Here is the entire method. There is nothing else to it. She opened YouTube and searched baby shows. She found one with millions of views. A dancing fruit sensory video, a counting whales cartoon, the kind of thing that plays on a loop in the background of every toddler's life. She opened it, went to the transcript, and copied the whole thing. She pasted that transcript into Claude and asked it to turn the format into a prompt for a similar video. Claude wrote the prompt. She pasted the prompt into an AI video generator. A few minutes later she had a finished cartoon. Bright colors, dancing animals, big letters, cheerful music. Indistinguishable from the one she copied. She posted it. Then she did the exact same thing the next day. And the day after. And every single day for 30 days. She never wrote a script, animated a frame or recorded a single sound. She found something that already worked, fed it to Claude, let an AI rebuild it, and uploaded the result before she went to bed. Nobody knew who she was. No name, no face, no personality, no story. Just a channel quietly posting toddler cartoons every day. And YouTube paid her anyway, because YouTube does not pay you for being interesting. It pays you for watch time, and toddlers watch the same video until the battery dies. By the end of the month the payments were real. $20,000 to a girl who will tell you to your face that she is not smart. That is the part nobody wants to sit with. The barrier was never intelligence. It was never talent. The only thing standing between her and the money was whether she would run a boring 5 minute loop every day for 30 days without quitting. She did. Most people won't. The system didn't filter for smart. It filtered for showing up.

Marlow

28,708 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад