正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

2500+ participants 300+ developers 67 startups 31 days 1 incredible initiative: Crecimiento 🌞 🇦🇷

42,788 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

9 条评论

Tools For Humanity 的头像
Tools For Humanity2 年前

@crecimientoar 🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷

Joel Olara 的头像
Joel Olara2 年前

@crecimientoar I have an issue with my last claim, the balance reflects but if I try sending to another wallet, it shows there is no money 😭

Noro 的头像
Noro2 年前

@crecimientoar I have an issue with my last claim, the balance reflects but if I try sending to another wallet, it shows there is no money... I noticed that I'm not alone with that issue, please check devs

Loki 的头像
Loki2 年前

@crecimientoar Why does support never answer? I want to know why my account was suspended

SANE🇰🇪 的头像
SANE🇰🇪2 年前

@crecimientoar You’ve failed to give me my account back… missing grants

maxwel airo 的头像
maxwel airo2 年前

@crecimientoar Why you guys holding the coins

The Sage Alfariky ᮅᮛᮀ ᮞᮥᮔ᮪ᮓ 的头像
The Sage Alfariky ᮅᮛᮀ ᮞᮥᮔ᮪ᮓ2 年前

@crecimientoar My Account again failed to claim, support doesnt even answer.

Zen Robot 的头像
Zen Robot2 年前

@JWachunas @crecimientoar 🙌

dominatrix 的头像
dominatrix2 年前

@crecimientoar Why can't I withdraw my world coin??

相关视频

A 67-year-old grandfather in Vermont built a trading bot during retirement - it earned him $290,000 in a single year without losing a single trade. 168 trades. 100% win rate. Zero drawdown across 365 days. The strategy is so safe it's basically a bond ladder - but with AI doing the probability math instead of credit Here's how it actually works: He only takes bets the model is >85% sure of. Everything else? Killed. 188 events scanned per day. ~12 pass the filter. ~1 actually deploy. AI algo waits. Most days he doesn't trade at all. The probability model is stolen from weather forecasting: 31 models vote on every outcome. 28 out of 31 saying "yes" = 90% conviction. Below 26 = automatic reject. That's the entire edge. Polymarket is full of 87-92¢ markets that almost always settle at $1. Most traders ignore them - upside per dollar looks tiny. The math: edge = model_p − market_p kelly = edge / (1 − token_price) size = bankroll x kelly x 0.15 The stack runs free: Polymarket Gamma API for discovery, ClickHouse + Redpanda for the pipeline, paper mode validation before live capital. Brier score 0.041 across all 168 predictions. Anything under 0.10 is institutional-grade. He's printing the academic numbers. Most boring account on Polymarket. Also the most profitable - so save this post. And if you’ve been looking for the most safest strategy to copy - you’ve definitely found it. You only need Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment Your thoughts . 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Marry Evan

Marry Evan

16,414 次观看 • 3 个月前

VEAN ESTO 🤯 Si se daba la lógica, Argentina 🇦🇷 hubiera tenido el camino MÁS DIFÍCIL entre las 8 selecciones que habrían clasificado a cuartos de final. El gran MisterChip (Alexis) público hace unos días que Argentina 🇦🇷 tuvo el MAYOR ranking promedio de rivales en los primeros 6 partidos y, por lo tanto, el camino más accesible. Eso es cierto, pero si se daba la lógica y las otras selecciones hacían lo que debían, hubiera pasado exactamente lo contrario. 👉🏻 ARG 🇦🇷 habría tenido el ranking promedio MÁS BAJO de rivales, considerando a las 6 selecciones que habría enfrentado hasta cuartos de final incluido. Este es el ranking promedio de cada una de las rivales de las selecciones que habrían llegado a cuartos de final si se daba la lógica 👇🏻 26 🇦🇷 Argentina: habría jugado con 🇩🇿 28°, 🇦🇹24°, 🇯🇴 63°, 🇺🇾 16°, 🇮🇷 20°, 🇵🇹 5° 27,1 🇵🇹Portugal: habría jugado con 🇨🇩 46°, 🇺🇿 50°, 🇨🇴 13°, 🇵🇦 34°, 🇨🇭 19°, 🇦🇷 1° 27,5 🇫🇷Francia: habría jugado con 🇸🇳15°, 🇮🇶 57°, 🇳🇴 31°, 🇹🇳 45°, 🇩🇪 10°, 🇲🇦 7°. 27,8 🇲🇦Marruecos: habría jugado con 🇧🇷 6°, 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 42°, 🇭🇹 83°, 🇳🇱 8°, 🇰🇷25°, 🇫🇷 3° 28,1 🇧🇷Brasil: habría jugado con 🇲🇦6°, 🇭🇹 83°, 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 42°, 🇯🇵 18°, 🇸🇳 15°, 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 4° 28, 1 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿Inglaterra: habría jugado con 🇭🇷 11°, 🇬🇭 73°, 🇵🇦 34°, 🇳🇴 31°, 🇲🇽 14°, 🇧🇷 6° 31,6 🇪🇦España: habría jugado con 🇨🇻 67°, 🇸🇦 61°, 🇺🇾 16°, 🇦🇹 24°, 🇨🇴 13°, 🇧🇪 9° 33,8 🇧🇪Bélgica: había jugado con 🇪🇬29°, 🇮🇷 20°, 🇳🇿 85°, 🇺🇿 50°, 🇺🇸 17°, 🇪🇸 2° Para quienes dicen que está arreglado 😂🤌🏻

Gastón Trucco

363,974 次观看 • 1 个月前

A 67-year-old grandfather in Vermont built a trading bot during retirement - it earned him $290,000 in a single year without losing a single trade. 168 trades. 100% win rate. Zero drawdown across 365 days. The strategy is so safe it’s basically a bond ladder - but with AI doing the probability math instead of credit ratings. Here’s how it actually works: He only takes bets the model is >85% sure of. Everything else? Killed. 188 events scanned per day. ~12 pass the filter. ~1 actually deploy. AI algo waits. Most days he doesn’t trade at all. The probability model is stolen from weather forecasting: 31 models vote on every outcome. 28 out of 31 saying “yes” = 90% conviction. Below 26 = automatic reject. That’s the entire edge. Polymarket is full of 87-92¢ markets that almost always settle at $1. Most traders ignore them - upside per dollar looks tiny. The math: edge = model_p − market_p kelly = edge / (1 − token_price) size = bankroll × kelly × 0.15 The stack runs free: Polymarket Gamma API for discovery, ClickHouse + Redpanda for the pipeline, paper mode validation before live capital. Brier score 0.041 across all 168 predictions. Anything under 0.10 is institutional-grade. He’s printing the academic numbers. Most boring account on Polymarket. Also the most profitable - so save this post. And if you’ve been looking for the safest strategy to copy - you’ve definitely found it. You only need Claude + Device + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free Dm for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment What Ever you think about it. ( Mandatory ) 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Marry Evan

Marry Evan

12,383 次观看 • 2 个月前